Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors

▸ Development techniques of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors are reviewed. ▸ The known failure modes of biosensors are a starting point for research. ▸ Design of device-to-tissue interfaces is key to long duration implantation. ▸ Biosmart materials are essential for maintaining desired bio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biosensors & bioelectronics 2012-05, Vol.35 (1), p.14-26
Hauptverfasser: Kotanen, Christian N., Moussy, Francis Gabriel, Carrara, Sandro, Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Biosensors & bioelectronics
container_volume 35
creator Kotanen, Christian N.
Moussy, Francis Gabriel
Carrara, Sandro
Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony
description ▸ Development techniques of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors are reviewed. ▸ The known failure modes of biosensors are a starting point for research. ▸ Design of device-to-tissue interfaces is key to long duration implantation. ▸ Biosmart materials are essential for maintaining desired bioanalytical performance. ▸ Systems integration to minimize device footprint is paramount for implantable. The implantable enzyme amperometric biosensor continues as the dominant in vivo format for the detection, monitoring and reporting of biochemical analytes related to a wide range of pathologies. Widely used in animal studies, there is increasing emphasis on their use in diabetes care and management, the management of trauma-associated hemorrhage and in critical care monitoring by intensivists in the ICU. These frontier opportunities demand continuous indwelling performance for up to several years, well in excess of the currently approved seven days. This review outlines the many challenges to successful deployment of chronically implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors and emphasizes the emerging technological approaches in their continued development. The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implantable biotransducer failure. Topics considering the approaches to mitigate the inflammatory response, use of biomimetic chemistries, nanostructured topographies, drug eluting constructs, and tissue-to-device interface modulus matching are reviewed. Similarly, factors that influence biotransducer performance such as enzyme stability, substrate interference, mediator selection and calibration are reviewed. For the biosensor system, the opportunities and challenges of integration, guided by footprint requirements, the limitations of mixed signal electronics, and power requirements, has produced three systems approaches. The potential is great. However, integration along the multiple length scales needed to address fundamental issues and integration across the diverse disciplines needed to achieve success of these highly integrated systems, continues to be a challenge in the development and deployment of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensor systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709769221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956566312001856</els_id><sourcerecordid>1017981905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ca8fa1354ee67755f2d540fadc0e824a381478bba8c0c2b35b4cf3337f14f723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0MtKLDEQBuAgio6jL-DiMBtBhG4rt04a3Ih4A8GN-5BOVyBDX8akR_A8vRlmju6OrgLFV5Wqn5AzCiUFWl0tyyaMqWRAWQm8zKU9MqNa8UIwLvfJDGpZFbKq-BE5TmkJAIrWcEiOGJO0ooLNyOVTv-rsMNmmwwUOfz96XNh-hXHscYrBLTZf4JDGmE7IgbddwtPdOyev93evt4_F88vD0-3Nc-GEZFPhrPaWcikQK6Wk9KyVArxtHaBmwnJNhdJNY7UDxxouG-E851x5KrxifE4utmNXcXxbY5pMH5LDLm-J4zoZqqBWVc0Y_ZkCVbXOJ8vfUKoliBzWnLAtdXFMKaI3qxh6Gz8y2rjKLM0mFbMJ3gA3uZSb_uzmr5se26-Wf0lncL4DNjnb-WgHF9K3kzWtGejsrrcOc8TvAaNJLuDgsA0R3WTaMfxvj08VYZ9D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011850466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kotanen, Christian N. ; Moussy, Francis Gabriel ; Carrara, Sandro ; Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</creator><creatorcontrib>Kotanen, Christian N. ; Moussy, Francis Gabriel ; Carrara, Sandro ; Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>▸ Development techniques of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors are reviewed. ▸ The known failure modes of biosensors are a starting point for research. ▸ Design of device-to-tissue interfaces is key to long duration implantation. ▸ Biosmart materials are essential for maintaining desired bioanalytical performance. ▸ Systems integration to minimize device footprint is paramount for implantable. The implantable enzyme amperometric biosensor continues as the dominant in vivo format for the detection, monitoring and reporting of biochemical analytes related to a wide range of pathologies. Widely used in animal studies, there is increasing emphasis on their use in diabetes care and management, the management of trauma-associated hemorrhage and in critical care monitoring by intensivists in the ICU. These frontier opportunities demand continuous indwelling performance for up to several years, well in excess of the currently approved seven days. This review outlines the many challenges to successful deployment of chronically implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors and emphasizes the emerging technological approaches in their continued development. The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implantable biotransducer failure. Topics considering the approaches to mitigate the inflammatory response, use of biomimetic chemistries, nanostructured topographies, drug eluting constructs, and tissue-to-device interface modulus matching are reviewed. Similarly, factors that influence biotransducer performance such as enzyme stability, substrate interference, mediator selection and calibration are reviewed. For