Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates
AIMS: This study explores the biofumigation effects of glucosinolate (GSL) containing Brassica oleracea plant material on beneficial, non-target soil organisms, and aims to relate those effects to differences in GSL profiles. METHODS: Leaf material of purple sprouting broccoli ‘Santee’, Savoy cabbag...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2015-09, Vol.394 (1-2), p.155-163 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 163 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Plant and soil |
| container_volume | 394 |
| creator | Zuluaga, Diana L van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine Verkerk, Ruud Röling, Wilfred F. M Ellers, Jacintha Roelofs, Dick Aarts, Mark G. M |
| description | AIMS: This study explores the biofumigation effects of glucosinolate (GSL) containing Brassica oleracea plant material on beneficial, non-target soil organisms, and aims to relate those effects to differences in GSL profiles. METHODS: Leaf material of purple sprouting broccoli ‘Santee’, Savoy cabbage ‘Wintessa’, and the wild B. oleracea accession Winspit was analysed for GSL production and used for biofumigation experiments on the beneficial soil invertebrates, Folsomia candida (springtail) and Eisenia andrei (earthworm) and the soil bacterial community. RESULTS: When mixed into soil, the Winspit plant material exerted the highest toxic effects on beneficial soil invertebrates by reducing survival and reproduction. Total GSL levels varied substantially between genotypes, in particular the aliphatic GSL (AGSL) sinigrin and gluconapin being highly abundant or exclusively present in Winspit. Differences between the genotypes regarding biofumigation effects on the soil microbial community were only observed on a temporal basis with the largest difference in bacterial community structure after 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The high total GSL content in biofumigated soil could explain the toxicity of Winspit for soil invertebrates. These effects are likely to be the results of high AGSL levels in Winspit. The use of wild B. oleracea crops, such as Winspit, for biofumigation practices would need a proper assessment of the overall impact on soil biota before being applied on a wide scale. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-015-2497-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712773162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A426574882</galeid><jstor_id>43872193</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A426574882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-4a68d169e5936c85d58b60dd80f65fba4204dfe881520d300f256ee42b73afc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYso-Bz9AC7EgBs3HW_-9y1nBnWEARc64C6k6U1fHn3NmKQOgh_elIoMLiSLkJvfObm5p2leUjinAPpdppSCaIHKlom9btmjZkel5q0Erh43OwDOWtD7b0-bZzkfYT1TtWt-XYbol1MYbQlxJksO80gsuQ_TQC6TzTk4S-KEyTq0xDqHtVTB-1AO5BDGAxmnxcUqi5MtSFycC86FWO_RlUx6nNEHF-xEcgwTCfMPTAX7VOH8vHni7ZTxxZ_9rLn98P7r1XV78_njp6uLm9ZJCqUVVnUDVXuUe65cJwfZ9QqGoQOvpO-tYCAGj11HJYOBA3gmFaJgvebWO87Pmreb712K3xfMxZxCdjhNdsa4ZEM1ZVpzqlhF3_yDHuOS5tpdpUAJJZiQlTrfqNFOaMLsY6kDqmvAU6gjqF-u9QvBlNSi61Zbuglcijkn9OYuhZNNPw0FswZotgBNDdCsAZpVwzZNruw8YnrQyn9ErzbRMZeY_r4ieKcZ3a-jeL3dexuNHVPI5vYLqwYAjFUvwX8DEDOxqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1706464245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zuluaga, Diana L ; van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine ; Verkerk, Ruud ; Röling, Wilfred F. M ; Ellers, Jacintha ; Roelofs, Dick ; Aarts, Mark G. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Zuluaga, Diana L ; van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine ; Verkerk, Ruud ; Röling, Wilfred F. M ; Ellers, Jacintha ; Roelofs, Dick ; Aarts, Mark G. M</creatorcontrib><description>AIMS: This study explores the biofumigation effects of glucosinolate (GSL) containing Brassica oleracea plant material on beneficial, non-target soil organisms, and aims to relate those effects to differences in GSL profiles. METHODS: Leaf material of purple sprouting broccoli ‘Santee’, Savoy cabbage ‘Wintessa’, and the wild B. oleracea accession Winspit was analysed for GSL production and used for biofumigation experiments on the beneficial soil invertebrates, Folsomia candida (springtail) and Eisenia andrei (earthworm) and the soil bacterial community. RESULTS: When mixed into soil, the Winspit plant material exerted the highest toxic effects on beneficial soil invertebrates by reducing survival and reproduction. Total GSL levels varied substantially between genotypes, in particular the aliphatic GSL (AGSL) sinigrin and gluconapin being highly abundant or exclusively present in Winspit. Differences between the genotypes regarding biofumigation effects on the soil microbial community were only observed on a temporal basis with the largest difference in bacterial community structure after 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The high total GSL content in biofumigated soil could explain the toxicity of Winspit for soil invertebrates. These effects are likely to be the results of high AGSL levels in