Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT
The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European public policy 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1003 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 985 |
container_title | Journal of European public policy |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Belschner, Tobias |
description | The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13501763.2014.989891 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710638678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1710638678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhRtZQVf9Bx5y2730WJlOJ-m9yDDoKohexnOoSVeclnSiScviv9-Mo1eVFKSo-t6D4lXVKYcZBw1nvGmBK9nM5sDFrNPl8b3qkAspayHm3Y_SF6TeMgfVz5wfAaDVujusNrdxYjmyh0QUGLqJEkPvz9lqQ-zi_ldmKXpiQyhVdgGnIQb0zA15Q2mgzEYM-EAjhekPm4rIYi7T6Njt4vKOYejZ9XK5WB1X-w59ppP3_6i6v7xYLa_qm7u_18vFTW2FklPtOLZOWwWud-s1IfB1B51s7Fy0gEoRIfYtImnZYg_Y9ZakdRwagdiV-46q3zvfpxSfXyhPZhyyJe8xUHzJhisOstFS6a9R2SnVzltQ30C1FFyrN1exQ22KOSdy5ikNI6ZXw8Fs4zIfcZltXGYXV5Gd72RDcDGN-C8m35sJX31MLmGwQzbNpw7_AbDimp4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686418778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Belschner, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2014.989891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Domestic politics ; Environmental policy ; Europe ; European Union ; fisheries policy ; Fishery management ; Fishery policy ; ICCAT ; International governance ; NAFO ; Sustainability ; Thunnus</subject><ispartof>Journal of European public policy, 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><title>Journal of European public policy</title><description>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</description><subject>Domestic politics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>fisheries policy</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishery policy</subject><subject>ICCAT</subject><subject>International governance</subject><subject>NAFO</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Thunnus</subject><issn>1350-1763</issn><issn>1466-4429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhRtZQVf9Bx5y2730WJlOJ-m9yDDoKohexnOoSVeclnSiScviv9-Mo1eVFKSo-t6D4lXVKYcZBw1nvGmBK9nM5sDFrNPl8b3qkAspayHm3Y_SF6TeMgfVz5wfAaDVujusNrdxYjmyh0QUGLqJEkPvz9lqQ-zi_ldmKXpiQyhVdgGnIQb0zA15Q2mgzEYM-EAjhekPm4rIYi7T6Njt4vKOYejZ9XK5WB1X-w59ppP3_6i6v7xYLa_qm7u_18vFTW2FklPtOLZOWwWud-s1IfB1B51s7Fy0gEoRIfYtImnZYg_Y9ZakdRwagdiV-46q3zvfpxSfXyhPZhyyJe8xUHzJhisOstFS6a9R2SnVzltQ30C1FFyrN1exQ22KOSdy5ikNI6ZXw8Fs4zIfcZltXGYXV5Gd72RDcDGN-C8m35sJX31MLmGwQzbNpw7_AbDimp4</recordid><startdate>20150809</startdate><enddate>20150809</enddate><creator>Belschner, Tobias</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150809</creationdate><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><author>Belschner, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Domestic politics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>fisheries policy</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishery policy</topic><topic>ICCAT</topic><topic>International governance</topic><topic>NAFO</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Thunnus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belschner, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle><date>2015-08-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>985-1003</pages><issn>1350-1763</issn><eissn>1466-4429</eissn><abstract>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13501763.2014.989891</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-1763 |
ispartof | Journal of European public policy, 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003 |
issn | 1350-1763 1466-4429 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710638678 |
source | Political Science Complete |
subjects | Domestic politics Environmental policy Europe European Union fisheries policy Fishery management Fishery policy ICCAT International governance NAFO Sustainability Thunnus |
title | Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20so%20green%20after%20all?%20The%20EU's%20role%20in%20international%20fisheries%20management:%20the%20cases%20of%20NAFO%20and%20ICCAT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20public%20policy&rft.au=Belschner,%20Tobias&rft.date=2015-08-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=985-1003&rft.issn=1350-1763&rft.eissn=1466-4429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13501763.2014.989891&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1710638678%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686418778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |