Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina
Comparative studies between brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations from Brazil (Jaboticabal, São Paulo) and Argentina (Rafaela, Santa Fé) showed significant biological, morphological and genetic differences between them. This work aimed to study, in a comparative way, the acquisition of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental & applied acarology 2015-09, Vol.67 (1), p.135-146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | Experimental & applied acarology |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Évora, Patricia Martinez Sanches, Gustavo Seron Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues Machado, Rosangela Zacarias Bechara, Gervásio Henrique |
description | Comparative studies between brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations from Brazil (Jaboticabal, São Paulo) and Argentina (Rafaela, Santa Fé) showed significant biological, morphological and genetic differences between them. This work aimed to study, in a comparative way, the acquisition of resistance in domestic dogs to R. sanguineus from Jaboticabal and Rafaela, after successive and controlled infestations. Ticks were kept in a BOD incubator under controlled conditions (27 °C, 80 % relative humidity, 12-h photoperiod). Ten dogs, Dachshund breed, males and females, 6 months old, short- or long-haired, without prior contact with ticks, were used as hosts. They were distributed into two experimental groups composed of five animals each: G1 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) per animal, and G2 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Rafaela) per animal. Ticks’ biological parameters and titration of antibodies from the dogs’ sera by ELISA test were used for comparison between the strains. Results of the biological parameters showed that the dogs did not acquire immunity to either of the R. sanguineus strains after repeated infestations. The ELISA test showed low antibody titers in sera of dogs from G2, in successive infestations, and higher antibody responses post second and third infestations in G1. It also demonstrated cross-reactivity between sera of dogs infested with R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) and antigens from R. sanguineus (Rafaela) and vice versa. We conclude that Dachshund dogs did not develop resistance against neither Jaboticabal nor Rafaela strains of R. sanguineus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712769756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1700104649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2f99b9ba94370f4f4c89a66f88e004ae821a417500c9b4db528e9ab1fdd3107e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-AClrhwCYydxI6PbcWXtBIS0LPlOHbqNmtvPQkq_fV4lYIQB8TJlv28M_Y8hDxn8IYByLfIoFF1BaytlKpFdfuAbFgreaUk8IdkA0x0VccEPyFPEK8AoAXRPiYnXICoG2g35G5n7DVNnhp7s4TsBpodBpxNtI6GSIc0Ip0TxcVahxi-H0-9K8AcUsRj8stlOATrDpdmWpCiieMSoivbOdhrpD6nPT3L5i5M1MSBnubRxTlE85Q88mZC9-x-3ZKL9---nX-sdp8_fDo_3VW24WquuFeqV71RTS3BN76xnTJC-K5zAI1xHWemYbIFsKpvhr7lnVOmZ34YagbS1Vvyeq17yOlmKU_X-4DWTZOJLi2omWRcCiVb8R8oQJm5KFPfkld_oVdpybF8RDOhVNEgFRSKrZTNCTE7rw857E3-oRnoo0O9OtTFoT461Lcl8-K-8tLv3fA78UtaAfgKYLmKo8t_tP5H1ZdryJukzZgD6ouvvAAAnIu2VvVP7M-xaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1699157790</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Évora, Patricia Martinez ; Sanches, Gustavo Seron ; Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes ; Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues ; Machado, Rosangela Zacarias ; Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</creator><creatorcontrib>Évora, Patricia Martinez ; Sanches, Gustavo Seron ; Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes ; Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues ; Machado, Rosangela Zacarias ; Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative studies between brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations from Brazil (Jaboticabal, São Paulo) and Argentina (Rafaela, Santa Fé) showed significant biological, morphological and genetic differences between them. This work aimed to study, in a comparative way, the acquisition of resistance in domestic dogs to R. sanguineus from Jaboticabal and Rafaela, after successive and controlled infestations. Ticks were kept in a BOD incubator under controlled conditions (27 °C, 80 % relative humidity, 12-h photoperiod). Ten dogs, Dachshund breed, males and females, 6 months old, short- or long-haired, without prior contact with ticks, were used as hosts. They were distributed into two experimental groups composed of five animals each: G1 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) per animal, and G2 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Rafaela) per animal. Ticks’ biological parameters and titration of antibodies from the dogs’ sera by ELISA test were used for comparison between the strains. Results of the biological parameters showed that the dogs did not acquire immunity to either of the R. sanguineus strains after repeated infestations. The ELISA test showed low antibody titers in sera of dogs from G2, in successive infestations, and higher antibody responses post second