A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts

Objective Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2015-10, Vol.62 (4), p.877-883
Hauptverfasser: Davila, Victor J., MD, Stone, William, MD, Duncan, Audra A., MD, Wood, Emily, MD, Jordan, William D., MD, Zea, Nicholas, MD, Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD, Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 883
container_issue 4
container_start_page 877
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 62
creator Davila, Victor J., MD
Stone, William, MD
Duncan, Audra A., MD
Wood, Emily, MD
Jordan, William D., MD
Zea, Nicholas, MD
Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD
Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA
description Objective Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all EVAR explants from 1997 to 2014 at four institutions was performed. Patients with I-EVAR undergoing surgical treatment were reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results Thirty-six patients (30 male) were treated with endovascular graft excision and revascularization for I-EVAR with a median age of 69 years (range, 54-80 years). Average time from the initial EVAR to presentation was 589 days (range, 43-2466 days). Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension, 32 (89%); tobacco use, 31(86%); coronary artery disease, 26 (72%); hyperlipidemia, 25 (69%), peripheral artery disease, 13 (36%); cerebrovascular disease, 10 (28%); diabetes, 10 (28%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 (25%); and chronic kidney disease, 9 (25%). The most common presenting patient characteristics were leukocytosis, 23 (63%); pain, 21 (58%); and fever, 20 (56%), which were present an average of 65 days (range, 0-514 days) before explantation. Nine different types of endograft were removed. Three patients (8%) underwent emergency explantation. Thirty-four patients (89%) underwent total graft excision, and two patients (6%) underwent partial excision. Methods of reconstruction were in situ in 27 (75%) and extra-anatomic in nine (28%). Conduits used were Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), with or without rifampin, polytetrafluoroethylene, cryopreserved allograft, and femoral vein. Forty-nine organisms grew from operative cultures. Gram-positive organisms were the most common, found in 24 (67%), including Staphylococcus in 13 (36%) and Streptococcus in six (17%). Anaerobes were cultured in 6 patients (17%), gram-negative organisms in 6 (17%), and fungus in 5 (14%). Thirty-one patients (86%) received long-term antibiotics. Early complications included acute renal failure requiring dialysis, 12 (33%); respiratory failure, 3 (8%); bleeding, 4 (11%); and sepsis, 2 (6%). Six patients required re-exploration due to hematoma, infected hematoma, lymphatic leak, bowel perforation, open abdomen at initial operation, and anastomotic bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 8% (3 of 36), and long-term mortality was 25% (9 of 36) a
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.440
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717484758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521415010034</els_id><sourcerecordid>1717484758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-74853221289b893b14e47d1f7b2cff20f775b12f56ffa55449966aa5809787503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS0EoreFH8AGeckmwePYcSIkpKoCilSJRcsOyXKcceuQx8V2-vj3ONzSBQtWs5hzzuh8Q8gbYCUwqN8P5XAbS85AlkyUQrBnZAesVUXdsPY52TEloJAcxBE5jnFgDEA26iU54jU0QslqR36c0mkdk7c4JwwU7_cYPM4W6Z1PNzTdII1ruPbWjDQFNGnKQro46meHNmFPTdcvk5_z3iwhB1Gc--U6GJfiK_LCmTHi68d5Qr5__nR1dl5cfPvy9ez0orBVA6lQopEV58CbtmvaqgOBQvXgVMetc5w5pWQH3MnaOSOlEG1b18bIXFI1SrLqhLw75O7D8mvFmPTko8VxNDMua9SgIN_IhZsshYPUhiXGgE7vg59MeNDA9AZVDzpD1RtUzYTOULPn7WP82k3YPzn-UsyCDwcB5pK3HoOO9g_E3ocMSfeL_2_8x3_cdvTzRvwnPmAcljVkurmFjlwzfbl9dXsqSAaMVaL6DViEnEM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717484758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Davila, Victor J., MD ; Stone, William, MD ; Duncan, Audra A., MD ; Wood, Emily, MD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Zea, Nicholas, MD ; Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD ; Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</creator><creatorcontrib>Davila, Victor J., MD ; Stone, William, MD ; Duncan, Audra A., MD ; Wood, Emily, MD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Zea, Nicholas, MD ; Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD ; Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all EVAR explants from 1997 to 2014 at four institutions was performed. Patients with I-EVAR undergoing surgical treatment were reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results Thirty-six patients (30 male) were treated with endovascular graft excision and revascularization for I-EVAR with a median age of 69 years (range, 54-80 years). Average time from the initial EVAR to presentation was 589 days (range, 43-2466 days). Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension, 32 (89%); tobacco use, 31(86%); coronary artery disease, 26 (72%); hyperlipidemia, 25 (69%), peripheral artery disease, 13 (36%); cerebrovascular disease, 10 (28%); diabetes, 10 (28%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 (25%); and chronic kidney disease, 9 (25%). The most common presenting patient characteristics were leukocytosis, 23 (63%); pain, 21 (58%); and fever, 20 (56%), which were present an average of 65 days (range, 0-514 days) before explantation. Nine different types of endograft were removed. Three patients (8%) underwent emergency explantation. Thirty-four patients (89%) underwent total graft excision, and two patients (6%) underwent partial excision. Methods of reconstruction were in situ in 27 (75%) and extra-anatomic in nine (28%). Conduits used were Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), with or without