Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance

The space allowance appropriate for sows in group housing remains scientifically undefined, since the social space requirement of a group of animals and the factors which affect this are unknown. Eight established groups of six pregnant, multiparous sows were used in a replicated Latin Square design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied animal behaviour science 1998-09, Vol.59 (4), p.307-316
Hauptverfasser: Weng, R.C, Edwards, S.A, English, P.R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 316
container_issue 4
container_start_page 307
container_title Applied animal behaviour science
container_volume 59
creator Weng, R.C
Edwards, S.A
English, P.R
description The space allowance appropriate for sows in group housing remains scientifically undefined, since the social space requirement of a group of animals and the factors which affect this are unknown. Eight established groups of six pregnant, multiparous sows were used in a replicated Latin Square design of experiment, with 7 day periods, to compare four pen sizes providing 2.0, 2.4, 3.6 or 4.8 m 2/sow. For the last 48 h of each 7 day period, a continuous video recording was made to determine general behaviour and all social interactions. Time spent rooting increased progressively with increasing space allowance, whereas time spent sitting and standing inactive were both progressively reduced. The total frequency of social interactions and aggressive behaviour both increased with decreasing space allowance. The Attack:Retreat ratio was significantly higher, and the Avoidance Index significantly lower, in the smallest pen. All body regions had the highest count of lesions after sows had been in the smallest pen, with damage levels being reduced as pen area increased. Analysis of body lesion scores, combining incidence and severity, gave the same treatment effects. In conclusion, the results indicated that a minimum space of between 2.4 and 3.6 m 2/sow was necessary in the conditions of this experiment to promote good welfare. This result cannot be generalised to situations of different group size, group stability or feeding method.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00143-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17112654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168159197001433</els_id><sourcerecordid>17112654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9ef1b61c5dbec6dc3cb07a629b299e5534c18856af118291f76341eb2d3893733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1EJZbCT6jwCVGJgMeO4_iEoOJLWpVD6dlynEnryo0XT7ZV_z1OF3HgwsVjaZ53ZvQwdgLiHQjo3l_Up29AW3hjzakQ0KpGPWEb6I1srGj1U7b5izxjz4luhBBagdiwm0947e9i3pe3nHKIPvE4L1h8WGKeift55Amp_jmFXJB4nvhVyftdc533hGNN3VPN8ILJrxm-ZD6lnAunnQ_IfUr53s8BX7CjySfCl3_qMbv88vnn2bdm--Pr97OP2yaovl0aixMMHQQ9Dhi6MagwCOM7aQdpLWqt2gB9rzs_AfTSwmQ61QIOclS9VUapY_b6MHdX8q890uJuIwVMyc9YT3ZgAGSn2wrqAxhKJio4uV2Jt748OBBuNesezbpVm7PGPZp164JXh9zks_NXJZK7vJAClJC9Na0UlTj5lzjfgrV29W7W_odDH6uHu4jFUYhYHY2xYFjcmON_bvgNxs6TMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17112654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weng, R.C ; Edwards, S.A ; English, P.R</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, R.C ; Edwards, S.A ; English, P.R</creatorcontrib><description>The space allowance appropriate for sows in group housing remains scientifically undefined, since the social space requirement of a group of animals and the factors which affect this are unknown. Eight established groups of six pregnant, multiparous sows were used in a replicated Latin Square design of experiment, with 7 day periods, to compare four pen sizes providing 2.0, 2.4, 3.6 or 4.8 m 2/sow. For the last 48 h of each 7 day period, a continuous video recording was made to determine general behaviour and all social interactions. Time spent rooting increased progressively with increasing space allowance, whereas time spent sitting and standing inactive were both progressively reduced. The total frequency of social interactions and aggressive behaviour both increased with decreasing space allowance. The Attack:Retreat ratio was significantly higher, and the Avoidance Index significantly lower, in the smallest pen. All body regions had the highest count of lesions after sows had been in the smallest pen, with damage levels being reduced as pen area increased. Analysis of body lesion scores, combining incidence and severity, gave the same treatment effects. In conclusion, the results indicated that a minimum space of between 2.4 and 3.6 m 2/sow was necessary in the conditions of this experiment to promote good welfare. This result cannot be generalised to situations of different group size, group stability or feeding method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00143-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>aggression ; AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR ; animal welfare ; Anomalous behaviour ; bites ; body regions ; CERDO ; COMPORTAMIENTO AGRESIVO ; COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL ; COMPORTEMENT AGRESSIF ; COMPORTEMENT SOCIAL ; floor space ; group size ; lesions ; physical activity ; Pig-social behaviour ; PIGGERIES ; POCILGA ; PORCHERIE ; PORCIN ; pregnancy ; social behavior ; SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR ; sows ; Space requirements ; SWINE</subject><ispartof>Applied animal behaviour science, 1998-09, Vol.59 (4), p.307-316</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9ef1b61c5dbec6dc3cb07a629b299e5534c18856af118291f76341eb2d3893733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9ef1b61c5dbec6dc3cb07a629b299e5534c18856af118291f76341eb2d3893733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159197001433$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, P.R</creatorcontrib><title>Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance</title><title>Applied animal behaviour science</title><description>The space allowance appropriate for sows in group housing remains scientifically undefined, since the social space requirement of a group of animals and the factors which affect this are unknown. Eight established groups of six pregnant, multiparous sows were used in a replicated Latin Square design of experiment, with 7 day periods, to compare four pen sizes providing 2.0, 2.4, 3.6 or 4.8 m 2/sow. For the last 48 h of each 7 day period, a continuous video recording was made to determine general behaviour and all social interactions. Time spent rooting increased progressively with increasing space allowance, whereas time spent sitting and standing inactive were both progressively reduced. The total frequency of social interactions and aggressive behaviour both increased with decreasing space allowance. The Attack:Retreat ratio was significantly higher, and the Avoidance Index significantly lower, in the smallest pen. All body regions had the highest count of lesions after sows had been in the smallest pen, with damage levels being reduced as pen area increased. Analysis of body lesion scores, combining incidence and severity, gave the same treatment effects. In conclusion, the results indicated that a minimum space of between 2.4 and 3.6 m 2/sow was necessary in the conditions of this experiment to promote good welfare. This result cannot be generalised to situations of different group size, group stability or feeding method.