Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries
Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientometrics 2013-09, Vol.96 (3), p.829-844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 844 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 829 |
container_title | Scientometrics |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Ding, Zuo-Qi Ge, Jian-Ping Wu, Xiao-Ming Zheng, Xiao-Nan |
description | Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation to ten representative countries. The publications in the field pharmacology/pharmacy of China and ten representative countries in the past decade (2001–2010) were retrieved from Web of Science database, and studies were conducted on the immediacy index of articles published in 2011. Multiple bibliometric indicators were obtained from the “InCites” analysis. Most of the bibliometric indicators for the developed countries including the USA and the European countries remained stable in the past decade. The number of publications by the Asian countries, especially China, increased dramatically in the past decade year by year; however, the Asian countries improved little in the indicators assessing the scientific quality of publications including the citation behaviors and the impact relative to either country and subject area. It may need a long time to fill in the gap, in terms of the scientific quality, between the developing countries and the developed countries. In view of the dramatic increase in the financial investment, our findings suggest that the development of the field pharmacology/pharmacy worldwide is not optimistic, which may partially explain the decreased R&D productivity of pharmaceutical industry since the last decade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718055281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718055281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-93cd5fff4ef0ab0835119baa5f62dfeafb07d3d1ec1431a6d6ea0819fdc4d2543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP4zAQhS20SHQLP4CbL0h7CfXETepwY6tddiUkLnC2ps6YGqV2sJOq_fe4SrXHPVlv5r1v5MfYLYh7EGK1SADQlIUAWYimVsXhgs2gUqooVQ3f2CwvVNGAFFfse0ofImekUDN2_Ok2nQs7GqIzidMeuxEHFzwPlkdKhNFseU_RhrhDb4g7z_stZmFCF96Pi7M4PvD11nnMoS4D9sSHwAfyWfcnjh-mqQmjz7coXbNLi12im_M7Z2-_f72u_xTPL09_14_PhZEVDEUjTVtZa5dkBW6EykNoNoiVrcvWEtqNWLWyBTKwlIB1WxMKBY1tzbItq6Wcsx8Tt4_hc6Q06J1LhroOPYUxaViBElVVKshWmKwmhpQiWd1Ht8N41CD0qWY91axzm_pUsz7kzN0Zj8lgZ2MuyaV_wXJVN7WsmuwrJ1_KK_9OUX-EMfr88__AvwCBTpHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718055281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ding, Zuo-Qi ; Ge, Jian-Ping ; Wu, Xiao-Ming ; Zheng, Xiao-Nan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Zuo-Qi ; Ge, Jian-Ping ; Wu, Xiao-Ming ; Zheng, Xiao-Nan</creatorcontrib><description>Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation to ten representative countries. The publications in the field pharmacology/pharmacy of China and ten representative countries in the past decade (2001–2010) were retrieved from Web of Science database, and studies were conducted on the immediacy index of articles published in 2011. Multiple bibliometric indicators were obtained from the “InCites” analysis. Most of the bibliometric indicators for the developed countries including the USA and the European countries remained stable in the past decade. The number of publications by the Asian countries, especially China, increased dramatically in the past decade year by year; however, the Asian countries improved little in the indicators assessing the scientific quality of publications including the citation behaviors and the impact relative to either country and subject area. It may need a long time to fill in the gap, in terms of the scientific quality, between the developing countries and the developed countries. In view of the dramatic increase in the financial investment, our findings suggest that the development of the field pharmacology/pharmacy worldwide is not optimistic, which may partially explain the decreased R&D productivity of pharmaceutical industry since the last decade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCNTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation ; Computer Science ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; International comparisons ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Library Science ; Pharmaceuticals ; Publication output ; Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2013-09, Vol.96 (3), p.829-844</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-93cd5fff4ef0ab0835119baa5f62dfeafb07d3d1ec1431a6d6ea0819fdc4d2543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-93cd5fff4ef0ab0835119baa5f62dfeafb07d3d1ec1431a6d6ea0819fdc4d2543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27696359$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Zuo-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jian-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Nan</creatorcontrib><title>Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation to ten representative countries. The publications in the field pharmacology/pharmacy of China and ten representative countries in the past decade (2001–2010) were retrieved from Web of Science database, and studies were conducted on the immediacy index of articles published in 2011. Multiple bibliometric indicators were obtained from the “InCites” analysis. Most of the bibliometric indicators for the developed