De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center

Abstract Background Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transpla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2015-09, Vol.47 (7), p.2116-2120
Hauptverfasser: Rossetto, A, Tulissi, P, De Marchi, F, Gropuzzo, M, Vallone, C, Adani, G.L, Baccarani, U, Lorenzin, D, Montanaro, D, Risaliti, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2120
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2116
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 47
creator Rossetto, A
Tulissi, P
De Marchi, F
Gropuzzo, M
Vallone, C
Adani, G.L
Baccarani, U
Lorenzin, D
Montanaro, D
Risaliti, A
description Abstract Background Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. Methods We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 ( n  = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. Results There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. Conclusions Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711539296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134515006351</els_id><sourcerecordid>1711539296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-a1c9fc220be787d7307465e9dbc53a3bc0fbb9b1d4d7f63a421d756014c07d583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2P0zAUjBCILQt_AVmcuCT42bHT7AFUdT-oWAGi4Ww59gtyN4m7drqiP2D_N-52V0KcOFnWzLzRm3lZ9g5oARTkh00xBT3GbfAG0RaMgigoFJTVz7IZzCueM8n482xGaQk58FKcZK9i3ND0ZyV_mZ0wySVIUc2y-3MkX_2dJ2vfO0ua3eBDJItuwkC-ODvinjQPZr0eJz05P56RVSSriTRuQNL5QDT5ngAcp7zRrvcBLfnh4g1ZxIgxDgn4RC5-bzEkjkFyGfyQNGs3_uqRLBOM4XX2otN9xDeP72n28_KiWX7Or79drZaL69yUXEy5BlN3hjHaYjWvbMVpVUqBtW2N4Jq3hnZtW7dgS1t1kuuSga2EpFAaWlkx56fZ--PclN3tDuOkBhcN9mk59LuooAIQvGa1TNSzI9UEH2PATm2DG3TYK6DqUIPaqL9rUIcaFAWVakjit48-u3ZI2JP0KfdEOD8SMG175zCoaB7isS6gmZT17v98Pv4zxvRudEb3N7jHuPG7MKY8FajIFFXrw0Ec7gEEpZIL4H8A4Tm1ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1711539296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rossetto, A ; Tulissi, P ; De Marchi, F ; Gropuzzo, M ; Vallone, C ; Adani, G.L ; Baccarani, U ; Lorenzin, D ; Montanaro, D ; Risaliti, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, A ; Tulissi, P ; De Marchi, F ; Gropuzzo, M ; Vallone, C ; Adani, G.L ; Baccarani, U ; Lorenzin, D ; Montanaro, D ; Risaliti, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. Methods We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 ( n  = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. Results There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. Conclusions Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26361657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppression - adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - etiology ; Neoplasms - mortality ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2015-09, Vol.47 (7), p.2116-2120</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-a1c9fc220be787d7307465e9dbc53a3bc0fbb9b1d4d7f63a421d756014c07d583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-a1c9fc220be787d7307465e9dbc53a3bc0fbb9b1d4d7f63a421d756014c07d583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134515006351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulissi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marchi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gropuzzo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallone, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adani, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baccarani, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risaliti, A</creatorcontrib><title>De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. Methods We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 ( n  = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. Results There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. Conclusions Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2P0zAUjBCILQt_AVmcuCT42bHT7AFUdT-oWAGi4Ww59gtyN4m7drqiP2D_N-52V0KcOFnWzLzRm3lZ9g5oARTkh00xBT3GbfAG0RaMgigoFJTVz7IZzCueM8n482xGaQk58FKcZK9i3ND0ZyV_mZ0wySVIUc2y-3MkX_2dJ2vfO0ua3eBDJItuwkC-ODvinjQPZr0eJz05P56RVSSriTRuQNL5QDT5ngAcp7zRrvcBLfnh4g1ZxIgxDgn4RC5-bzEkjkFyGfyQNGs3_uqRLBOM4XX2otN9xDeP72n28_KiWX7Or79drZaL69yUXEy5BlN3hjHaYjWvbMVpVUqBtW2N4Jq3hnZtW7dgS1t1kuuSga2EpFAaWlkx56fZ--PclN3tDuOkBhcN9mk59LuooAIQvGa1TNSzI9UEH2PATm2DG3TYK6DqUIPaqL9rUIcaFAWVakjit48-u3ZI2JP0KfdEOD8SMG175zCoaB7isS6gmZT17v98Pv4zxvRudEb3N7jHuPG7MKY8FajIFFXrw0Ec7gEEpZIL4H8A4Tm1ew</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Rossetto, A</creator><creator>Tulissi, P</creator><creator>De