Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation

This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, bo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social psychology quarterly 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24
1. Verfasser: Pettigrew, Thomas F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 7
container_title Social psychology quarterly
container_volume 78
creator Pettigrew, Thomas F.
description This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0190272514566793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718068167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44075386</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0190272514566793</sage_id><sourcerecordid>44075386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8LJLNT-al-Qo8ycMBKfnkqavstG1M2kH_vemVEQGYi5JeJ_3hfcIOWf0ijGlrikzlCsuWSYBlBEHZMKMMKk2xhySyVBOh_oxOQlhTePJwEzIbGk3PdbJsmv7qkKf2KZMXrC23WqHyS1u_WoX321zSo4qWwc8-76n5O3-7nX-mC6eH57mN4vUSSq71ClUiKiyAkELZqGwaEoLwG0hHOcGbSRQllw5yApKrZMg4g-cMOBATMlszN369qPH0OWbVXBY17bBtg85U0xT0AzU_xQU10pqISO93KPrtvdNHCQqEIJzLXRUdFTOtyF4rPI4_sb6z5zRfNhyvr_l2JKOLcG-46_Qv_3F6Neha_1PfpZRJYUG8QXJwYOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1663322838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-2725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0190272514566793</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPQUD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Deprivation ; History ; Hostility ; Meta-analysis ; Personal profiles ; Political protests ; Prejudices ; Probability ; Protestantism ; Psychology ; Relative Deprivation ; Resentment ; Social comparison ; Social movements ; Social Psychology ; Social research ; Social Science Research ; Social sciences ; Social theories ; Sociology ; Soldiers ; Statistical methods ; Stouffer, Samuel ; Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960) ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Social psychology quarterly, 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Sociological Association</rights><rights>American Sociological Association 2015</rights><rights>Copyright American Sociological Association Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44075386$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44075386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><title>Social psychology quarterly</title><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><description>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</description><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Personal profiles</subject><subject>Political protests</subject><subject>Prejudices</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Protestantism</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Relative Deprivation</subject><subject>Resentment</subject><subject>Social comparison</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social Psychology</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social theories</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Stouffer, Samuel</subject><subject>Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960)</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0190-2725</issn><issn>1939-8999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8LJLNT-al-Qo8ycMBKfnkqavstG1M2kH_vemVEQGYi5JeJ_3hfcIOWf0ijGlrikzlCsuWSYBlBEHZMKMMKk2xhySyVBOh_oxOQlhTePJwEzIbGk3PdbJsmv7qkKf2KZMXrC23WqHyS1u_WoX321zSo4qWwc8-76n5O3-7nX-mC6eH57mN4vUSSq71ClUiKiyAkELZqGwaEoLwG0hHOcGbSRQllw5yApKrZMg4g-cMOBATMlszN369qPH0OWbVXBY17bBtg85U0xT0AzU_xQU10pqISO93KPrtvdNHCQqEIJzLXRUdFTOtyF4rPI4_sb6z5zRfNhyvr_l2JKOLcG-46_Qv_3F6Neha_1PfpZRJYUG8QXJwYOQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Sociological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</title><author>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c505t-c7e7eee74be6831a6bae9da662ab3c229eac7e6dd27c64b00ac563d276c396c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Personal profiles</topic><topic>Political protests</topic><topic>Prejudices</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Protestantism</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Relative Deprivation</topic><topic>Resentment</topic><topic>Social comparison</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social Psychology</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social theories</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Stouffer, Samuel</topic><topic>Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960)</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pettigrew, Thomas F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation</atitle><jtitle>Social psychology quarterly</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Psychol Q</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>7-24</pages><issn>0190-2725</issn><eissn>1939-8999</eissn><coden>SPQUD6</coden><abstract>This paper first offers a tribute to Samuel Stouffer (1900-1960), a major contributor to social psychology. He helped to establish probability surveys as a useful method for social science, led three major studies at midcentury, and introduced important new concepts and statistical methods. Thus, both conceptually and methodologically, he shaped modern social psychology. Second, the paper revitalizes Stouffer's most famous concept—relative deprivation. A new meta-analysis demonstrates that relative deprivation predicts a wide range of important outcomes, so long as it measures resentment with data from individuals and is paired with dependent variables of similar scope. Unfortunately, sociology largely abandoned the concept because it failed to meet the overstated early claims made for it in the collective protest domain. The history of this use and disuse of relative deprivation is summarized and critiqued.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0190272514566793</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0190-2725
ispartof Social psychology quarterly, 2015-03, Vol.78 (1), p.7-24
issn 0190-2725
1939-8999
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718068167
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Deprivation
History
Hostility
Meta-analysis
Personal profiles
Political protests
Prejudices
Probability
Protestantism
Psychology
Relative Deprivation
Resentment
Social comparison
Social movements
Social Psychology
Social research
Social Science Research
Social sciences
Social theories
Sociology
Soldiers
Statistical methods
Stouffer, Samuel
Stouffer, Samuel Andrew (1900-1960)
Systematic review
title Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Samuel%20Stouffer%20and%20Relative%20Deprivation&rft.jtitle=Social%20psychology%20quarterly&rft.au=Pettigrew,%20Thomas%20F.&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=7-24&rft.issn=0190-2725&rft.eissn=1939-8999&rft.coden=SPQUD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0190272514566793&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44075386%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1663322838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44075386&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0190272514566793&rfr_iscdi=true