A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech
Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government‐mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech‐and‐display ultrasound laws, are subject to – and survive – a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics medicine & ethics, 2015-03, Vol.43 (1), p.35-50 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 50 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 35 |
| container_title | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Gaylord, Scott W. |
| description | Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government‐mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech‐and‐display ultrasound laws, are subject to – and survive – a form of rational basis scrutiny. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jlme.12194 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718059702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A411614344</galeid><sage_id>10.1111_jlme.12194</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A411614344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6684-91a72d1e14abb9fdcce70c8cc14e8b687b1dab8d0d4bb9274df39a9be5f696213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl1v0zAUhiMEYmNwww9AkZD4kjJ8EsdOuKuqUT66DzEQu7Mc56R1l8QldgT997hLVyiqhn1hy37Oa59z3iB4CuQY_Hi7qBs8hhhyei84BE6ziMfk6r7fE55EACQ9CB5ZuyCEQJywh8FBnGaUkYQfBl9G4al0DrvQVOHYtA5_uXfhWFpchbItQzfH9bF12vVOm1bW2q0GtlliXWMZXsxXVist2_Byiajmj4MHlawtPtmsR8G39ydfxx-i6fnk43g0jRRjGY1ykDwuAYHKosirUinkRGVKAcWsYBkvoJRFVpKS-vuY07JKcpkXmFYsZzEkR8GrQXfZmR89WicabZX_k2zR9FYAh4ykOSfx_1HGff14DKlHn_-DLkzf-bytiHlCMko4IX-omaxR6LYyrpNqLSpGFIABTSj1VLSHmmGLnaxNi5X2xzv88R7ezxIbrfYGvN4JUEMDZ7K3VmST6V2f2bDK-CbOUPjWjM93-Rd_8XOUtZtbU9-4wO6CbwZQdcbaDiux7HQju5UAItYGFWuDihuDevjZprx90WC5RW8d6QEYgJ8-19UdUuLT9PTkVvTlEGOlz2Tbr73Pb4qgrU9-qy67a8F4wlPx_WwiLuLp2dXlZyZo8hupDgW5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730840700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Gaylord, Scott W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaylord, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><description>Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government‐mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech‐and‐display ultrasound laws, are subject to – and survive – a form of rational basis scrutiny.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-720X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25846037</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence ; Analysis ; Confidential communications ; Disclosure ; Female ; First Amendment-US ; Freedom of speech ; Government regulation ; Health policy ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislatures ; Licensing ; Medicine ; Nationalism ; Physician-patient privilege ; Physicians ; Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence ; Pregnancy ; Regulation ; Religious orthodoxy ; Reproductive health ; Speaking ; Strict scrutiny doctrine ; Supreme court ; Supreme courts ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; United States</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2015-03, Vol.43 (1), p.35-50</ispartof><rights>2015 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics</rights><rights>2015 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6684-91a72d1e14abb9fdcce70c8cc14e8b687b1dab8d0d4bb9274df39a9be5f696213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6684-91a72d1e14abb9fdcce70c8cc14e8b687b1dab8d0d4bb9274df39a9be5f696213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjlme.12194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjlme.12194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27844,27845,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25846037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaylord, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech</title><title>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</title><addtitle>The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics</addtitle><description>Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government‐mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech‐and‐display ultrasound laws, are subject to – and survive – a form of rational basis scrutiny.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Confidential communications</subject><subject>Disclosure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>First Amendment-US</subject><subject>Freedom of speech</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Licensing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Physician-patient privilege</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Religious orthodoxy</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Strict scrutiny doctrine</subject><subject>Supreme court</subject><subject>Supreme courts</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1073-1105</issn><issn>1748-720X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl1v0zAUhiMEYmNwww9AkZD4kjJ8EsdOuKuqUT66DzEQu7Mc56R1l8QldgT997hLVyiqhn1hy37Oa59z3iB4CuQY_Hi7qBs8hhhyei84BE6ziMfk6r7fE55EACQ9CB5ZuyCEQJywh8FBnGaUkYQfBl9G4al0DrvQVOHYtA5_uXfhWFpchbItQzfH9bF12vVOm1bW2q0GtlliXWMZXsxXVist2_Byiajmj4MHlawtPtmsR8G39ydfxx-i6fnk43g0jRRjGY1ykDwuAYHKosirUinkRGVKAcWsYBkvoJRFVpKS-vuY07JKcpkXmFYsZzEkR8GrQXfZmR89WicabZX_k2zR9FYAh4ykOSfx_1HGff14DKlHn_-DLkzf-bytiHlCMko4IX-omaxR6LYyrpNqLSpGFIABTSj1VLSHmmGLnaxNi5X2xzv88R7ezxIbrfYGvN4JUEMDZ7K3VmST6V2f2bDK-CbOUPjWjM93-Rd_8XOUtZtbU9-4wO6CbwZQdcbaDiux7HQju5UAItYGFWuDihuDevjZprx90WC5RW8d6QEYgJ8-19UdUuLT9PTkVvTlEGOlz2Tbr73Pb4qgrU9-qy67a8F4wlPx_WwiLuLp2dXlZyZo8hupDgW5</recordid><startdate>20150322</startdate><enddate>20150322</enddate><creator>Gaylord, Scott W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150322</creationdate><title>A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech</title><author>Gaylord, Scott W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6684-91a72d1e14abb9fdcce70c8cc14e8b687b1dab8d0d4bb9274df39a9be5f696213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Confidential communications</topic><topic>Disclosure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>First Amendment-US</topic><topic>Freedom of speech</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Licensing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Physician-patient privilege</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Religious orthodoxy</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Strict scrutiny doctrine</topic><topic>Supreme court</topic><topic>Supreme courts</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaylord, Scott W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaylord, Scott W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle><addtitle>The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics</addtitle><date>2015-03-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>35-50</pages><issn>1073-1105</issn><eissn>1748-720X</eissn><abstract>Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government‐mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech‐and‐display ultrasound laws, are subject to – and survive – a form of rational basis scrutiny.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25846037</pmid><doi>10.1111/jlme.12194</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1073-1105 |
| ispartof | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2015-03, Vol.43 (1), p.35-50 |
| issn | 1073-1105 1748-720X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718059702 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Abortion Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence Analysis Confidential communications Disclosure Female First Amendment-US Freedom of speech Government regulation Health policy Health technology assessment Humans Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence Law Laws, regulations and rules Legislatures Licensing Medicine Nationalism Physician-patient privilege Physicians Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence Pregnancy Regulation Religious orthodoxy Reproductive health Speaking Strict scrutiny doctrine Supreme court Supreme courts Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound United States |
| title | A Matter of Context: Casey and the Constitutionality of Compelled Physician Speech |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Matter%20of%20Context:%20Casey%20and%20the%20Constitutionality%20of%20Compelled%20Physician%20Speech&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law,%20medicine%20&%20ethics&rft.au=Gaylord,%20Scott%20W.&rft.date=2015-03-22&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=35-50&rft.issn=1073-1105&rft.eissn=1748-720X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jlme.12194&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA411614344%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730840700&rft_id=info:pmid/25846037&rft_galeid=A411614344&rft_sage_id=10.1111_jlme.12194&rfr_iscdi=true |