The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland

Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) densities have declined dramatically throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes after the introduction of dreissenid mussels (Mollusca: Dreissenidae). Recent surveys in some Great Lake coastal wetlands have found abundant unionid populations, but the factors that reduce zebr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2005-08, Vol.545 (1), p.93-102
Hauptverfasser: BOWERS, Richard, SUDOMIR, Judy C, KERSHNER, Mark W, DE SZALAY, Ferenc A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 545
creator BOWERS, Richard
SUDOMIR, Judy C
KERSHNER, Mark W
DE SZALAY, Ferenc A
description Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) densities have declined dramatically throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes after the introduction of dreissenid mussels (Mollusca: Dreissenidae). Recent surveys in some Great Lake coastal wetlands have found abundant unionid populations, but the factors that reduce zebra mussels on unionids in these habitats are not well understood. In 2001-2002, we tested effects of predation and unionid burrowing on corbiculids, sphaeriids and dreissenids in a Great Lake coastal wetland in western Lake Erie. In one experiment, we reduced access by molluscivores using exclosures with two mesh sizes (1.3 cm × 1.3 cm; 5 cm × 10 cm) and sampled bivalves after 15 months. Small mesh exclosures had higher numbers of dreissenids, Corbicula fluminea and sphaeriids (54.9, 3.8, 22.6 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than large mesh exclosures (0.0, 1.13, 0.13 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) or open controls (0.3, 1.0, 0.1 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively). Numbers of dreissenids on C. fluminea were higher in small mesh exclosures (3.8 dreissenids/Corbicula) than in large mesh exclosures (0.1 dreissenids/Corbicula) or cageless controls (0dreissenids/Corbicula). In a second experiment, we held two species of live unionids (Leptodea fragilis, Quadrula quadrula) and immobile Pyganodon grandis shells in exclosures (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm mesh) with either 5 cm, 10 cm, or 20 cm deep sediments and sampled bivalves after 2 months. There were fewer dreissenids on L. fragilis than P. grandis shells, but there was no difference in the number of dreissenids on Q. quadrula and P. grandis shells. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher inside (189-494 dreissenids/unionid) than outside (8-11 dreissenids/unionid) exclosures, and densities of sphaeriid and C. fluminea clams were also higher inside (21.8, 4.7 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than outside (0.4, 0.9 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) exclosures. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher on unionids that could burrow below the sediments (20 cm depth) than unionids in shallow sediments (5 cm depth) for unexplained reasons. Our data suggest that molluscivores can play a pivotal role in limiting numbers of bivalves including dreissenids in coastal wetlands.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-005-2212-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17149095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222878871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f497ad2057896992a4bd26ef36faed3f7a42c3e7da71f58455d3d37d289f2bd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFsQ9LaaP5tmcxTRKhS86DlMNxNN3e7WJKvopzelguBphpnfewzzCDnl7JIzpq8SZ1qxijFVCcFF9b1HJlxpWSnO9T6ZMMabquGqOSRHKa1Y0RjBJmTz9IoUvcc2Jzp4uonoIIehp9A7OvalC44uxxiHz9C_0LJYhg_oPpC2w3pdgBww0VB4uoAxYp8D9HQeEXIZvG0xSBk6-om5K57H5MBDl_Dkt07J893t0819tXicP9xcL6pWSpkrXxsNTjClGzMzRkC9dGKGXs48oJNeQy1aidqB5l41tVJOOqmdaIwXS2fklFzsfDdxeB8xZbsOqcWu3IDDmCzXvDbMqAKe_QNXwxj7cpttyidVI5UsEN9BbRxSiujtJoY1xC_Lmd0GYHcB2BKA3QZgv4vm_NcYUgudj9C3If0JNVNMz4z8ARIUhwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821258353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>BOWERS, Richard ; SUDOMIR, Judy C ; KERSHNER, Mark W ; DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</creator><creatorcontrib>BOWERS, Richard ; SUDOMIR, Judy C ; KERSHNER, Mark W ; DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</creatorcontrib><description>Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) densities have declined dramatically throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes after the introduction of dreissenid mussels (Mollusca: Dreissenidae). Recent surveys in some Great Lake coastal wetlands have found abundant unionid populations, but the factors that reduce zebra mussels on unionids in these habitats are not well understood. In 2001-2002, we tested effects of predation and unionid burrowing on corbiculids, sphaeriids and dreissenids in a Great Lake coastal wetland in western Lake Erie. In one experiment, we reduced access by molluscivores using exclosures with two mesh sizes (1.3 cm × 1.3 cm; 5 cm × 10 cm) and sampled bivalves after 15 months. Small mesh exclosures had higher numbers of dreissenids, Corbicula fluminea and sphaeriids (54.9, 3.8, 22.6 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than large mesh exclosures (0.0, 1.13, 0.13 