Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil

This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2015-10, Vol.529, p.249-263
Hauptverfasser: Kibblewhite, Mark, Tóth, Gergely, Hermann, Tamás
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 529
creator Kibblewhite, Mark
Tóth, Gergely
Hermann, Tamás
description This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by preserving artefacts from and information about past societies. They are also relevant to predicting the state of existing and planned buried infrastructure and the persistence of materials spread on land. Soils are variable and preserve different materials and stratigraphic evidence differently. This study identifies the material and soil properties that affect preservation and relates these to soil types; it assesses their preservation capacities for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Fe, Pb and bronze), ceramics, glass and stratigraphic evidence. Preservation of Au, Pb and ceramics, glass and phytoliths is good in most soils but degradation rates of other materials (e.g. Fe and organic materials) is strongly influenced by soil type. A method is proposed for using data on the distribution of soil types to map the variable preservation capacities of soil for different materials. This is applied at a continental scale across the EU for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Cu, bronze and Fe) and stratigraphic evidence. The maps produced demonstrate how soil provides an extensive but variable preservation of buried objects. •The preservation in soils of different materials and of stratigraphic evidence is reviewed.•A predictive framework for the preservation of materials in soil is proposed.•Preservation of materials and stratigraphic evidence in soils of the EU is predicted.•Soil performs an important cultural service by preserving anthropogenic artefacts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709763689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969715004854</els_id><sourcerecordid>1690208318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-a0321a1b60ddaaf1bef9a53637a9acf09395d9db013e90dd59f82d088f2613483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK2qqCy0f6H1sZeEsZ049hGhPpAQcICz5djj1qtssrWdlfj3ZLV0r8tcRiN989B8hHxjUDNg8mpdZxfLVHDc1RxYW0NTg5AfyIqpTlcMuPxIVgCNqrTU3Tm5yHkNS3SKfSLnXALnDegVuX9M6KMrcfxDy1-k24QZ086WOI10CtTNQ5mTHahNBYN1JVM7etrPKaKnG1swRTtkGkeapzh8JmdhKfHLW74kzz9_PN38ru4eft3eXN9VrlGyVBYEZ5b1Ery3NrAeg7atkKKz2roAWujWa98DE6gXptVBcQ9KBS6ZaJS4JN8Pc7dp-jdjLmYTs8NhsCNOczasA91JIZV-D8oaxaGVp1GpgYMSbH9Ad0BdmnJOGMw2xY1NL4aB2Ssya3NUZPaKDDRmUbR0fn1bMvcb9Me-_04W4PoA4PLAXcS0H4SjWzwldMX4KZ5c8gowEKas</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690208318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kibblewhite, Mark ; Tóth, Gergely ; Hermann, Tamás</creator><creatorcontrib>Kibblewhite, Mark ; Tóth, Gergely ; Hermann, Tamás</creatorcontrib><description>This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by preserving artefacts from and information about past societies. They are also relevant to predicting the state of existing and planned buried infrastructure and the persistence of materials spread on land. Soils are variable and preserve different materials and stratigraphic evidence differently. This study identifies the material and soil properties that affect preservation and relates these to soil types; it assesses their preservation capacities for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Fe, Pb and bronze), ceramics, glass and stratigraphic evidence. Preservation of Au, Pb and ceramics, glass and phytoliths is good in most soils but degradation rates of other materials (e.g. Fe and organic materials) is strongly influenced by soil type. A method is proposed for using data on the distribution of soil types to map the variable preservation capacities of soil for different materials. This is applied at a continental scale across the EU for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Cu, bronze and Fe) and stratigraphic evidence. The maps produced demonstrate how soil provides an extensive but variable preservation of buried objects. •The preservation in soils of different materials and of stratigraphic evidence is reviewed.•A predictive framework for the preservation of materials in soil is proposed.•Preservation of materials and stratigraphic evidence in soils of the EU is predicted.•Soil performs an important cultural service by preserving anthropogenic artefacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26022409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Artefacts ; Bones ; Burial ; Cultural services ; Glass ; Iron ; Lead (metal) ; Organic materials ; Preservation ; Soil ; Soil (material) ; Stratigraphy ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2015-10, Vol.529, p.249-263</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-a0321a1b60ddaaf1bef9a53637a9acf09395d9db013e90dd59f82d088f2613483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-a0321a1b60ddaaf1bef9a53637a9acf09395d9db013e90dd59f82d088f2613483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26022409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kibblewhite, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóth, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Tamás</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by preserving artefacts from and information about past societies. They are also relevant to predicting the state of existing and planned buried infrastructure and the persistence of materials spread on land. Soils are variable and preserve different materials and stratigraphic evidence differently. This study identifies the material and soil properties that affect preservation and relates these to soil types; it assesses their preservation capacities for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Fe, Pb and bronze), ceramics, glass and stratigraphic evidence. Preservation of Au, Pb and ceramics, glass and phytoliths is good in most soils but degradation rates of other materials (e.g. Fe and organic materials) is strongly influenced by soil type. A method is proposed for using data on the distribution of soil types to map the variable preservation capacities of soil for different materials. This is applied at a continental scale across the EU for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Cu, bronze and Fe) and stratigraphic evidence. The maps produced demonstrate how soil provides an extensive but variable preservation of buried objects. •The preservation in soils of different materials and of stratigraphic evidence is reviewed.