Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide
•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred bio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicology letters 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Toxicology letters |
container_volume | 237 |
creator | Sams, C. Jones, K. Warren, N. Cocker, J. Bell, S. Bull, P. Cain, M. |
description | •We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed.
Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated.
Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure.
Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709766371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378427415001940</els_id><sourcerecordid>1709766371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl7eQKRLNx1zcm0XCjJ4A8HNuA6Z9HTI0E40adV5eyOjLsXDD2fznQsfIadAp0BBXaymQ_jocJgyCnJKc6DaIROodF1yUPUumVCuq1IwLQ7IYUorSqkSSu6TA6YoE1rJCbmch3cbm1TYYuFDF5be2a7ow9oPIfr1sliOvrFrh8Wb7UYs2hAL6-Kms71v8JjstbZLePLdj8jz7c18dl8-Pt09zK4fSydYNZRac-l4rSXIRX5Wt61lkkmHklHmsAFOacMF1hw1VIorXillW5lLACjHj8j5du9LDK8jpsH0PjnsOrvGMCYDmtZaKa7hPyiIite0zqjYoi6GlCK25iX63saNAWq-HJuV2To2X44NzYEqj519XxgXPTa_Qz9SM3C1BTArefMYTXIes8PGR3SDaYL_-8In3zWNHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701483909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><description>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed.
Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated.
Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure.
Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26024765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Acetylcysteine - urine ; Acrylamide ; Acrylamide - urine ; Biological monitoring ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - urine ; Correlation ; Creatinine - urine ; Diets ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Epoxy Compounds - urine ; Exposure ; Exposure limits ; Haemoglobin adduct ; Hand Disinfection ; Humans ; Mercapturic acid ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - standards ; United Kingdom ; Urine ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Toxicology letters, 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><title>Toxicology letters</title><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><description>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed.
Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated.
Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure.
Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</description><subject>Acetylcysteine - urine</subject><subject>Acrylamide</subject><subject>Acrylamide - urine</subject><subject>Biological monitoring</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - urine</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Creatinine - urine</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Epoxy Compounds - urine</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Exposure limits</subject><subject>Haemoglobin adduct</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mercapturic acid</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - standards</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0378-4274</issn><issn>1879-3169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl7eQKRLNx1zcm0XCjJ4A8HNuA6Z9HTI0E40adV5eyOjLsXDD2fznQsfIadAp0BBXaymQ_jocJgyCnJKc6DaIROodF1yUPUumVCuq1IwLQ7IYUorSqkSSu6TA6YoE1rJCbmch3cbm1TYYuFDF5be2a7ow9oPIfr1sliOvrFrh8Wb7UYs2hAL6-Kms71v8JjstbZLePLdj8jz7c18dl8-Pt09zK4fSydYNZRac-l4rSXIRX5Wt61lkkmHklHmsAFOacMF1hw1VIorXillW5lLACjHj8j5du9LDK8jpsH0PjnsOrvGMCYDmtZaKa7hPyiIite0zqjYoi6GlCK25iX63saNAWq-HJuV2To2X44NzYEqj519XxgXPTa_Qz9SM3C1BTArefMYTXIes8PGR3SDaYL_-8In3zWNHg</recordid><startdate>20150819</startdate><enddate>20150819</enddate><creator>Sams, C.</creator><creator>Jones, K.</creator><creator>Warren, N.</creator><creator>Cocker, J.</creator><creator>Bell, S.</creator><creator>Bull, P.</creator><creator>Cain, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150819</creationdate><title>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</title><author>Sams, C. ; Jones, K. ; Warren, N. ; Cocker, J. ; Bell, S. ; Bull, P. ; Cain, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-7735c397515b0157ffa2525ce5202ced1300d34e93e7186363866af55554116c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acetylcysteine - urine</topic><topic>Acrylamide</topic><topic>Acrylamide - urine</topic><topic>Biological monitoring</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - urine</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Creatinine - urine</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Epoxy Compounds - urine</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Exposure limits</topic><topic>Haemoglobin adduct</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mercapturic acid</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - standards</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sams, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cocker, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bull, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sams, C.</au><au>Jones, K.</au><au>Warren, N.</au><au>Cocker, J.</au><au>Bell, S.</au><au>Bull, P.</au><au>Cain, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><date>2015-08-19</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>0378-4274</issn><eissn>1879-3169</eissn><abstract>•We report a study of workers at a UK acrylamide production plant.•Biological monitoring data (urine metabolites and haemoglobin adducts) are given.•Their relationship with environmental (air and hand wash) levels were investigated.•We propose urinary acrylamide-mercapturic acid as the preferred biomarker.•A guidance value is proposed.
Acrylamide is classified as a potential human carcinogen and neurotoxicant. Biological monitoring is a useful tool for monitoring worker exposure. However, other sources of exposure to acrylamide (including cigarette smoke and diet) also need to be considered. This study has performed repeat measurements of the urinary mercapturic acids of acrylamide (AAMA) and its metabolite glycidamide (GAMA) and determined globin adducts in 20 production-plant workers at a UK acrylamide production facility. The relationship between biomarker levels and environmental monitoring data (air levels and hand washes) was investigated.
Good correlations were found between all of the biomarkers (r2=0.86–0.91) and moderate correlations were found between the biomarkers and air levels (r2=0.56–0.65). Our data show that urinary AAMA is a reliable biomarker of acrylamide exposure.
Occupational hygiene data showed that acrylamide exposure at the company was well within the current UK Workplace Exposure Limit. The 90th percentile of urinary AAMA in non-smoking production-plant workers (537μmol/mol creatinine (n=59 samples)) is proposed as a possible biological monitoring guidance value. This 90th percentile increased to 798μmol/mol if smokers were included (n=72 samples). These values would be expected following an airborne exposure of less than 0.07mg/m3, well below the current UK workplace exposure limit of 0.3mg/m3. Comparison of biomarker levels in non-occupationally exposed individuals suggests regional variations (between UK and Germany), possibly due to differences in diet.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>26024765</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-4274 |
ispartof | Toxicology letters, 2015-08, Vol.237 (1), p.30-37 |
issn | 0378-4274 1879-3169 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709766371 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Acetylcysteine - urine Acrylamide Acrylamide - urine Biological monitoring Biomarkers Biomarkers - urine Correlation Creatinine - urine Diets Environmental Monitoring - methods Epoxy Compounds - urine Exposure Exposure limits Haemoglobin adduct Hand Disinfection Humans Mercapturic acid Occupational exposure Occupational Exposure - standards United Kingdom Urine Workplaces |
title | Towards a biological monitoring guidance value for acrylamide |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A10%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20biological%20monitoring%20guidance%20value%20for%20acrylamide&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20letters&rft.au=Sams,%20C.&rft.date=2015-08-19&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=0378-4274&rft.eissn=1879-3169&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709766371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701483909&rft_id=info:pmid/26024765&rft_els_id=S0378427415001940&rfr_iscdi=true |