Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon

We explored patterns of flight activity, flocking, and habitat use in a diverse community of parrots in an Amazonian lowland forest. Parrots were most active just after sunrise with a second peak of flight activity following a mid-day lull. Brotogeris spp. were exceptional, being most active in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 1998-11, Vol.100 (4), p.641-653
Hauptverfasser: Gilardi, James D., Munn, Charles A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 653
container_issue 4
container_start_page 641
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 100
creator Gilardi, James D.
Munn, Charles A.
description We explored patterns of flight activity, flocking, and habitat use in a diverse community of parrots in an Amazonian lowland forest. Parrots were most active just after sunrise with a second peak of flight activity following a mid-day lull. Brotogeris spp. were exceptional, being most active in the early afternoon. Among the nine genera studied, we observed marked differences in where the birds flew relative to the canopy. Body size was a poor predictor of flight height, although it was strongly and inversely correlated with flock size. Most parrot species flew in groups of one to four individuals, suggesting that mated pairs are stable and that family groups remain together post-fledging. Flocks were exclusively monospecific except when the birds were foraging in trees or eating soil at clay licks. These forest-dwelling parrots did not show dramatic increases in flock size in the evening, reflecting the lack of communal and multispecies roosting observed in other parrots. Generally, the large- and mid-sized species of parrots were associated with high-ground forest, whereas smaller species favored transitional forest. Because daily ranging patterns for these parrots potentially include all habitats, these patterns of habitat use suggest selection for subtle differences among forest types. As expected, smaller species were less detectable at a distance than large species. Comparisons of size and detectability indicate that macaws can be reliably counted to a distance of 300 m, but 100 m may be more appropriate for the smaller and low-flying genera. In sum, we found that observing parrots from the canopy is a useful method for quantifying parrot activities in a closed-canopy system, and that these forest-dwelling parrots are markedly less social than their counterparts on islands and in more open habitats. Patterns of flight behavior, habitat preferences, and the body size to flock size relationship invite further studies on the roles of predation and resource availability in the structuring of parrot communities.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1369745
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17161069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1369745</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1369745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7304bcb8f24b9abd24bb3bce538b0fefe5e773c003bcf729d30358e96f7af2013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4KI3qyaj7ZpLsdwThg4wV2XJEs0s0s0SQfz19u5gSJ49XIOz3k4vACcY3RDKGK3mJac5cUB6GFOq6zAhB-CHkIYZUVOyDE4iXGJupnkpAeeZiIlHVyE3sChSnZt02YAx41Xb9a9DKBwCzgR0iaR4DxqaB2ciRB8-r5IrxrOdGjXVjg4XIlP707BkRFN1Gf77IP5-O55NMmmj_cPo-E0U5SRlDGKcqlkZUguuZCLLiSVShe0kshoowvNGFUIdUvDCF9QRItK89IwYQjCtA-udt734D9aHVO9slHpphFO-zbWmOESo5J34MUfcOnb4LrfaoK7Fkpebm3XO0gFH2PQpn4PdiXCpsao3vZa73vtyMu9TkQlGhOEUzb-4CUrGP6FLWPy4V_bF4gPgGI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211246961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive</source><creator>Gilardi, James D. ; Munn, Charles A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, James D. ; Munn, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><description>We explored patterns of flight activity, flocking, and habitat use in a diverse community of parrots in an Amazonian lowland forest. Parrots were most active just after sunrise with a second peak of flight activity following a mid-day lull. Brotogeris spp. were exceptional, being most active in the early afternoon. Among the nine genera studied, we observed marked differences in where the birds flew relative to the canopy. Body size was a poor predictor of flight height, although it was strongly and inversely correlated with flock size. Most parrot species flew in groups of one to four individuals, suggesting that mated pairs are stable and that family groups remain together post-fledging. Flocks were exclusively monospecific except when the birds were foraging in trees or eating soil at clay licks. These forest-dwelling parrots did not show dramatic increases in flock size in the evening, reflecting the lack of communal and multispecies roosting observed in other parrots. Generally, the large- and mid-sized species of parrots were associated with high-ground forest, whereas smaller species favored transitional forest. Because daily ranging patterns for these parrots potentially include all habitats, these patterns of habitat use suggest selection for subtle differences among forest types. As expected, smaller species were less detectable at a distance than large species. Comparisons of size and detectability indicate that macaws can be reliably counted to a distance of 300 m, but 100 m may be more appropriate for the smaller and low-flying genera. In sum, we found that observing parrots from the canopy is a useful method for quantifying parrot activities in a closed-canopy system, and that these forest-dwelling parrots are markedly less social than their counterparts on islands and in more open habitats. Patterns of flight behavior, habitat preferences, and the body size to flock size relationship invite further studies on the roles of predation and resource availability in the structuring of parrot communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1369745</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Clara, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Aerial locomotion ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird migration ; Birds ; Body size ; Flocks ; Forest canopy ; Forest habitats ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat preferences ; Habitat selection ; Habitat utilization ; Ornithology ; Parrots ; Psittacidae ; Vertebrata ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1998-11, Vol.100 (4), p.641-653</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cooper Ornithological Society Nov 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7304bcb8f24b9abd24bb3bce538b0fefe5e773c003bcf729d30358e96f7af2013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7304bcb8f24b9abd24bb3bce538b0fefe5e773c003bcf729d30358e96f7af2013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1369745$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1369745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1675715$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munn, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>We