•A predictive framework for the preservation of materials in soil is proposed.•Preservation of materials and stratigraphic evidence in soils of the EU is predicted.•Soil performs an important cultural service by preserving anthropogenic artefacts.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Artefacts</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Burial</subject><subject>Cultural services</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lead (metal)</subject><subject>Organic materials</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgK2qqCy0f6H1sZeEsZ049hGhPpAQcICz5djj1qtssrWdlfj3ZLV0r8tcRiN989B8hHxjUDNg8mpdZxfLVHDc1RxYW0NTg5AfyIqpTlcMuPxIVgCNqrTU3Tm5yHkNS3SKfSLnXALnDegVuX9M6KMrcfxDy1-k24QZ086WOI10CtTNQ5mTHahNBYN1JVM7etrPKaKnG1swRTtkGkeapzh8JmdhKfHLW74kzz9_PN38ru4eft3eXN9VrlGyVBYEZ5b1Ery3NrAeg7atkKKz2roAWujWa98DE6gXptVBcQ9KBS6ZaJS4JN8Pc7dp-jdjLmYTs8NhsCNOczasA91JIZV-D8oaxaGVp1GpgYMSbH9Ad0BdmnJOGMw2xY1NL4aB2Ssya3NUZPaKDDRmUbR0fn1bMvcb9Me-_04W4PoA4PLAXcS0H4SjWzwldMX4KZ5c8gowEKas</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Kibblewhite, Mark</creator><creator>Tóth, Gergely</creator><creator>Hermann, Tamás</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil</title><author>Kibblewhite, Mark ; Tóth, Gergely ; Hermann, Tamás</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-a0321a1b60ddaaf1bef9a53637a9acf09395d9db013e90dd59f82d088f2613483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Artefacts</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Burial</topic><topic>Cultural services</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lead (metal)</topic><topic>Organic materials</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kibblewhite, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóth, Gergely</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Tamás</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kibblewhite, Mark</au><au>Tóth, Gergely</au><au>Hermann, Tamás</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>529</volume><spage>249</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>249-263</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>This study identifies factors affecting the fate of buried objects in soil and develops a method for assessing where preservation of different materials and stratigraphic evidence is more or less likely in the landscape. The results inform the extent of the cultural service that soil supports by preserving artefacts from and information about past societies. They are also relevant to predicting the state of existing and planned buried infrastructure and the persistence of materials spread on land. Soils are variable and preserve different materials and stratigraphic evidence differently. This study identifies the material and soil properties that affect preservation and relates these to soil types; it assesses their preservation capacities for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Au, Ag, Cu, Fe, Pb and bronze), ceramics, glass and stratigraphic evidence. Preservation of Au, Pb and ceramics, glass and phytoliths is good in most soils but degradation rates of other materials (e.g. Fe and organic materials) is strongly influenced by soil type. A method is proposed for using data on the distribution of soil types to map the variable preservation capacities of soil for different materials. This is applied at a continental scale across the EU for bones, teeth and shells, organic materials, metals (Cu, bronze and Fe) and stratigraphic evidence. The maps produced demonstrate how soil provides an extensive but variable preservation of buried objects. •The preservation in soils of different materials and of stratigraphic evidence is reviewed.•A predictive framework for the preservation of materials in soil is proposed.•Preservation of materials and stratigraphic evidence in soils of the EU is predicted.•Soil performs an important cultural service by preserving anthropogenic artefacts.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26022409</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2015-10, Vol.529, p.249-263
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709763689
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Archaeology
Artefacts
Bones
Burial
Cultural services
Glass
Iron
Lead (metal)
Organic materials
Preservation
Soil
Soil (material)
Stratigraphy
Teeth
title Predicting the preservation of cultural artefacts and buried materials in soil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20preservation%20of%20cultural%20artefacts%20and%20buried%20materials%20in%20soil&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Kibblewhite,%20Mark&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=529&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=249-263&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1690208318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690208318&rft_id=info:pmid/26022409&rft_els_id=S0048969715004854&rfr_iscdi=true