Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey

SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275
Hauptverfasser: Davison, K. L., Reynolds, C. A., Andrews, N., Brailsford, S. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 4
container_start_page 265
container_title Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)
container_volume 25
creator Davison, K. L.
Reynolds, C. A.
Andrews, N.
Brailsford, S. R.
description SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors. Materials and methods The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders. Results The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall. Conclusion A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tme.12236
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1716940475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1716940475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtu1DAUhi1ERYeBBS-AvASJtL7EdrKkpQy9AF20Ymk5yXHHbRIH2zPDPADv0Wfpk5HptFU3HMk6kvX9n3R-hN5RskfH2U8d7FHGuHyBJpRLkXGaFy_RhJSiyJRQxS56HeM1IZSzkr1Cu0xyrgpJJujvDFJy_RUeIETfmxavXJrjqvW-wY3vfYh3t9ndbZoDDia5DQLY-vAJd5DmvvGtv1pjb7Hpm_Fhv4SwdLDafA0mJFe7wfQpYtfjjeTy9Lkcx0VYwvoN2rGmjfD2YU_R5deji8Nv2dnP2fHh57Os5mUhM1EzaoUiJaMcJJe1BGJoUylRWyqltFXFGc0Vy4FKq5Qscq4Er0VlCVGG8in6sPUOwf9eQEy6c7GGtjU9-EXUVFFZ5iQfQ1P0cYvWwccYwOohuM6EtaZEb1rXY-v6vvWRff-gXVQdNE_kY80jsL8FVq6F9f9N-uL70aMy2yZcTPDnKWHCjZZqPEr_-jHT4uDg_Et5LvUJ_wfgp50R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716940475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R. ; UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group ; on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors. Materials and methods The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders. Results The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall. Conclusion A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26337860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; blood donation ; blood donor ; Blood Donors - psychology ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Communicable Diseases - epidemiology ; compliance ; Confidentiality ; Cooperative Behavior ; Donor Selection ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Health Behavior ; Health Surveys - methods ; Humans ; Internet ; Male ; men who have sex with men ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Risk-Taking ; safety ; Self Report ; Sexual Behavior ; Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Travel ; Truth Disclosure ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275</ispartof><rights>2015 British Blood Transfusion Society</rights><rights>2015 British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailsford, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfusion Med</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors. Materials and methods The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders. Results The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall. Conclusion A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>blood donation</subject><subject>blood donor</subject><subject>Blood Donors - psychology</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Donor Selection</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Surveys - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>men who have sex with men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtu1DAUhi1ERYeBBS-AvASJtL7EdrKkpQy9AF20Ymk5yXHHbRIH2zPDPADv0Wfpk5HptFU3HMk6kvX9n3R-hN5RskfH2U8d7FHGuHyBJpRLkXGaFy_RhJSiyJRQxS56HeM1IZSzkr1Cu0xyrgpJJujvDFJy_RUeIETfmxavXJrjqvW-wY3vfYh3t9ndbZoDDia5DQLY-vAJd5DmvvGtv1pjb7Hpm_Fhv4SwdLDafA0mJFe7wfQpYtfjjeTy9Lkcx0VYwvoN2rGmjfD2YU_R5deji8Nv2dnP2fHh57Os5mUhM1EzaoUiJaMcJJe1BGJoUylRWyqltFXFGc0Vy4FKq5Qscq4Er0VlCVGG8in6sPUOwf9eQEy6c7GGtjU9-EXUVFFZ5iQfQ1P0cYvWwccYwOohuM6EtaZEb1rXY-v6vvWRff-gXVQdNE_kY80jsL8FVq6F9f9N-uL70aMy2yZcTPDnKWHCjZZqPEr_-jHT4uDg_Et5LvUJ_wfgp50R</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Davison, K. L.</creator><creator>Reynolds, C. A.</creator><creator>Andrews, N.</creator><creator>Brailsford, S. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><author>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>blood donation</topic><topic>blood donor</topic><topic>Blood Donors - psychology</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Donor Selection</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Surveys - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>men who have sex with men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailsford, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davison, K. L.</au><au>Reynolds, C. A.</au><au>Andrews, N.</au><au>Brailsford, S. R.</au><aucorp>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</aucorp><aucorp>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion Med</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>265-275</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors. Materials and methods The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders. Results The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall. Conclusion A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26337860</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12236</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-7578
ispartof Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275
issn 0958-7578
1365-3148
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1716940475
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
blood donation
blood donor
Blood Donors - psychology
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Communicable Diseases - epidemiology
compliance
Confidentiality
Cooperative Behavior
Donor Selection
Feasibility Studies
Female
Focus Groups
Health Behavior
Health Surveys - methods
Humans
Internet
Male
men who have sex with men
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Risk-Taking
safety
Self Report
Sexual Behavior
Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology
survey
Surveys and Questionnaires
Travel
Truth Disclosure
United Kingdom
Young Adult
title Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20personal%20with%20blood%20donors%C2%A0-%C2%A0the%20rationale%20for,%20methodology%20of%20and%20an%20overview%20of%20participants%20in%20the%20UK%20blood%20donor%20survey&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Davison,%20K.%20L.&rft.aucorp=UK%20Blood%20Donor%20Survey%20Steering%20Group&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=265-275&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1716940475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716940475&rft_id=info:pmid/26337860&rfr_iscdi=true