countries including the USA and the European countries remained stable in the past decade. The number of publications by the Asian countries, especially China, increased dramatically in the past decade year by year; however, the Asian countries improved little in the indicators assessing the scientific quality of publications including the citation behaviors and the impact relative to either country and subject area. It may need a long time to fill in the gap, in terms of the scientific quality, between the developing countries and the developed countries. In view of the dramatic increase in the financial investment, our findings suggest that the development of the field pharmacology/pharmacy worldwide is not optimistic, which may partially explain the decreased R&D productivity of pharmaceutical industry since the last decade.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Publication output</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFP4zAQhS20SHQLP4CbL0h7CfXETepwY6tddiUkLnC2ps6YGqV2sJOq_fe4SrXHPVlv5r1v5MfYLYh7EGK1SADQlIUAWYimVsXhgs2gUqooVQ3f2CwvVNGAFFfse0ofImekUDN2_Ok2nQs7GqIzidMeuxEHFzwPlkdKhNFseU_RhrhDb4g7z_stZmFCF96Pi7M4PvD11nnMoS4D9sSHwAfyWfcnjh-mqQmjz7coXbNLi12im_M7Z2-_f72u_xTPL09_14_PhZEVDEUjTVtZa5dkBW6EykNoNoiVrcvWEtqNWLWyBTKwlIB1WxMKBY1tzbItq6Wcsx8Tt4_hc6Q06J1LhroOPYUxaViBElVVKshWmKwmhpQiWd1Ht8N41CD0qWY91axzm_pUsz7kzN0Zj8lgZ2MuyaV_wXJVN7WsmuwrJ1_KK_9OUX-EMfr88__AvwCBTpHc</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Ding, Zuo-Qi</creator><creator>Ge, Jian-Ping</creator><creator>Wu, Xiao-Ming</creator><creator>Zheng, Xiao-Nan</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BP</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries</title><author>Ding, Zuo-Qi ; Ge, Jian-Ping ; Wu, Xiao-Ming ; Zheng, Xiao-Nan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-93cd5fff4ef0ab0835119baa5f62dfeafb07d3d1ec1431a6d6ea0819fdc4d2543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Publication output</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Zuo-Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jian-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Xiao-Nan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Zuo-Qi</au><au>Ge, Jian-Ping</au><au>Wu, Xiao-Ming</au><au>Zheng, Xiao-Nan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>829</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>829-844</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><coden>SCNTDX</coden><abstract>Pharmacology/pharmacy is an important scientific field and plays a pivotal role in new drug research and development. China has steadily increased investment in drug development. This study aimed to evaluate the productivity of China in the field pharmacology/pharmacy in the past decade in relation to ten representative countries. The publications in the field pharmacology/pharmacy of China and ten representative countries in the past decade (2001–2010) were retrieved from Web of Science database, and studies were conducted on the immediacy index of articles published in 2011. Multiple bibliometric indicators were obtained from the “InCites” analysis. Most of the bibliometric indicators for the developed countries including the USA and the European countries remained stable in the past decade. The number of publications by the Asian countries, especially China, increased dramatically in the past decade year by year; however, the Asian countries improved little in the indicators assessing the scientific quality of publications including the citation behaviors and the impact relative to either country and subject area. It may need a long time to fill in the gap, in terms of the scientific quality, between the developing countries and the developed countries. In view of the dramatic increase in the financial investment, our findings suggest that the development of the field pharmacology/pharmacy worldwide is not optimistic, which may partially explain the decreased R&D productivity of pharmaceutical industry since the last decade.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0138-9130 |
ispartof | Scientometrics, 2013-09, Vol.96 (3), p.829-844 |
issn | 0138-9130 1588-2861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718055281 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Bibliometrics Bibliometrics. Scientometrics Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation Computer Science Exact sciences and technology Information and communication sciences Information science. Documentation Information Storage and Retrieval International comparisons Library and information science. General aspects Library Science Pharmaceuticals Publication output Sciences and techniques of general use |
title | Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T01%3A43%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bibliometrics%20evaluation%20of%20research%20performance%20in%20pharmacology/pharmacy:%20China%20relative%20to%20ten%20representative%20countries&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Ding,%20Zuo-Qi&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=829&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=829-844&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft.coden=SCNTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-013-0968-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718055281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718055281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |