The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background : Although some authors have recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and bipolar disorders, the topic remains insufficiently studied. Defining the prevalence and predictors of BD–OCD comorbidity has important nosological, clinical and therapeutic implications. Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2015-11, Vol.186, p.99-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Amerio, A Stubbs, B Odone, A Tonna, M Marchesi, C Ghaemi, S.N |
description | Abstract Background : Although some authors have recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and bipolar disorders, the topic remains insufficiently studied. Defining the prevalence and predictors of BD–OCD comorbidity has important nosological, clinical and therapeutic implications. Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD. Relevant papers published through March 30th, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Results : 46 articles met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD was 17.0% (95% CI 12.7–22.4%), which was comparable to the results reported by the pooled prevalence of BD in OCD (18.35%, 95% CI 13.2–24.8%). With regard to OCD–BD predictors, a higher mean age predicted a lower prevalence of OCD in BD patients. Sub group meta-analyses reported higher OCD prevalence rates in BD children and adolescents (24.2%, compared to 13.5% in adults), in BD-I patients (24.6%, compared to 13.6% in mixed BD patients), and among population-based studies (22.2%, compared to 13.2% in hospital-based studies). Limitations : Most studies use retrospective assessment scales with low sensitivity in discriminating true ego-dystonic obsessions from depressive ruminations that may bias results towards an overestimation of obsessive symptom prevalence. Conclusions : This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD confirms that BD–OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry with children and adolescents and BD-I patients as the most affected subgroups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710983416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032715302469</els_id><sourcerecordid>1710983416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-32f8725a1b4db7d55402c8071982fe83e872c9f5c646ca536300fe69c8dc4e383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFu1TAQhiMEoq-FA7BBWbJJGNuxk4CEVFVQkCqxoKwtx54IhyR-eJKit2PDCbghJ8HpK12wYGWN_P0zmm-y7BmDkgFTL4dyMK7kwGQJqgSQD7Idk7UouGT1w2yXGFmA4PVJdko0AIBqa3icnXDFhRAcdtnP6y-Y7yPemBFni7mZ3VY6b5cQKQ99bsMUYudd3vl9GE3MnacQHcZbNnSERP4Gf__4lcj9Om7FPfMqP8_pQAtOZvE2T3M8fr8NTriYwsxmPJCnJ9mj3oyET-_es-zzu7fXF--Lq4-XHy7Orwpb1dVSCN43NZeGdZXraidlBdw2ULO24T02AtOvbXtpVaWskUIJgB5VaxtnKxSNOMteHPvuY_i2Ii168mRxHM2MYSXNagZtIyqmEsqOqI2BKGKv99FPJh40A73Z14NO9vVmX4PSyX7KPL9rv3YTuvvEX90JeH0EMC2ZVERN1m_enY9oF-2C_2_7N_-k7ehnb834FQ9IQ1hj8pm20MQ16E_b-bfrMymAV6oVfwD0kazi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710983416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Amerio, A ; Stubbs, B ; Odone, A ; Tonna, M ; Marchesi, C ; Ghaemi, S.N</creator><creatorcontrib>Amerio, A ; Stubbs, B ; Odone, A ; Tonna, M ; Marchesi, C ; Ghaemi, S.N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background : Although some authors have recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and bipolar disorders, the topic remains insufficiently studied. Defining the prevalence and predictors of BD–OCD comorbidity has important nosological, clinical and therapeutic implications. Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD. Relevant papers published through March 30th, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Results : 46 articles met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD was 17.0% (95% CI 12.7–22.4%), which was comparable to the results reported by the pooled prevalence of BD in OCD (18.35%, 95% CI 13.2–24.8%). With regard to OCD–BD predictors, a higher mean age predicted a lower prevalence of OCD in BD patients. Sub group meta-analyses reported higher OCD prevalence rates in BD children and adolescents (24.2%, compared to 13.5% in adults), in BD-I patients (24.6%, compared to 13.6% in mixed BD patients), and among population-based studies (22.2%, compared to 13.2% in hospital-based studies). Limitations : Most studies use retrospective assessment scales with low sensitivity in discriminating true ego-dystonic obsessions from depressive ruminations that may bias results towards an overestimation of obsessive symptom prevalence. Conclusions : This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD confirms that BD–OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry with children and adolescents and BD-I patients as the most affected subgroups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26233320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Bipolar disorder ; Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Humans ; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - epidemiology ; Obsessive–compulsive disorder ; predictors ; Prevalence ; Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2015-11, Vol.186, p.99-109</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-32f8725a1b4db7d55402c8071982fe83e872c9f5c646ca536300fe69c8dc4e383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-32f8725a1b4db7d55402c8071982fe83e872c9f5c646ca536300fe69c8dc4e383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032715302469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26233320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amerio, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonna, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaemi, S.N</creatorcontrib><title>The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background : Although some authors have recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and bipolar disorders, the topic remains insufficiently studied. Defining the prevalence and predictors of BD–OCD comorbidity has important nosological, clinical and therapeutic implications. Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD. Relevant papers published through March 30th, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Results : 46 articles met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD was 17.0% (95% CI 12.7–22.4%), which was comparable to the results reported by the pooled prevalence of BD in OCD (18.35%, 95% CI 13.2–24.8%). With regard to OCD–BD predictors, a higher mean age predicted a lower prevalence of OCD in BD patients. Sub group meta-analyses reported higher OCD prevalence rates in BD children and adolescents (24.2%, compared to 13.5% in adults), in BD-I patients (24.6%, compared to 13.6% in mixed BD patients), and among population-based studies (22.2%, compared to 13.2% in hospital-based studies). Limitations : Most studies use retrospective assessment scales with low sensitivity in discriminating true ego-dystonic obsessions from depressive ruminations that may bias results towards an overestimation of obsessive symptom prevalence. Conclusions : This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD confirms that BD–OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry with children and adolescents and BD-I patients as the most affected subgroups.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obsessive–compulsive disorder</subject><subject>predictors</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFu1TAQhiMEoq-FA7BBWbJJGNuxk4CEVFVQkCqxoKwtx54IhyR-eJKit2PDCbghJ8HpK12wYGWN_P0zmm-y7BmDkgFTL4dyMK7kwGQJqgSQD7Idk7UouGT1w2yXGFmA4PVJdko0AIBqa3icnXDFhRAcdtnP6y-Y7yPemBFni7mZ3VY6b5cQKQ99bsMUYudd3vl9GE3MnacQHcZbNnSERP4Gf__4lcj9Om7FPfMqP8_pQAtOZvE2T3M8fr8NTriYwsxmPJCnJ9mj3oyET-_es-zzu7fXF--Lq4-XHy7Orwpb1dVSCN43NZeGdZXraidlBdw2ULO24T02AtOvbXtpVaWskUIJgB5VaxtnKxSNOMteHPvuY_i2Ii168mRxHM2MYSXNagZtIyqmEsqOqI2BKGKv99FPJh40A73Z14NO9vVmX4PSyX7KPL9rv3YTuvvEX90JeH0EMC2ZVERN1m_enY9oF-2C_2_7N_-k7ehnb834FQ9IQ1hj8pm20MQ16E_b-bfrMymAV6oVfwD0kazi</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Amerio, A</creator><creator>Stubbs, B</creator><creator>Odone, A</creator><creator>Tonna, M</creator><creator>Marchesi, C</creator><creator>Ghaemi, S.N</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Amerio, A ; Stubbs, B ; Odone, A ; Tonna, M ; Marchesi, C ; Ghaemi, S.N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-32f8725a1b4db7d55402c8071982fe83e872c9f5c646ca536300fe69c8dc4e383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obsessive–compulsive disorder</topic><topic>predictors</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amerio, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stubbs, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonna, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaemi, S.N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amerio, A</au><au>Stubbs, B</au><au>Odone, A</au><au>Tonna, M</au><au>Marchesi, C</au><au>Ghaemi, S.N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>99</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>99-109</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background : Although some authors have recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and bipolar disorders, the topic remains insufficiently studied. Defining the prevalence and predictors of BD–OCD comorbidity has important nosological, clinical and therapeutic implications. Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD. Relevant papers published through March 30th, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. Results : 46 articles met inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD was 17.0% (95% CI 12.7–22.4%), which was comparable to the results reported by the pooled prevalence of BD in OCD (18.35%, 95% CI 13.2–24.8%). With regard to OCD–BD predictors, a higher mean age predicted a lower prevalence of OCD in BD patients. Sub group meta-analyses reported higher OCD prevalence rates in BD children and adolescents (24.2%, compared to 13.5% in adults), in BD-I patients (24.6%, compared to 13.6% in mixed BD patients), and among population-based studies (22.2%, compared to 13.2% in hospital-based studies). Limitations : Most studies use retrospective assessment scales with low sensitivity in discriminating true ego-dystonic obsessions from depressive ruminations that may bias results towards an overestimation of obsessive symptom prevalence. Conclusions : This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD–OCD confirms that BD–OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry with children and adolescents and BD-I patients as the most affected subgroups.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26233320</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.005</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2015-11, Vol.186, p.99-109 |
issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710983416 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Age Factors Bipolar disorder Bipolar Disorder - epidemiology Comorbidity Humans Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - epidemiology Obsessive–compulsive disorder predictors Prevalence Psychiatry |
title | The prevalence and predictors of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A36%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prevalence%20and%20predictors%20of%20comorbid%20bipolar%20disorder%20and%20obsessive%E2%80%93compulsive%20disorder:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Amerio,%20A&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=99-109&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1710983416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710983416&rft_id=info:pmid/26233320&rft_els_id=S0165032715302469&rfr_iscdi=true |