Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015

Objective The task of this working group was to assess the existing knowledge in computer‐assisted implant planning and placement, fabrication of reconstructions applying computers compared to traditional fabrication, and assessments of treatment outcomes using novel imaging techniques. Material and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2015-09, Vol.26 (S11), p.97-101
Hauptverfasser: Hämmerle, Christoph H. F., Cordaro, Luca, van Assche, Nele, Benic, Goran I., Bornstein, Michael, Gamper, Felix, Gotfredsen, Klaus, Harris, David, Hürzeler, Marc, Jacobs, Reinhilde, Kapos, Theodoros, Kohal, Ralf J., Patzelt, Sebastian B. M., Sailer, Irena, Tahmaseb, Ali, Vercruyssen, Marjolein, Wismeijer, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The task of this working group was to assess the existing knowledge in computer‐assisted implant planning and placement, fabrication of reconstructions applying computers compared to traditional fabrication, and assessments of treatment outcomes using novel imaging techniques. Material and methods Three reviews were available for assessing the current literature and provided the basis for the discussions and the consensus report. One review dealt with the use of computers to plan implant therapy and to place implants in partially and fully edentulous patients. A second one focused on novel techniques and methods to assess treatment outcomes and the third compared CAD/CAM‐fabricated reconstructions to conventionally fabricated ones. Results The consensus statements, the clinical recommendations, and the implications for research, all of them after approval by the plenum of the consensus conference, are described in this article. The three articles by Vercruyssen et al., Patzelt & Kohal, and Benic et al. are presented separately as part of the supplement of this consensus conference.
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/clr.12648