</description><subject>aggression</subject><subject>AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>animal welfare</subject><subject>Anomalous behaviour</subject><subject>bites</subject><subject>body regions</subject><subject>CERDO</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO AGRESIVO</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT AGRESSIF</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT SOCIAL</subject><subject>floor space</subject><subject>group size</subject><subject>lesions</subject><subject>physical activity</subject><subject>Pig-social behaviour</subject><subject>PIGGERIES</subject><subject>POCILGA</subject><subject>PORCHERIE</subject><subject>PORCIN</subject><subject>pregnancy</subject><subject>social behavior</subject><subject>SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>sows</subject><subject>Space requirements</subject><subject>SWINE</subject><issn>0168-1591</issn><issn>1872-9045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi1EJZbCT6jwCVGJgMeO4_iEoOJLWpVD6dlynEnryo0XT7ZV_z1OF3HgwsVjaZ53ZvQwdgLiHQjo3l_Up29AW3hjzakQ0KpGPWEb6I1srGj1U7b5izxjz4luhBBagdiwm0947e9i3pe3nHKIPvE4L1h8WGKeift55Amp_jmFXJB4nvhVyftdc533hGNN3VPN8ILJrxm-ZD6lnAunnQ_IfUr53s8BX7CjySfCl3_qMbv88vnn2bdm--Pr97OP2yaovl0aixMMHQQ9Dhi6MagwCOM7aQdpLWqt2gB9rzs_AfTSwmQ61QIOclS9VUapY_b6MHdX8q890uJuIwVMyc9YT3ZgAGSn2wrqAxhKJio4uV2Jt748OBBuNesezbpVm7PGPZp164JXh9zks_NXJZK7vJAClJC9Na0UlTj5lzjfgrV29W7W_odDH6uHu4jFUYhYHY2xYFjcmON_bvgNxs6TMw</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>Weng, R.C</creator><creator>Edwards, S.A</creator><creator>English, P.R</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance</title><author>Weng, R.C ; Edwards, S.A ; English, P.R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-9ef1b61c5dbec6dc3cb07a629b299e5534c18856af118291f76341eb2d3893733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>aggression</topic><topic>AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>animal welfare</topic><topic>Anomalous behaviour</topic><topic>bites</topic><topic>body regions</topic><topic>CERDO</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO AGRESIVO</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT AGRESSIF</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT SOCIAL</topic><topic>floor space</topic><topic>group size</topic><topic>lesions</topic><topic>physical activity</topic><topic>Pig-social behaviour</topic><topic>PIGGERIES</topic><topic>POCILGA</topic><topic>PORCHERIE</topic><topic>PORCIN</topic><topic>pregnancy</topic><topic>social behavior</topic><topic>SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>sows</topic><topic>Space requirements</topic><topic>SWINE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, R.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>English, P.R</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, R.C</au><au>Edwards, S.A</au><au>English, P.R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance</atitle><jtitle>Applied animal behaviour science</jtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>316</epage><pages>307-316</pages><issn>0168-1591</issn><eissn>1872-9045</eissn><abstract>The space allowance appropriate for sows in group housing remains scientifically undefined, since the social space requirement of a group of animals and the factors which affect this are unknown. Eight established groups of six pregnant, multiparous sows were used in a replicated Latin Square design of experiment, with 7 day periods, to compare four pen sizes providing 2.0, 2.4, 3.6 or 4.8 m 2/sow. For the last 48 h of each 7 day period, a continuous video recording was made to determine general behaviour and all social interactions. Time spent rooting increased progressively with increasing space allowance, whereas time spent sitting and standing inactive were both progressively reduced. The total frequency of social interactions and aggressive behaviour both increased with decreasing space allowance. The Attack:Retreat ratio was significantly higher, and the Avoidance Index significantly lower, in the smallest pen. All body regions had the highest count of lesions after sows had been in the smallest pen, with damage levels being reduced as pen area increased. Analysis of body lesion scores, combining incidence and severity, gave the same treatment effects. In conclusion, the results indicated that a minimum space of between 2.4 and 3.6 m 2/sow was necessary in the conditions of this experiment to promote good welfare. This result cannot be generalised to situations of different group size, group stability or feeding method.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00143-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1591
ispartof Applied animal behaviour science, 1998-09, Vol.59 (4), p.307-316
issn 0168-1591
1872-9045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17112654
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects aggression
AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOUR
animal welfare
Anomalous behaviour
bites
body regions
CERDO
COMPORTAMIENTO AGRESIVO
COMPORTAMIENTO SOCIAL
COMPORTEMENT AGRESSIF
COMPORTEMENT SOCIAL
floor space
group size
lesions
physical activity
Pig-social behaviour
PIGGERIES
POCILGA
PORCHERIE
PORCIN
pregnancy
social behavior
SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
sows
Space requirements
SWINE
title Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behaviour,%20social%20interactions%20and%20lesion%20scores%20of%20group-housed%20sows%20in%20relation%20to%20floor%20space%20allowance&rft.jtitle=Applied%20animal%20behaviour%20science&rft.au=Weng,%20R.C&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=316&rft.pages=307-316&rft.issn=0168-1591&rft.eissn=1872-9045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00143-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17112654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17112654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168159197001433&rfr_iscdi=true