Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey
SUMMARY Objective To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG). Background Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Davison, K. L. Reynolds, C. A. Andrews, N. Brailsford, S. R. |
description | SUMMARY
Objective
To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG).
Background
Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors.
Materials and methods
The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders.
Results
The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall.
Conclusion
A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tme.12236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1716940475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1716940475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtu1DAUhi1ERYeBBS-AvASJtL7EdrKkpQy9AF20Ymk5yXHHbRIH2zPDPADv0Wfpk5HptFU3HMk6kvX9n3R-hN5RskfH2U8d7FHGuHyBJpRLkXGaFy_RhJSiyJRQxS56HeM1IZSzkr1Cu0xyrgpJJujvDFJy_RUeIETfmxavXJrjqvW-wY3vfYh3t9ndbZoDDia5DQLY-vAJd5DmvvGtv1pjb7Hpm_Fhv4SwdLDafA0mJFe7wfQpYtfjjeTy9Lkcx0VYwvoN2rGmjfD2YU_R5deji8Nv2dnP2fHh57Os5mUhM1EzaoUiJaMcJJe1BGJoUylRWyqltFXFGc0Vy4FKq5Qscq4Er0VlCVGG8in6sPUOwf9eQEy6c7GGtjU9-EXUVFFZ5iQfQ1P0cYvWwccYwOohuM6EtaZEb1rXY-v6vvWRff-gXVQdNE_kY80jsL8FVq6F9f9N-uL70aMy2yZcTPDnKWHCjZZqPEr_-jHT4uDg_Et5LvUJ_wfgp50R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716940475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R. ; UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group ; on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
Objective
To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG).
Background
Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors.
Materials and methods
The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders.
Results
The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall.
Conclusion
A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26337860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; blood donation ; blood donor ; Blood Donors - psychology ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Communicable Diseases - epidemiology ; compliance ; Confidentiality ; Cooperative Behavior ; Donor Selection ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Focus Groups ; Health Behavior ; Health Surveys - methods ; Humans ; Internet ; Male ; men who have sex with men ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Risk-Taking ; safety ; Self Report ; Sexual Behavior ; Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Travel ; Truth Disclosure ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275</ispartof><rights>2015 British Blood Transfusion Society</rights><rights>2015 British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12236$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailsford, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfusion Med</addtitle><description>SUMMARY
Objective
To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG).
Background
Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors.
Materials and methods
The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders.
Results
The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall.
Conclusion
A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>blood donation</subject><subject>blood donor</subject><subject>Blood Donors - psychology</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>compliance</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Donor Selection</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Surveys - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>men who have sex with men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Risk-Taking</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtu1DAUhi1ERYeBBS-AvASJtL7EdrKkpQy9AF20Ymk5yXHHbRIH2zPDPADv0Wfpk5HptFU3HMk6kvX9n3R-hN5RskfH2U8d7FHGuHyBJpRLkXGaFy_RhJSiyJRQxS56HeM1IZSzkr1Cu0xyrgpJJujvDFJy_RUeIETfmxavXJrjqvW-wY3vfYh3t9ndbZoDDia5DQLY-vAJd5DmvvGtv1pjb7Hpm_Fhv4SwdLDafA0mJFe7wfQpYtfjjeTy9Lkcx0VYwvoN2rGmjfD2YU_R5deji8Nv2dnP2fHh57Os5mUhM1EzaoUiJaMcJJe1BGJoUylRWyqltFXFGc0Vy4FKq5Qscq4Er0VlCVGG8in6sPUOwf9eQEy6c7GGtjU9-EXUVFFZ5iQfQ1P0cYvWwccYwOohuM6EtaZEb1rXY-v6vvWRff-gXVQdNE_kY80jsL8FVq6F9f9N-uL70aMy2yZcTPDnKWHCjZZqPEr_-jHT4uDg_Et5LvUJ_wfgp50R</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Davison, K. L.</creator><creator>Reynolds, C. A.</creator><creator>Andrews, N.</creator><creator>Brailsford, S. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</title><author>Davison, K. L. ; Reynolds, C. A. ; Andrews, N. ; Brailsford, S. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3986-5c21f5709213e636c6e0a1db75cf1666fbb3214724e16f776843753c5bf007a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>blood donation</topic><topic>blood donor</topic><topic>Blood Donors - psychology</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Communicable Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>compliance</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Donor Selection</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Surveys - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>men who have sex with men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Risk-Taking</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davison, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailsford, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davison, K. L.</au><au>Reynolds, C. A.</au><au>Andrews, N.</au><au>Brailsford, S. R.</au><aucorp>UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</aucorp><aucorp>on Behalf of the UK Blood Donor Survey Steering Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion Med</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>265-275</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY
Objective
To design and pilot a survey of UK blood donors to assess, on a large scale, their understanding of and compliance with the donor selection guidelines (DSG).
Background
Compliance with the DSG is important for maintaining blood safety, however, little is currently known about the extent of this among UK donors.
Materials and methods
The online, unlinked survey was based on the donor health check form with a focus on behaviours associated with blood borne infections, sexual contact, drug use and travel. The survey materials were reviewed by a donor focus group and the survey was piloted among 2982 UK donors. Percentage responses were calculated, complaints monitored and answers to questions reviewed. The survey went live in 2013; 225 091 donors were invited via email to participate followed by two reminders.
Results
The survey was well received by the focus group, with little concern about the sensitive and personal questions. Their feedback led to important refinement in the survey materials. In the pilots, 21·0% (627/2982) responded, a reminder was necessary to achieve this. Among responders, there was evidence of non‐compliance and test seeking behaviour, and no evidence that intention to donate again was affected. In the live survey, 29% (65 439) responded; responders were generally representative of donors overall.
Conclusion
A large scale survey of donor compliances is feasible, acceptable and effective in ascertaining appropriate information; involving donors and the blood services in the development stages through a focus group and pilots was important to achieve this.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26337860</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12236</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-7578 |
ispartof | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2015-08, Vol.25 (4), p.265-275 |
issn | 0958-7578 1365-3148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1716940475 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult blood donation blood donor Blood Donors - psychology Blood-Borne Pathogens Communicable Diseases - epidemiology compliance Confidentiality Cooperative Behavior Donor Selection Feasibility Studies Female Focus Groups Health Behavior Health Surveys - methods Humans Internet Male men who have sex with men Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care Risk-Taking safety Self Report Sexual Behavior Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology survey Surveys and Questionnaires Travel Truth Disclosure United Kingdom Young Adult |
title | Getting personal with blood donors - the rationale for, methodology of and an overview of participants in the UK blood donor survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20personal%20with%20blood%20donors%C2%A0-%C2%A0the%20rationale%20for,%20methodology%20of%20and%20an%20overview%20of%20participants%20in%20the%20UK%20blood%20donor%20survey&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Davison,%20K.%20L.&rft.aucorp=UK%20Blood%20Donor%20Survey%20Steering%20Group&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=265-275&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1716940475%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716940475&rft_id=info:pmid/26337860&rfr_iscdi=true |