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) or open controls (0.3, 1.0, 0.1 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively). Numbers of dreissenids on C. fluminea were higher in small mesh exclosures (3.8 dreissenids/Corbicula) than in large mesh exclosures (0.1 dreissenids/Corbicula) or cageless controls (0dreissenids/Corbicula). In a second experiment, we held two species of live unionids (Leptodea fragilis, Quadrula quadrula) and immobile Pyganodon grandis shells in exclosures (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm mesh) with either 5 cm, 10 cm, or 20 cm deep sediments and sampled bivalves after 2 months. There were fewer dreissenids on L. fragilis than P. grandis shells, but there was no difference in the number of dreissenids on Q. quadrula and P. grandis shells. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher inside (189-494 dreissenids/unionid) than outside (8-11 dreissenids/unionid) exclosures, and densities of sphaeriid and C. fluminea clams were also higher inside (21.8, 4.7 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than outside (0.4, 0.9 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) exclosures. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher on unionids that could burrow below the sediments (20 cm depth) than unionids in shallow sediments (5 cm depth) for unexplained reasons. Our data suggest that molluscivores can play a pivotal role in limiting numbers of bivalves including dreissenids in coastal wetlands.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-2212-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Corbicula fluminea ; Dreissenidae ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Invertebrates ; Lakes ; Leptodea fragilis ; Mollusca ; Mollusks ; Pyganodon grandis ; Quadrula ; Quadrula quadrula ; Sediments ; Synecology ; Unionidae ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2005-08, Vol.545 (1), p.93-102</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f497ad2057896992a4bd26ef36faed3f7a42c3e7da71f58455d3d37d289f2bd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f497ad2057896992a4bd26ef36faed3f7a42c3e7da71f58455d3d37d289f2bd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17050769$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOWERS, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUDOMIR, Judy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERSHNER, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) densities have declined dramatically throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes after the introduction of dreissenid mussels (Mollusca: Dreissenidae). Recent surveys in some Great Lake coastal wetlands have found abundant unionid populations, but the factors that reduce zebra mussels on unionids in these habitats are not well understood. In 2001-2002, we tested effects of predation and unionid burrowing on corbiculids, sphaeriids and dreissenids in a Great Lake coastal wetland in western Lake Erie. In one experiment, we reduced access by molluscivores using exclosures with two mesh sizes (1.3 cm × 1.3 cm; 5 cm × 10 cm) and sampled bivalves after 15 months. Small mesh exclosures had higher numbers of dreissenids, Corbicula fluminea and sphaeriids (54.9, 3.8, 22.6 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than large mesh exclosures (0.0, 1.13, 0.13 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) or open controls (0.3, 1.0, 0.1 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively). Numbers of dreissenids on C. fluminea were higher in small mesh exclosures (3.8 dreissenids/Corbicula) than in large mesh exclosures (0.1 dreissenids/Corbicula) or cageless controls (0dreissenids/Corbicula). In a second experiment, we held two species of live unionids (Leptodea fragilis, Quadrula quadrula) and immobile Pyganodon grandis shells in exclosures (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm mesh) with either 5 cm, 10 cm, or 20 cm deep sediments and sampled bivalves after 2 months. There were fewer dreissenids on L. fragilis than P. grandis shells, but there was no difference in the number of dreissenids on Q. quadrula and P. grandis shells. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher inside (189-494 dreissenids/unionid) than outside (8-11 dreissenids/unionid) exclosures, and densities of sphaeriid and C. fluminea clams were also higher inside (21.8, 4.7 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than outside (0.4, 0.9 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) exclosures. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher on unionids that could burrow below the sediments (20 cm depth) than unionids in shallow sediments (5 cm depth) for unexplained reasons. Our data suggest that molluscivores can play a pivotal role in limiting numbers of bivalves including dreissenids in coastal wetlands.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Corbicula fluminea</subject><subject>Dreissenidae</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Leptodea fragilis</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Pyganodon grandis</subject><subject>Quadrula</subject><subject>Quadrula quadrula</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Unionidae</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFsQ9LaaP5tmcxTRKhS86DlMNxNN3e7WJKvopzelguBphpnfewzzCDnl7JIzpq8SZ1qxijFVCcFF9b1HJlxpWSnO9T6ZMMabquGqOSRHKa1Y0RjBJmTz9IoUvcc2Jzp4uonoIIehp9A7OvalC44uxxiHz9C_0LJYhg_oPpC2w3pdgBww0VB4uoAxYp8D9HQeEXIZvG0xSBk6-om5K57H5MBDl_Dkt07J893t0819tXicP9xcL6pWSpkrXxsNTjClGzMzRkC9dGKGXs48oJNeQy1aidqB5l41tVJOOqmdaIwXS2fklFzsfDdxeB8xZbsOqcWu3IDDmCzXvDbMqAKe_QNXwxj7cpttyidVI5UsEN9BbRxSiujtJoY1xC_Lmd0GYHcB2BKA3QZgv4vm_NcYUgudj9C3If0JNVNMz4z8ARIUhwM</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>BOWERS, Richard</creator><creator>SUDOMIR, Judy C</creator><creator>KERSHNER, Mark W</creator><creator>DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland</title><author>BOWERS, Richard ; SUDOMIR, Judy C ; KERSHNER, Mark W ; DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-f497ad2057896992a4bd26ef36faed3f7a42c3e7da71f58455d3d37d289f2bd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Corbicula fluminea</topic><topic>Dreissenidae</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Leptodea fragilis</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Pyganodon grandis</topic><topic>Quadrula</topic><topic>Quadrula quadrula</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Unionidae</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOWERS, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUDOMIR, Judy C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERSHNER, Mark W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOWERS, Richard</au><au>SUDOMIR, Judy C</au><au>KERSHNER, Mark W</au><au>DE SZALAY, Ferenc A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>545</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>93-102</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>Unionid (Mollusca: Unionidae) densities have declined dramatically throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes after the introduction of dreissenid mussels (Mollusca: Dreissenidae). Recent surveys in some Great Lake coastal wetlands have found abundant unionid populations, but the factors that reduce zebra mussels on unionids in these habitats are not well understood. In 2001-2002, we tested effects of predation and unionid burrowing on corbiculids, sphaeriids and dreissenids in a Great Lake coastal wetland in western Lake Erie. In one experiment, we reduced access by molluscivores using exclosures with two mesh sizes (1.3 cm × 1.3 cm; 5 cm × 10 cm) and sampled bivalves after 15 months. Small mesh exclosures had higher numbers of dreissenids, Corbicula fluminea and sphaeriids (54.9, 3.8, 22.6 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than large mesh exclosures (0.0, 1.13, 0.13 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) or open controls (0.3, 1.0, 0.1 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively). Numbers of dreissenids on C. fluminea were higher in small mesh exclosures (3.8 dreissenids/Corbicula) than in large mesh exclosures (0.1 dreissenids/Corbicula) or cageless controls (0dreissenids/Corbicula). In a second experiment, we held two species of live unionids (Leptodea fragilis, Quadrula quadrula) and immobile Pyganodon grandis shells in exclosures (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm mesh) with either 5 cm, 10 cm, or 20 cm deep sediments and sampled bivalves after 2 months. There were fewer dreissenids on L. fragilis than P. grandis shells, but there was no difference in the number of dreissenids on Q. quadrula and P. grandis shells. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher inside (189-494 dreissenids/unionid) than outside (8-11 dreissenids/unionid) exclosures, and densities of sphaeriid and C. fluminea clams were also higher inside (21.8, 4.7 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) than outside (0.4, 0.9 individuals/m^sup 2^, respectively) exclosures. Numbers of attached dreissenids were higher on unionids that could burrow below the sediments (20 cm depth) than unionids in shallow sediments (5 cm depth) for unexplained reasons. Our data suggest that molluscivores can play a pivotal role in limiting numbers of bivalves including dreissenids in coastal wetlands.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-005-2212-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2005-08, Vol.545 (1), p.93-102
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17149095
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Corbicula fluminea
Dreissenidae
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Invertebrates
Lakes
Leptodea fragilis
Mollusca
Mollusks
Pyganodon grandis
Quadrula
Quadrula quadrula
Sediments
Synecology
Unionidae
Wetlands
title The effects of predation and unionid burrowing on bivalve communities in a Laurentian Great Lake coastal wetland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20predation%20and%20unionid%20burrowing%20on%20bivalve%20communities%20in%20a%20Laurentian%20Great%20Lake%20coastal%20wetland&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=BOWERS,%20Richard&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=545&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=93-102&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-005-2212-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2222878871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821258353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true