Femoral cortical index: an indicator of poor bone quality in patient with hip fracture

Background Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly, characterized by poor bone quality as a result of alterations affecting trabecular bone. However, recent studies have described also an important role of alterations of cortical bone in the physiopathology of osteoporosis. Although dual-energy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aging clinical and experimental research 2015-10, Vol.27 (Suppl 1), p.45-50
Hauptverfasser: Feola, M., Rao, C., Tempesta, V., Gasbarra, E., Tarantino, U.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly, characterized by poor bone quality as a result of alterations affecting trabecular bone. However, recent studies have described also an important role of alterations of cortical bone in the physiopathology of osteoporosis. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a valid method to assess bone mineral density, in the presence of comorbidities real bone fragility is unable to be evaluated. The number of hip fractures is rising, especially in people over 85 years old. Aims The aim is to evaluate an alternative method so that it can indicate fracture risk, independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Femoral cortical index (FCI) assesses cortical bone stock using femur X-ray. Methods A retrospective study has been conducted on 152 patients with hip fragility fractures. FCI has been calculated on fractured femur and on the opposite side. The presence of comorbidities, osteoporosis risk factors, vitamin D levels, and BMD have been analyzed for each patient. Results Average values of FCI have been 0.42 for fractured femurs and 0.48 at the opposite side with a statistically significant difference ( p  = 0.002). Patients with severe hypovitaminosis D had a minor FCI compared to those with moderate deficiency (0.41 vs. 0.46, p  
ISSN:1720-8319
1594-0667
1720-8319
DOI:10.1007/s40520-015-0423-3