Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis
This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training ph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources 2015-09, Vol.42 (5), p.721-734 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 734 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 721 |
container_title | Water resources |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Hooshyaripor, Farhad Tahershamsi, Ahmad Behzadian, Kourosh |
description | This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training phase of the ANN is analysed by two different algorithms including Levenberg—Marquardt (LM) as a standard technique used to solve nonlinear least squares problems and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) as a new evolutionary algorithm in the evolutionary computation field. Comparison of the obtained results with those of the conventional approach based on regression analysis shows a better performance of the ANN model trained with ICA. Investigation on the uncertainty band of the models indicated that LM predictions have the least uncertainty band whilst ICA’s have the lowest mean prediction error. More analysis on the models’ uncertainty is conducted by a Monte Carlo simulation in which 1000 randomly generated sets of input data are sampled from the database of historical dam failures. The result of 1000 ANN models which have been analysed with three statistical measures including p-factor, d-factor, and DDR confirms that LM predictions have more limited uncertainty band. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1134/S0097807815050085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717494269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3796452751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-772542d81f78a62bf690ec51ef282ed02f53aefbd200154b539815bdbf0f52223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAZiwxMISODtxnIyo4p9UiaFUYoucxC5uU7vYjqp-exyFAYHEcjfc753eewhdErglJM3uFgAlL4AXhAEDKNgRmpAciiTNsvdjNBnOyXA_RWferwFIhMoJqh980FsRtDXYKryTYoNtH1Rn91gb3IotVkJ3vZO499qssJG9E11cYW_dBovdzlnRfODetNLF2UgXhDbhgIUR3cFrf45OlOi8vPjeU7R8fHibPSfz16eX2f08aTKSh4RzyjLaFkTxQuS0VnkJsmFEKlpQ2QJVLBVS1S2N5llWs7SMYeu2VqAYpTSdopvxb3T02Usfqq32jew6YaTtfUU44VmZ0byM6PUvdG17F_0OFJTRCOFppMhINc5676Sqdi525Q4VgWpovfrTetTQUeMja1bS_fj8j-hqFClhK7Fy2lfLBY0pASihvMjTL1YrjVs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709254173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hooshyaripor, Farhad ; Tahershamsi, Ahmad ; Behzadian, Kourosh</creator><creatorcontrib>Hooshyaripor, Farhad ; Tahershamsi, Ahmad ; Behzadian, Kourosh</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training phase of the ANN is analysed by two different algorithms including Levenberg—Marquardt (LM) as a standard technique used to solve nonlinear least squares problems and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) as a new evolutionary algorithm in the evolutionary computation field. Comparison of the obtained results with those of the conventional approach based on regression analysis shows a better performance of the ANN model trained with ICA. Investigation on the uncertainty band of the models indicated that LM predictions have the least uncertainty band whilst ICA’s have the lowest mean prediction error. More analysis on the models’ uncertainty is conducted by a Monte Carlo simulation in which 1000 randomly generated sets of input data are sampled from the database of historical dam failures. The result of 1000 ANN models which have been analysed with three statistical measures including p-factor, d-factor, and DDR confirms that LM predictions have more limited uncertainty band.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-8078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1608-344X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1134/S0097807815050085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; bias ; Dam failure ; Dams ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; least squares ; Monte Carlo method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Neural networks ; prediction ; Regression analysis ; Uncertainty ; uncertainty analysis ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water resources ; Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects</subject><ispartof>Water resources, 2015-09, Vol.42 (5), p.721-734</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-772542d81f78a62bf690ec51ef282ed02f53aefbd200154b539815bdbf0f52223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-772542d81f78a62bf690ec51ef282ed02f53aefbd200154b539815bdbf0f52223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S0097807815050085$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0097807815050085$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hooshyaripor, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahershamsi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behzadian, Kourosh</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis</title><title>Water resources</title><addtitle>Water Resour</addtitle><description>This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training phase of the ANN is analysed by two different algorithms including Levenberg—Marquardt (LM) as a standard technique used to solve nonlinear least squares problems and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) as a new evolutionary algorithm in the evolutionary computation field. Comparison of the obtained results with those of the conventional approach based on regression analysis shows a better performance of the ANN model trained with ICA. Investigation on the uncertainty band of the models indicated that LM predictions have the least uncertainty band whilst ICA’s have the lowest mean prediction error. More analysis on the models’ uncertainty is conducted by a Monte Carlo simulation in which 1000 randomly generated sets of input data are sampled from the database of historical dam failures. The result of 1000 ANN models which have been analysed with three statistical measures including p-factor, d-factor, and DDR confirms that LM predictions have more limited uncertainty band.