the biosensor system, the opportunities and challenges of integration, guided by footprint requirements, the limitations of mixed signal electronics, and power requirements, has produced three systems approaches. The potential is great. However, integration along the multiple length scales needed to address fundamental issues and integration across the diverse disciplines needed to achieve success of these highly integrated systems, continues to be a challenge in the development and deployment of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensor systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4235</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22516142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amperometry ; Animals ; Biochips ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomimetic Materials ; Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation ; Biosensors ; Biotechnology ; Drug Implants ; Electrical measurements ; Electronics ; Enzyme Stability ; Enzymes ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Failure ; Foreign-Body Reaction - prevention &amp; control ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Implantable ; In vivo ; Inflammation - prevention &amp; control ; Management ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Monitoring ; Nanostructure ; Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects ; Systems Integration ; Various methods and equipments</subject><ispartof>Biosensors &amp; bioelectronics, 2012-05, Vol.35 (1), p.14-26</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ca8fa1354ee67755f2d540fadc0e824a381478bba8c0c2b35b4cf3337f14f723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ca8fa1354ee67755f2d540fadc0e824a381478bba8c0c2b35b4cf3337f14f723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25919208$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22516142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kotanen, Christian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moussy, Francis Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrara, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</creatorcontrib><title>Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors</title><title>Biosensors &amp; bioelectronics</title><addtitle>Biosens Bioelectron</addtitle><description>▸ Development techniques of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors are reviewed. ▸ The known failure modes of biosensors are a starting point for research. ▸ Design of device-to-tissue interfaces is key to long duration implantation. ▸ Biosmart materials are essential for maintaining desired bioanalytical performance. ▸ Systems integration to minimize device footprint is paramount for implantable. The implantable enzyme amperometric biosensor continues as the dominant in vivo format for the detection, monitoring and reporting of biochemical analytes related to a wide range of pathologies. Widely used in animal studies, there is increasing emphasis on their use in diabetes care and management, the management of trauma-associated hemorrhage and in critical care monitoring by intensivists in the ICU. These frontier opportunities demand continuous indwelling performance for up to several years, well in excess of the currently approved seven days. This review outlines the many challenges to successful deployment of chronically implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors and emphasizes the emerging technological approaches in their continued development. The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implantable biotransducer failure. Topics considering the approaches to mitigate the inflammatory response, use of biomimetic chemistries, nanostructured topographies, drug eluting constructs, and tissue-to-device interface modulus matching are reviewed. Similarly, factors that influence biotransducer performance such as enzyme stability, substrate interference, mediator selection and calibration are reviewed. For the biosensor system, the opportunities and challenges of integration, guided by footprint requirements, the limitations of mixed signal electronics, and power requirements, has produced three systems approaches. The potential is great. However, integration along the multiple length scales needed to address fundamental issues and integration across the diverse disciplines needed to achieve success of these highly integrated systems, continues to be a challenge in the development and deployment of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensor systems.</description><subject>Amperometry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biochips</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomimetic Materials</subject><subject>Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation</subject><subject>Biosensors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Drug Implants</subject><subject>Electrical measurements</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Enzyme Stability</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Reaction - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantable</subject><subject>In vivo</subject><subject>Inflammation - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Nanostructure</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Systems Integration</subject><subject>Various methods and equipments</subject><issn>0956-5663</issn><issn>1873-4235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0MtKLDEQBuAgio6jL-DiMBtBhG4rt04a3Ih4A8GN-5BOVyBDX8akR_A8vRlmju6OrgLFV5Wqn5AzCiUFWl0tyyaMqWRAWQm8zKU9MqNa8UIwLvfJDGpZFbKq-BE5TmkJAIrWcEiOGJO0ooLNyOVTv-rsMNmmwwUOfz96XNh-hXHscYrBLTZf4JDGmE7IgbddwtPdOyev93evt4_F88vD0-3Nc-GEZFPhrPaWcikQK6Wk9KyVArxtHaBmwnJNhdJNY7UDxxouG-E851x5KrxifE4utmNXcXxbY5pMH5LDLm-J4zoZqqBWVc0Y_ZkCVbXOJ8vfUKoliBzWnLAtdXFMKaI3qxh6Gz8y2rjKLM0mFbMJ3gA3uZSb_uzmr5se26-Wf0lncL4DNjnb-WgHF9K3kzWtGejsrrcOc8TvAaNJLuDgsA0R3WTaMfxvj08VYZ9D</recordid><startdate>20120515</startdate><enddate>20120515</enddate><creator>Kotanen, Christian N.