Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate
The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food and chemical toxicology 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 714 |
container_title | Food and chemical toxicology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Pappas, R.S. Polzin, G.M. Zhang, L. Watson, C.H. Paschal, D.C. Ashley, D.L. |
description | The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17106653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691505003212</els_id><sourcerecordid>17106653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZpf0AvwZf0FG9nZFuSySksSVsI9JKexVgaU239sZHsQP99texCbj0NMzzzzvAI8Rlhi4Dq637bu2UrAZrcbwHqN2KDRlelqhp8KzYgtSlVi82F-JDSHgA0avVeXKCqoDWIG7HbkR_DOt4UA5O_KWjyxfKbhiHPijAVI4UpLZFpLJa5I-fmIo3zHy4OFJfg1oEW_ije9TQk_nSul-LXw_3T7nv5-PPbj93dY-lqbZaSu07K3mjixhuQne469srUTdu2fac9yApIk3S9d0ymRdWatmGPWNeAEqpL8eWUe4jz88ppsWNIjoeBJp7XZFEjKNVUGcQT6OKcUuTeHmIYKf61CPZozu5tNmeP5o6jbC7vXJ3D125k_7pxVpWB6zNAydHQR5pcSK-c1lpW8hh0e-I4q3gJHG1ygSfHPkTOR_0c_vPGP45giqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17106653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16309811</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FCTOD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cadmium ; Cadmium - analysis ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Cigarettes ; Humans ; Lead ; Lead - analysis ; Mass Spectrometry ; Medical sciences ; Metals and various inorganic compounds ; Nicotiana - chemistry ; Smoke ; Smoke - analysis ; Smoking - adverse effects ; Tars - analysis ; Thallium ; Thallium - analysis ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17772324$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschal, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cadmium - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead - analysis</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metals and various inorganic compounds</subject><subject>Nicotiana - chemistry</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Smoke - analysis</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tars - analysis</subject><subject>Thallium</subject><subject>Thallium - analysis</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZpf0AvwZf0FG9nZFuSySksSVsI9JKexVgaU239sZHsQP99texCbj0NMzzzzvAI8Rlhi4Dq637bu2UrAZrcbwHqN2KDRlelqhp8KzYgtSlVi82F-JDSHgA0avVeXKCqoDWIG7HbkR_DOt4UA5O_KWjyxfKbhiHPijAVI4UpLZFpLJa5I-fmIo3zHy4OFJfg1oEW_ije9TQk_nSul-LXw_3T7nv5-PPbj93dY-lqbZaSu07K3mjixhuQne469srUTdu2fac9yApIk3S9d0ymRdWatmGPWNeAEqpL8eWUe4jz88ppsWNIjoeBJp7XZFEjKNVUGcQT6OKcUuTeHmIYKf61CPZozu5tNmeP5o6jbC7vXJ3D125k_7pxVpWB6zNAydHQR5pcSK-c1lpW8hh0e-I4q3gJHG1ygSfHPkTOR_0c_vPGP45giqs</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Pappas, R.S.</creator><creator>Polzin, G.M.</creator><creator>Zhang, L.</creator><creator>Watson, C.H.</creator><creator>Paschal, D.C.</creator><creator>Ashley, D.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><author>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cadmium - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead - analysis</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metals and various inorganic compounds</topic><topic>Nicotiana - chemistry</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Smoke - analysis</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tars - analysis</topic><topic>Thallium</topic><topic>Thallium - analysis</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschal, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pappas, R.S.</au><au>Polzin, G.M.</au><au>Zhang, L.</au><au>Watson, C.H.</au><au>Paschal, D.C.</au><au>Ashley, D.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>714-723</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><coden>FCTOD7</coden><abstract>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16309811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6915 |
ispartof | Food and chemical toxicology, 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723 |
issn | 0278-6915 1873-6351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17106653 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cadmium Cadmium - analysis Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases Cigarettes Humans Lead Lead - analysis Mass Spectrometry Medical sciences Metals and various inorganic compounds Nicotiana - chemistry Smoke Smoke - analysis Smoking - adverse effects Tars - analysis Thallium Thallium - analysis Tobacco Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology Volatilization |
title | Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T17%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cadmium,%20lead,%20and%20thallium%20in%20mainstream%20tobacco%20smoke%20particulate&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Pappas,%20R.S.&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=714-723&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.coden=FCTOD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17106653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17106653&rft_id=info:pmid/16309811&rft_els_id=S0278691505003212&rfr_iscdi=true |