explored patterns of flight activity, flocking, and habitat use in a diverse community of parrots in an Amazonian lowland forest. Parrots were most active just after sunrise with a second peak of flight activity following a mid-day lull. Brotogeris spp. were exceptional, being most active in the early afternoon. Among the nine genera studied, we observed marked differences in where the birds flew relative to the canopy. Body size was a poor predictor of flight height, although it was strongly and inversely correlated with flock size. Most parrot species flew in groups of one to four individuals, suggesting that mated pairs are stable and that family groups remain together post-fledging. Flocks were exclusively monospecific except when the birds were foraging in trees or eating soil at clay licks. These forest-dwelling parrots did not show dramatic increases in flock size in the evening, reflecting the lack of communal and multispecies roosting observed in other parrots. Generally, the large- and mid-sized species of parrots were associated with high-ground forest, whereas smaller species favored transitional forest. Because daily ranging patterns for these parrots potentially include all habitats, these patterns of habitat use suggest selection for subtle differences among forest types. As expected, smaller species were less detectable at a distance than large species. Comparisons of size and detectability indicate that macaws can be reliably counted to a distance of 300 m, but 100 m may be more appropriate for the smaller and low-flying genera. In sum, we found that observing parrots from the canopy is a useful method for quantifying parrot activities in a closed-canopy system, and that these forest-dwelling parrots are markedly less social than their counterparts on islands and in more open habitats. Patterns of flight behavior, habitat preferences, and the body size to flock size relationship invite further studies on the roles of predation and resource availability in the structuring of parrot communities.</description><subject>Aerial locomotion</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Flocks</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Parrots</subject><subject>Psittacidae</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4F4KI3qyaj7ZpLsdwThg4wV2XJEs0s0s0SQfz19u5gSJ49XIOz3k4vACcY3RDKGK3mJac5cUB6GFOq6zAhB-CHkIYZUVOyDE4iXGJupnkpAeeZiIlHVyE3sChSnZt02YAx41Xb9a9DKBwCzgR0iaR4DxqaB2ciRB8-r5IrxrOdGjXVjg4XIlP707BkRFN1Gf77IP5-O55NMmmj_cPo-E0U5SRlDGKcqlkZUguuZCLLiSVShe0kshoowvNGFUIdUvDCF9QRItK89IwYQjCtA-udt734D9aHVO9slHpphFO-zbWmOESo5J34MUfcOnb4LrfaoK7Fkpebm3XO0gFH2PQpn4PdiXCpsao3vZa73vtyMu9TkQlGhOEUzb-4CUrGP6FLWPy4V_bF4gPgGI</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>Gilardi, James D.</creator><creator>Munn, Charles A.</creator><general>Cooper Ornithological Society</general><general>Cooper Ornithological Club</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon</title><author>Gilardi, James D. ; Munn, Charles A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7304bcb8f24b9abd24bb3bce538b0fefe5e773c003bcf729d30358e96f7af2013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aerial locomotion</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Flocks</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Parrots</topic><topic>Psittacidae</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilardi, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munn, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilardi, James D.</au><au>Munn, Charles A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>641-653</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>We explored patterns of flight activity, flocking, and habitat use in a diverse community of parrots in an Amazonian lowland forest. Parrots were most active just after sunrise with a second peak of flight activity following a mid-day lull. Brotogeris spp. were exceptional, being most active in the early afternoon. Among the nine genera studied, we observed marked differences in where the birds flew relative to the canopy. Body size was a poor predictor of flight height, although it was strongly and inversely correlated with flock size. Most parrot species flew in groups of one to four individuals, suggesting that mated pairs are stable and that family groups remain together post-fledging. Flocks were exclusively monospecific except when the birds were foraging in trees or eating soil at clay licks. These forest-dwelling parrots did not show dramatic increases in flock size in the evening, reflecting the lack of communal and multispecies roosting observed in other parrots. Generally, the large- and mid-sized species of parrots were associated with high-ground forest, whereas smaller species favored transitional forest. Because daily ranging patterns for these parrots potentially include all habitats, these patterns of habitat use suggest selection for subtle differences among forest types. As expected, smaller species were less detectable at a distance than large species. Comparisons of size and detectability indicate that macaws can be reliably counted to a distance of 300 m, but 100 m may be more appropriate for the smaller and low-flying genera. In sum, we found that observing parrots from the canopy is a useful method for quantifying parrot activities in a closed-canopy system, and that these forest-dwelling parrots are markedly less social than their counterparts on islands and in more open habitats. Patterns of flight behavior, habitat preferences, and the body size to flock size relationship invite further studies on the roles of predation and resource availability in the structuring of parrot communities.</abstract><cop>Santa Clara, CA</cop><pub>Cooper Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1369745</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 1998-11, Vol.100 (4), p.641-653
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17161069
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive
subjects Aerial locomotion
Animal and plant ecology
Animal behavior
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Bird migration
Birds
Body size
Flocks
Forest canopy
Forest habitats
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat preferences
Habitat selection
Habitat utilization
Ornithology
Parrots
Psittacidae
Vertebrata
Wildlife habitats
title Patterns of Activity, Flocking, and Habitat Use in Parrots of the Peruvian Amazon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A47%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20Activity,%20Flocking,%20and%20Habitat%20Use%20in%20Parrots%20of%20the%20Peruvian%20Amazon&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Gilardi,%20James%20D.&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=641-653&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1369745&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1369745%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211246961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1369745&rfr_iscdi=true