Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer
Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most natio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2012 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2005 |
container_title | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Muendlein, Axel Rohde, Bettina H. Gasser, Klaus Haid, Anton Rauch, Stephanie Kinz, Elena Drexel, Heinz Hofmann, Wera Schindler, Verena Kapoor, Rita Decker, Thomas Lang, Alois H. |
description | Purpose
Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity.
Methods
We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed.
Results
We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked.
Conclusions
We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713526818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3807755531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8S8OJlbSbZZNNjLVqFgiB6Dml2tm7Zj5rsVvz3plZFBC_JzOR5Z8i8hJwBuwLGslFgLBU8YSATGGuV8D0yhG0FhJD7ZMggg0RyUANyFMKKxVxm_JAMuBxnoLgcktXNxla97cq2oW1Brx-nExhxWvfdZ81WNMSoD9TWbbOkM_S1bahtcjrpQ-fLmLy1Ncaz7F5oLKwrTBpcRvUG6cKjDR11tnHoT8hBYauAp1_3MXm-vXma3iXzh9n9dDJPXJryLsmd1VrlBXcyR5FrB05rZ61cjJ1mBSusFoVkTol0DIXOER1mAFbwGC9SJY7J5a7v2revPYbO1GVwWFW2wbYPJi5FSK406Ihe_EFXbe_jrz8pnspMKREp2FHOtyF4LMzal7X17waY2RphdkaYaITZGmF41Jx_de4XNeY_iu_NR4DvgBCfmiX6X6P_7foB2r2T1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712457663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity.
Methods
We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed.
Results
We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked.
Conclusions
We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-5216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25971625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Austria - epidemiology ; BRCA1 Protein - genetics ; BRCA2 Protein - genetics ; Breast cancer ; Cancer Research ; Family ; Female ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic Testing ; Germany - epidemiology ; Hematology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics ; Oncology ; Original Article – Clinical Oncology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Bettina H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasser, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haid, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><title>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity.
Methods
We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed.
Results
We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked.
Conclusions
We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article – Clinical Oncology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0171-5216</issn><issn>1432-1335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8S8OJlbSbZZNNjLVqFgiB6Dml2tm7Zj5rsVvz3plZFBC_JzOR5Z8i8hJwBuwLGslFgLBU8YSATGGuV8D0yhG0FhJD7ZMggg0RyUANyFMKKxVxm_JAMuBxnoLgcktXNxla97cq2oW1Brx-nExhxWvfdZ81WNMSoD9TWbbOkM_S1bahtcjrpQ-fLmLy1Ncaz7F5oLKwrTBpcRvUG6cKjDR11tnHoT8hBYauAp1_3MXm-vXma3iXzh9n9dDJPXJryLsmd1VrlBXcyR5FrB05rZ61cjJ1mBSusFoVkTol0DIXOER1mAFbwGC9SJY7J5a7v2revPYbO1GVwWFW2wbYPJi5FSK406Ihe_EFXbe_jrz8pnspMKREp2FHOtyF4LMzal7X17waY2RphdkaYaITZGmF41Jx_de4XNeY_iu_NR4DvgBCfmiX6X6P_7foB2r2T1g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Muendlein, Axel</creator><creator>Rohde, Bettina H.</creator><creator>Gasser, Klaus</creator><creator>Haid, Anton</creator><creator>Rauch, Stephanie</creator><creator>Kinz, Elena</creator><creator>Drexel, Heinz</creator><creator>Hofmann, Wera</creator><creator>Schindler, Verena</creator><creator>Kapoor, Rita</creator><creator>Decker, Thomas</creator><creator>Lang, Alois H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><author>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article – Clinical Oncology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Bettina H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasser, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haid, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muendlein, Axel</au><au>Rohde, Bettina H.</au><au>Gasser, Klaus</au><au>Haid, Anton</au><au>Rauch, Stephanie</au><au>Kinz, Elena</au><au>Drexel, Heinz</au><au>Hofmann, Wera</au><au>Schindler, Verena</au><au>Kapoor, Rita</au><au>Decker, Thomas</au><au>Lang, Alois H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2005</spage><epage>2012</epage><pages>2005-2012</pages><issn>0171-5216</issn><eissn>1432-1335</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity.
Methods
We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed.
Results
We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked.
Conclusions
We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25971625</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-5216 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012 |
issn | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713526818 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Austria - epidemiology BRCA1 Protein - genetics BRCA2 Protein - genetics Breast cancer Cancer Research Family Female Genetic Predisposition to Disease Genetic Testing Germany - epidemiology Hematology Humans Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Mutation Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics Oncology Original Article – Clinical Oncology Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics Womens health Young Adult |
title | Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A05%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20BRCA1/2%20mutational%20status%20among%20German%20and%20Austrian%20women%20with%20triple-negative%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Muendlein,%20Axel&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2005&rft.epage=2012&rft.pages=2005-2012&rft.issn=0171-5216&rft.eissn=1432-1335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3807755531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712457663&rft_id=info:pmid/25971625&rfr_iscdi=true |