The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5

Historically, strategies to reduce acute rejection and improve graft survival in kidney transplant recipients included blood transfusions (BTs) before transplantation. While advents in recipient immunosuppression strategies have replaced this practice, the impact of BTs in the organ donor on recipie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2015-10, Vol.79 (4 Suppl 2), p.S164-S170
Hauptverfasser: de la Cruz, J Salvador, Sally, Mitchell B, Zatarain, John R, Crutchfield, Megan, Ramsey, Katrina, Nielsen, Jamison, Patel, Madhukar, Lapidus, Jodi, Orloff, Susan, Malinoski, Darren J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S170
container_issue 4 Suppl 2
container_start_page S164
container_title The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
container_volume 79
creator de la Cruz, J Salvador
Sally, Mitchell B
Zatarain, John R
Crutchfield, Megan
Ramsey, Katrina
Nielsen, Jamison
Patel, Madhukar
Lapidus, Jodi
Orloff, Susan
Malinoski, Darren J
description Historically, strategies to reduce acute rejection and improve graft survival in kidney transplant recipients included blood transfusions (BTs) before transplantation. While advents in recipient immunosuppression strategies have replaced this practice, the impact of BTs in the organ donor on recipient graft outcomes has not been evaluated. We hypothesize that BTs in organ donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDDs) translate into improved recipient renal graft outcomes, as measured by a decrease in delayed graft function (DGF). Donor demographics, critical care end points, the use of BTs, and graft outcome data were prospectively collected on DNDDs from March 2012 to October 2013 in the United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5 Donor Management Database. Propensity analysis determined each DNDD's probability of receiving packed red blood cells based on demographic and critical care data as well as provider bias. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DGF (dialysis in the first week after transplantation) in different donor BT groups as follows: no BT, any BT, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or greater than 10 packed red blood cell units. Regression models determined the relationship between donor BTs and recipient DGF after accounting for known predictors of DGF as well as the propensity to receive a BT. Data were complete for 1,884 renal grafts from 1,006 DNDDs; 52% received any BT, 32% received 1 to 5 U, 11% received 6 to 10, and 9% received greater than 10 U of blood. Grafts from transfused donors had a lower rate of DGF compared with those of the nontransfused donors (26% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for known confounders, grafts from donors with any BT had a lower odds of DGF (odds ratio, 0.76; p = 0.030), and this effect was greatest in those with greater than 10 U transfused. Any BT in a DNDD was associated with a 23% decrease in the odds of recipients developing DGF, and this effect was more pronounced as the number of BTs increased. Therapeutic study, level III; epidemiologic/prognostic study, level II.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/TA.0000000000000670
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718078102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718078102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-76239c1f98759b2b8f16f8db403d1d4fe4998a50b0f96816ff533b5196ac12cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtKAzEQhoMotqhPIMhcemE12TSnyyKeQCxovV6y2aRd3U1qkkV8CZ_ZrSfEuZkZ5v_-gRmEDgk-JViJs8XsFP8NLvAWGheE0wkWnG7_1oyN0EFKTxsR44oytotGBSeUCCnG6H2xstB0a20yBAdVG0INOWqfXJ-a4BM0HmprrE62hhCXemiDDzFB8JAHOPTZhM6mDU5OpJxCtF63sIza5QQuhg4efZMH_M7m1xCfwYUI80-rh5WOjV_CvV0Oy4Dtox2n22QPvvMeery8WJxfT27nVzfns9uJKQqcJ4IXVBnilBRMVUUlHeFO1tUU05rUU2enSknNcIWd4nKYOUZpxYji2pDCVHQPHX_5rmN46W3KZdckY9tWexv6VBJBJBaS4GKQ0i-piSGlaF25jk2n41tJcLn5RbmYlf9_MVBH3wv6qrP1L_NzefoBva2Dyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718078102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>de la Cruz, J Salvador ; Sally, Mitchell B ; Zatarain, John R ; Crutchfield, Megan ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Nielsen, Jamison ; Patel, Madhukar ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Orloff, Susan ; Malinoski, Darren J</creator><creatorcontrib>de la Cruz, J Salvador ; Sally, Mitchell B ; Zatarain, John R ; Crutchfield, Megan ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Nielsen, Jamison ; Patel, Madhukar ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Orloff, Susan ; Malinoski, Darren J</creatorcontrib><description>Historically, strategies to reduce acute rejection and improve graft survival in kidney transplant recipients included blood transfusions (BTs) before transplantation. While advents in recipient immunosuppression strategies have replaced this practice, the impact of BTs in the organ donor on recipient graft outcomes has not been evaluated. We hypothesize that BTs in organ donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDDs) translate into improved recipient renal graft outcomes, as measured by a decrease in delayed graft function (DGF). Donor demographics, critical care end points, the use of BTs, and graft outcome data were prospectively collected on DNDDs from March 2012 to October 2013 in the United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5 Donor Management Database. Propensity analysis determined each DNDD's probability of receiving packed red blood cells based on demographic and critical care data as well as provider bias. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DGF (dialysis in the first week after transplantation) in different donor BT groups as follows: no BT, any BT, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or greater than 10 packed red blood cell units. Regression models determined the relationship between donor BTs and recipient DGF after accounting for known predictors of DGF as well as the propensity to receive a BT. Data were complete for 1,884 renal grafts from 1,006 DNDDs; 52% received any BT, 32% received 1 to 5 U, 11% received 6 to 10, and 9% received greater than 10 U of blood. Grafts from transfused donors had a lower rate of DGF compared with those of the nontransfused donors (26% vs. 34%, p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for known confounders, grafts from donors with any BT had a lower odds of DGF (odds ratio, 0.76; p = 0.030), and this effect was greatest in those with greater than 10 U transfused. Any BT in a DNDD was associated with a 23% decrease in the odds of recipients developing DGF, and this effect was more pronounced as the number of BTs increased. Therapeutic study, level III; epidemiologic/prognostic study, level II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-0755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000670</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26131787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood Transfusion - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Cadaver ; Delayed Graft Function ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunosuppression ; Kidney Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Tissue Donors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2015-10, Vol.79 (4 Suppl 2), p.S164-S170</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-76239c1f98759b2b8f16f8db403d1d4fe4998a50b0f96816ff533b5196ac12cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-76239c1f98759b2b8f16f8db403d1d4fe4998a50b0f96816ff533b5196ac12cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de la Cruz, J Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sally, Mitchell B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatarain, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crutchfield, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jamison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Madhukar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malinoski, Darren J</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5</title><title>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</title><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><description>Historically, strategies to reduce acute rejection and improve graft survival in kidney transplant recipients included blood transfusions (BTs) before transplantation. While advents in recipient immunosuppression strategies have replaced this practice, the impact of BTs in the organ donor on recipient graft outcomes has not been evaluated. We hypothesize that BTs in organ donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDDs) translate into improved recipient renal graft outcomes, as measured by a decrease in delayed graft function (DGF). Donor demographics, critical care end points, the use of BTs, and graft outcome data were prospectively collected on DNDDs from March 2012 to October 2013 in the United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5 Donor Management Database. Propensity analysis determined each DNDD's probability of receiving packed red blood cells based on demographic and critical care data as well as provider bias. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DGF (dialysis in the first week after transplantation) in different donor BT groups as follows: no BT, any BT, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or greater than 10 packed red blood cell units. Regression models determined the relationship between donor BTs and recipient DGF after accounting for known predictors of DGF as well as the propensity to receive a BT. Data were complete for 1,884 renal grafts from 1,006 DNDDs; 52% received any BT, 32% received 1 to 5 U, 11% received 6 to 10, and 9% received greater than 10 U of blood. Grafts from transfused donors had a lower rate of DGF compared with those of the nontransfused donors (26% vs. 34%, p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for known confounders, grafts from donors with any BT had a lower odds of DGF (odds ratio, 0.76; p = 0.030), and this effect was greatest in those with greater than 10 U transfused. Any BT in a DNDD was associated with a 23% decrease in the odds of recipients developing DGF, and this effect was more pronounced as the number of BTs increased. Therapeutic study, level III; epidemiologic/prognostic study, level II.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Delayed Graft Function</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2163-0755</issn><issn>2163-0763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtKAzEQhoMotqhPIMhcemE12TSnyyKeQCxovV6y2aRd3U1qkkV8CZ_ZrSfEuZkZ5v_-gRmEDgk-JViJs8XsFP8NLvAWGheE0wkWnG7_1oyN0EFKTxsR44oytotGBSeUCCnG6H2xstB0a20yBAdVG0INOWqfXJ-a4BM0HmprrE62hhCXemiDDzFB8JAHOPTZhM6mDU5OpJxCtF63sIza5QQuhg4efZMH_M7m1xCfwYUI80-rh5WOjV_CvV0Oy4Dtox2n22QPvvMeery8WJxfT27nVzfns9uJKQqcJ4IXVBnilBRMVUUlHeFO1tUU05rUU2enSknNcIWd4nKYOUZpxYji2pDCVHQPHX_5rmN46W3KZdckY9tWexv6VBJBJBaS4GKQ0i-piSGlaF25jk2n41tJcLn5RbmYlf9_MVBH3wv6qrP1L_NzefoBva2Dyw</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>de la Cruz, J Salvador</creator><creator>Sally, Mitchell B</creator><creator>Zatarain, John R</creator><creator>Crutchfield, Megan</creator><creator>Ramsey, Katrina</creator><creator>Nielsen, Jamison</creator><creator>Patel, Madhukar</creator><creator>Lapidus, Jodi</creator><creator>Orloff, Susan</creator><creator>Malinoski, Darren J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5</title><author>de la Cruz, J Salvador ; Sally, Mitchell B ; Zatarain, John R ; Crutchfield, Megan ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Nielsen, Jamison ; Patel, Madhukar ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Orloff, Susan ; Malinoski, Darren J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c220t-76239c1f98759b2b8f16f8db403d1d4fe4998a50b0f96816ff533b5196ac12cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Delayed Graft Function</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de la Cruz, J Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sally, Mitchell B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zatarain, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crutchfield, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Jamison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Madhukar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orloff, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malinoski, Darren J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de la Cruz, J Salvador</au><au>Sally, Mitchell B</au><au>Zatarain, John R</au><au>Crutchfield, Megan</au><au>Ramsey, Katrina</au><au>Nielsen, Jamison</au><au>Patel, Madhukar</au><au>Lapidus, Jodi</au><au>Orloff, Susan</au><au>Malinoski, Darren J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5</atitle><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>4 Suppl 2</issue><spage>S164</spage><epage>S170</epage><pages>S164-S170</pages><issn>2163-0755</issn><eissn>2163-0763</eissn><abstract>Historically, strategies to reduce acute rejection and improve graft survival in kidney transplant recipients included blood transfusions (BTs) before transplantation. While advents in recipient immunosuppression strategies have replaced this practice, the impact of BTs in the organ donor on recipient graft outcomes has not been evaluated. We hypothesize that BTs in organ donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDDs) translate into improved recipient renal graft outcomes, as measured by a decrease in delayed graft function (DGF). Donor demographics, critical care end points, the use of BTs, and graft outcome data were prospectively collected on DNDDs from March 2012 to October 2013 in the United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5 Donor Management Database. Propensity analysis determined each DNDD's probability of receiving packed red blood cells based on demographic and critical care data as well as provider bias. The primary outcome measure was the rate of DGF (dialysis in the first week after transplantation) in different donor BT groups as follows: no BT, any BT, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or greater than 10 packed red blood cell units. Regression models determined the relationship between donor BTs and recipient DGF after accounting for known predictors of DGF as well as the propensity to receive a BT. Data were complete for 1,884 renal grafts from 1,006 DNDDs; 52% received any BT, 32% received 1 to 5 U, 11% received 6 to 10, and 9% received greater than 10 U of blood. Grafts from transfused donors had a lower rate of DGF compared with those of the nontransfused donors (26% vs. 34%, p &lt; 0.001). After adjusting for known confounders, grafts from donors with any BT had a lower odds of DGF (odds ratio, 0.76; p = 0.030), and this effect was greatest in those with greater than 10 U transfused. Any BT in a DNDD was associated with a 23% decrease in the odds of recipients developing DGF, and this effect was more pronounced as the number of BTs increased. Therapeutic study, level III; epidemiologic/prognostic study, level II.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26131787</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0000000000000670</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2163-0755
ispartof The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2015-10, Vol.79 (4 Suppl 2), p.S164-S170
issn 2163-0755
2163-0763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718078102
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Blood Transfusion - statistics & numerical data
Cadaver
Delayed Graft Function
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Immunosuppression
Kidney Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Tissue Donors
Treatment Outcome
title The impact of blood transfusions in deceased organ donors on the outcomes of 1,884 renal grafts from United Network for Organ Sharing Region 5
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20blood%20transfusions%20in%20deceased%20organ%20donors%20on%20the%20outcomes%20of%201,884%20renal%20grafts%20from%20United%20Network%20for%20Organ%20Sharing%20Region%205&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20acute%20care%20surgery&rft.au=de%20la%20Cruz,%20J%20Salvador&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=4%20Suppl%202&rft.spage=S164&rft.epage=S170&rft.pages=S164-S170&rft.issn=2163-0755&rft.eissn=2163-0763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0000000000000670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718078102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718078102&rft_id=info:pmid/26131787&rfr_iscdi=true