Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard

Background During cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, the temporalis muscle is firmly attached to the dural patch and intermixed with fibrotic tissue leading to considerable difficulty in dissecting the plane between the dura, galea and the temporalis muscle. This leads to increased surgic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2015-09, Vol.84 (3), p.709-713
Hauptverfasser: Javed, Gohar, Khan, Muhammad Babar, Ahmed, Syed Ijlal, Hussain, Manzar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 3
container_start_page 709
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 84
creator Javed, Gohar
Khan, Muhammad Babar
Ahmed, Syed Ijlal
Hussain, Manzar
description Background During cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, the temporalis muscle is firmly attached to the dural patch and intermixed with fibrotic tissue leading to considerable difficulty in dissecting the plane between the dura, galea and the temporalis muscle. This leads to increased surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, risk of complications and also affects rehabilitation. We have developed the “dhaga technique,” which aids in preserving the plane between the muscle and dura in order to improve outcomes. Here we describe our technique and also compare the “dhaga technique” with the generally accepted standard procedure. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy either through the “dhaga technique” or the institutional standard (control group). Both techniques were compared using intra operative blood loss, duration of surgery and any complications as study variables. Results There were 133 patients were included in the study. The control group included 68 patients who underwent the procedure according to institutional standard, and 65 patients were included in the “dhaga technique group.” Both groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients in the “dhaga technique” group had statistically significant lower operating time ( P  value = 0.037) and intra operative blood loss ( P  value = 0.025). However, there was no significant difference in complications. Conclusion The utilization of “dhaga technique” can potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs by decreasing operative time and blood loss. Moreover, the temporalis muscle preservation in the “dhaga technique” may also enhance aesthetic outcomes and chewing, which were not assessed in this study. There were no differences in complication between the two techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711540421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1878875015004775</els_id><sourcerecordid>1711540421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d0ef60646ada842077db246277f9be07595b1f068cf2cd5b39214b9550f4b5c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAPykcsuY8eOE4SQ0JaPShUgdTlbjjNmvSTxYju72j_A78bRtlXFAWtkj-w3T573piheUlhSoNWb7fIw4rRkQMUSeI76SXFOa1kvalk1Tx9yAWfFZYxbyKukvJbl8-KMiaasGuDnxZ-rjf6pyRrNZnS_JyTWB7J2Meb0e6_HvAeMGPY6OT8SbRMGcoXGD7t8H90eySro0aFJfji-Jav8oIOLGest-YqHR9QHlzbkeozJpWlm0z25TXrsdOheFM-s7iNe3p0XxY9PH9erL4ubb5-vVx9uFobXNC06QFtBxSvd6ZozkLJrGa-YlLZpEaRoREstVLWxzHSiLRtGedsIAZa3wojyonh94t0Fn78UkxpcNNjPnfopKiopFRw4oxnKTlATfIwBrdoFN-hwVBTUbIHaqtkCNVuggOeoc9GrO_6pHbB7KLkXPAPenQCYu9w7DCoah6PBzoWsoeq8-z__-3_KTe9GZ3T_C48Yt34KWdbch4pMgbqdh2CeASoAuJSi_AtBZa6m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1711540421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Javed, Gohar ; Khan, Muhammad Babar ; Ahmed, Syed Ijlal ; Hussain, Manzar</creator><creatorcontrib>Javed, Gohar ; Khan, Muhammad Babar ; Ahmed, Syed Ijlal ; Hussain, Manzar</creatorcontrib><description>Background During cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, the temporalis muscle is firmly attached to the dural patch and intermixed with fibrotic tissue leading to considerable difficulty in dissecting the plane between the dura, galea and the temporalis muscle. This leads to increased surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, risk of complications and also affects rehabilitation. We have developed the “dhaga technique,” which aids in preserving the plane between the muscle and dura in order to improve outcomes. Here we describe our technique and also compare the “dhaga technique” with the generally accepted standard procedure. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy either through the “dhaga technique” or the institutional standard (control group). Both techniques were compared using intra operative blood loss, duration of surgery and any complications as study variables. Results There were 133 patients were included in the study. The control group included 68 patients who underwent the procedure according to institutional standard, and 65 patients were included in the “dhaga technique group.” Both groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients in the “dhaga technique” group had statistically significant lower operating time ( P  value = 0.037) and intra operative blood loss ( P  value = 0.025). However, there was no significant difference in complications. Conclusion The utilization of “dhaga technique” can potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs by decreasing operative time and blood loss. Moreover, the temporalis muscle preservation in the “dhaga technique” may also enhance aesthetic outcomes and chewing, which were not assessed in this study. There were no differences in complication between the two techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25936904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood Loss, Surgical - physiopathology ; Cranioplasty ; Decompressive craniectomy ; Decompressive Craniectomy - methods ; Dhaga technique ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal - surgery ; Neurosurgery ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Raised intracranial pressure ; Retrospective Studies ; Temporalis muscle preservation ; Traumatic brain injury ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2015-09, Vol.84 (3), p.709-713</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d0ef60646ada842077db246277f9be07595b1f068cf2cd5b39214b9550f4b5c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d0ef60646ada842077db246277f9be07595b1f068cf2cd5b39214b9550f4b5c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875015004775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25936904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Javed, Gohar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Syed Ijlal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Manzar</creatorcontrib><title>Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Background During cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, the temporalis muscle is firmly attached to the dural patch and intermixed with fibrotic tissue leading to considerable difficulty in dissecting the plane between the dura, galea and the temporalis muscle. This leads to increased surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, risk of complications and also affects rehabilitation. We have developed the “dhaga technique,” which aids in preserving the plane between the muscle and dura in order to improve outcomes. Here we describe our technique and also compare the “dhaga technique” with the generally accepted standard procedure. