Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain

This study tested two contrasting theories of adaptation of postural control to pain. One proposes alteration to the postural strategy including inhibition of muscles that produce painful movement; another proposes amplification of the postural adjustment to recruit strategies normally reserved for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2015-09, Vol.233 (9), p.2745-2752
Hauptverfasser: Hodges, Paul W., Tsao, Henry, Sims, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2752
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2745
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 233
creator Hodges, Paul W.
Tsao, Henry
Sims, Kevin
description This study tested two contrasting theories of adaptation of postural control to pain. One proposes alteration to the postural strategy including inhibition of muscles that produce painful movement; another proposes amplification of the postural adjustment to recruit strategies normally reserved for higher load. This study that aimed to determine which of these alternatives best explains pain-related adaptation of the hip muscle activity associated with stepping down from steps of increasing height adaptation of postural control to increasing load was evaluated from hip muscle electromyography (fine-wire and surface electrodes) as ten males stepped from steps of increasing height (i.e. increasing load). In one set of trials, participants stepped from a low step (5 cm) and pain was induced by noxious electrical stimulation over the sacrum triggered from foot contact with a force plate or was anticipated. Changes in EMG amplitude and onset timing were compared between conditions. Hip muscle activation was earlier and larger when stepping from higher steps. Although ground reaction forces (one of the determinants of joint load) were unchanged before, during and after pain, trials with real or anticipated noxious stimulation were accompanied by muscle activity indistinguishable from that normally reserved for higher steps (EMG amplitude increased from 9 to 17 % of peak). These data support the notion that muscle activation for postural control is augmented when challenged by real/anticipated noxious stimulation. Muscle activation was earlier and greater than that required for the task and is likely to create unnecessary joint loading. This could have long-term consequences if maintained.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712771121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A425283819</galeid><sourcerecordid>A425283819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-8ef17772acd1027921f318e0aff832dba4c053326b1fe052961a011bda395c523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFTEQhoNY7LH6A7yRBUH0YutMPjZ7LkvRWmgR_LgOOdnkNGXPZk2yUP-9WbbWnqJQQshk8sxA3nkJeYVwjADyQwKgFGtAUXPGZQ1PyAo5ozUiNE_JCgB5zVtcH5LnKV3PVybhGTmkDYKQgq7I5Zn2QxVcNYaUp6j7Kto0hiHZVPnBRKuX6C5d5VDiwumhKzt740edbVeNpdELcuB0n-zL2_OI_Pj08fvp5_riy9n56clFbRqQuW6tQykl1aZDoHJN0TFsLWjnWka7jeYGBGO02aCzIOi6QQ2Im06ztTCCsiPybuk7xvBzsimrnU_G9r0ebJiSQolUSkSKj0ChaMcF5QV98wC9DlMcykdmignWctn8pba6t8oPLuSozdxUnXAqaMuK4IU6_gdVVmd33oTBOl_yewXv9woKk-1N3uopJXX-7es--_Yee1Wmka9S6Kfsy4T2QVxAE0NK0To1Rr_T8ZdCULOF1GIhVSykZgspKDWvb1WYNjvb3VX88UwB6AKk8jRsbbwn03-7_gbnMcs8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703538476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hodges, Paul W. ; Tsao, Henry ; Sims, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W. ; Tsao, Henry ; Sims, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>This study tested two contrasting theories of adaptation of postural control to pain. One proposes alteration to the postural strategy including inhibition of muscles that produce painful movement; another proposes amplification of the postural adjustment to recruit strategies normally reserved for higher load. This study that aimed to determine which of these alternatives best explains pain-related adaptation of the hip muscle activity associated with stepping down from steps of increasing height adaptation of postural control to increasing load was evaluated from hip muscle electromyography (fine-wire and surface electrodes) as ten males stepped from steps of increasing height (i.e. increasing load). In one set of trials, participants stepped from a low step (5 cm) and pain was induced by noxious electrical stimulation over the sacrum triggered from foot contact with a force plate or was anticipated. Changes in EMG amplitude and onset timing were compared between conditions. Hip muscle activation was earlier and larger when stepping from higher steps. Although ground reaction forces (one of the determinants of joint load) were unchanged before, during and after pain, trials with real or anticipated noxious stimulation were accompanied by muscle activity indistinguishable from that normally reserved for higher steps (EMG amplitude increased from 9 to 17 % of peak). These data support the notion that muscle activation for postural control is augmented when challenged by real/anticipated noxious stimulation. Muscle activation was earlier and greater than that required for the task and is likely to create unnecessary joint loading. This could have long-term consequences if maintained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26105752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Adult ; Anticipation, Psychological - physiology ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology ; Health aspects ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Male ; Methods ; Muscle function ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Nervous system ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Nociception - physiology ; Pain ; Pain - pathology ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain management ; Physical Stimulation - adverse effects ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture ; Posture - physiology ; Research Article ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2015-09, Vol.233 (9), p.2745-2752</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-8ef17772acd1027921f318e0aff832dba4c053326b1fe052961a011bda395c523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-8ef17772acd1027921f318e0aff832dba4c053326b1fe052961a011bda395c523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26105752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>This study tested two contrasting theories of adaptation of postural control to pain. One proposes alteration to