Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK

Attempts are being made to restore heathland and acid grassland on arable land at the Minsmere reserve of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Experiments were conducted to acidify the arable soils (pH 6–7) to heathland levels (pH 3.5–4) by the addition of varying amounts of element...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological conservation 1999, Vol.87 (1), p.105-121
Hauptverfasser: Owen, K.M, Marrs, R.H, Snow, C.S.R, Evans, C.E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 1
container_start_page 105
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 87
creator Owen, K.M
Marrs, R.H
Snow, C.S.R
Evans, C.E
description Attempts are being made to restore heathland and acid grassland on arable land at the Minsmere reserve of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Experiments were conducted to acidify the arable soils (pH 6–7) to heathland levels (pH 3.5–4) by the addition of varying amounts of elemental sulphur (S), bracken litter and pine chippings. All rates of S addition reduced soil pH, although the efficacy of acidification was related to the application rate. Rates of 1 and 2 t S ha −1 produced soils of c. pH 4. Rates of 8 t S ha −1 and above reduced the soil pH to
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17147052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320798000275</els_id><sourcerecordid>17147052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8014461a1b390963eb1fe2c1b26dfb411418bb96cde29f02fd51b476fc5c667b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoMoOK4-gpCDiIKtqf6TdJ9kWfyHKx7WPYckXXEiPZ0xlRb25kN49918EjPTg3v0lFT46vdV6mPsMYiXIEC-uhJCyKqphXo29M9LUauqu8M20KumqgdQd9nmn-Q-e0D0rZSqkd2G_b6KYeLGhTH44EwOcf7z81feIl8IefSclmm_XRI387jKHN9PZs58ZzKmYCbiOZ4AN9wkYyfkVKDEfUz8QEroEh7RB-C2XLfTEXeL_JoM0fqY-acw0w4TvuDXHx-ye7544KPTecau3775cvG-uvz87sPF-WXlGqly1QtoWwkGbDOIQTZowWPtwNZy9LYFaKG3dpBuxHrwovZjB7ZV0rvOSalsc8aertx9it8XpKx3gRxOZSaMC2lQ0CrR1UXYrUKXIlFCr_cp7Ey60SD0IQ59jEMfdq2HXh_j0F3pe3IyMOTM5JOZXaDbZjlA38sie73KsHz2R8CkyQWcHY6hrDHrMYb_GP0FUKSh1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17147052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Owen, K.M ; Marrs, R.H ; Snow, C.S.R ; Evans, C.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Owen, K.M ; Marrs, R.H ; Snow, C.S.R ; Evans, C.E</creatorcontrib><description>Attempts are being made to restore heathland and acid grassland on arable land at the Minsmere reserve of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Experiments were conducted to acidify the arable soils (pH 6–7) to heathland levels (pH 3.5–4) by the addition of varying amounts of elemental sulphur (S), bracken litter and pine chippings. All rates of S addition reduced soil pH, although the efficacy of acidification was related to the application rate. Rates of 1 and 2 t S ha −1 produced soils of c. pH 4. Rates of 8 t S ha −1 and above reduced the soil pH to &lt;pH 3. Equations were derived for two fields to enable calculations of the S additions required to reduce pH to a given value. Bracken litter reduced soil pH to 4–4.5, and pine chippings reduced the soil pH by 0.5–1 unit to pH 5.5. The addition of pine chippings was not an effective means of acidifying the soil where large reductions in pH are needed. Soil acidification did not significantly increase the available concentrations of Ca, Mg, K and P, indeed reductions in extractable P and exchangeable Ca were found, which may aid the establishment of heathland and acid grassland species. The reduction in soil pH brought about by the addition of bracken litter was not sufficient to inhibit the growth of arable weeds that compete with heathland vegetation. S was the most effective means of acidifying the soil, but at high application rates caused acidification through the soil profile, which could be problematic should leaching occur into water courses. A combination of low rates of S application coupled with the addition of bracken litter may offer the best solution, although further experiments are needed to test this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bracken litter ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Heathland recreation ; Pine chippings ; Soil acidification ; Sulphur</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 1999, Vol.87 (1), p.105-121</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8014461a1b390963eb1fe2c1b26dfb411418bb96cde29f02fd51b476fc5c667b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8014461a1b390963eb1fe2c1b26dfb411418bb96cde29f02fd51b476fc5c667b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1691886$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Owen, K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrs, R.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, C.S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, C.E</creatorcontrib><title>Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Attempts are being made to restore heathland and acid grassland on arable land at the Minsmere reserve of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Experiments were conducted to acidify the arable soils (pH 6–7) to heathland levels (pH 3.5–4) by the addition of varying amounts of elemental sulphur (S), bracken litter and pine chippings. All rates of S addition reduced soil pH, although the efficacy of acidification was related to the application rate. Rates of 1 and 2 t S ha −1 produced soils of c. pH 4. Rates of 8 t S ha −1 and above reduced the soil pH to &lt;pH 3. Equations were derived for two fields to enable calculations of the S additions required to reduce pH to a given