and third infestations in G1. It also demonstrated cross-reactivity between sera of dogs infested with R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) and antigens from R. sanguineus (Rafaela) and vice versa. We conclude that Dachshund dogs did not develop resistance against neither Jaboticabal nor Rafaela strains of R. sanguineus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26063405</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAACEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>acarology ; adults ; Animal Ecology ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Animals ; antibodies ; antigens ; Argentina ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brazil ; Comparative studies ; cross reaction ; Dachshund ; dog diseases ; Dog Diseases - immunology ; Dog Diseases - parasitology ; Dogs ; Domestic animals ; Entomology ; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary ; Female ; females ; hosts ; Ixodidae ; Life Sciences ; Male ; males ; photoperiod ; population ; Relative humidity ; Reproduction ; Rhipicephalus sanguineus ; Rhipicephalus sanguineus - physiology ; strains ; Tick Infestations - veterinary ; ticks ; titration</subject><ispartof>Experimental & applied acarology, 2015-09, Vol.67 (1), p.135-146</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2f99b9ba94370f4f4c89a66f88e004ae821a417500c9b4db528e9ab1fdd3107e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2f99b9ba94370f4f4c89a66f88e004ae821a417500c9b4db528e9ab1fdd3107e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Évora, Patricia Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanches, Gustavo Seron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Rosangela Zacarias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina</title><title>Experimental & applied acarology</title><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><description>Comparative studies between brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations from Brazil (Jaboticabal, São Paulo) and Argentina (Rafaela, Santa Fé) showed significant biological, morphological and genetic differences between them. This work aimed to study, in a comparative way, the acquisition of resistance in domestic dogs to R. sanguineus from Jaboticabal and Rafaela, after successive and controlled infestations. Ticks were kept in a BOD incubator under controlled conditions (27 °C, 80 % relative humidity, 12-h photoperiod). Ten dogs, Dachshund breed, males and females, 6 months old, short- or long-haired, without prior contact with ticks, were used as hosts. They were distributed into two experimental groups composed of five animals each: G1 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) per animal, and G2 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Rafaela) per animal. Ticks’ biological parameters and titration of antibodies from the dogs’ sera by ELISA test were used for comparison between the strains. Results of the biological parameters showed that the dogs did not acquire immunity to either of the R. sanguineus strains after repeated infestations. The ELISA test showed low antibody titers in sera of dogs from G2, in successive infestations, and higher antibody responses post second and third infestations in G1. It also demonstrated cross-reactivity between sera of dogs infested with R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) and antigens from R. sanguineus (Rafaela) and vice versa. We conclude that Dachshund dogs did not develop resistance against neither Jaboticabal nor Rafaela strains of R. sanguineus.</description><subject>acarology</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>antibodies</subject><subject>antigens</subject><subject>Argentina</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>cross reaction</subject><subject>Dachshund</subject><subject>dog diseases</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>hosts</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>males</subject><subject>photoperiod</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus sanguineus - physiology</subject><subject>strains</subject><subject>Tick Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>ticks</subject><subject>titration</subject><issn>0168-8162</issn><issn>1572-9702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCD-AClrhwCYydxI6PbcWXtBIS0LPlOHbqNmtvPQkq_fV4lYIQB8TJlv28M_Y8hDxn8IYByLfIoFF1BaytlKpFdfuAbFgreaUk8IdkA0x0VccEPyFPEK8AoAXRPiYnXICoG2g35G5n7DVNnhp7s4TsBpodBpxNtI6GSIc0Ip0TxcVahxi-H0-9K8AcUsRj8stlOATrDpdmWpCiieMSoivbOdhrpD6nPT3L5i5M1MSBnubRxTlE85Q88mZC9-x-3ZKL9---nX-sdp8_fDo_3VW24WquuFeqV71RTS3BN76xnTJC-K5zAI1xHWemYbIFsKpvhr7lnVOmZ34YagbS1Vvyeq17yOlmKU_X-4DWTZOJLi2omWRcCiVb8R8oQJm5KFPfkld_oVdpybF8RDOhVNEgFRSKrZTNCTE7rw857E3-oRnoo0O9OtTFoT461Lcl8-K-8tLv3fA78UtaAfgKYLmKo8t_tP5H1ZdryJukzZgD6ouvvAAAnIu2VvVP7M-xaw</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Évora, Patricia Martinez</creator><creator>Sanches, Gustavo Seron</creator><creator>Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes</creator><creator>Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues</creator><creator>Machado, Rosangela Zacarias</creator><creator>Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina</title><author>Évora, Patricia