Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes
Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental biology 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2978 |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt 18 |
container_start_page | 2970 |
container_title | Journal of experimental biology |
container_volume | 218 |
creator | Kurth, Jessica A Kier, William M |
description | Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1242/jeb.119305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1717474379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtOwzAYRi0EoqWw8ADII0JK8S1xM6KWqyqxwBz58rt1lcTBTlT17WnVwrd8y9EZDkK3lEwpE-xxA3pKaclJfobGVEiZlVTk52hMCGMZKUU5Qlcpbch-RS4u0YgVjDNBZ2P0sfDOQYTWQMK-xcmo2rcrrFqLmxC7dajDaoc19FuAFtdDo6M33mJQsV9vQ2wwmNDvOkjX6MKpOsHN6Sfo--X5a_6WLT9f3-dPy8xwxvtMFXmpLRhnuDOklIQyCxIUEzOjqLCSc8W0hsIyRrhwhVWUSOtmuuCcmZJP0P3R28XwM0Dqq8YnA3WtWghDqqikUkjB5QF9OKImhpQiuKqLvlFxV1FSHdpV-3bVsd0evjt5B92A_Uf_YvFf6jRq3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717474379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><description>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.119305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26232418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Body Size ; Ecotype ; Locomotion - physiology ; Muscles - anatomy & histology ; Oligochaeta - anatomy & histology ; Oligochaeta - growth & development ; Oligochaeta - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978</ispartof><rights>2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3678,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26232418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Ecotype</subject><subject>Locomotion - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - growth & development</subject><subject>Oligochaeta - physiology</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtOwzAYRi0EoqWw8ADII0JK8S1xM6KWqyqxwBz58rt1lcTBTlT17WnVwrd8y9EZDkK3lEwpE-xxA3pKaclJfobGVEiZlVTk52hMCGMZKUU5Qlcpbch-RS4u0YgVjDNBZ2P0sfDOQYTWQMK-xcmo2rcrrFqLmxC7dajDaoc19FuAFtdDo6M33mJQsV9vQ2wwmNDvOkjX6MKpOsHN6Sfo--X5a_6WLT9f3-dPy8xwxvtMFXmpLRhnuDOklIQyCxIUEzOjqLCSc8W0hsIyRrhwhVWUSOtmuuCcmZJP0P3R28XwM0Dqq8YnA3WtWghDqqikUkjB5QF9OKImhpQiuKqLvlFxV1FSHdpV-3bVsd0evjt5B92A_Uf_YvFf6jRq3Q</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Kurth, Jessica A</creator><creator>Kier, William M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</title><author>Kurth, Jessica A ; Kier, William M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a659bdecfc3fc097012de7ea248ca14d733a2bbe6d22034f6da107df8b6332c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Ecotype</topic><topic>Locomotion - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - growth & development</topic><topic>Oligochaeta - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurth, Jessica A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kier, William M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurth, Jessica A</au><au>Kier, William M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>218</volume><issue>Pt 18</issue><spage>2970</spage><epage>2978</epage><pages>2970-2978</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><abstract>Many soft-bodied invertebrates use a flexible, fluid-filled hydrostatic skeleton for burrowing. The aim of our study was to compare the scaling and morphology between surface-dwelling and burrowing earthworm ecotypes to explore the specializations of non-rigid musculoskeletal systems for burrowing locomotion. We compared the scaling of adult lumbricid earthworms across species and ecotypes to determine whether linear dimensions were significantly associated with ecotype. We also compared the ontogenetic scaling of a burrowing species, Lumbricus terrestris, and a surface-dwelling species, Eisenia fetida, using glycol methacrylate histology. We show that burrowing species are longer, thinner and have higher length-to-diameter ratios than non-burrowers, and that L. terrestris is thinner for any given body mass compared with E. fetida. We also found differences in the size of the musculature between the two species that may correlate with surface crawling or burrowing. Our results suggest that adaptations to burrowing for soft-bodied animals include a disproportionately thin body and strong longitudinal muscles.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26232418</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.119305</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0949 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental biology, 2015-09, Vol.218 (Pt 18), p.2970-2978 |
issn | 0022-0949 1477-9145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1717474379 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Company of Biologists |
subjects | Animals Biomechanical Phenomena Body Size Ecotype Locomotion - physiology Muscles - anatomy & histology Oligochaeta - anatomy & histology Oligochaeta - growth & development Oligochaeta - physiology |
title | Differences in scaling and morphology between lumbricid earthworm ecotypes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A38%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20scaling%20and%20morphology%20between%20lumbricid%20earthworm%20ecotypes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=Kurth,%20Jessica%20A&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=218&rft.issue=Pt%2018&rft.spage=2970&rft.epage=2978&rft.pages=2970-2978&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.119305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717474379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717474379&rft_id=info:pmid/26232418&rfr_iscdi=true |