rifampin, polytetrafluoroethylene, cryopreserved allograft, and femoral vein. Forty-nine organisms grew from operative cultures. Gram-positive organisms were the most common, found in 24 (67%), including Staphylococcus in 13 (36%) and Streptococcus in six (17%). Anaerobes were cultured in 6 patients (17%), gram-negative organisms in 6 (17%), and fungus in 5 (14%). Thirty-one patients (86%) received long-term antibiotics. Early complications included acute renal failure requiring dialysis, 12 (33%); respiratory failure, 3 (8%); bleeding, 4 (11%); and sepsis, 2 (6%). Six patients required re-exploration due to hematoma, infected hematoma, lymphatic leak, bowel perforation, open abdomen at initial operation, and anastomotic bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 8% (3 of 36), and long-term mortality was 25% (9 of 36) at a mean follow-up of 569 days (range, 0-3079 days). Type of reconstruction (in situ vs extra-anatomic) or conduit type did not affect perioperative or overall mortality. Conclusions I-EVAR is a rare but potentially devastating clinical problem. Although perioperative mortality is acceptable, long-term mortality is high. The most common postoperative complication was acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Although this is the largest series of I-EVAR, further studies are needed to understand the risk factors and preventive measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.440</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26184753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aorta, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Comorbidity ; Endovascular Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - mortality ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2015-10, Vol.62 (4), p.877-883</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2015 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-74853221289b893b14e47d1f7b2cff20f775b12f56ffa55449966aa5809787503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-74853221289b893b14e47d1f7b2cff20f775b12f56ffa55449966aa5809787503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521415010034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26184753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davila, Victor J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, William, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Audra A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Emily, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zea, Nicholas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><title>A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all EVAR explants from 1997 to 2014 at four institutions was performed. Patients with I-EVAR undergoing surgical treatment were reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results Thirty-six patients (30 male) were treated with endovascular graft excision and revascularization for I-EVAR with a median age of 69 years (range, 54-80 years). Average time from the initial EVAR to presentation was 589 days (range, 43-2466 days). Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension, 32 (89%); tobacco use, 31(86%); coronary artery disease, 26 (72%); hyperlipidemia, 25 (69%), peripheral artery disease, 13 (36%); cerebrovascular disease, 10 (28%); diabetes, 10 (28%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 (25%); and chronic kidney disease, 9 (25%). The most common presenting patient characteristics were leukocytosis, 23 (63%); pain, 21 (58%); and fever, 20 (56%), which were present an average of 65 days (range, 0-514 days) before explantation. Nine different types of endograft were removed. Three patients (8%) underwent emergency explantation. Thirty-four patients (89%) underwent total graft excision, and two patients (6%) underwent partial excision. Methods of reconstruction were in situ in 27 (75%) and extra-anatomic in nine (28%). Conduits used were Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), with or without rifampin, polytetrafluoroethylene, cryopreserved allograft, and femoral vein. Forty-nine organisms grew from operative cultures. Gram-positive organisms were the most common, found in 24 (67%), including Staphylococcus in 13 (36%) and Streptococcus in six (17%). Anaerobes were cultured in 6 patients (17%), gram-negative organisms in 6 (17%), and fungus in 5 (14%). Thirty-one patients (86%) received long-term antibiotics. Early complications included acute renal failure requiring dialysis, 12 (33%); respiratory failure, 3 (8%); bleeding, 4 (11%); and sepsis, 2 (6%). Six patients required re-exploration due to hematoma, infected hematoma, lymphatic leak, bowel perforation, open abdomen at initial operation, and anastomotic bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 8% (3 of 36), and long-term mortality was 25% (9 of 36) at a mean follow-up of 569 days (range, 0-3079 days). Type of reconstruction (in situ vs extra-anatomic) or conduit type did not affect perioperative or overall mortality. Conclusions I-EVAR is a rare but potentially devastating clinical problem. Although perioperative mortality is acceptable, long-term mortality is high. The most common postoperative complication was acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Although this is the largest series of I-EVAR, further studies are needed to understand the risk factors and preventive measures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - mortality</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhS0EoreFH8AGeckmwePYcSIkpKoCilSJRcsOyXKcceuQx8V2-vj3ONzSBQtWs5hzzuh8Q8gbYCUwqN8P5XAbS85AlkyUQrBnZAesVUXdsPY52TEloJAcxBE5jnFgDEA26iU54jU0QslqR36c0mkdk7c4JwwU7_cYPM4W6Z1PNzTdII1ruPbWjDQFNGnKQro46meHNmFPTdcvk5_z3iwhB1Gc--U6GJfiK_LCmTHi68d5Qr5__nR1dl5cfPvy9ez0orBVA6lQopEV58CbtmvaqgOBQvXgVMetc5w5pWQH3MnaOSOlEG1b18bIXFI1SrLqhLw75O7D8mvFmPTko8VxNDMua9SgIN_IhZsshYPUhiXGgE7vg59MeNDA9AZVDzpD1RtUzYTOULPn7WP82k3YPzn-UsyCDwcB5pK3HoOO9g_E3ocMSfeL_2_8x3_cdvTzRvwnPmAcljVkurmFjlwzfbl9dXsqSAaMVaL6DViEnEM</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Davila, Victor