Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction
The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean engineering 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Ocean engineering |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Badoe, Charles E. Phillips, Alexander B. Turnock, Stephen R. |
description | The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres.
•We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709733780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801815001468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1701499540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KxDAQx4MouH68gvTopXXSpGlyUxa_QPCy95AmUzdLt12TVvDmO_iGPokpq2c9_WfgN8PMj5ALCgUFKq42xWDR9Ni_FCXQqgBeQKUOyILKmuVVWclDsgAoVS6BymNyEuMGAIQAtiCrx77tJuwtZkObueDbMTP9S5faPhvXmNlhu5tGM_rUJ2I9dd3Xx-cuDDvsOgypDpNzGDLfjxiMncEzctSaLuL5T56S1d3tavmQPz3fPy5vnnLLSzHmpXLCMIFSppAGJEeBjFreCu6aSjm0DUCj6lYyYyTKqm6scgyrBrhl7JRc7tema14njKPe-mjTWUnGMEVNa1A1Y7WE_6CUK1XxGRV71IYhxoCt3gW_NeFdU9CzcL3Rv8L1LFwD10l4GrzeD2J6-c1j0NH62azzAe2o3eD_WvENBHeP-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701499540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><description>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres.
•We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computation ; Drift ; Drift angle ; Finite element method ; Flow straightening ; Hull–propeller–rudder interaction ; Manoeuvring ; Maritime CFD ; Mathematical models ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Propellers ; Rudders ; Upstream</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801815001468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alexander B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres.
•We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Drift angle</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flow straightening</subject><subject>Hull–propeller–rudder interaction</subject><subject>Manoeuvring</subject><subject>Maritime CFD</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Propellers</subject><subject>Rudders</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KxDAQx4MouH68gvTopXXSpGlyUxa_QPCy95AmUzdLt12TVvDmO_iGPokpq2c9_WfgN8PMj5ALCgUFKq42xWDR9Ni_FCXQqgBeQKUOyILKmuVVWclDsgAoVS6BymNyEuMGAIQAtiCrx77tJuwtZkObueDbMTP9S5faPhvXmNlhu5tGM_rUJ2I9dd3Xx-cuDDvsOgypDpNzGDLfjxiMncEzctSaLuL5T56S1d3tavmQPz3fPy5vnnLLSzHmpXLCMIFSppAGJEeBjFreCu6aSjm0DUCj6lYyYyTKqm6scgyrBrhl7JRc7tema14njKPe-mjTWUnGMEVNa1A1Y7WE_6CUK1XxGRV71IYhxoCt3gW_NeFdU9CzcL3Rv8L1LFwD10l4GrzeD2J6-c1j0NH62azzAe2o3eD_WvENBHeP-g</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Badoe, Charles E.</creator><creator>Phillips, Alexander B.</creator><creator>Turnock, Stephen R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><author>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Drift angle</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flow straightening</topic><topic>Hull–propeller–rudder interaction</topic><topic>Manoeuvring</topic><topic>Maritime CFD</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Propellers</topic><topic>Rudders</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alexander B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badoe, Charles E.</au><au>Phillips, Alexander B.</au><au>Turnock, Stephen R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>64</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>64-77</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres.
•We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8018 |
ispartof | Ocean engineering, 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77 |
issn | 0029-8018 1873-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709733780 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Computation Drift Drift angle Finite element method Flow straightening Hull–propeller–rudder interaction Manoeuvring Maritime CFD Mathematical models Navier-Stokes equations Propellers Rudders Upstream |
title | Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20drift%20angle%20on%20the%20computation%20of%20hull%E2%80%93propeller%E2%80%93rudder%20interaction&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Badoe,%20Charles%20E.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=64-77&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701499540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701499540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801815001468&rfr_iscdi=true |