Marchi, F</creator><creator>Gropuzzo, M</creator><creator>Vallone, C</creator><creator>Adani, G.L</creator><creator>Baccarani, U</creator><creator>Lorenzin, D</creator><creator>Montanaro, D</creator><creator>Risaliti, A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center</title><author>Rossetto, A ; Tulissi, P ; De Marchi, F ; Gropuzzo, M ; Vallone, C ; Adani, G.L ; Baccarani, U ; Lorenzin, D ; Montanaro, D ; Risaliti, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-a1c9fc220be787d7307465e9dbc53a3bc0fbb9b1d4d7f63a421d756014c07d583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppression - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulissi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marchi, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gropuzzo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallone, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adani, G.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baccarani, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risaliti, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossetto, A</au><au>Tulissi, P</au><au>De Marchi, F</au><au>Gropuzzo, M</au><au>Vallone, C</au><au>Adani, G.L</au><au>Baccarani, U</au><au>Lorenzin, D</au><au>Montanaro, D</au><au>Risaliti, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2116</spage><epage>2120</epage><pages>2116-2120</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Progress in immunosuppressive therapy and perioperative techniques has improved the survivals of both grafts and patients. The patient, however, is exposed to the risks of aging and side effects of immunosuppression. De novo tumors are the 2nd cause of death in the organ transplant population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the current accepted guidelines for the pre-transplantation study and the post-transplantation follow-up have been effective, in our kidney transplant population, regarding early detection and treatment, improving prognosis, and reducing mortality of some curable neoplastic diseases. Methods We considered de novo tumors in kidney transplant patients from 1995 to 2010 ( n  = 636) excluding hematologic and nonmelanoma skin tumors from our study. Results There were 64 de novo tumors in 59 patients out of 636 kidney transplant patients; 29.68% were urogenital cancer, 26.56% gastrointestinal cancer, 12.5% melanoma, 6.25% lung cancer, 6.25% biliopancreatic cancer, 4.68% visceral Kaposi sarcoma, 4.68% breast cancer, 4.68% thyroid cancer, 1 pleural mesothelioma, 1 meningioma, 1 merkeloma. Twenty patients died because of cancer. Ten patients had a late de novo tumor diagnosis, when the stage of tumor was advanced and not suitable for curative treatment. Conclusions Because of the increased neoplastic risk, we consider it mandatory to carry out a meticulous screening and to implement pre-transplantation study concerning this increased neoplastic risk population to detect a subgroup of patients presenting the highest risk to improve their outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26361657</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.029</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2015-09, Vol.47 (7), p.2116-2120
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1711539296
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Female
Humans
Immunosuppression - adverse effects
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - etiology
Neoplasms - mortality
Preoperative Care - methods
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment - methods
Surgery
title De Novo Solid Tumors After Kidney Transplantation: Is It Time for a Patient-Tailored Risk Assessment? Experience From a Single Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A31%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De%20Novo%20Solid%20Tumors%20After%20Kidney%20Transplantation:%20Is%20It%20Time%20for%20a%20Patient-Tailored%20Risk%20Assessment?%20Experience%20From%20a%20Single%20Center&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Rossetto,%20A&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2116&rft.epage=2120&rft.pages=2116-2120&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.01.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1711539296%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1711539296&rft_id=info:pmid/26361657&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134515006351&rfr_iscdi=true