Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of interval and constant velocity training in runners. METHODS: Twenty seven recreational endurance runners were matched into the interval training group (IT-group, n = 14) and constant velocity training group (CT-group, n = 13). All runners went through a 10-week end...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.237-237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 237 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5S |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Medicine and science in sports and exercise |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Nummela, Ari T Vesterinen, Ville Hynynen, Esa Mikkola, Jussi Hokka, Laura |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the effects of interval and constant velocity training in runners. METHODS: Twenty seven recreational endurance runners were matched into the interval training group (IT-group, n = 14) and constant velocity training group (CT-group, n = 13). All runners went through a 10-week endurance training program, which included two high intensity training sessions per week. RESULTS: All runners improved their velocity at VO sub(2max) (2.7%, p%lt; 0.001), VT (4.2%, p < 0.001), LT (3.6%, p < 0.001) and vMART (1.8%, p < 0.01) but they could not improve their RE and there were no significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The main novel finding of the present study was that IT-group improved their VO sub(2max) in l/min (4.6%) more than CT-group (0.6%, p < 0.05). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717495200</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1717495200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17174952003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi7sKwjAUQDMoWB__kLEOhaSxlM6lYiZBimuJ5VYi6a3mNsXP14I_4HSGc86CRUIWWVJIJVdsTfQQQuRKyYiVGkfwk3G89saixTvXxKuus60FHLlGrvunH6bZXM-cwi1Oe_Pez-YSEMHTli074wh2P25YfKzq8pR8v1cAGpveUgvOGYQhUCNzmR-KLBVC_ZF-AF67PEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717495200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners</title><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Nummela, Ari T ; Vesterinen, Ville ; Hynynen, Esa ; Mikkola, Jussi ; Hokka, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Nummela, Ari T ; Vesterinen, Ville ; Hynynen, Esa ; Mikkola, Jussi ; Hokka, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: To compare the effects of interval and constant velocity training in runners. METHODS: Twenty seven recreational endurance runners were matched into the interval training group (IT-group, n = 14) and constant velocity training group (CT-group, n = 13). All runners went through a 10-week endurance training program, which included two high intensity training sessions per week. RESULTS: All runners improved their velocity at VO sub(2max) (2.7%, p%lt; 0.001), VT (4.2%, p < 0.001), LT (3.6%, p < 0.001) and vMART (1.8%, p < 0.01) but they could not improve their RE and there were no significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The main novel finding of the present study was that IT-group improved their VO sub(2max) in l/min (4.6%) more than CT-group (0.6%, p < 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9131</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.237-237</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nummela, Ari T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesterinen, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynynen, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikkola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokka, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners</title><title>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</title><description>PURPOSE: To compare the effects of interval and constant velocity training in runners. METHODS: Twenty seven recreational endurance runners were matched into the interval training group (IT-group, n = 14) and constant velocity training group (CT-group, n = 13). All runners went through a 10-week endurance training program, which included two high intensity training sessions per week. RESULTS: All runners improved their velocity at VO sub(2max) (2.7%, p%lt; 0.001), VT (4.2%, p < 0.001), LT (3.6%, p < 0.001) and vMART (1.8%, p < 0.01) but they could not improve their RE and there were no significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The main novel finding of the present study was that IT-group improved their VO sub(2max) in l/min (4.6%) more than CT-group (0.6%, p < 0.05).</description><issn>0195-9131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVi7sKwjAUQDMoWB__kLEOhaSxlM6lYiZBimuJ5VYi6a3mNsXP14I_4HSGc86CRUIWWVJIJVdsTfQQQuRKyYiVGkfwk3G89saixTvXxKuus60FHLlGrvunH6bZXM-cwi1Oe_Pez-YSEMHTli074wh2P25YfKzq8pR8v1cAGpveUgvOGYQhUCNzmR-KLBVC_ZF-AF67PEE</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Nummela, Ari T</creator><creator>Vesterinen, Ville</creator><creator>Hynynen, Esa</creator><creator>Mikkola, Jussi</creator><creator>Hokka, Laura</creator><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners</title><author>Nummela, Ari T ; Vesterinen, Ville ; Hynynen, Esa ; Mikkola, Jussi ; Hokka, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17174952003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nummela, Ari T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vesterinen, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hynynen, Esa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikkola, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hokka, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nummela, Ari T</au><au>Vesterinen, Ville</au><au>Hynynen, Esa</au><au>Mikkola, Jussi</au><au>Hokka, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners</atitle><jtitle>Medicine and science in sports and exercise</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5S</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>237-237</pages><issn>0195-9131</issn><abstract>PURPOSE: To compare the effects of interval and constant velocity training in runners. METHODS: Twenty seven recreational endurance runners were matched into the interval training group (IT-group, n = 14) and constant velocity training group (CT-group, n = 13). All runners went through a 10-week endurance training program, which included two high intensity training sessions per week. RESULTS: All runners improved their velocity at VO sub(2max) (2.7%, p%lt; 0.001), VT (4.2%, p < 0.001), LT (3.6%, p < 0.001) and vMART (1.8%, p < 0.01) but they could not improve their RE and there were no significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). The main novel finding of the present study was that IT-group improved their VO sub(2max) in l/min (4.6%) more than CT-group (0.6%, p < 0.05).</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9131 |
ispartof | Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2012-05, Vol.44 (5S), p.237-237 |
issn | 0195-9131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717495200 |
source | Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete |
title | Interval Training Is Efficient In Improving VO sub(2max) In Runners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interval%20Training%20Is%20Efficient%20In%20Improving%20VO%20sub(2max)%20In%20Runners&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20and%20science%20in%20sports%20and%20exercise&rft.au=Nummela,%20Ari%20T&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5S&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=237-237&rft.issn=0195-9131&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1717495200%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717495200&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |