Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation
This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, bo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social psychology quarterly 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 24 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | Social psychology quarterly |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Pettigrew, Thomas F. |
description | This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0190272514566793 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718068167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44075386</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0190272514566793</sage_id><sourcerecordid>44075386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8LJLNT-al-Qo8ycMBKfnkqavstG1M2kH_vemVEQGYi5JeJ_3hfcIOWf0ijGlrikzlCsuWSYBlBEHZMKMMKk2xhySyVBOh_oxOQlhTePJwEzIbGk3PdbJsmv7qkKf2KZMXrC23WqHyS1u_WoX321zSo4qWwc8-76n5O3-7nX-mC6eH57mN4vUSSq71ClUiKiyAkELZqGwaEoLwG0hHOcGbSRQllw5yApKrZMg4g-cMOBATMlszN369qPH0OWbVXBY17bBtg85U0xT0AzU_xQU10pqISO93KPrtvdNHCQqEIJzLXRUdFTOtyF4rPI4_sb6z5zRfNhyvr_l2JKOLcG-46_Qv_3F6Neha_1PfpZRJYUG8QXJwYOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663322838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0190272514566793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPQUD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Deprivation ; History ; Hostility ; Meta-analysis ; Personal profiles ; Political protests ; Prejudices ; Probability ; Protestantism ; Psychology ; Relative Deprivation ; Resentment ; Social comparison ; Social movements ; Social Psychology ; Social research ; Social Science Research ; Social sciences ; Social theories ; Sociology ; Soldiers ; Statistical methods ; Stouffer, Samuel ; Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960) ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Social psychology quarterly, 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>American Sociological Association 2015</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44075386$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44075386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><title>Social psychology quarterly</title><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><description>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</description><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Personal profiles</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Prejudices</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Relative Deprivation</subject><subject>Resentment</subject><subject>Social comparison</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stouffer, Samuel</subject><subject>Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960)</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0190-2725</issn><issn>1939-8999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8LJLNT-al-Qo8ycMBKfnkqavstG1M2kH_vemVEQGYi5JeJ_3hfcIOWf0ijGlrikzlCsuWSYBlBEHZMKMMKk2xhySyVBOh_oxOQlhTePJwEzIbGk3PdbJsmv7qkKf2KZMXrC23WqHyS1u_WoX321zSo4qWwc8-76n5O3-7nX-mC6eH57mN4vUSSq71ClUiKiyAkELZqGwaEoLwG0hHOcGbSRQllw5yApKrZMg4g-cMOBATMlszN369qPH0OWbVXBY17bBtg85U0xT0AzU_xQU10pqISO93KPrtvdNHCQqEIJzLXRUdFTOtyF4rPI4_sb6z5zRfNhyvr_l2JKOLcG-46_Qv_3F6Neha_1PfpZRJYUG8QXJwYOQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><author>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Personal profiles</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Prejudices</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Relative Deprivation</topic><topic>Resentment</topic><topic>Social comparison</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stouffer, Samuel</topic><topic>Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960)</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</atitle><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>7-24</pages><issn>0190-2725</issn><eissn>1939-8999</eissn><coden>SPQUD6</coden><abstract>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0190272514566793</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-2725 |
ispartof | Social psychology quarterly, 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24 |
issn | 0190-2725 1939-8999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718068167 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Deprivation History Hostility Meta-analysis Personal profiles Political protests Prejudices Probability Protestantism Psychology Relative Deprivation Resentment Social comparison Social movements Social Psychology Social research Social Science Research Social sciences Social theories Sociology Soldiers Statistical methods Stouffer, Samuel Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960) Systematic review |
title | Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Samuel%20Stouffer%20and%20Relative%20Deprivation&rft.jtitle=Social%20psychology%20quarterly&rft.au=Pettigrew,%20Thomas%20F.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=7-24&rft.issn=0190-2725&rft.eissn=1939-8999&rft.coden=SPQUD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0190272514566793&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44075386%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663322838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44075386&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0190272514566793&rfr_iscdi=true |