Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer
Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the FACT-P (version 4) in Chinese males with prostate cancer. Methods Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). Internal consis...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2015-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2397-2402 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2402 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2397 |
| container_title | Quality of life research |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Wong, Carlos K. H. Choi, Edmond P. H. Tsu, James H. L. Ho, Brian S. H. Ng, Ada T. L. Chin, W. Y. Yiu, M. K. |
| description | Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the FACT-P (version 4) in Chinese males with prostate cancer. Methods Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, respectively. Sensitivity was determined by performing known-group comparisons by independent t test. Results FACT-P subscale scores had a moderate correlation with the corresponding SF-12v2 domain score that conceptually measures the similar construct providing evidence for adequate construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable (α: 0.687-0.900) for all subscales aside from the Prostate Cancer Subscale (α: 0.505) and Trial Outcome Index (α: 0.562). FACT-P subscale and total scores showed good test-retest reliability (range 0.753-0.913). All total scales and most of the subscales were sensitive in detecting differences between patients with different levels of functional impairment but not different cancer stages or levels of prostate-specific antigen. Conclusions The measure is a valid and reliable measure to assess the health-related quality of life of Chinese males with prostate cancer. The FACT-P is sensitive to detect difference between patients with varying functional status. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-015-0993-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711540660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849338</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6fc3a3c2f18c8fbece93246965399467ecd3674aecf069d241c6075d06d299e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbGO1DAQhi0E4paDB6AAWaI5CoMdO3ZcriIWkE5ii-0jnzNhs9o4weMIbcG741yOE6KgcjHf_408PyGvBf8gODcfUQghNeOiZNxayaonZCNKI1mhlX1KNtzqglmp5BV5gXjinFeWF8_JVVFWxthSbsivPV78cRwgxd7TKY4TxNQD0rGjuzn41I_BnekWERAHCGkZ1C54iPRwhOimC9vHEZNLQG922_rA9u9pH2h97AMg0MllXUhIf_bpuCxYUX-veEmede6M8OrhvSaH3adD_YXdfvv8td7eMl9yk5juvHTSF52ofNXdgQcrC6WtLqW1ShvwrdRGOfAd17YtlPCam7Llui2sBXlNblZtXv9jBkzN0KOH89kFGGdshBGiVFxrntF3_6CncY75BPcU1_niusqUWCmf_4MRumaK_eDipRG8Wapp1mqaXE2zVNMsmbcP5vlugPYx8aeLDBQrgHkUvkP8a_V_rG_W0AnTGB-lSlXKSlnJ39QQoz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710611168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wong, Carlos K. H. ; Choi, Edmond P. H. ; Tsu, James H. L. ; Ho, Brian S. H. ; Ng, Ada T. L. ; Chin, W. Y. ; Yiu, M. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K. H. ; Choi, Edmond P. H. ; Tsu, James H. L. ; Ho, Brian S. H. ; Ng, Ada T. L. ; Chin, W. Y. ; Yiu, M. K.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the FACT-P (version 4) in Chinese males with prostate cancer. Methods Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, respectively. Sensitivity was determined by performing known-group comparisons by independent t test. Results FACT-P subscale scores had a moderate correlation with the corresponding SF-12v2 domain score that conceptually measures the similar construct providing evidence for adequate construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable (α: 0.687-0.900) for all subscales aside from the Prostate Cancer Subscale (α: 0.505) and Trial Outcome Index (α: 0.562). FACT-P subscale and total scores showed good test-retest reliability (range 0.753-0.913). All total scales and most of the subscales were sensitive in detecting differences between patients with different levels of functional impairment but not different cancer stages or levels of prostate-specific antigen. Conclusions The measure is a valid and reliable measure to assess the health-related quality of life of Chinese males with prostate cancer. The FACT-P is sensitive to detect difference between patients with varying functional status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0993-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25877953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgens ; Antigens ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Brief Communication ; Cancer therapies ; China ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT ; Male ; Measurement ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Performance evaluation ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology ; Psychometrics - methods ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Sociology ; Standard deviation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2015-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2397-2402</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6fc3a3c2f18c8fbece93246965399467ecd3674aecf069d241c6075d06d299e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6fc3a3c2f18c8fbece93246965399467ecd3674aecf069d241c6075d06d299e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25877953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Edmond P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsu, James H. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Brian S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Ada T. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, W. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, M. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the FACT-P (version 4) in Chinese males with prostate cancer. Methods Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, respectively. Sensitivity was determined by performing known-group comparisons by independent t test. Results FACT-P subscale scores had a moderate correlation with the corresponding SF-12v2 domain score that conceptually measures the similar construct providing evidence for adequate construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable (α: 0.687-0.900) for all subscales aside from the Prostate Cancer Subscale (α: 0.505) and Trial Outcome Index (α: 0.562). FACT-P subscale and total scores showed good test-retest reliability (range 0.753-0.913). All total scales and most of the subscales were sensitive in detecting differences between patients with different levels of functional impairment but not different cancer stages or levels of prostate-specific antigen. Conclusions The measure is a valid and reliable measure to assess the health-related quality of life of Chinese males with prostate cancer. The FACT-P is sensitive to detect difference between patients with varying functional status.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Brief Communication</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sickness Impact Profile</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbGO1DAQhi0E4paDB6AAWaI5CoMdO3ZcriIWkE5ii-0jnzNhs9o4weMIbcG741yOE6KgcjHf_408PyGvBf8gODcfUQghNeOiZNxayaonZCNKI1mhlX1KNtzqglmp5BV5gXjinFeWF8_JVVFWxthSbsivPV78cRwgxd7TKY4TxNQD0rGjuzn41I_BnekWERAHCGkZ1C54iPRwhOimC9vHEZNLQG922_rA9u9pH2h97AMg0MllXUhIf_bpuCxYUX-veEmede6M8OrhvSaH3adD_YXdfvv8td7eMl9yk5juvHTSF52ofNXdgQcrC6WtLqW1ShvwrdRGOfAd17YtlPCam7Llui2sBXlNblZtXv9jBkzN0KOH89kFGGdshBGiVFxrntF3_6CncY75BPcU1_niusqUWCmf_4MRumaK_eDipRG8Wapp1mqaXE2zVNMsmbcP5vlugPYx8aeLDBQrgHkUvkP8a_V_rG_W0AnTGB-lSlXKSlnJ39QQoz4</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Wong, Carlos K. H.</creator><creator>Choi, Edmond P. H.</creator><creator>Tsu, James H. L.</creator><creator>Ho, Brian S. H.</creator><creator>Ng, Ada T. L.</creator><creator>Chin, W. Y.</creator><creator>Yiu, M. K.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer</title><author>Wong, Carlos K. H. ; Choi, Edmond P. H. ; Tsu, James H. L. ; Ho, Brian S. H. ; Ng, Ada T. L. ; Chin, W. Y. ; Yiu, M. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-6fc3a3c2f18c8fbece93246965399467ecd3674aecf069d241c6075d06d299e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Asian Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Brief Communication</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sickness Impact Profile</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Carlos K. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Edmond P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsu, James H. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Brian S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Ada T. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chin, W. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, M. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Carlos K. H.</au><au>Choi, Edmond P. H.</au><au>Tsu, James H. L.</au><au>Ho, Brian S. H.</au><au>Ng, Ada T. L.</au><au>Chin, W. Y.</au><au>Yiu, M. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2397</spage><epage>2402</epage><pages>2397-2402</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the FACT-P (version 4) in Chinese males with prostate cancer. Methods Construct validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation test against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient, respectively. Sensitivity was determined by performing known-group comparisons by independent t test. Results FACT-P subscale scores had a moderate correlation with the corresponding SF-12v2 domain score that conceptually measures the similar construct providing evidence for adequate construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable (α: 0.687-0.900) for all subscales aside from the Prostate Cancer Subscale (α: 0.505) and Trial Outcome Index (α: 0.562). FACT-P subscale and total scores showed good test-retest reliability (range 0.753-0.913). All total scales and most of the subscales were sensitive in detecting differences between patients with different levels of functional impairment but not different cancer stages or levels of prostate-specific antigen. Conclusions The measure is a valid and reliable measure to assess the health-related quality of life of Chinese males with prostate cancer. The FACT-P is sensitive to detect difference between patients with varying functional status.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>25877953</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-015-0993-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
| ispartof | Quality of life research, 2015-10, Vol.24 (10), p.2397-2402 |
| issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711540660 |
| source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Androgens Antigens Asian Continental Ancestry Group Brief Communication Cancer therapies China Health Surveys Humans INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT Male Measurement Medicine Medicine & Public Health Performance evaluation Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology Psychometrics - methods Public Health Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Sickness Impact Profile Socioeconomic Factors Sociology Standard deviation Surveys and Questionnaires Validation studies Validity |
| title | Psychometric properties of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) in Chinese patients with prostate cancer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20properties%20of%20Functional%20Assessment%20of%20Cancer%20Therapy-Prostate%20(FACT-P)%20in%20Chinese%20patients%20with%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Wong,%20Carlos%20K.%20H.&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2397&rft.epage=2402&rft.pages=2397-2402&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-015-0993-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849338%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710611168&rft_id=info:pmid/25877953&rft_jstor_id=44849338&rfr_iscdi=true |