Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide

•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred bio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology letters 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37
Hauptverfasser: Sams, C., Jones, K., Warren, N., Cocker, J., Bell, S., Bull, P., Cain, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Toxicology letters
container_volume 237
creator Sams, C.
Jones, K.
Warren, N.
Cocker, J.
Bell, S.
Bull, P.
Cain, M.
description •We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed. Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated. Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure. Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709766371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378427415001940</els_id><sourcerecordid>1709766371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl7eQKRLNx1zcm0XCjJ4A8HNuA6Z9HTI0E40adV5eyOjLsXDD2fznQsfIadAp0BBXaymQ_jocJgyCnJKc6DaIROodF1yUPUumVCuq1IwLQ7IYUorSqkSSu6TA6YoE1rJCbmch3cbm1TYYuFDF5be2a7ow9oPIfr1sliOvrFrh8Wb7UYs2hAL6-Kms71v8JjstbZLePLdj8jz7c18dl8-Pt09zK4fSydYNZRac-l4rSXIRX5Wt61lkkmHklHmsAFOacMF1hw1VIorXillW5lLACjHj8j5du9LDK8jpsH0PjnsOrvGMCYDmtZaKa7hPyiIite0zqjYoi6GlCK25iX63saNAWq-HJuV2To2X44NzYEqj519XxgXPTa_Qz9SM3C1BTArefMYTXIes8PGR3SDaYL_-8In3zWNHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701483909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><description>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed. Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated. Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure. Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Acetylcysteine - urine ; Acrylamide ; Acrylamide - urine ; Biological monitoring ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - urine ; Correlation ; Creatinine - urine ; Diets ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epoxy Compounds - urine ; Exposure ; Exposure limits ; Haemoglobin adduct ; Hand Disinfection ; Humans ; Mercapturic acid ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - standards ; United Kingdom ; Urine ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Toxicology letters, 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><title>Toxicology letters</title><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><description>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed. Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated. Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure. Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</description><subject>Acetylcysteine - urine</subject><subject>Acrylamide</subject><subject>Acrylamide - urine</subject><subject>Biological monitoring</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - urine</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Creatinine - urine</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - urine</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Exposure limits</subject><subject>Haemoglobin adduct</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mercapturic acid</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - standards</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0378-4274</issn><issn>1879-3169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl7eQKRLNx1zcm0XCjJ4A8HNuA6Z9HTI0E40adV5eyOjLsXDD2fznQsfIadAp0BBXaymQ_jocJgyCnJKc6DaIROodF1yUPUumVCuq1IwLQ7IYUorSqkSSu6TA6YoE1rJCbmch3cbm1TYYuFDF5be2a7ow9oPIfr1sliOvrFrh8Wb7UYs2hAL6-Kms71v8JjstbZLePLdj8jz7c18dl8-Pt09zK4fSydYNZRac-l4rSXIRX5Wt61lkkmHklHmsAFOacMF1hw1VIorXillW5lLACjHj8j5du9LDK8jpsH0PjnsOrvGMCYDmtZaKa7hPyiIite0zqjYoi6GlCK25iX63saNAWq-HJuV2To2X44NzYEqj519XxgXPTa_Qz9SM3C1BTArefMYTXIes8PGR3SDaYL_-8In3zWNHg</recordid><startdate>20150819</startdate><enddate>20150819</enddate><creator>Sams, C.</creator><creator>Jones, K.</creator><creator>Warren, N.</creator><creator>Cocker, J.</creator><creator>Bell, S.</creator><creator>Bull, P.</creator><creator>Cain, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150819</creationdate><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><author>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acetylcysteine - urine</topic><topic>Acrylamide</topic><topic>Acrylamide - urine</topic><topic>Biological monitoring</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - urine</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Creatinine - urine</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - urine</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Exposure limits</topic><topic>Haemoglobin adduct</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mercapturic acid</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - standards</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sams, C.</au><au>Jones, K.</au><au>Warren, N.</au><au>Cocker, J.</au><au>Bell, S.</au><au>Bull, P.</au><au>Cain, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><date>2015-08-19</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>0378-4274</issn><eissn>1879-3169</eissn><abstract>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed. Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated. Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure. Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>26024765</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4274
ispartof Toxicology letters, 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37
issn 0378-4274
1879-3169
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709766371
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acetylcysteine - urine
Acrylamide
Acrylamide - urine
Biological monitoring
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - urine
Correlation
Creatinine - urine
Diets
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Epoxy Compounds - urine
Exposure
Exposure limits
Haemoglobin adduct
Hand Disinfection
Humans
Mercapturic acid
Occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - standards
United Kingdom
Urine
Workplaces
title Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20biological%20monitoring%20guidance%20value%20for%20acrylamide&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20letters&rft.au=Sams,%20C.&rft.date=2015-08-19&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=0378-4274&rft.eissn=1879-3169&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709766371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701483909&rft_id=info:pmid/26024765&rft_els_id=S0378427415001940&rfr_iscdi=true