</creator><creator>Moussy, Francis Gabriel</creator><creator>Carrara, Sandro</creator><creator>Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120515</creationdate><title>Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors</title><author>Kotanen, Christian N. ; Moussy, Francis Gabriel ; Carrara, Sandro ; Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-ca8fa1354ee67755f2d540fadc0e824a381478bba8c0c2b35b4cf3337f14f723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Amperometry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biochips</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomimetic Materials</topic><topic>Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation</topic><topic>Biosensors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Drug Implants</topic><topic>Electrical measurements</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Enzyme Stability</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Reaction - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantable</topic><topic>In vivo</topic><topic>Inflammation - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Nanostructure</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Systems Integration</topic><topic>Various methods and equipments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kotanen, Christian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moussy, Francis Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrara, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Biosensors &amp; bioelectronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kotanen, Christian N.</au><au>Moussy, Francis Gabriel</au><au>Carrara, Sandro</au><au>Guiseppi-Elie, Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors</atitle><jtitle>Biosensors &amp; bioelectronics</jtitle><addtitle>Biosens Bioelectron</addtitle><date>2012-05-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>14-26</pages><issn>0956-5663</issn><eissn>1873-4235</eissn><abstract>▸ Development techniques of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors are reviewed. ▸ The known failure modes of biosensors are a starting point for research. ▸ Design of device-to-tissue interfaces is key to long duration implantation. ▸ Biosmart materials are essential for maintaining desired bioanalytical performance. ▸ Systems integration to minimize device footprint is paramount for implantable. The implantable enzyme amperometric biosensor continues as the dominant in vivo format for the detection, monitoring and reporting of biochemical analytes related to a wide range of pathologies. Widely used in animal studies, there is increasing emphasis on their use in diabetes care and management, the management of trauma-associated hemorrhage and in critical care monitoring by intensivists in the ICU. These frontier opportunities demand continuous indwelling performance for up to several years, well in excess of the currently approved seven days. This review outlines the many challenges to successful deployment of chronically implantable amperometric enzyme biosensors and emphasizes the emerging technological approaches in their continued development. The foreign body response plays a prominent role in implantable biotransducer failure. Topics considering the approaches to mitigate the inflammatory response, use of biomimetic chemistries, nanostructured topographies, drug eluting constructs, and tissue-to-device interface modulus matching are reviewed. Similarly, factors that influence biotransducer performance such as enzyme stability, substrate interference, mediator selection and calibration are reviewed. For the biosensor system, the opportunities and challenges of integration, guided by footprint requirements, the limitations of mixed signal electronics, and power requirements, has produced three systems approaches. The potential is great. However, integration along the multiple length scales needed to address fundamental issues and integration across the diverse disciplines needed to achieve success of these highly integrated systems, continues to be a challenge in the development and deployment of implantable amperometric enzyme biosensor systems.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22516142</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-5663
ispartof Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2012-05, Vol.35 (1), p.14-26
issn 0956-5663
1873-4235
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709769221
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Amperometry
Animals
Biochips
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomimetic Materials
Biosensing Techniques - instrumentation
Biosensors
Biotechnology
Drug Implants
Electrical measurements
Electronics
Enzyme Stability
Enzymes
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Failure
Foreign-Body Reaction - prevention & control
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Implantable
In vivo
Inflammation - prevention & control
Management
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
Monitoring
Nanostructure
Prostheses and Implants - adverse effects
Systems Integration
Various methods and equipments
title Implantable enzyme amperometric biosensors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implantable%20enzyme%20amperometric%20biosensors&rft.jtitle=Biosensors%20&%20bioelectronics&rft.au=Kotanen,%20Christian%20N.&rft.date=2012-05-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=14-26&rft.issn=0956-5663&rft.eissn=1873-4235&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1017981905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011850466&rft_id=info:pmid/22516142&rft_els_id=S0956566312001856&rfr_iscdi=true