Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners
Abstract Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeata...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.549-553 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 553 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 549 |
| container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
| container_volume | 114 |
| creator | Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD |
| description | Abstract Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P =.001, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717484930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391315002589</els_id><sourcerecordid>1717484930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b18e578014685748a27534e44996b1f0b7b627e6f2790df593b3bdc2829e30413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1DAUtRCITgu_UGXJJqlfSewNAlXlIVViQVlbjnPTeHCcYDtTzYfwvziaKQs2rOxjnXuuzz0XoWuCK4JJc7OvljDHHnyqKCZ1hXmFiXyBdgTLtmwEJy_RDmNKSyYJu0CXMe4xxqJuyWt0QRsiqKj5Dv1-GANA2dsJfLSz166Ag3arThkU81CkEYoAC-ikO-tsOm6P0WjvoS_M7A_5C6c6Oy0B4iYSN04Giw6ZlADSWDyCh6BTxk82w6fRJigL7fuicyuUzj6O6awb4hv0atAuwtvzeYV-fLp7uP1S3n_7_PX2431pOGWp7IiAuhWY8CYb40LTtmYcOJey6ciAu7ZraAvNQFuJ-6GWrGNdb6igEhjmhF2hdyfdPMxfK8SkJhsNOKc9zGtUpCVZlkuGM7U5UU2eewwwqCXYSYejIlhtkai9eo5EbZEozFWOJBden3us3QT937LnDDLhw4kA2enBQlDRWPAGehvAJNXP9v893v8jYZz11mj3E44Q9_MackLZj4pUYfV9W4xtL0idb7WQ7A_ZzrhP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717484930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD ; Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD ; Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD ; Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD ; Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD ; Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD ; Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Abstract Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P =.001, P <.001, P <.001; ±SD: P <.001, P <.001, P =.003). Means of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 5.8 μm for the canine, 5.9 μm for the premolar, and 8.6 μm for the molar teeth and 4.4 μm, 2.9 μm, and 3.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P <.001). Corresponding SDs of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 15.9 μm for the canine, 23.2 μm for the premolar, and 14.6 μm for the molar teeth and 9.8 μm, 10.6 μm, and 11.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P =.73). Conclusions On evaluation of the digitized abutment tooth impressions, the blue-light scanner exhibited greater repeatability than the white-light scanner.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26182854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Crowns ; Dental Abutments ; Dental Impression Materials - chemistry ; Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation ; Dental Models ; Dentistry ; Dogs ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation ; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed - standards ; Tooth Preparation - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.549-553</ispartof><rights>Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b18e578014685748a27534e44996b1f0b7b627e6f2790df593b3bdc2829e30413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b18e578014685748a27534e44996b1f0b7b627e6f2790df593b3bdc2829e30413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6730-4960</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391315002589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26182854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Abstract Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P =.001, P <.001, P <.001; ±SD: P <.001, P <.001, P =.003). Means of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 5.8 μm for the canine, 5.9 μm for the premolar, and 8.6 μm for the molar teeth and 4.4 μm, 2.9 μm, and 3.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P <.001). Corresponding SDs of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 15.9 μm for the canine, 23.2 μm for the premolar, and 14.6 μm for the molar teeth and 9.8 μm, 10.6 μm, and 11.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P =.73). Conclusions On evaluation of the digitized abutment tooth impressions, the blue-light scanner exhibited greater repeatability than the white-light scanner.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Impression Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dental Models</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><subject>Tooth Preparation - methods</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUstu1DAUtRCITgu_UGXJJqlfSewNAlXlIVViQVlbjnPTeHCcYDtTzYfwvziaKQs2rOxjnXuuzz0XoWuCK4JJc7OvljDHHnyqKCZ1hXmFiXyBdgTLtmwEJy_RDmNKSyYJu0CXMe4xxqJuyWt0QRsiqKj5Dv1-GANA2dsJfLSz166Ag3arThkU81CkEYoAC-ikO-tsOm6P0WjvoS_M7A_5C6c6Oy0B4iYSN04Giw6ZlADSWDyCh6BTxk82w6fRJigL7fuicyuUzj6O6awb4hv0atAuwtvzeYV-fLp7uP1S3n_7_PX2431pOGWp7IiAuhWY8CYb40LTtmYcOJey6ciAu7ZraAvNQFuJ-6GWrGNdb6igEhjmhF2hdyfdPMxfK8SkJhsNOKc9zGtUpCVZlkuGM7U5UU2eewwwqCXYSYejIlhtkai9eo5EbZEozFWOJBden3us3QT937LnDDLhw4kA2enBQlDRWPAGehvAJNXP9v893v8jYZz11mj3E44Q9_MackLZj4pUYfV9W4xtL0idb7WQ7A_ZzrhP</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD</creator><creator>Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-4960</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners</title><author>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD ; Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD ; Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD ; Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD ; Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-b18e578014685748a27534e44996b1f0b7b627e6f2790df593b3bdc2829e30413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Impression Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dental Models</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><topic>Tooth Preparation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeon, Jin-Hun, MSc, PhD</au><au>Choi, Byeong-Yeol, MSc, PhD</au><au>Kim, Chong-Myeong, MSc, PhD</au><au>Kim, Ji-Hwan, MPH, PhD</au><au>Kim, Hae-Young, DDS, PhD</au><au>Kim, Woong-Chul, MPH, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>549</spage><epage>553</epage><pages>549-553</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Abstract Statement of problem Digital scanning is increasingly used in prosthodontics. Three-dimensional (3D) evaluations that compare the repeatability of the blue-light scanner with that of the white-light scanner are required. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the repeatability of conventional impressions of abutment teeth digitized with white- and blue-light scanners and compare the findings for different types of abutment teeth. Material and methods Impressions of the canine, premolar, and molar abutment teeth were made and repeatedly scanned with each scanner type to obtain 5 sets of 3D data for each tooth. Point clouds were compared, and error sizes per tooth and scanner type were measured (n=10). One-way ANOVA with Tukey honest significant differences multiple comparison and independent t tests were performed to evaluate repeatability (α=.05). Results Repeatability (mean ±SD) of the white- and blue-light scanners for canine, premolar, and molar teeth was statistically significant (means: P =.001, P <.001, P <.001; ±SD: P <.001, P <.001, P =.003). Means of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 5.8 μm for the canine, 5.9 μm for the premolar, and 8.6 μm for the molar teeth and 4.4 μm, 2.9 μm, and 3.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P <.001). Corresponding SDs of discrepancies with the white-light scanner ( P <.001) were 15.9 μm for the canine, 23.2 μm for the premolar, and 14.6 μm for the molar teeth and 9.8 μm, 10.6 μm, and 11.2 μm, respectively, with the blue-light scanner ( P =.73). Conclusions On evaluation of the digitized abutment tooth impressions, the blue-light scanner exhibited greater repeatability than the white-light scanner.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26182854</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-4960</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
| ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-10, Vol.114 (4), p.549-553 |
| issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717484930 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Animals Crowns Dental Abutments Dental Impression Materials - chemistry Dental Impression Technique - instrumentation Dental Models Dentistry Dogs Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed - standards Tooth Preparation - methods |
| title | Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T12%3A50%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20evaluation%20of%20the%20repeatability%20of%20scanned%20conventional%20impressions%20of%20prepared%20teeth%20generated%20with%20white-%20and%20blue-light%20scanners&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Jeon,%20Jin-Hun,%20MSc,%20PhD&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=549&rft.epage=553&rft.pages=549-553&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717484930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717484930&rft_id=info:pmid/26182854&rft_els_id=S0022391315002589&rfr_iscdi=true |