value. Bracken litter reduced soil pH to 4–4.5, and pine chippings reduced the soil pH by 0.5–1 unit to pH 5.5. The addition of pine chippings was not an effective means of acidifying the soil where large reductions in pH are needed. Soil acidification did not significantly increase the available concentrations of Ca, Mg, K and P, indeed reductions in extractable P and exchangeable Ca were found, which may aid the establishment of heathland and acid grassland species. The reduction in soil pH brought about by the addition of bracken litter was not sufficient to inhibit the growth of arable weeds that compete with heathland vegetation. S was the most effective means of acidifying the soil, but at high application rates caused acidification through the soil profile, which could be problematic should leaching occur into water courses. A combination of low rates of S application coupled with the addition of bracken litter may offer the best solution, although further experiments are needed to test this approach.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bracken litter</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Heathland recreation</subject><subject>Pine chippings</subject><subject>Soil acidification</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoMoOK4-gpCDiIKtqf6TdJ9kWfyHKx7WPYckXXEiPZ0xlRb25kN49918EjPTg3v0lFT46vdV6mPsMYiXIEC-uhJCyKqphXo29M9LUauqu8M20KumqgdQd9nmn-Q-e0D0rZSqkd2G_b6KYeLGhTH44EwOcf7z81feIl8IefSclmm_XRI387jKHN9PZs58ZzKmYCbiOZ4AN9wkYyfkVKDEfUz8QEroEh7RB-C2XLfTEXeL_JoM0fqY-acw0w4TvuDXHx-ye7544KPTecau3775cvG-uvz87sPF-WXlGqly1QtoWwkGbDOIQTZowWPtwNZy9LYFaKG3dpBuxHrwovZjB7ZV0rvOSalsc8aertx9it8XpKx3gRxOZSaMC2lQ0CrR1UXYrUKXIlFCr_cp7Ey60SD0IQ59jEMfdq2HXh_j0F3pe3IyMOTM5JOZXaDbZjlA38sie73KsHz2R8CkyQWcHY6hrDHrMYb_GP0FUKSh1Q</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Owen, K.M</creator><creator>Marrs, R.H</creator><creator>Snow, C.S.R</creator><creator>Evans, C.E</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK</title><author>Owen, K.M ; Marrs, R.H ; Snow, C.S.R ; Evans, C.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-8014461a1b390963eb1fe2c1b26dfb411418bb96cde29f02fd51b476fc5c667b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bracken litter</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Heathland recreation</topic><topic>Pine chippings</topic><topic>Soil acidification</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Owen, K.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrs, R.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, C.S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, C.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Owen, K.M</au><au>Marrs, R.H</au><au>Snow, C.S.R</au><au>Evans, C.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>105-121</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Attempts are being made to restore heathland and acid grassland on arable land at the Minsmere reserve of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). Experiments were conducted to acidify the arable soils (pH 6–7) to heathland levels (pH 3.5–4) by the addition of varying amounts of elemental sulphur (S), bracken litter and pine chippings. All rates of S addition reduced soil pH, although the efficacy of acidification was related to the application rate. Rates of 1 and 2 t S ha −1 produced soils of c. pH 4. Rates of 8 t S ha −1 and above reduced the soil pH to &lt;pH 3. Equations were derived for two fields to enable calculations of the S additions required to reduce pH to a given value. Bracken litter reduced soil pH to 4–4.5, and pine chippings reduced the soil pH by 0.5–1 unit to pH 5.5. The addition of pine chippings was not an effective means of acidifying the soil where large reductions in pH are needed. Soil acidification did not significantly increase the available concentrations of Ca, Mg, K and P, indeed reductions in extractable P and exchangeable Ca were found, which may aid the establishment of heathland and acid grassland species. The reduction in soil pH brought about by the addition of bracken litter was not sufficient to inhibit the growth of arable weeds that compete with heathland vegetation. S was the most effective means of acidifying the soil, but at high application rates caused acidification through the soil profile, which could be problematic should leaching occur into water courses. A combination of low rates of S application coupled with the addition of bracken litter may offer the best solution, although further experiments are needed to test this approach.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 1999, Vol.87 (1), p.105-121
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17147052
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bracken litter
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Heathland recreation
Pine chippings
Soil acidification
Sulphur
title Soil acidification—the use of sulphur and acidic plant materials to acidify arable soils for the recreation of heathland and acidic grassland at Minsmere, UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20acidification%E2%80%94the%20use%20of%20sulphur%20and%20acidic%20plant%20materials%20to%20acidify%20arable%20soils%20for%20the%20recreation%20of%20heathland%20and%20acidic%20grassland%20at%20Minsmere,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Owen,%20K.M&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=105-121&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00027-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17147052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17147052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320798000275&rfr_iscdi=true