Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer

Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most natio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012
Hauptverfasser: Muendlein, Axel, Rohde, Bettina H., Gasser, Klaus, Haid, Anton, Rauch, Stephanie, Kinz, Elena, Drexel, Heinz, Hofmann, Wera, Schindler, Verena, Kapoor, Rita, Decker, Thomas, Lang, Alois H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2012
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2005
container_title Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
container_volume 141
creator Muendlein, Axel
Rohde, Bettina H.
Gasser, Klaus
Haid, Anton
Rauch, Stephanie
Kinz, Elena
Drexel, Heinz
Hofmann, Wera
Schindler, Verena
Kapoor, Rita
Decker, Thomas
Lang, Alois H.
description Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. Methods We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. Results We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. Conclusions We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713526818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3807755531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8S8OJlbSbZZNNjLVqFgiB6Dml2tm7Zj5rsVvz3plZFBC_JzOR5Z8i8hJwBuwLGslFgLBU8YSATGGuV8D0yhG0FhJD7ZMggg0RyUANyFMKKxVxm_JAMuBxnoLgcktXNxla97cq2oW1Brx-nExhxWvfdZ81WNMSoD9TWbbOkM_S1bahtcjrpQ-fLmLy1Ncaz7F5oLKwrTBpcRvUG6cKjDR11tnHoT8hBYauAp1_3MXm-vXma3iXzh9n9dDJPXJryLsmd1VrlBXcyR5FrB05rZ61cjJ1mBSusFoVkTol0DIXOER1mAFbwGC9SJY7J5a7v2revPYbO1GVwWFW2wbYPJi5FSK406Ihe_EFXbe_jrz8pnspMKREp2FHOtyF4LMzal7X17waY2RphdkaYaITZGmF41Jx_de4XNeY_iu_NR4DvgBCfmiX6X6P_7foB2r2T1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712457663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. Methods We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. Results We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. Conclusions We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-5216</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25971625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Austria - epidemiology ; BRCA1 Protein - genetics ; BRCA2 Protein - genetics ; Breast cancer ; Cancer Research ; Family ; Female ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic Testing ; Germany - epidemiology ; Hematology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics ; Oncology ; Original Article – Clinical Oncology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25971625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Bettina H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasser, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haid, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><title>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. Methods We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. Results We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. Conclusions We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Germany - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article – Clinical Oncology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0171-5216</issn><issn>1432-1335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8S8OJlbSbZZNNjLVqFgiB6Dml2tm7Zj5rsVvz3plZFBC_JzOR5Z8i8hJwBuwLGslFgLBU8YSATGGuV8D0yhG0FhJD7ZMggg0RyUANyFMKKxVxm_JAMuBxnoLgcktXNxla97cq2oW1Brx-nExhxWvfdZ81WNMSoD9TWbbOkM_S1bahtcjrpQ-fLmLy1Ncaz7F5oLKwrTBpcRvUG6cKjDR11tnHoT8hBYauAp1_3MXm-vXma3iXzh9n9dDJPXJryLsmd1VrlBXcyR5FrB05rZ61cjJ1mBSusFoVkTol0DIXOER1mAFbwGC9SJY7J5a7v2revPYbO1GVwWFW2wbYPJi5FSK406Ihe_EFXbe_jrz8pnspMKREp2FHOtyF4LMzal7X17waY2RphdkaYaITZGmF41Jx_de4XNeY_iu_NR4DvgBCfmiX6X6P_7foB2r2T1g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Muendlein, Axel</creator><creator>Rohde, Bettina H.</creator><creator>Gasser, Klaus</creator><creator>Haid, Anton</creator><creator>Rauch, Stephanie</creator><creator>Kinz, Elena</creator><creator>Drexel, Heinz</creator><creator>Hofmann, Wera</creator><creator>Schindler, Verena</creator><creator>Kapoor, Rita</creator><creator>Decker, Thomas</creator><creator>Lang, Alois H.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</title><author>Muendlein, Axel ; Rohde, Bettina H. ; Gasser, Klaus ; Haid, Anton ; Rauch, Stephanie ; Kinz, Elena ; Drexel, Heinz ; Hofmann, Wera ; Schindler, Verena ; Kapoor, Rita ; Decker, Thomas ; Lang, Alois H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-dca886df2c5de3d8c1c88caa5b9c80f0fa83f50c63491f8deece711a328deb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>BRCA1 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>BRCA2 Protein - genetics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Germany - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article – Clinical Oncology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muendlein, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Bettina H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasser, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haid, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinz, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drexel, Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindler, Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Alois H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muendlein, Axel</au><au>Rohde, Bettina H.</au><au>Gasser, Klaus</au><au>Haid, Anton</au><au>Rauch, Stephanie</au><au>Kinz, Elena</au><au>Drexel, Heinz</au><au>Hofmann, Wera</au><au>Schindler, Verena</au><au>Kapoor, Rita</au><au>Decker, Thomas</au><au>Lang, Alois H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2005</spage><epage>2012</epage><pages>2005-2012</pages><issn>0171-5216</issn><eissn>1432-1335</eissn><abstract>Purpose Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients’ family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity. Methods We determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed. Results We identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked. Conclusions We conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25971625</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-5216
ispartof Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015-11, Vol.141 (11), p.2005-2012
issn 0171-5216
1432-1335
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1713526818
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Austria - epidemiology
BRCA1 Protein - genetics
BRCA2 Protein - genetics
Breast cancer
Cancer Research
Family
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Germany - epidemiology
Hematology
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasms, Second Primary - epidemiology
Neoplasms, Second Primary - genetics
Oncology
Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Womens health
Young Adult
title Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A05%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20BRCA1/2%20mutational%20status%20among%20German%20and%20Austrian%20women%20with%20triple-negative%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20research%20and%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Muendlein,%20Axel&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2005&rft.epage=2012&rft.pages=2005-2012&rft.issn=0171-5216&rft.eissn=1432-1335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00432-015-1986-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3807755531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712457663&rft_id=info:pmid/25971625&rfr_iscdi=true