Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density
Accurately forecasting snowfall is a challenge. In particular, one poorly understood component of snowfall forecasting is determining the snow ratio. The snow ratio is the ratio of snowfall to liquid equivalent and is inversely proportional to the snow density. In a previous paper, an artificial neu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weather and forecasting 2006-02, Vol.21 (1), p.94-103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Weather and forecasting |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | WARE, Eric C SCHULTZ, David M BROOKS, Harold E ROEBBER, Paul J BRUENING, Sara L |
description | Accurately forecasting snowfall is a challenge. In particular, one poorly understood component of snowfall forecasting is determining the snow ratio. The snow ratio is the ratio of snowfall to liquid equivalent and is inversely proportional to the snow density. In a previous paper, an artificial neural network was developed to predict snow ratios probabilistically in three classes: heavy (1:1 < ratio < 9:1), average (9:1 ≤ ratio ≤ 15:1), and light (ratio > 15:1). A Web-based application for the probabilistic prediction of snow ratio in these three classes based on operational forecast model soundings and the neural network is now available. The goal of this paper is to explore the statistical characteristics of the snow ratio to determine how temperature, liquid equivalent, and wind speed can be used to provide additional guidance (quantitative, wherever possible) for forecasting snowfall, especially for extreme values of snow ratio. Snow ratio tends to increase as the low-level (surface to roughly 850 mb) temperature decreases. For example, mean low-level temperatures greater than −2.7°C rarely (less than 5% of the time) produce snow ratios greater than 25:1, whereas mean low-level temperatures less than −10.1°C rarely produce snow ratios less than 10:1. Snow ratio tends to increase strongly as the liquid equivalent decreases, leading to a nomogram for probabilistic forecasting snowfall, given a forecasted value of liquid equivalent. For example, liquid equivalent amounts 2.8–4.1 mm (0.11–0.16 in.) rarely produce snow ratios less than 14:1, and liquid equivalent amounts greater than 11.2 mm (0.44 in.) rarely produce snow ratios greater than 26:1. The surface wind speed plays a minor role by decreasing snow ratio with increasing wind speed. Although previous research has shown simple relationships to determine the snow ratio are difficult to obtain, this note helps to clarify some situations where such relationships are possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/waf903.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17108527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2829434704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a9428fc7fcf7c8d46e2cd69bbc4bad83c2adc49d5facb5292c0c0f58d1e1445d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVFLwzAQx4MoOKfgRyiK4ktnkiZt8jiG08HAF8XHkF6T2dE1M2k39u3NNkEQfDru8uPH5X8IXRM8IqTgj1ttJc5G5AQNCKc4xSxjp2iAhaCpIDw_RxchLDHGlFM5QGq2Wnu3qdtFElq3tbppEuu8AR26_bDcJRrA9e2hiy9J92kSaOqV7lzjFjXoJtloX-uybupulzh7ECWVaUPsL9FZdAZz9VOH6H369DZ5Seevz7PJeJ4CY1mXasmosFBYsAWIiuWGQpXLsgRW6kpkQHUFTFbcaijj4hQwYMtFRQxhjFfZEN0fvfE3X70JnVrVAUzT6Na4PihSECw4LSJ4-wdcut63cTdFBZUxrSJGNkQ3_1FE5lnGGd6rHo4QeBeCN1atfczF7xTBan8M9TGexmMoEtG7H58OMTHrdQt1-OULLnOcy-wbDlaK3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196335407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WARE, Eric C ; SCHULTZ, David M ; BROOKS, Harold E ; ROEBBER, Paul J ; BRUENING, Sara L</creator><creatorcontrib>WARE, Eric C ; SCHULTZ, David M ; BROOKS, Harold E ; ROEBBER, Paul J ; BRUENING, Sara L</creatorcontrib><description>Accurately forecasting snowfall is a challenge. In particular, one poorly understood component of snowfall forecasting is determining the snow ratio. The snow ratio is the ratio of snowfall to liquid equivalent and is inversely proportional to the snow density. In a previous paper, an artificial neural network was developed to predict snow ratios probabilistically in three classes: heavy (1:1 < ratio < 9:1), average (9:1 ≤ ratio ≤ 15:1), and light (ratio > 15:1). A Web-based application for the probabilistic prediction of snow ratio in these three classes based on operational forecast model soundings and the neural network is now available. The goal of this paper is to explore the statistical characteristics of the snow ratio to determine how temperature, liquid equivalent, and wind speed can be used to provide additional guidance (quantitative, wherever possible) for forecasting snowfall, especially for extreme values of snow ratio. Snow ratio tends to increase as the low-level (surface to roughly 850 mb) temperature decreases. For example, mean low-level temperatures greater than −2.7°C rarely (less than 5% of the time) produce snow ratios greater than 25:1, whereas mean low-level temperatures less than −10.1°C rarely produce snow ratios less than 10:1. Snow ratio tends to increase strongly as the liquid equivalent decreases, leading to a nomogram for probabilistic forecasting snowfall, given a forecasted value of liquid equivalent. For example, liquid equivalent amounts 2.8–4.1 mm (0.11–0.16 in.) rarely produce snow ratios less than 14:1, and liquid equivalent amounts greater than 11.2 mm (0.44 in.) rarely produce snow ratios greater than 26:1. The surface wind speed plays a minor role by decreasing snow ratio with increasing wind speed. Although previous research has shown simple relationships to determine the snow ratio are difficult to obtain, this note helps to clarify some situations where such relationships are possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0882-8156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/waf903.