Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review
To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the safety and effectiveness of primary care provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) and evaluate the potential of their deployment to help alleviate primary care shortages. PubMed, Medline and the Cumulative Index to Nursi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for quality in health care 2015-10, Vol.27 (5), p.396-404 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 404 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 396 |
container_title | International journal for quality in health care |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | SWAN, MELANIE FERGUSON, SACHA CHANG, ALICE LARSON, ELAINE SMALDONE, ARLENE |
description | To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the safety and effectiveness of primary care provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) and evaluate the potential of their deployment to help alleviate primary care shortages.
PubMed, Medline and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
RCTs and their follow-up reports that compared outcomes of care provided to adults by APNs and physicians in equivalent primary care provider roles were selected for inclusion.
Ten articles (seven RCTs, plus two economic evaluations and one 2-year follow-up study of included RCTs) met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted regarding study design, setting and outcomes across four common categories.
The seven RCTs include data for 10 911 patients who presented for ongoing primary care (four RCTs) or same-day consultations for acute conditions (three RCTs) in the primary care setting. Study follow-up ranged from 1 day to 2 years. APN groups demonstrated equal or better outcomes than physician groups for physiologic measures, patient satisfaction and cost. APNs generally had longer consultations compared with physicians; however, two studies reported that APN patients required fewer consultations over time.
There were few differences in primary care provided by APNs and physicians; for some measures APN care was superior. While studies are needed to assess longer term outcomes, these data suggest that the APN workforce is well-positioned to provide safe and effective primary care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/intqhc/mzv054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718076834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48519027</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48519027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7ff64b4b174f5175d9e2eadfb01789dceae782c6f8a5dd7fbc3fca964a2123f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK0uXSpZuomd9yRLKfUBBRF0PUxm7mBKHu1MUqi_3khiV_fA-ThwP4RuCX4kOGfLsun233ZZ_xyw4GdoTrjkKZNKnQ-ZCZZygcUMXcW4xZhIJuQlmlFJWc4VnyP20Zuq7I5J65NdKGsTjok1AZLimBh3MI0FNxTGdqWFpOlDhHiNLrypItxMd4G-ntefq9d08_7ytnrapJZT3KXKe8kLXhDFvSBKuBwoGOcLTFSWOwsGVEat9JkRzilfWOatySU3lFDmBVugh3F3F9p9D7HTdRktVJVpoO2jJopkWMmM8QFNR9SGNsYAXk_PaIL1nyc9etKjp4G_n6b7ogZ3ov_FDMDdCGxj14ZTzzNBckwV-wU_5G_d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718076834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SWAN, MELANIE ; FERGUSON, SACHA ; CHANG, ALICE ; LARSON, ELAINE ; SMALDONE, ARLENE</creator><creatorcontrib>SWAN, MELANIE ; FERGUSON, SACHA ; CHANG, ALICE ; LARSON, ELAINE ; SMALDONE, ARLENE</creatorcontrib><description>To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the safety and effectiveness of primary care provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) and evaluate the potential of their deployment to help alleviate primary care shortages.
PubMed, Medline and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
RCTs and their follow-up reports that compared outcomes of care provided to adults by APNs and physicians in equivalent primary care provider roles were selected for inclusion.
Ten articles (seven RCTs, plus two economic evaluations and one 2-year follow-up study of included RCTs) met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted regarding study design, setting and outcomes across four common categories.
The seven RCTs include data for 10 911 patients who presented for ongoing primary care (four RCTs) or same-day consultations for acute conditions (three RCTs) in the primary care setting. Study follow-up ranged from 1 day to 2 years. APN groups demonstrated equal or better outcomes than physician groups for physiologic measures, patient satisfaction and cost. APNs generally had longer consultations compared with physicians; however, two studies reported that APN patients required fewer consultations over time.
There were few differences in primary care provided by APNs and physicians; for some measures APN care was superior. While studies are needed to assess longer term outcomes, these data suggest that the APN workforce is well-positioned to provide safe and effective primary care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-4505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26239474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Nurse Practitioners - standards ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physicians, Primary Care - standards ; Primary Health Care - economics ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Quality of Health Care - organization & administration ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>International journal for quality in health care, 2015-10, Vol.27 (5), p.396-404</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015</rights><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7ff64b4b174f5175d9e2eadfb01789dceae782c6f8a5dd7fbc3fca964a2123f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7ff64b4b174f5175d9e2eadfb01789dceae782c6f8a5dd7fbc3fca964a2123f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48519027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48519027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26239474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SWAN, MELANIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERGUSON, SACHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHANG, ALICE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSON, ELAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMALDONE, ARLENE</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review</title><title>International journal for quality in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><description>To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the safety and effectiveness of primary care provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) and evaluate the potential of their deployment to help alleviate primary care shortages.