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>bias</subject><subject>Dam failure</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>least squares</subject><subject>Monte Carlo method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>uncertainty analysis</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects</subject><issn>0097-8078</issn><issn>1608-344X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAZiwxMISODtxnIyo4p9UiaFUYoucxC5uU7vYjqp-exyFAYHEcjfc753eewhdErglJM3uFgAlL4AXhAEDKNgRmpAciiTNsvdjNBnOyXA_RWferwFIhMoJqh980FsRtDXYKryTYoNtH1Rn91gb3IotVkJ3vZO499qssJG9E11cYW_dBovdzlnRfODetNLF2UgXhDbhgIUR3cFrf45OlOi8vPjeU7R8fHibPSfz16eX2f08aTKSh4RzyjLaFkTxQuS0VnkJsmFEKlpQ2QJVLBVS1S2N5llWs7SMYeu2VqAYpTSdopvxb3T02Usfqq32jew6YaTtfUU44VmZ0byM6PUvdG17F_0OFJTRCOFppMhINc5676Sqdi525Q4VgWpovfrTetTQUeMja1bS_fj8j-hqFClhK7Fy2lfLBY0pASihvMjTL1YrjVs</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Hooshyaripor, Farhad</creator><creator>Tahershamsi, Ahmad</creator><creator>Behzadian, Kourosh</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis</title><author>Hooshyaripor, Farhad ; Tahershamsi, Ahmad ; Behzadian, Kourosh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-772542d81f78a62bf690ec51ef282ed02f53aefbd200154b539815bdbf0f52223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>bias</topic><topic>Dam failure</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>least squares</topic><topic>Monte Carlo method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>uncertainty analysis</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hooshyaripor, Farhad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahershamsi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behzadian, Kourosh</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hooshyaripor, Farhad</au><au>Tahershamsi, Ahmad</au><au>Behzadian, Kourosh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis</atitle><jtitle>Water resources</jtitle><stitle>Water Resour</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>721-734</pages><issn>0097-8078</issn><eissn>1608-344X</eissn><abstract>This paper presents two Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based models for the prediction of peak outflow from breached embankment dams using two effective parameters including height and volume of water behind the dam at the time of failure. Estimation of optimal weights and biases in the training phase of the ANN is analysed by two different algorithms including Levenberg—Marquardt (LM) as a standard technique used to solve nonlinear least squares problems and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) as a new evolutionary algorithm in the evolutionary computation field. Comparison of the obtained results with those of the conventional approach based on regression analysis shows a better performance of the ANN model trained with ICA. Investigation on the uncertainty band of the models indicated that LM predictions have the least uncertainty band whilst ICA’s have the lowest mean prediction error. More analysis on the models’ uncertainty is conducted by a Monte Carlo simulation in which 1000 randomly generated sets of input data are sampled from the database of historical dam failures. The result of 1000 ANN models which have been analysed with three statistical measures including p-factor, d-factor, and DDR confirms that LM predictions have more limited uncertainty band.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.1134/S0097807815050085</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0097-8078 |
ispartof | Water resources, 2015-09, Vol.42 (5), p.721-734 |
issn | 0097-8078 1608-344X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717494269 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Aquatic Pollution bias Dam failure Dams Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Hydrology/Water Resources least squares Monte Carlo method Monte Carlo simulation Neural networks prediction Regression analysis Uncertainty uncertainty analysis Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control Water resources Water Resources Development: Economic and Legal Aspects |
title | Estimation of peak outflow in dam failure using neural network approach under uncertainty analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20peak%20outflow%20in%20dam%20failure%20using%20neural%20network%20approach%20under%20uncertainty%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources&rft.au=Hooshyaripor,%20Farhad&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=721-734&rft.issn=0097-8078&rft.eissn=1608-344X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1134/S0097807815050085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3796452751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709254173&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |