Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction

The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean engineering 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77
Hauptverfasser: Badoe, Charles E., Phillips, Alexander B., Turnock, Stephen R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue
container_start_page 64
container_title Ocean engineering
container_volume 103
creator Badoe, Charles E.
Phillips, Alexander B.
Turnock, Stephen R.
description The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres. •We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709733780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801815001468</els_id><sourcerecordid>1701499540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1KxDAQx4MouH68gvTopXXSpGlyUxa_QPCy95AmUzdLt12TVvDmO_iGPokpq2c9_WfgN8PMj5ALCgUFKq42xWDR9Ni_FCXQqgBeQKUOyILKmuVVWclDsgAoVS6BymNyEuMGAIQAtiCrx77tJuwtZkObueDbMTP9S5faPhvXmNlhu5tGM_rUJ2I9dd3Xx-cuDDvsOgypDpNzGDLfjxiMncEzctSaLuL5T56S1d3tavmQPz3fPy5vnnLLSzHmpXLCMIFSppAGJEeBjFreCu6aSjm0DUCj6lYyYyTKqm6scgyrBrhl7JRc7tema14njKPe-mjTWUnGMEVNa1A1Y7WE_6CUK1XxGRV71IYhxoCt3gW_NeFdU9CzcL3Rv8L1LFwD10l4GrzeD2J6-c1j0NH62azzAe2o3eD_WvENBHeP-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701499540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><description>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres. •We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computation ; Drift ; Drift angle ; Finite element method ; Flow straightening ; Hull–propeller–rudder interaction ; Manoeuvring ; Maritime CFD ; Mathematical models ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Propellers ; Rudders ; Upstream</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801815001468$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alexander B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres. •We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</description><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Drift angle</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flow straightening</subject><subject>Hull–propeller–rudder interaction</subject><subject>Manoeuvring</subject><subject>Maritime CFD</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Propellers</subject><subject>Rudders</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1KxDAQx4MouH68gvTopXXSpGlyUxa_QPCy95AmUzdLt12TVvDmO_iGPokpq2c9_WfgN8PMj5ALCgUFKq42xWDR9Ni_FCXQqgBeQKUOyILKmuVVWclDsgAoVS6BymNyEuMGAIQAtiCrx77tJuwtZkObueDbMTP9S5faPhvXmNlhu5tGM_rUJ2I9dd3Xx-cuDDvsOgypDpNzGDLfjxiMncEzctSaLuL5T56S1d3tavmQPz3fPy5vnnLLSzHmpXLCMIFSppAGJEeBjFreCu6aSjm0DUCj6lYyYyTKqm6scgyrBrhl7JRc7tema14njKPe-mjTWUnGMEVNa1A1Y7WE_6CUK1XxGRV71IYhxoCt3gW_NeFdU9CzcL3Rv8L1LFwD10l4GrzeD2J6-c1j0NH62azzAe2o3eD_WvENBHeP-g</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Badoe, Charles E.</creator><creator>Phillips, Alexander B.</creator><creator>Turnock, Stephen R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</title><author>Badoe, Charles E. ; Phillips, Alexander B. ; Turnock, Stephen R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29d6a36e886a38a084e6e31c4f64db59decb00b97f83aa8e857bc9d3e5b04c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Drift angle</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flow straightening</topic><topic>Hull–propeller–rudder interaction</topic><topic>Manoeuvring</topic><topic>Maritime CFD</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Propellers</topic><topic>Rudders</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badoe, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Alexander B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turnock, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badoe, Charles E.</au><au>Phillips, Alexander B.</au><au>Turnock, Stephen R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>103</volume><spage>64</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>64-77</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>The operation of the propeller dominates the flow interaction effects on the upstream hull and a downstream rudder. An investigation is carried out into the sensitivity with which these effects can be resolved when an angle of drift is applied as well as the length of an upstream body is varied. The computed results are compared to a detailed wind tunnel investigation which measured changes in propeller thrust, torque and rudder forces. Variation of the upstream body length and drift angle effectively varies the magnitude of the crossflow and wake at the propeller plane. The time resolved flow was computed around the hull–propeller–rudder configuration using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and an Arbitrary Mesh Interface (AMI) model to account for the motion of the propeller. A mesh sensitivity study quantifies the necessary number of mesh cells to adequately resolve the flow field. Overall, good agreement is found between the experimental and computational results when predicting the change in propulsive efficiency, flow straightening and rudder manoeuvring performance. However, it can be seen that there is a significant computational expense associated with a time resolved propeller interaction and that alternative body force based methods are likely to still be required with the computation of self-propelled ship manoeuvres. •We modelled the drift angle influence on the marine propeller.•We examined the effect of an upstream board on flow straightening.•Effect of drift angle tends to shift the forces on the rudder but does not change them totally.•By placing the short board upstream of the propeller at drift, flow straightening increased.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8018
ispartof Ocean engineering, 2015-07, Vol.103, p.64-77
issn 0029-8018
1873-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709733780
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Computation
Drift
Drift angle
Finite element method
Flow straightening
Hull–propeller–rudder interaction
Manoeuvring
Maritime CFD
Mathematical models
Navier-Stokes equations
Propellers
Rudders
Upstream
title Influence of drift angle on the computation of hull–propeller–rudder interaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A43%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20drift%20angle%20on%20the%20computation%20of%20hull%E2%80%93propeller%E2%80%93rudder%20interaction&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Badoe,%20Charles%20E.&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=103&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=64-77&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701499540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701499540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801815001468&rfr_iscdi=true