PubMed, Medline and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
RCTs and their follow-up reports that compared outcomes of care provided to adults by APNs and physicians in equivalent primary care provider roles were selected for inclusion.
Ten articles (seven RCTs, plus two economic evaluations and one 2-year follow-up study of included RCTs) met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted regarding study design, setting and outcomes across four common categories.
The seven RCTs include data for 10 911 patients who presented for ongoing primary care (four RCTs) or same-day consultations for acute conditions (three RCTs) in the primary care setting. Study follow-up ranged from 1 day to 2 years. APN groups demonstrated equal or better outcomes than physician groups for physiologic measures, patient satisfaction and cost. APNs generally had longer consultations compared with physicians; however, two studies reported that APN patients required fewer consultations over time.
There were few differences in primary care provided by APNs and physicians; for some measures APN care was superior. While studies are needed to assess longer term outcomes, these data suggest that the APN workforce is well-positioned to provide safe and effective primary care.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nurse Practitioners - standards</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physicians, Primary Care - standards</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1353-4505</issn><issn>1464-3677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AUhQdRbK0uXSpZuomd9yRLKfUBBRF0PUxm7mBKHu1MUqi_3khiV_fA-ThwP4RuCX4kOGfLsun233ZZ_xyw4GdoTrjkKZNKnQ-ZCZZygcUMXcW4xZhIJuQlmlFJWc4VnyP20Zuq7I5J65NdKGsTjok1AZLimBh3MI0FNxTGdqWFpOlDhHiNLrypItxMd4G-ntefq9d08_7ytnrapJZT3KXKe8kLXhDFvSBKuBwoGOcLTFSWOwsGVEat9JkRzilfWOatySU3lFDmBVugh3F3F9p9D7HTdRktVJVpoO2jJopkWMmM8QFNR9SGNsYAXk_PaIL1nyc9etKjp4G_n6b7ogZ3ov_FDMDdCGxj14ZTzzNBckwV-wU_5G_d</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>SWAN, MELANIE</creator><creator>FERGUSON, SACHA</creator><creator>CHANG, ALICE</creator><creator>LARSON, ELAINE</creator><creator>SMALDONE, ARLENE</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses</title><author>SWAN, MELANIE ; FERGUSON, SACHA ; CHANG, ALICE ; LARSON, ELAINE ; SMALDONE, ARLENE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-7ff64b4b174f5175d9e2eadfb01789dceae782c6f8a5dd7fbc3fca964a2123f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nurse Practitioners - standards</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physicians, Primary Care - standards</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SWAN, MELANIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERGUSON, SACHA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHANG, ALICE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSON, ELAINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMALDONE, ARLENE</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SWAN, MELANIE</au><au>FERGUSON, SACHA</au><au>CHANG, ALICE</au><au>LARSON, ELAINE</au><au>SMALDONE, ARLENE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal for quality in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Qual Health Care</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>396</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>396-404</pages><issn>1353-4505</issn><eissn>1464-3677</eissn><abstract>To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the safety and effectiveness of primary care provided by advanced practice nurses (APNs) and evaluate the potential of their deployment to help alleviate primary care shortages.
PubMed, Medline and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
RCTs and their follow-up reports that compared outcomes of care provided to adults by APNs and physicians in equivalent primary care provider roles were selected for inclusion.
Ten articles (seven RCTs, plus two economic evaluations and one 2-year follow-up study of included RCTs) met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted regarding study design, setting and outcomes across four common categories.
The seven RCTs include data for 10 911 patients who presented for ongoing primary care (four RCTs) or same-day consultations for acute conditions (three RCTs) in the primary care setting. Study follow-up ranged from 1 day to 2 years. APN groups demonstrated equal or better outcomes than physician groups for physiologic measures, patient satisfaction and cost. APNs generally had longer consultations compared with physicians; however, two studies reported that APN patients required fewer consultations over time.
There were few differences in primary care provided by APNs and physicians; for some measures APN care was superior. While studies are needed to assess longer term outcomes, these data suggest that the APN workforce is well-positioned to provide safe and effective primary care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>26239474</pmid><doi>10.1093/intqhc/mzv054</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-4505 |
ispartof | International journal for quality in health care, 2015-10, Vol.27 (5), p.396-404 |
issn | 1353-4505 1464-3677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718076834 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Nurse Practitioners - standards Patient Satisfaction Physicians, Primary Care - standards Primary Health Care - economics Primary Health Care - organization & administration Primary Health Care - standards Quality of Health Care - organization & administration Quality of Health Care - standards Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
title | Quality of primary care by advanced practice nurses: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T11%3A13%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20primary%20care%20by%20advanced%20practice%20nurses:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20quality%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=SWAN,%20MELANIE&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=396&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=396-404&rft.issn=1353-4505&rft.eissn=1464-3677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/intqhc/mzv054&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48519027%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718076834&rft_id=info:pmid/26239474&rft_jstor_id=48519027&rfr_iscdi=true |