Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists

BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specify...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer cytopathology 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530
Hauptverfasser: Vaickus, Louis J., Tambouret, Rosemary H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 9
container_start_page 524
container_title Cancer cytopathology
container_volume 123
creator Vaickus, Louis J.
Tambouret, Rosemary H.
description BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device. METHODS Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images. RESULTS The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz. CONCLUSIONS Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society. Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncy.21585
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713947544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3808090591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxy0EYsvChQdAlvaCkLpkPHbicltVfEkruBSJnqLBcdtUjl3sZFFuPALPyJPg0NLDHrjMh_TTTzP6M_YcimsoCvHaeDNeC1BaPWAzWKCclyXqh-dZfL1gT1LaFwXoSsBjdiFKrJTWOGPjOgx-y1t_Z1PfbqkPkZsdOWf91r7hq53lZMwQyYw8bHifdz8YZyn-_vmrD7mYsQ8HR6lrDY_Ut4FPpm6aPKcuZHsfqfW24V2Ih11wYdumPj1ljzbkkn126pfsy7u3q-WH-e3n9x-XN7dzgwtUcy0qULBpSBFJjapsRIMKAEFSWWphCQCaUkJVklpUVqFAlISFwfykqPCSvTx6DzF8H_JtddcmY50jb8OQaqgAF7JSUmb06h66D0P0-bqJEgpQCp2pV0fKxJBStJv6EPO_cayhqKdA6imQ-m8gGX5xUg7fOtuc0X8JZACOwI_W2fE_qnr5abk-Sv8ARsyYLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712513428</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device. METHODS Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images. RESULTS The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz. CONCLUSIONS Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society. Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-662X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-6638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21585</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26375883</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Adult ; C ratio ; Cell Nucleus - pathology ; Clinical Competence ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; Cytoplasm - pathology ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; estimate ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - methods ; Male ; morphology ; morphometry ; NC ratio, N ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - pathology ; nuclear cytoplasmic ratio ; nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio ; Observer Variation ; Research Personnel ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; visual</subject><ispartof>Cancer cytopathology, 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530</ispartof><rights>2015 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 American Cancer Society.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncy.21585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncy.21585$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><title>Cancer cytopathology</title><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device. METHODS Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images. RESULTS The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz. CONCLUSIONS Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society. Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>C ratio</subject><subject>Cell Nucleus - pathology</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Cytoplasm - pathology</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>estimate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>morphometry</subject><subject>NC ratio, N</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>nuclear cytoplasmic ratio</subject><subject>nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Research Personnel</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>visual</subject><issn>1934-662X</issn><issn>1934-6638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O0zAQxy0EYsvChQdAlvaCkLpkPHbicltVfEkruBSJnqLBcdtUjl3sZFFuPALPyJPg0NLDHrjMh_TTTzP6M_YcimsoCvHaeDNeC1BaPWAzWKCclyXqh-dZfL1gT1LaFwXoSsBjdiFKrJTWOGPjOgx-y1t_Z1PfbqkPkZsdOWf91r7hq53lZMwQyYw8bHifdz8YZyn-_vmrD7mYsQ8HR6lrDY_Ut4FPpm6aPKcuZHsfqfW24V2Ih11wYdumPj1ljzbkkn126pfsy7u3q-WH-e3n9x-XN7dzgwtUcy0qULBpSBFJjapsRIMKAEFSWWphCQCaUkJVklpUVqFAlISFwfykqPCSvTx6DzF8H_JtddcmY50jb8OQaqgAF7JSUmb06h66D0P0-bqJEgpQCp2pV0fKxJBStJv6EPO_cayhqKdA6imQ-m8gGX5xUg7fOtuc0X8JZACOwI_W2fE_qnr5abk-Sv8ARsyYLw</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Vaickus, Louis J.</creator><creator>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</title><author>Vaickus, Louis J. ; Tambouret, Rosemary H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-827151fda5aa48356d2d3511314a6682ea111d64176a597e532334a30c3637273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>C ratio</topic><topic>Cell Nucleus - pathology</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Cytoplasm - pathology</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>estimate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>morphometry</topic><topic>NC ratio, N</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>nuclear cytoplasmic ratio</topic><topic>nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Research Personnel</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>visual</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaickus, Louis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaickus, Louis J.</au><au>Tambouret, Rosemary H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists</atitle><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>524-530</pages><issn>1934-662X</issn><eissn>1934-6638</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND The estimation of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio (N:C ratio) is an important factor in diagnosing atypia and malignancy in pathological specimens, particularly in cytology. Many algorithms for determining malignant potential make reference to specific, decimal N:C ratios without specifying how the ratio should be measured, with the implication that the observer is intended to estimate this ratio by eye. The authors wanted to determine how accurate trained morphologists (including attending pathologists, pathology residents, and cytotechnologists) are at estimating the N:C ratio without a measuring device. METHODS Two surveys were prepared containing ideal and real cell images of various N:C ratios. Participants were instructed to select their best estimate from a list of decimal ratios. The data were tabulated and analyzed to determine how accurate the estimates were and whether there was any performance difference between ideal and real images. RESULTS The absolute and percentage deviation from the actual N:C ratio decreased steadily with increasing N:C ratio. Aggregate performance was found to be closely correlated between real and ideal images, although interobserver variation was not significantly different among participants in the real images quiz, but was significantly different on the ideal images quiz. CONCLUSIONS Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the N:C ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:524–530. © 2015 American Cancer Society. Trained morphologists make relatively accurate estimations of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N:C) ratio and become increasingly more accurate as the depicted N:C ratio increases. This suggests that including N:C ratio decimals as a criteria for the diagnosis of atypia is valid for high N:C ratios.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26375883</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncy.21585</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-662X
ispartof Cancer cytopathology, 2015-09, Vol.123 (9), p.524-530
issn 1934-662X
1934-6638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713947544
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects accuracy
Adult
C ratio
Cell Nucleus - pathology
Clinical Competence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cytodiagnosis - methods
Cytoplasm - pathology
Education, Medical, Graduate - methods
estimate
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency - methods
Male
morphology
morphometry
NC ratio, N
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - pathology
nuclear cytoplasmic ratio
nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio
Observer Variation
Research Personnel
Sensitivity and Specificity
visual
title Young investigator challenge: The accuracy of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic ratio estimation among trained morphologists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T00%3A32%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Young%20investigator%20challenge:%20The%20accuracy%20of%20the%20nuclear%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90cytoplasmic%20ratio%20estimation%20among%20trained%20morphologists&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20cytopathology&rft.au=Vaickus,%20Louis%20J.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=524-530&rft.issn=1934-662X&rft.eissn=1934-6638&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncy.21585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3808090591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712513428&rft_id=info:pmid/26375883&rfr_iscdi=true