Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes

Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental biology 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978
Hauptverfasser: Kurth, Jessica A, Kier, William M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2978
container_issue Pt 18
container_start_page 2970
container_title Journal of experimental biology
container_volume 218
creator Kurth, Jessica A
Kier, William M
description Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.
doi_str_mv 10.1242/jeb.119305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1717474379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtOwzAYRi0EoqWw8ADII0JK8S1xM6KWqyqxwBz58rt1lcTBTlT17WnVwrd8y9EZDkK3lEwpE-xxA3pKaclJfobGVEiZlVTk52hMCGMZKUU5Qlcpbch-RS4u0YgVjDNBZ2P0sfDOQYTWQMK-xcmo2rcrrFqLmxC7dajDaoc19FuAFtdDo6M33mJQsV9vQ2wwmNDvOkjX6MKpOsHN6Sfo--X5a_6WLT9f3-dPy8xwxvtMFXmpLRhnuDOklIQyCxIUEzOjqLCSc8W0hsIyRrhwhVWUSOtmuuCcmZJP0P3R28XwM0Dqq8YnA3WtWghDqqikUkjB5QF9OKImhpQiuKqLvlFxV1FSHdpV-3bVsd0evjt5B92A_Uf_YvFf6jRq3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717474379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><description>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.119305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26232418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Size ; Ecotype ; Locomotion - physiology ; Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology ; Oligochaeta - anatomy &amp; histology ; Oligochaeta - growth &amp; development ; Oligochaeta - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978</ispartof><rights>2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3678,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26232418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Ecotype</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - physiology</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtOwzAYRi0EoqWw8ADII0JK8S1xM6KWqyqxwBz58rt1lcTBTlT17WnVwrd8y9EZDkK3lEwpE-xxA3pKaclJfobGVEiZlVTk52hMCGMZKUU5Qlcpbch-RS4u0YgVjDNBZ2P0sfDOQYTWQMK-xcmo2rcrrFqLmxC7dajDaoc19FuAFtdDo6M33mJQsV9vQ2wwmNDvOkjX6MKpOsHN6Sfo--X5a_6WLT9f3-dPy8xwxvtMFXmpLRhnuDOklIQyCxIUEzOjqLCSc8W0hsIyRrhwhVWUSOtmuuCcmZJP0P3R28XwM0Dqq8YnA3WtWghDqqikUkjB5QF9OKImhpQiuKqLvlFxV1FSHdpV-3bVsd0evjt5B92A_Uf_YvFf6jRq3Q</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Kurth, Jessica A</creator><creator>Kier, William M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><author>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Ecotype</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurth, Jessica A</au><au>Kier, William M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>218</volume><issue>Pt 18</issue><spage>2970</spage><epage>2978</epage><pages>2970-2978</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><abstract>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26232418</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.119305</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0949
ispartof Journal of experimental biology, 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978
issn 0022-0949
1477-9145
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474379
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Company of Biologists
subjects Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Body Size
Ecotype
Locomotion - physiology
Muscles - anatomy & histology
Oligochaeta - anatomy & histology
Oligochaeta - growth & development
Oligochaeta - physiology
title Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20scaling%20and%20morphology%20between%20lumbricid%20earthworm%20ecotypes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=Kurth,%20Jessica%20A&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=218&rft.issue=Pt%2018&rft.spage=2970&rft.epage=2978&rft.pages=2970-2978&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.119305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717474379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717474379&rft_id=info:pmid/26232418&rfr_iscdi=true