A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities
This study evaluated the use of video transects obtained from SCUBA divers or remote operated vehicle (ROV) and point intercept transect (PIT) method from divers for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Comparisons were made between the datasets obtained by the ROV and SCUBA diver video transec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 2006-05, Vol.333 (1), p.115-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology |
container_volume | 333 |
creator | Lam, Katherine Shin, Paul K.S. Bradbeer, Robin Randall, David Ku, Kenneth K.K. Hodgson, Paul Cheung, Siu Gin |
description | This study evaluated the use of video transects obtained from SCUBA divers or remote operated vehicle (ROV) and point intercept transect (PIT) method from divers for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Comparisons were made between the datasets obtained by the ROV and SCUBA diver video transect (‘Diver’) and the PIT method on three nearby coral sites with different hydrographies, scleractinian coral composition, dominant species and percentage cover. There was no significant difference between the ROV and ‘Diver’ datasets whereas the PIT method tended to over-estimate percentage cover at sites where corals are not extensive. Power analysis showed that the minimum detectable change in coral percentage cover,
δ, had low mean values between 0.39% and 1.65% for the ROV dataset, 0.66% for the “Diver’ dataset, and 12.11% for the PIT dataset. This implied that the ROV and SCUBA survey methods can produce higher precision in terms of detecting temporal changes in coral communities and are thus more suitable for scientific research and management purposes than the PIT method. Other advantages of using video transects by SCUBA divers or ROV include provision of permanent records for subsequent studies and public information, less field time incurred and wider survey areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17175719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022098105005927</els_id><sourcerecordid>14787325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-764017596d573df56a24311ecf71a6d919cbe2fd3d4105fc995285f095faea693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLFuHCEURVHkSFk7-YI0NHE3Yx4zwFCksKw4sWTJjV0jFh4Oq51hAqwl_32w11K6yAVQcO59T4eQr8B6YCAvdv0O5y32nDHRA-8Z0x_IBialO5BanZANY5x3TE_wiZyWsmOMgeByQx4vqUvzanMsaaEp0KfoMVG7eLqmuFTaDmaHa6U126Wgq3TG-jv5QkPKdE5LrCnH5ZGWw7bmtEZn960zv97zfGj_Ectn8jHYfcEvb-8Zebj-cX_1q7u9-3lzdXnbuVFC7ZQcGSihpRdq8EFIy8cBAF1QYKXXoN0WefCDH4GJ4LQWfBKBaREsWqmHM3J-7F1z-nPAUs0ci8P93i6YDsWAavUK3gGOalIDFw0cjqDLqZSMwaw5zjY_G2Dmxb7ZmVf75sW-AW6a_Zb69lZvSxMSmjsXy7-omrhoqzfu-5HDJuUpYjbFRVwc-piba-NT_O-cv8zOnTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14787325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lam, Katherine ; Shin, Paul K.S. ; Bradbeer, Robin ; Randall, David ; Ku, Kenneth K.K. ; Hodgson, Paul ; Cheung, Siu Gin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, Katherine ; Shin, Paul K.S. ; Bradbeer, Robin ; Randall, David ; Ku, Kenneth K.K. ; Hodgson, Paul ; Cheung, Siu Gin</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the use of video transects obtained from SCUBA divers or remote operated vehicle (ROV) and point intercept transect (PIT) method from divers for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Comparisons were made between the datasets obtained by the ROV and SCUBA diver video transect (‘Diver’) and the PIT method on three nearby coral sites with different hydrographies, scleractinian coral composition, dominant species and percentage cover. There was no significant difference between the ROV and ‘Diver’ datasets whereas the PIT method tended to over-estimate percentage cover at sites where corals are not extensive. Power analysis showed that the minimum detectable change in coral percentage cover,
δ, had low mean values between 0.39% and 1.65% for the ROV dataset, 0.66% for the “Diver’ dataset, and 12.11% for the PIT dataset. This implied that the ROV and SCUBA survey methods can produce higher precision in terms of detecting temporal changes in coral communities and are thus more suitable for scientific research and management purposes than the PIT method. Other advantages of using video transects by SCUBA divers or ROV include provision of permanent records for subsequent studies and public information, less field time incurred and wider survey areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEMBAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cnidaria. Ctenaria ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrates ; Marine ; Point intercept transect ; ROV ; Scleractinia ; Sea water ecosystems ; Subtropical coral community ; Synecology ; Video transect</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 2006-05, Vol.333 (1), p.115-128</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-764017596d573df56a24311ecf71a6d919cbe2fd3d4105fc995285f095faea693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-764017596d573df56a24311ecf71a6d919cbe2fd3d4105fc995285f095faea693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098105005927$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17825528$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Paul K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbeer, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Kenneth K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Siu Gin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities</title><title>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</title><description>This study evaluated the use of video transects obtained from SCUBA divers or remote operated vehicle (ROV) and point intercept transect (PIT) method from divers for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Comparisons were made between the datasets obtained by the ROV and SCUBA diver video transect (‘Diver’) and the PIT method on three nearby coral sites with different hydrographies, scleractinian coral composition, dominant species and percentage cover. There was no significant difference between the ROV and ‘Diver’ datasets whereas the PIT method tended to over-estimate percentage cover at sites where corals are not extensive. Power analysis showed that the minimum detectable change in coral percentage cover,
