Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT

The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of European public policy 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003
1. Verfasser: Belschner, Tobias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1003
container_issue 7
container_start_page 985
container_title Journal of European public policy
container_volume 22
creator Belschner, Tobias
description The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13501763.2014.989891
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710638678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1710638678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhRtZQVf9Bx5y2730WJlOJ-m9yDDoKohexnOoSVeclnSiScviv9-Mo1eVFKSo-t6D4lXVKYcZBw1nvGmBK9nM5sDFrNPl8b3qkAspayHm3Y_SF6TeMgfVz5wfAaDVujusNrdxYjmyh0QUGLqJEkPvz9lqQ-zi_ldmKXpiQyhVdgGnIQb0zA15Q2mgzEYM-EAjhekPm4rIYi7T6Njt4vKOYejZ9XK5WB1X-w59ppP3_6i6v7xYLa_qm7u_18vFTW2FklPtOLZOWwWud-s1IfB1B51s7Fy0gEoRIfYtImnZYg_Y9ZakdRwagdiV-46q3zvfpxSfXyhPZhyyJe8xUHzJhisOstFS6a9R2SnVzltQ30C1FFyrN1exQ22KOSdy5ikNI6ZXw8Fs4zIfcZltXGYXV5Gd72RDcDGN-C8m35sJX31MLmGwQzbNpw7_AbDimp4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686418778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Belschner, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2014.989891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Domestic politics ; Environmental policy ; Europe ; European Union ; fisheries policy ; Fishery management ; Fishery policy ; ICCAT ; International governance ; NAFO ; Sustainability ; Thunnus</subject><ispartof>Journal of European public policy, 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><title>Journal of European public policy</title><description>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</description><subject>Domestic politics</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>fisheries policy</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishery policy</subject><subject>ICCAT</subject><subject>International governance</subject><subject>NAFO</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Thunnus</subject><issn>1350-1763</issn><issn>1466-4429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFLJDEQhRtZQVf9Bx5y2730WJlOJ-m9yDDoKohexnOoSVeclnSiScviv9-Mo1eVFKSo-t6D4lXVKYcZBw1nvGmBK9nM5sDFrNPl8b3qkAspayHm3Y_SF6TeMgfVz5wfAaDVujusNrdxYjmyh0QUGLqJEkPvz9lqQ-zi_ldmKXpiQyhVdgGnIQb0zA15Q2mgzEYM-EAjhekPm4rIYi7T6Njt4vKOYejZ9XK5WB1X-w59ppP3_6i6v7xYLa_qm7u_18vFTW2FklPtOLZOWwWud-s1IfB1B51s7Fy0gEoRIfYtImnZYg_Y9ZakdRwagdiV-46q3zvfpxSfXyhPZhyyJe8xUHzJhisOstFS6a9R2SnVzltQ30C1FFyrN1exQ22KOSdy5ikNI6ZXw8Fs4zIfcZltXGYXV5Gd72RDcDGN-C8m35sJX31MLmGwQzbNpw7_AbDimp4</recordid><startdate>20150809</startdate><enddate>20150809</enddate><creator>Belschner, Tobias</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150809</creationdate><title>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</title><author>Belschner, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c476t-f1a5f8c70fdfbbea01b90963c2450a77eeaad5aae865ad0a9dce6cf1034aa9763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Domestic politics</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>fisheries policy</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishery policy</topic><topic>ICCAT</topic><topic>International governance</topic><topic>NAFO</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Thunnus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belschner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belschner, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle><date>2015-08-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>1003</epage><pages>985-1003</pages><issn>1350-1763</issn><eissn>1466-4429</eissn><abstract>The European Union (EU) is usually described as a promoter of global environmental governance, committed to sustainability and the precautionary principle. Regarding international fisheries management, however, the EU has repeatedly deviated from these principles. This article analyses the EU's policy in two Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (RFMOs): the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The EU's deviation from its environmental principles is explained by the weakness of the pro-environmental advocacy coalition in the EU's fisheries policy subsystem and the overcapacity of the EU's fleet, which first arose when European fishing nations were excluded from traditional fishing grounds during the creation of Exclusive Economic Zones in the 1970s. At the same time the article finds evidence of a trend towards sustainability and precaution in the EU's external fisheries policy since the mid-2000s.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13501763.2014.989891</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-1763
ispartof Journal of European public policy, 2015-08, Vol.22 (7), p.985-1003
issn 1350-1763
1466-4429
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1710638678
source Political Science Complete
subjects Domestic politics
Environmental policy
Europe
European Union
fisheries policy
Fishery management
Fishery policy
ICCAT
International governance
NAFO
Sustainability
Thunnus
title Not so green after all? The EU's role in international fisheries management: the cases of NAFO and ICCAT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20so%20green%20after%20all?%20The%20EU's%20role%20in%20international%20fisheries%20management:%20the%20cases%20of%20NAFO%20and%20ICCAT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20public%20policy&rft.au=Belschner,%20Tobias&rft.date=2015-08-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=1003&rft.pages=985-1003&rft.issn=1350-1763&rft.eissn=1466-4429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13501763.2014.989891&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1710638678%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686418778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true