Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists
BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specify...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer cytopathology 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 524 |
container_title | Cancer cytopathology |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Vaickus, Louis J. Tambouret, Rosemary H. |
description | BACKGROUND
The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device.
METHODS
Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images.
RESULTS
The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz.
CONCLUSIONS
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncy.21585 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713947544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3808090591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxy0EYsvChQdAlvaCkLpkPHbicltVfEkruBSJnqLBcdtUjl3sZFFuPALPyJPg0NLDHrjMh_TTTzP6M_YcimsoCvHaeDNeC1BaPWAzWKCclyXqh-dZfL1gT1LaFwXoSsBjdiFKrJTWOGPjOgx-y1t_Z1PfbqkPkZsdOWf91r7hq53lZMwQyYw8bHifdz8YZyn-_vmrD7mYsQ8HR6lrDY_Ut4FPpm6aPKcuZHsfqfW24V2Ih11wYdumPj1ljzbkkn126pfsy7u3q-WH-e3n9x-XN7dzgwtUcy0qULBpSBFJjapsRIMKAEFSWWphCQCaUkJVklpUVqFAlISFwfykqPCSvTx6DzF8H_JtddcmY50jb8OQaqgAF7JSUmb06h66D0P0-bqJEgpQCp2pV0fKxJBStJv6EPO_cayhqKdA6imQ-m8gGX5xUg7fOtuc0X8JZACOwI_W2fE_qnr5abk-Sv8ARsyYLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712513428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device.
METHODS
Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images.
RESULTS
The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz.
CONCLUSIONS
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-662X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-6638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21585</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26375883</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Adult ; C ratio ; Cell Nucleus - pathology ; Clinical Competence ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; Cytoplasm - pathology ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; estimate ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - methods ; Male ; morphology ; morphometry ; NC ratio, N ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - pathology ; nuclear cytoplasmic ratio ; nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio ; Observer Variation ; Research Personnel ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; visual</subject><ispartof>Cancer cytopathology, 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530</ispartof><rights>2015 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 American Cancer Society.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncy.21585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncy.21585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><title>Cancer cytopathology</title><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device.
METHODS
Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images.
RESULTS
The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz.
CONCLUSIONS
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>C ratio</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - pathology</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Cytoplasm - pathology</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>estimate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>morphometry</subject><subject>NC ratio, N</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>nuclear cytoplasmic ratio</subject><subject>nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Research Personnel</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>visual</subject><issn>1934-662X</issn><issn>1934-6638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxy0EYsvChQdAlvaCkLpkPHbicltVfEkruBSJnqLBcdtUjl3sZFFuPALPyJPg0NLDHrjMh_TTTzP6M_YcimsoCvHaeDNeC1BaPWAzWKCclyXqh-dZfL1gT1LaFwXoSsBjdiFKrJTWOGPjOgx-y1t_Z1PfbqkPkZsdOWf91r7hq53lZMwQyYw8bHifdz8YZyn-_vmrD7mYsQ8HR6lrDY_Ut4FPpm6aPKcuZHsfqfW24V2Ih11wYdumPj1ljzbkkn126pfsy7u3q-WH-e3n9x-XN7dzgwtUcy0qULBpSBFJjapsRIMKAEFSWWphCQCaUkJVklpUVqFAlISFwfykqPCSvTx6DzF8H_JtddcmY50jb8OQaqgAF7JSUmb06h66D0P0-bqJEgpQCp2pV0fKxJBStJv6EPO_cayhqKdA6imQ-m8gGX5xUg7fOtuc0X8JZACOwI_W2fE_qnr5abk-Sv8ARsyYLw</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Vaickus, Louis J.</creator><creator>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><author>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>C ratio</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - pathology</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Cytoplasm - pathology</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>estimate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>morphometry</topic><topic>NC ratio, N</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>nuclear cytoplasmic ratio</topic><topic>nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Research Personnel</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>visual</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaickus, Louis J.</au><au>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</atitle><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>524-530</pages><issn>1934-662X</issn><eissn>1934-6638</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND
The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device.
METHODS
Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images.
RESULTS
The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz.
CONCLUSIONS
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26375883</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncy.21585</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1934-662X |
ispartof | Cancer cytopathology, 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530 |
issn | 1934-662X 1934-6638 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713947544 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | accuracy Adult C ratio Cell Nucleus - pathology Clinical Competence Cross-Sectional Studies Cytodiagnosis - methods Cytoplasm - pathology Education, Medical, Graduate - methods estimate Female Humans Internship and Residency - methods Male morphology morphometry NC ratio, N Neoplasms - diagnosis Neoplasms - pathology nuclear cytoplasmic ratio nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio Observer Variation Research Personnel Sensitivity and Specificity visual |
title | Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A32%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Young%20investigator%20challenge:%20The%20accuracy%20of%20the%20nuclear%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90cytoplasmic%20ratio%20estimation%20among%20trained%20morphologists&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20cytopathology&rft.au=Vaickus,%20Louis%20J.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=524-530&rft.issn=1934-662X&rft.eissn=1934-6638&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncy.21585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3808090591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712513428&rft_id=info:pmid/26375883&rfr_iscdi=true |