δ, had low mean values between 0.39% and 1.65% for the ROV dataset, 0.66% for the “Diver’ dataset, and 12.11% for the PIT dataset. This implied that the ROV and SCUBA survey methods can produce higher precision in terms of detecting temporal changes in coral communities and are thus more suitable for scientific research and management purposes than the PIT method. Other advantages of using video transects by SCUBA divers or ROV include provision of permanent records for subsequent studies and public information, less field time incurred and wider survey areas.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Point intercept transect</subject><subject>ROV</subject><subject>Scleractinia</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>Subtropical coral community</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Video transect</subject><issn>0022-0981</issn><issn>1879-1697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLFuHCEURVHkSFk7-YI0NHE3Yx4zwFCksKw4sWTJjV0jFh4Oq51hAqwl_32w11K6yAVQcO59T4eQr8B6YCAvdv0O5y32nDHRA-8Z0x_IBialO5BanZANY5x3TE_wiZyWsmOMgeByQx4vqUvzanMsaaEp0KfoMVG7eLqmuFTaDmaHa6U126Wgq3TG-jv5QkPKdE5LrCnH5ZGWw7bmtEZn960zv97zfGj_Ectn8jHYfcEvb-8Zebj-cX_1q7u9-3lzdXnbuVFC7ZQcGSihpRdq8EFIy8cBAF1QYKXXoN0WefCDH4GJ4LQWfBKBaREsWqmHM3J-7F1z-nPAUs0ci8P93i6YDsWAavUK3gGOalIDFw0cjqDLqZSMwaw5zjY_G2Dmxb7ZmVf75sW-AW6a_Zb69lZvSxMSmjsXy7-omrhoqzfu-5HDJuUpYjbFRVwc-piba-NT_O-cv8zOnTI</recordid><startdate>20060530</startdate><enddate>20060530</enddate><creator>Lam, Katherine</creator><creator>Shin, Paul K.S.</creator><creator>Bradbeer, Robin</creator><creator>Randall, David</creator><creator>Ku, Kenneth K.K.</creator><creator>Hodgson, Paul</creator><creator>Cheung, Siu Gin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060530</creationdate><title>A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities</title><author>Lam, Katherine ; Shin, Paul K.S. ; Bradbeer, Robin ; Randall, David ; Ku, Kenneth K.K. ; Hodgson, Paul ; Cheung, Siu Gin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-764017596d573df56a24311ecf71a6d919cbe2fd3d4105fc995285f095faea693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cnidaria. Ctenaria</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Point intercept transect</topic><topic>ROV</topic><topic>Scleractinia</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>Subtropical coral community</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Video transect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Paul K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbeer, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ku, Kenneth K.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Siu Gin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, Katherine</au><au>Shin, Paul K.S.</au><au>Bradbeer, Robin</au><au>Randall, David</au><au>Ku, Kenneth K.K.</au><au>Hodgson, Paul</au><au>Cheung, Siu Gin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</jtitle><date>2006-05-30</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>333</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>115-128</pages><issn>0022-0981</issn><eissn>1879-1697</eissn><coden>JEMBAM</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the use of video transects obtained from SCUBA divers or remote operated vehicle (ROV) and point intercept transect (PIT) method from divers for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Comparisons were made between the datasets obtained by the ROV and SCUBA diver video transect (‘Diver’) and the PIT method on three nearby coral sites with different hydrographies, scleractinian coral composition, dominant species and percentage cover. There was no significant difference between the ROV and ‘Diver’ datasets whereas the PIT method tended to over-estimate percentage cover at sites where corals are not extensive. Power analysis showed that the minimum detectable change in coral percentage cover,
δ, had low mean values between 0.39% and 1.65% for the ROV dataset, 0.66% for the “Diver’ dataset, and 12.11% for the PIT dataset. This implied that the ROV and SCUBA survey methods can produce higher precision in terms of detecting temporal changes in coral communities and are thus more suitable for scientific research and management purposes than the PIT method. Other advantages of using video transects by SCUBA divers or ROV include provision of permanent records for subsequent studies and public information, less field time incurred and wider survey areas.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.009</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0981 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 2006-05, Vol.333 (1), p.115-128 |
issn | 0022-0981 1879-1697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17175719 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Cnidaria. Ctenaria Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Invertebrates Marine Point intercept transect ROV Scleractinia Sea water ecosystems Subtropical coral community Synecology Video transect |
title | A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T06%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20video%20and%20point%20intercept%20transect%20methods%20for%20monitoring%20subtropical%20coral%20communities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20marine%20biology%20and%20ecology&rft.au=Lam,%20Katherine&rft.date=2006-05-30&rft.volume=333&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=115-128&rft.issn=0022-0981&rft.eissn=1879-1697&rft.coden=JEMBAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14787325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14787325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022098105005927&rfr_iscdi=true |