Winspit. The use of wild B. oleracea crops, such as Winspit, for biofumigation practices would need a proper assessment of the overall impact on soil biota before being applied on a wide scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2497-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>bacterial communities ; biofumigation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Brassica ; Brassica oleracea ; Brassica oleracea var. sabauda ; broccoli ; Cauliflower ; Community structure ; crops ; earthworms ; Ecology ; Eisenia andrei ; Folsomia candida ; Fumigation ; genotype ; Genotypes ; gluconapin ; Health aspects ; Invertebrata ; Invertebrates ; leaves ; Life Sciences ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Regular Article ; reproduction ; sinigrin ; soil ; soil bacteria ; Soil invertebrates ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil sciences ; Soils ; sprouting ; toxicity ; wild relatives</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2015-09, Vol.394 (1-2), p.155-163</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-4a68d169e5936c85d58b60dd80f65fba4204dfe881520d300f256ee42b73afc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-4a68d169e5936c85d58b60dd80f65fba4204dfe881520d300f256ee42b73afc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43872193$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43872193$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zuluaga, Diana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkerk, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röling, Wilfred F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellers, Jacintha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelofs, Dick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarts, Mark G. M</creatorcontrib><title>Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>AIMS: This study explores the biofumigation effects of glucosinolate (GSL) containing Brassica oleracea plant material on beneficial, non-target soil organisms, and aims to relate those effects to differences in GSL profiles. METHODS: Leaf material of purple sprouting broccoli ‘Santee’, Savoy cabbage ‘Wintessa’, and the wild B. oleracea accession Winspit was analysed for GSL production and used for biofumigation experiments on the beneficial soil invertebrates, Folsomia candida (springtail) and Eisenia andrei (earthworm) and the soil bacterial community. RESULTS: When mixed into soil, the Winspit plant material exerted the highest toxic effects on beneficial soil invertebrates by reducing survival and reproduction. Total GSL levels varied substantially between genotypes, in particular the aliphatic GSL (AGSL) sinigrin and gluconapin being highly abundant or exclusively present in Winspit. Differences between the genotypes regarding biofumigation effects on the soil microbial community were only observed on a temporal basis with the largest difference in bacterial community structure after 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The high total GSL content in biofumigated soil could explain the toxicity of Winspit for soil invertebrates. These effects are likely to be the results of high AGSL levels in Winspit. The use of wild B. oleracea crops, such as Winspit, for biofumigation practices would need a proper assessment of the overall impact on soil biota before being applied on a wide scale.</description><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>biofumigation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Brassica oleracea</subject><subject>Brassica oleracea var. sabauda</subject><subject>broccoli</subject><subject>Cauliflower</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>earthworms</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Eisenia andrei</subject><subject>Folsomia candida</subject><subject>Fumigation</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>gluconapin</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>reproduction</subject><subject>sinigrin</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>soil bacteria</subject><subject>Soil invertebrates</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>sprouting</subject><subject>toxicity</subject><subject>wild relatives</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYso-Bz9AC7EgBs3HW_-9y1nBnWEARc64C6k6U1fHn3NmKQOgh_elIoMLiSLkJvfObm5p2leUjinAPpdppSCaIHKlom9btmjZkel5q0Erh43OwDOWtD7b0-bZzkfYT1TtWt-XYbol1MYbQlxJksO80gsuQ_TQC6TzTk4S-KEyTq0xDqHtVTB-1AO5BDGAxmnxcUqi5MtSFycC86FWO_RlUx6nNEHF-xEcgwTCfMPTAX7VOH8vHni7ZTxxZ_9rLn98P7r1XV78_njp6uLm9ZJCqUVVnUDVXuUe65cJwfZ9QqGoQOvpO-tYCAGj11HJYOBA3gmFaJgvebWO87Pmreb712K3xfMxZxCdjhNdsa4ZEM1ZVpzqlhF3_yDHuOS5tpdpUAJJZiQlTrfqNFOaMLsY6kDqmvAU6gjqF-u9QvBlNSi61Zbuglcijkn9OYuhZNNPw0FswZotgBNDdCsAZpVwzZNruw8YnrQyn9ErzbRMZeY_r4ieKcZ3a-jeL3dexuNHVPI5vYLqwYAjFUvwX8DEDOxqA</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Zuluaga, Diana L</creator><creator>van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine</creator><creator>Verkerk, Ruud</creator><creator>Röling, Wilfred F. M</creator><creator>Ellers, Jacintha</creator><creator>Roelofs, Dick</creator><creator>Aarts, Mark G. M</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates</title><author>Zuluaga, Diana L ; van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine ; Verkerk, Ruud ; Röling, Wilfred F. M ; Ellers, Jacintha ; Roelofs, Dick ; Aarts, Mark G. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c510t-4a68d169e5936c85d58b60dd80f65fba4204dfe881520d300f256ee42b73afc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>biofumigation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Brassica oleracea</topic><topic>Brassica oleracea var. sabauda</topic><topic>broccoli</topic><topic>Cauliflower</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>earthworms</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Eisenia andrei</topic><topic>Folsomia candida</topic><topic>Fumigation</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>gluconapin</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>reproduction</topic><topic>sinigrin</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>soil bacteria</topic><topic>Soil invertebrates</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>sprouting</topic><topic>toxicity</topic><topic>wild relatives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zuluaga, Diana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkerk, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Röling, Wilfred F. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellers, Jacintha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelofs, Dick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aarts, Mark G. M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zuluaga, Diana L</au><au>van Ommen Kloeke, A. E. Elaine</au><au>Verkerk, Ruud</au><au>Röling, Wilfred F. M</au><au>Ellers, Jacintha</au><au>Roelofs, Dick</au><au>Aarts, Mark G. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>394</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>155-163</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>AIMS: This study explores the biofumigation effects of glucosinolate (GSL) containing Brassica oleracea plant material on beneficial, non-target soil organisms, and aims to relate those effects to differences in GSL profiles. METHODS: Leaf material of purple sprouting broccoli ‘Santee’, Savoy cabbage ‘Wintessa’, and the wild B. oleracea accession Winspit was analysed for GSL production and used for biofumigation experiments on the beneficial soil invertebrates, Folsomia candida (springtail) and Eisenia andrei (earthworm) and the soil bacterial community. RESULTS: When mixed into soil, the Winspit plant material exerted the highest toxic effects on beneficial soil invertebrates by reducing survival and reproduction. Total GSL levels varied substantially between genotypes, in particular the aliphatic GSL (AGSL) sinigrin and gluconapin being highly abundant or exclusively present in Winspit. Differences between the genotypes regarding biofumigation effects on the soil microbial community were only observed on a temporal basis with the largest difference in bacterial community structure after 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The high total GSL content in biofumigated soil could explain the toxicity of Winspit for soil invertebrates. These effects are likely to be the results of high AGSL levels in Winspit. The use of wild B. oleracea crops, such as Winspit, for biofumigation practices would need a proper assessment of the overall impact on soil biota before being applied on a wide scale.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-015-2497-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
| ispartof | Plant and soil, 2015-09, Vol.394 (1-2), p.155-163 |
| issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712773162 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | bacterial communities biofumigation Biomedical and Life Sciences Biota Brassica Brassica oleracea Brassica oleracea var. sabauda broccoli Cauliflower Community structure crops earthworms Ecology Eisenia andrei Folsomia candida Fumigation genotype Genotypes gluconapin Health aspects Invertebrata Invertebrates leaves Life Sciences Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Regular Article reproduction sinigrin soil soil bacteria Soil invertebrates Soil Science & Conservation Soil sciences Soils sprouting toxicity wild relatives |
| title | Biofumigation using a wild Brassica oleracea accession with high glucosinolate content affects beneficial soil invertebrates |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A56%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biofumigation%20using%20a%20wild%20Brassica%20oleracea%20accession%20with%20high%20glucosinolate%20content%20affects%20beneficial%20soil%20invertebrates&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Zuluaga,%20Diana%20L&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=394&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=155-163&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-015-2497-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA426574882%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1706464245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A426574882&rft_jstor_id=43872193&rfr_iscdi=true |