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WEFOE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Atmospheric models ; Datasets ; Density ; Earth, ocean, space ; Equivalence ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Extreme values ; Extreme weather ; Forecasting ; Low temperature ; Mean ; Meteorology ; Neural networks ; Nomograms ; Precipitation ; Ratios ; Snow ; Snow density ; Snowfall ; Soundings ; Statistical analysis ; Surface wind ; Temperature ; Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation) ; Weather analysis and prediction ; Weather forecasting ; Wind ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Weather and forecasting, 2006-02, Vol.21 (1), p.94-103</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Feb 2006</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a9428fc7fcf7c8d46e2cd69bbc4bad83c2adc49d5facb5292c0c0f58d1e1445d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a9428fc7fcf7c8d46e2cd69bbc4bad83c2adc49d5facb5292c0c0f58d1e1445d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3681,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17596069$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WARE, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULTZ, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROOKS, Harold E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROEBBER, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUENING, Sara L</creatorcontrib><title>Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density</title><title>Weather and forecasting</title><description>Accurately forecasting snowfall is a challenge. In particular, one poorly understood component of snowfall forecasting is determining the snow ratio. The snow ratio is the ratio of snowfall to liquid equivalent and is inversely proportional to the snow density. In a previous paper, an artificial neural network was developed to predict snow ratios probabilistically in three classes: heavy (1:1 < ratio < 9:1), average (9:1 ≤ ratio ≤ 15:1), and light (ratio > 15:1). A Web-based application for the probabilistic prediction of snow ratio in these three classes based on operational forecast model soundings and the neural network is now available. The goal of this paper is to explore the statistical characteristics of the snow ratio to determine how temperature, liquid equivalent, and wind speed can be used to provide additional guidance (quantitative, wherever possible) for forecasting snowfall, especially for extreme values of snow ratio. Snow ratio tends to increase as the low-level (surface to roughly 850 mb) temperature decreases. For example, mean low-level temperatures greater than −2.7°C rarely (less than 5% of the time) produce snow ratios greater than 25:1, whereas mean low-level temperatures less than −10.1°C rarely produce snow ratios less than 10:1. Snow ratio tends to increase strongly as the liquid equivalent decreases, leading to a nomogram for probabilistic forecasting snowfall, given a forecasted value of liquid equivalent. For example, liquid equivalent amounts 2.8–4.1 mm (0.11–0.16 in.) rarely produce snow ratios less than 14:1, and liquid equivalent amounts greater than 11.2 mm (0.44 in.) rarely produce snow ratios greater than 26:1. The surface wind speed plays a minor role by decreasing snow ratio with increasing wind speed. Although previous research has shown simple relationships to determine the snow ratio are difficult to obtain, this note helps to clarify some situations where such relationships are possible.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Low temperature</subject><subject>Mean</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow density</subject><subject>Snowfall</subject><subject>Soundings</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</subject><subject>Weather analysis and prediction</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0882-8156</issn><issn>1520-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kVFLwzAQx4MoOKfgRyiK4ktnkiZt8jiG08HAF8XHkF6T2dE1M2k39u3NNkEQfDru8uPH5X8IXRM8IqTgj1ttJc5G5AQNCKc4xSxjp2iAhaCpIDw_RxchLDHGlFM5QGq2Wnu3qdtFElq3tbppEuu8AR26_bDcJRrA9e2hiy9J92kSaOqV7lzjFjXoJtloX-uybupulzh7ECWVaUPsL9FZdAZz9VOH6H369DZ5Seevz7PJeJ4CY1mXasmosFBYsAWIiuWGQpXLsgRW6kpkQHUFTFbcaijj4hQwYMtFRQxhjFfZEN0fvfE3X70JnVrVAUzT6Na4PihSECw4LSJ4-wdcut63cTdFBZUxrSJGNkQ3_1FE5lnGGd6rHo4QeBeCN1atfczF7xTBan8M9TGexmMoEtG7H58OMTHrdQt1-OULLnOcy-wbDlaK3Q</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>WARE, Eric