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy either through the “dhaga technique” or the institutional standard (control group). Both techniques were compared using intra operative blood loss, duration of surgery and any complications as study variables. Results There were 133 patients were included in the study. The control group included 68 patients who underwent the procedure according to institutional standard, and 65 patients were included in the “dhaga technique group.” Both groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients in the “dhaga technique” group had statistically significant lower operating time ( P  value = 0.037) and intra operative blood loss ( P  value = 0.025). However, there was no significant difference in complications. Conclusion The utilization of “dhaga technique” can potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs by decreasing operative time and blood loss. Moreover, the temporalis muscle preservation in the “dhaga technique” may also enhance aesthetic outcomes and chewing, which were not assessed in this study. There were no differences in complication between the two techniques.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cranioplasty</subject><subject>Decompressive craniectomy</subject><subject>Decompressive Craniectomy - methods</subject><subject>Dhaga technique</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - surgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Raised intracranial pressure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Temporalis muscle preservation</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCIVqV_gAPykcsuY8eOE4SQ0JaPShUgdTlbjjNmvSTxYju72j_A78bRtlXFAWtkj-w3T573piheUlhSoNWb7fIw4rRkQMUSeI76SXFOa1kvalk1Tx9yAWfFZYxbyKukvJbl8-KMiaasGuDnxZ-rjf6pyRrNZnS_JyTWB7J2Meb0e6_HvAeMGPY6OT8SbRMGcoXGD7t8H90eySro0aFJfji-Jav8oIOLGest-YqHR9QHlzbkeozJpWlm0z25TXrsdOheFM-s7iNe3p0XxY9PH9erL4ubb5-vVx9uFobXNC06QFtBxSvd6ZozkLJrGa-YlLZpEaRoREstVLWxzHSiLRtGedsIAZa3wojyonh94t0Fn78UkxpcNNjPnfopKiopFRw4oxnKTlATfIwBrdoFN-hwVBTUbIHaqtkCNVuggOeoc9GrO_6pHbB7KLkXPAPenQCYu9w7DCoah6PBzoWsoeq8-z__-3_KTe9GZ3T_C48Yt34KWdbch4pMgbqdh2CeASoAuJSi_AtBZa6m</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Javed, Gohar</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad Babar</creator><creator>Ahmed, Syed Ijlal</creator><creator>Hussain, Manzar</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard</title><author>Javed, Gohar ; Khan, Muhammad Babar ; Ahmed, Syed Ijlal ; Hussain, Manzar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d0ef60646ada842077db246277f9be07595b1f068cf2cd5b39214b9550f4b5c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cranioplasty</topic><topic>Decompressive craniectomy</topic><topic>Decompressive Craniectomy - methods</topic><topic>Dhaga technique</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - surgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Raised intracranial pressure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Temporalis muscle preservation</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Javed, Gohar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Babar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Syed Ijlal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Manzar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Javed, Gohar</au><au>Khan, Muhammad Babar</au><au>Ahmed, Syed Ijlal</au><au>Hussain, Manzar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>709-713</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Background During cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy, the temporalis muscle is firmly attached to the dural patch and intermixed with fibrotic tissue leading to considerable difficulty in dissecting the plane between the dura, galea and the temporalis muscle. This leads to increased surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, risk of complications and also affects rehabilitation. We have developed the “dhaga technique,” which aids in preserving the plane between the muscle and dura in order to improve outcomes. Here we describe our technique and also compare the “dhaga technique” with the generally accepted standard procedure. Methods A retrospective review was carried out of all patients undergoing cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy either through the “dhaga technique” or the institutional standard (control group). Both techniques were compared using intra operative blood loss, duration of surgery and any complications as study variables. Results There were 133 patients were included in the study. The control group included 68 patients who underwent the procedure according to institutional standard, and 65 patients were included in the “dhaga technique group.” Both groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Patients in the “dhaga technique” group had statistically significant lower operating time ( P  value = 0.037) and intra operative blood loss ( P  value = 0.025). However, there was no significant difference in complications. Conclusion The utilization of “dhaga technique” can potentially improve outcomes and reduce costs by decreasing operative time and blood loss. Moreover, the temporalis muscle preservation in the “dhaga technique” may also enhance aesthetic outcomes and chewing, which were not assessed in this study. There were no differences in complication between the two techniques.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25936904</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.048</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2015-09, Vol.84 (3), p.709-713
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711540421
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Blood Loss, Surgical - physiopathology
Cranioplasty
Decompressive craniectomy
Decompressive Craniectomy - methods
Dhaga technique
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle, Skeletal - surgery
Neurosurgery
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Prospective Studies
Raised intracranial pressure
Retrospective Studies
Temporalis muscle preservation
Traumatic brain injury
Treatment Outcome
title Dhaga Technique for Tissue Plane Preservation after Decompressive Craniectomy: Comparison of New Technique with Institutional Standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dhaga%20Technique%20for%20Tissue%20Plane%20Preservation%20after%20Decompressive%20Craniectomy:%20Comparison%20of%20New%20Technique%20with%20Institutional%20Standard&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Javed,%20Gohar&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=709-713&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1711540421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1711540421&rft_id=info:pmid/25936904&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1878875015004775&rfr_iscdi=true