Martinez ; Sanches, Gustavo Seron ; Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes ; Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues ; Machado, Rosangela Zacarias ; Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-2f99b9ba94370f4f4c89a66f88e004ae821a417500c9b4db528e9ab1fdd3107e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>acarology</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>antibodies</topic><topic>antigens</topic><topic>Argentina</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>cross reaction</topic><topic>Dachshund</topic><topic>dog diseases</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>hosts</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>males</topic><topic>photoperiod</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus - physiology</topic><topic>strains</topic><topic>Tick Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>ticks</topic><topic>titration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Évora, Patricia Martinez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanches, Gustavo Seron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Rosangela Zacarias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Évora, Patricia Martinez</au><au>Sanches, Gustavo Seron</au><au>Jusi, Márcia Mariza Gomes</au><au>Alves, Lucas Bocchini Rodrigues</au><au>Machado, Rosangela Zacarias</au><au>Bechara, Gervásio Henrique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina</atitle><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle><stitle>Exp Appl Acarol</stitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>135-146</pages><issn>0168-8162</issn><eissn>1572-9702</eissn><coden>EAACEM</coden><abstract>Comparative studies between brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus populations from Brazil (Jaboticabal, São Paulo) and Argentina (Rafaela, Santa Fé) showed significant biological, morphological and genetic differences between them. This work aimed to study, in a comparative way, the acquisition of resistance in domestic dogs to R. sanguineus from Jaboticabal and Rafaela, after successive and controlled infestations. Ticks were kept in a BOD incubator under controlled conditions (27 °C, 80 % relative humidity, 12-h photoperiod). Ten dogs, Dachshund breed, males and females, 6 months old, short- or long-haired, without prior contact with ticks, were used as hosts. They were distributed into two experimental groups composed of five animals each: G1 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) per animal, and G2 infested with ten adult couples of R. sanguineus (Rafaela) per animal. Ticks’ biological parameters and titration of antibodies from the dogs’ sera by ELISA test were used for comparison between the strains. Results of the biological parameters showed that the dogs did not acquire immunity to either of the R. sanguineus strains after repeated infestations. The ELISA test showed low antibody titers in sera of dogs from G2, in successive infestations, and higher antibody responses post second and third infestations in G1. It also demonstrated cross-reactivity between sera of dogs infested with R. sanguineus (Jaboticabal) and antigens from R. sanguineus (Rafaela) and vice versa. We conclude that Dachshund dogs did not develop resistance against neither Jaboticabal nor Rafaela strains of R. sanguineus.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26063405</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8162 |
ispartof | Experimental & applied acarology, 2015-09, Vol.67 (1), p.135-146 |
issn | 0168-8162 1572-9702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1712769756 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
subjects | acarology adults Animal Ecology Animal Genetics and Genomics Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Animals antibodies antigens Argentina Biomedical and Life Sciences Brazil Comparative studies cross reaction Dachshund dog diseases Dog Diseases - immunology Dog Diseases - parasitology Dogs Domestic animals Entomology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - veterinary Female females hosts Ixodidae Life Sciences Male males photoperiod population Relative humidity Reproduction Rhipicephalus sanguineus Rhipicephalus sanguineus - physiology strains Tick Infestations - veterinary ticks titration |
title | Lack of acquired resistance in dogs to successive infestations of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks from Brazil and Argentina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A32%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20acquired%20resistance%20in%20dogs%20to%20successive%20infestations%20of%20Rhipicephalus%20sanguineus%20ticks%20from%20Brazil%20and%20Argentina&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20&%20applied%20acarology&rft.au=%C3%89vora,%20Patricia%20Martinez&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=135-146&rft.issn=0168-8162&rft.eissn=1572-9702&rft.coden=EAACEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10493-015-9936-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1700104649%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1699157790&rft_id=info:pmid/26063405&rfr_iscdi=true |