J., MD</creator><creator>Stone, William, MD</creator><creator>Duncan, Audra A., MD</creator><creator>Wood, Emily, MD</creator><creator>Jordan, William D., MD</creator><creator>Zea, Nicholas, MD</creator><creator>Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD</creator><creator>Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts</title><author>Davila, Victor J., MD ; Stone, William, MD ; Duncan, Audra A., MD ; Wood, Emily, MD ; Jordan, William D., MD ; Zea, Nicholas, MD ; Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD ; Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-74853221289b893b14e47d1f7b2cff20f775b12f56ffa55449966aa5809787503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - mortality</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davila, Victor J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stone, William, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Audra A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Emily, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, William D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zea, Nicholas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davila, Victor J., MD</au><au>Stone, William, MD</au><au>Duncan, Audra A., MD</au><au>Wood, Emily, MD</au><au>Jordan, William D., MD</au><au>Zea, Nicholas, MD</au><au>Sternbergh, W. Charles, MD</au><au>Money, Samuel R., MD, MBA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>877</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>877-883</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective Single-center experiences with the treatment of infected endografts after endovascular aortic repair (I-EVAR) have been reported. We performed a multicenter review of the surgical care of these patients to elucidate short-term and long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all EVAR explants from 1997 to 2014 at four institutions was performed. Patients with I-EVAR undergoing surgical treatment were reviewed. Data were obtained detailing preoperative demographics, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results Thirty-six patients (30 male) were treated with endovascular graft excision and revascularization for I-EVAR with a median age of 69 years (range, 54-80 years). Average time from the initial EVAR to presentation was 589 days (range, 43-2466 days). Preoperative comorbidities included hypertension, 32 (89%); tobacco use, 31(86%); coronary artery disease, 26 (72%); hyperlipidemia, 25 (69%), peripheral artery disease, 13 (36%); cerebrovascular disease, 10 (28%); diabetes, 10 (28%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 (25%); and chronic kidney disease, 9 (25%). The most common presenting patient characteristics were leukocytosis, 23 (63%); pain, 21 (58%); and fever, 20 (56%), which were present an average of 65 days (range, 0-514 days) before explantation. Nine different types of endograft were removed. Three patients (8%) underwent emergency explantation. Thirty-four patients (89%) underwent total graft excision, and two patients (6%) underwent partial excision. Methods of reconstruction were in situ in 27 (75%) and extra-anatomic in nine (28%). Conduits used were Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), with or without rifampin, polytetrafluoroethylene, cryopreserved allograft, and femoral vein. Forty-nine organisms grew from operative cultures. Gram-positive organisms were the most common, found in 24 (67%), including Staphylococcus in 13 (36%) and Streptococcus in six (17%). Anaerobes were cultured in 6 patients (17%), gram-negative organisms in 6 (17%), and fungus in 5 (14%). Thirty-one patients (86%) received long-term antibiotics. Early complications included acute renal failure requiring dialysis, 12 (33%); respiratory failure, 3 (8%); bleeding, 4 (11%); and sepsis, 2 (6%). Six patients required re-exploration due to hematoma, infected hematoma, lymphatic leak, bowel perforation, open abdomen at initial operation, and anastomotic bleeding. Perioperative mortality was 8% (3 of 36), and long-term mortality was 25% (9 of 36) at a mean follow-up of 569 days (range, 0-3079 days). Type of reconstruction (in situ vs extra-anatomic) or conduit type did not affect perioperative or overall mortality. Conclusions I-EVAR is a rare but potentially devastating clinical problem. Although perioperative mortality is acceptable, long-term mortality is high. The most common postoperative complication was acute renal failure requiring dialysis. Although this is the largest series of I-EVAR, further studies are needed to understand the risk factors and preventive measures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26184753</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.440</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2015-10, Vol.62 (4), p.877-883
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717484758
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aorta, Abdominal - surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Comorbidity
Endovascular Procedures
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - mortality
Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
title A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicenter%20experience%20with%20the%20surgical%20treatment%20of%20infected%20abdominal%20aortic%20endografts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Davila,%20Victor%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=877&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=877-883&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.440&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717484758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717484758&rft_id=info:pmid/26184753&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521415010034&rfr_iscdi=true