C</creator><creator>SCHULTZ, David M</creator><creator>BROOKS, Harold E</creator><creator>ROEBBER, Paul J</creator><creator>BRUENING, Sara L</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density</title><author>WARE, Eric C ; SCHULTZ, David M ; BROOKS, Harold E ; ROEBBER, Paul J ; BRUENING, Sara L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-a9428fc7fcf7c8d46e2cd69bbc4bad83c2adc49d5facb5292c0c0f58d1e1445d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Low temperature</topic><topic>Mean</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow density</topic><topic>Snowfall</topic><topic>Soundings</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)</topic><topic>Weather analysis and prediction</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WARE, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHULTZ, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROOKS, Harold E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROEBBER, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRUENING, Sara L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WARE, Eric C</au><au>SCHULTZ, David M</au><au>BROOKS, Harold E</au><au>ROEBBER, Paul J</au><au>BRUENING, Sara L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density</atitle><jtitle>Weather and forecasting</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>94-103</pages><issn>0882-8156</issn><eissn>1520-0434</eissn><coden>WEFOE3</coden><abstract>Accurately forecasting snowfall is a challenge. In particular, one poorly understood component of snowfall forecasting is determining the snow ratio. The snow ratio is the ratio of snowfall to liquid equivalent and is inversely proportional to the snow density. In a previous paper, an artificial neural network was developed to predict snow ratios probabilistically in three classes: heavy (1:1 < ratio < 9:1), average (9:1 ≤ ratio ≤ 15:1), and light (ratio > 15:1). A Web-based application for the probabilistic prediction of snow ratio in these three classes based on operational forecast model soundings and the neural network is now available. The goal of this paper is to explore the statistical characteristics of the snow ratio to determine how temperature, liquid equivalent, and wind speed can be used to provide additional guidance (quantitative, wherever possible) for forecasting snowfall, especially for extreme values of snow ratio. Snow ratio tends to increase as the low-level (surface to roughly 850 mb) temperature decreases. For example, mean low-level temperatures greater than −2.7°C rarely (less than 5% of the time) produce snow ratios greater than 25:1, whereas mean low-level temperatures less than −10.1°C rarely produce snow ratios less than 10:1. Snow ratio tends to increase strongly as the liquid equivalent decreases, leading to a nomogram for probabilistic forecasting snowfall, given a forecasted value of liquid equivalent. For example, liquid equivalent amounts 2.8–4.1 mm (0.11–0.16 in.) rarely produce snow ratios less than 14:1, and liquid equivalent amounts greater than 11.2 mm (0.44 in.) rarely produce snow ratios greater than 26:1. The surface wind speed plays a minor role by decreasing snow ratio with increasing wind speed. Although previous research has shown simple relationships to determine the snow ratio are difficult to obtain, this note helps to clarify some situations where such relationships are possible.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/waf903.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0882-8156 |
ispartof | Weather and forecasting, 2006-02, Vol.21 (1), p.94-103 |
issn | 0882-8156 1520-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17108527 |
source | American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Atmospheric models Datasets Density Earth, ocean, space Equivalence Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Extreme values Extreme weather Forecasting Low temperature Mean Meteorology Neural networks Nomograms Precipitation Ratios Snow Snow density Snowfall Soundings Statistical analysis Surface wind Temperature Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation) Weather analysis and prediction Weather forecasting Wind Wind speed |
title | Improving snowfall forecasting by accounting for the climatological variability of snow density |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A13%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20snowfall%20forecasting%20by%20accounting%20for%20the%20climatological%20variability%20of%20snow%20density&rft.jtitle=Weather%20and%20forecasting&rft.au=WARE,%20Eric%20C&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=94-103&rft.issn=0882-8156&rft.eissn=1520-0434&rft.coden=WEFOE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/waf903.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2829434704%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196335407&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |