Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate

The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and chemical toxicology 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723
Hauptverfasser: Pappas, R.S., Polzin, G.M., Zhang, L., Watson, C.H., Paschal, D.C., Ashley, D.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 723
container_issue 5
container_start_page 714
container_title Food and chemical toxicology
container_volume 44
creator Pappas, R.S.
Polzin, G.M.
Zhang, L.
Watson, C.H.
Paschal, D.C.
Ashley, D.L.
description The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17106653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691505003212</els_id><sourcerecordid>17106653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZpf0AvwZf0FG9nZFuSySksSVsI9JKexVgaU239sZHsQP99texCbj0NMzzzzvAI8Rlhi4Dq637bu2UrAZrcbwHqN2KDRlelqhp8KzYgtSlVi82F-JDSHgA0avVeXKCqoDWIG7HbkR_DOt4UA5O_KWjyxfKbhiHPijAVI4UpLZFpLJa5I-fmIo3zHy4OFJfg1oEW_ije9TQk_nSul-LXw_3T7nv5-PPbj93dY-lqbZaSu07K3mjixhuQne469srUTdu2fac9yApIk3S9d0ymRdWatmGPWNeAEqpL8eWUe4jz88ppsWNIjoeBJp7XZFEjKNVUGcQT6OKcUuTeHmIYKf61CPZozu5tNmeP5o6jbC7vXJ3D125k_7pxVpWB6zNAydHQR5pcSK-c1lpW8hh0e-I4q3gJHG1ygSfHPkTOR_0c_vPGP45giqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17106653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16309811</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FCTOD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cadmium ; Cadmium - analysis ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; Cigarettes ; Humans ; Lead ; Lead - analysis ; Mass Spectrometry ; Medical sciences ; Metals and various inorganic compounds ; Nicotiana - chemistry ; Smoke ; Smoke - analysis ; Smoking - adverse effects ; Tars - analysis ; Thallium ; Thallium - analysis ; Tobacco ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17772324$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschal, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cadmium - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Lead - analysis</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metals and various inorganic compounds</subject><subject>Nicotiana - chemistry</subject><subject>Smoke</subject><subject>Smoke - analysis</subject><subject>Smoking - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tars - analysis</subject><subject>Thallium</subject><subject>Thallium - analysis</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpabZpf0AvwZf0FG9nZFuSySksSVsI9JKexVgaU239sZHsQP99texCbj0NMzzzzvAI8Rlhi4Dq637bu2UrAZrcbwHqN2KDRlelqhp8KzYgtSlVi82F-JDSHgA0avVeXKCqoDWIG7HbkR_DOt4UA5O_KWjyxfKbhiHPijAVI4UpLZFpLJa5I-fmIo3zHy4OFJfg1oEW_ije9TQk_nSul-LXw_3T7nv5-PPbj93dY-lqbZaSu07K3mjixhuQne469srUTdu2fac9yApIk3S9d0ymRdWatmGPWNeAEqpL8eWUe4jz88ppsWNIjoeBJp7XZFEjKNVUGcQT6OKcUuTeHmIYKf61CPZozu5tNmeP5o6jbC7vXJ3D125k_7pxVpWB6zNAydHQR5pcSK-c1lpW8hh0e-I4q3gJHG1ygSfHPkTOR_0c_vPGP45giqs</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Pappas, R.S.</creator><creator>Polzin, G.M.</creator><creator>Zhang, L.</creator><creator>Watson, C.H.</creator><creator>Paschal, D.C.</creator><creator>Ashley, D.L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</title><author>Pappas, R.S. ; Polzin, G.M. ; Zhang, L. ; Watson, C.H. ; Paschal, D.C. ; Ashley, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-ebb22f87ae5d802b7bbed6845999fb7d0230a7a2cfdcea89169895ed114401203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cadmium - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Lead - analysis</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metals and various inorganic compounds</topic><topic>Nicotiana - chemistry</topic><topic>Smoke</topic><topic>Smoke - analysis</topic><topic>Smoking - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tars - analysis</topic><topic>Thallium</topic><topic>Thallium - analysis</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pappas, R.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polzin, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paschal, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pappas, R.S.</au><au>Polzin, G.M.</au><au>Zhang, L.</au><au>Watson, C.H.</au><au>Paschal, D.C.</au><au>Ashley, D.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>714-723</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><coden>FCTOD7</coden><abstract>The deliveries of cadmium, thallium, and lead in mainstream smoke particulate from cigarettes with different smoke delivery designs were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry in order to investigate their impact on the delivery of these known toxic compounds. Analyses showed that the levels of all three metals in smoke particulate were associated with their tar delivery category. After normalizing the metal concentrations to tar, there were no longer any statistically significant delivery differences between full-flavor, light or ultra-light cigarettes. When the concentrations were normalized to nicotine, the mean levels from the three delivery groups were much smaller than before normalization. But unlike the case using tar to normalize, in some of the cases, there were still some statistically significant differences in the nicotine-normalized results. These findings suggest that if smokers compensate for differences in nicotine intake, they receive exposures to toxic heavy metals from ultra-light, light and full-flavor cigarettes that are more similar than results would suggest from using the Federal Trade Commission method alone.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16309811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6915
ispartof Food and chemical toxicology, 2006-05, Vol.44 (5), p.714-723
issn 0278-6915
1873-6351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17106653
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cadmium
Cadmium - analysis
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
Cigarettes
Humans
Lead
Lead - analysis
Mass Spectrometry
Medical sciences
Metals and various inorganic compounds
Nicotiana - chemistry
Smoke
Smoke - analysis
Smoking - adverse effects
Tars - analysis
Thallium
Thallium - analysis
Tobacco
Tobacco Smoke Pollution - analysis
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
Volatilization
title Cadmium, lead, and thallium in mainstream tobacco smoke particulate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T17%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cadmium,%20lead,%20and%20thallium%20in%20mainstream%20tobacco%20smoke%20particulate&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Pappas,%20R.S.&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=714-723&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.coden=FCTOD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2005.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17106653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17106653&rft_id=info:pmid/16309811&rft_els_id=S0278691505003212&rfr_iscdi=true