the postural strategy including inhibition of muscles that produce painful movement; another proposes amplification of the postural adjustment to recruit strategies normally reserved for higher load. This study that aimed to determine which of these alternatives best explains pain-related adaptation of the hip muscle activity associated with stepping down from steps of increasing height adaptation of postural control to increasing load was evaluated from hip muscle electromyography (fine-wire and surface electrodes) as ten males stepped from steps of increasing height (i.e. increasing load). In one set of trials, participants stepped from a low step (5 cm) and pain was induced by noxious electrical stimulation over the sacrum triggered from foot contact with a force plate or was anticipated. Changes in EMG amplitude and onset timing were compared between conditions. Hip muscle activation was earlier and larger when stepping from higher steps. Although ground reaction forces (one of the determinants of joint load) were unchanged before, during and after pain, trials with real or anticipated noxious stimulation were accompanied by muscle activity indistinguishable from that normally reserved for higher steps (EMG amplitude increased from 9 to 17 % of peak). These data support the notion that muscle activation for postural control is augmented when challenged by real/anticipated noxious stimulation. Muscle activation was earlier and greater than that required for the task and is likely to create unnecessary joint loading. This could have long-term consequences if maintained.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - pathology</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Physical Stimulation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFTEQhoNY7LH6A7yRBUH0YutMPjZ7LkvRWmgR_LgOOdnkNGXPZk2yUP-9WbbWnqJQQshk8sxA3nkJeYVwjADyQwKgFGtAUXPGZQ1PyAo5ozUiNE_JCgB5zVtcH5LnKV3PVybhGTmkDYKQgq7I5Zn2QxVcNYaUp6j7Kto0hiHZVPnBRKuX6C5d5VDiwumhKzt740edbVeNpdELcuB0n-zL2_OI_Pj08fvp5_riy9n56clFbRqQuW6tQykl1aZDoHJN0TFsLWjnWka7jeYGBGO02aCzIOi6QQ2Im06ztTCCsiPybuk7xvBzsimrnU_G9r0ebJiSQolUSkSKj0ChaMcF5QV98wC9DlMcykdmignWctn8pba6t8oPLuSozdxUnXAqaMuK4IU6_gdVVmd33oTBOl_yewXv9woKk-1N3uopJXX-7es--_Yee1Wmka9S6Kfsy4T2QVxAE0NK0To1Rr_T8ZdCULOF1GIhVSykZgspKDWvb1WYNjvb3VX88UwB6AKk8jRsbbwn03-7_gbnMcs8</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Hodges, Paul W.</creator><creator>Tsao, Henry</creator><creator>Sims, Kevin</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain</title><author>Hodges, Paul W. ; Tsao, Henry ; Sims, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-8ef17772acd1027921f318e0aff832dba4c053326b1fe052961a011bda395c523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - pathology</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Physical Stimulation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsao, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sims, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodges, Paul W.</au><au>Tsao, Henry</au><au>Sims, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>233</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2745</spage><epage>2752</epage><pages>2745-2752</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>This study tested two contrasting theories of adaptation of postural control to pain. One proposes alteration to the postural strategy including inhibition of muscles that produce painful movement; another proposes amplification of the postural adjustment to recruit strategies normally reserved for higher load. This study that aimed to determine which of these alternatives best explains pain-related adaptation of the hip muscle activity associated with stepping down from steps of increasing height adaptation of postural control to increasing load was evaluated from hip muscle electromyography (fine-wire and surface electrodes) as ten males stepped from steps of increasing height (i.e. increasing load). In one set of trials, participants stepped from a low step (5 cm) and pain was induced by noxious electrical stimulation over the sacrum triggered from foot contact with a force plate or was anticipated. Changes in EMG amplitude and onset timing were compared between conditions. Hip muscle activation was earlier and larger when stepping from higher steps. Although ground reaction forces (one of the determinants of joint load) were unchanged before, during and after pain, trials with real or anticipated noxious stimulation were accompanied by muscle activity indistinguishable from that normally reserved for higher steps (EMG amplitude increased from 9 to 17 % of peak). These data support the notion that muscle activation for postural control is augmented when challenged by real/anticipated noxious stimulation. Muscle activation was earlier and greater than that required for the task and is likely to create unnecessary joint loading. This could have long-term consequences if maintained.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26105752</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2015-09, Vol.233 (9), p.2745-2752
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712771121
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adaptation, Physiological - physiology
Adult
Anticipation, Psychological - physiology
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Electromyography
Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology
Health aspects
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Methods
Muscle function
Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology
Nervous system
Neurology
Neurosciences
Nociception - physiology
Pain
Pain - pathology
Pain - physiopathology
Pain - psychology
Pain management
Physical Stimulation - adverse effects
Postural Balance - physiology
Posture
Posture - physiology
Research Article
Young Adult
title Gain of postural responses increases in response to real and anticipated pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gain%20of%20postural%20responses%20increases%20in%20response%20to%20real%20and%20anticipated%20pain&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Hodges,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=233&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2745&rft.epage=2752&rft.pages=2745-2752&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-015-4347-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA425283819%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703538476&rft_id=info:pmid/26105752&rft_galeid=A425283819&rfr_iscdi=true