Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code
A range of plasma focus machines from the 200 J FMPF3 through the 2 kJ NX2 to the 20 kJ NX3 are operated at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. The neutron yield Y n versus pressure P curves for these machines have been measured and published. We use the Lee code to compute these Y n v...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of fusion energy 2015-06, Vol.34 (3), p.474-479 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 479 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 474 |
| container_title | Journal of fusion energy |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Saw, S. H. Lee, P. Rawat, R. S. Verma, R. Subedi, D. Khanal, R. Gautam, P. Shrestha, R. Singh, A. Lee, S. |
| description | A range of plasma focus machines from the 200 J FMPF3 through the 2 kJ NX2 to the 20 kJ NX3 are operated at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. The neutron yield Y
n
versus pressure P curves for these machines have been measured and published. We use the Lee code to compute these Y
n
versus P curve for each machine after fitting a computed current waveform to a current waveform measured from each machine. Comparison of computed with measured Y
n
versus P curves show good agreement of peak Y
n
for the NX2 and NX3 whilst the measured peak Y
n
of FMPF3 is larger than the computed by a factor of 3. The computed curve is generally broader whilst the NX3 computed curve also shows a shift to higher pressures than the measured curve. The results are critically discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10894-014-9824-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709727646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714497777</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714497777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c8735fcd73ea1b346c1f35f8f1d292b985fca56ffae800c30260c924b38d7c673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc-KFDEQxhtRcFx9AG8BLx7sNX-6O8lxGBwVZtZBXFlPIZOuzGbpScZUt-Cz-LKmaUEQTA4JX32_qoKvql4yes0olW-RUaWbmrKm1oqXz6NqxVrJa91q9rhaUdYVUTDxtHqG-EAp1arRq-rXJp0vNgdMkSRP9mBxytCTG5jGXLRvAYaefIWME5JDBpzLZDPlH4DEp0y2-8O2Fm_IzR0nNhbwTpDDYPFsyTa5Au2tuw-xuNcnGyKOZJ44jWXGZ8BpGJHcYognMt4D2QGQfephKKYenldPvB0QXvx5r6rb7bsvmw_17tP7j5v1rnZNq8baKSla73opwLKjaDrHfBGUZz3X_KhVKdq2896CotQJyjvqNG-OQvXSdVJcVa-Xvpecvk-AozkHdDAMNkKa0DBJteSya7piffWP9SFNOZbtDNdMCaqomF3Xi-tkBzAh-jRm68rt4RxciuBD0deSNY2W5RSALYDLCTGDN5cczjb_NIyaOV-z5GtKvmbO19DC8IXB4o0nyH9X-T_0G6C0pwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918308036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Saw, S. H. ; Lee, P. ; Rawat, R. S. ; Verma, R. ; Subedi, D. ; Khanal, R. ; Gautam, P. ; Shrestha, R. ; Singh, A. ; Lee, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saw, S. H. ; Lee, P. ; Rawat, R. S. ; Verma, R. ; Subedi, D. ; Khanal, R. ; Gautam, P. ; Shrestha, R. ; Singh, A. ; Lee, S.</creatorcontrib><description>A range of plasma focus machines from the 200 J FMPF3 through the 2 kJ NX2 to the 20 kJ NX3 are operated at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. The neutron yield Y
n
versus pressure P curves for these machines have been measured and published. We use the Lee code to compute these Y
n
versus P curve for each machine after fitting a computed current waveform to a current waveform measured from each machine. Comparison of computed with measured Y
n
versus P curves show good agreement of peak Y
n
for the NX2 and NX3 whilst the measured peak Y
n
of FMPF3 is larger than the computed by a factor of 3. The computed curve is generally broader whilst the NX3 computed curve also shows a shift to higher pressures than the measured curve. The results are critically discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0164-0313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10894-014-9824-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Comparative analysis ; Computation ; Education ; Energy Systems ; Fittings ; Fusion ; Machinery ; Magneto-electric machines ; Mathematical models ; Neutrons ; Nuclear Energy ; Nuclear Fusion ; Original Research ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Plasma ; Plasma focus ; Plasma Physics ; Radiation ; Sustainable Development ; Waveforms ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Journal of fusion energy, 2015-06, Vol.34 (3), p.474-479</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c8735fcd73ea1b346c1f35f8f1d292b985fca56ffae800c30260c924b38d7c673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c8735fcd73ea1b346c1f35f8f1d292b985fca56ffae800c30260c924b38d7c673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10894-014-9824-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918308036?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,27924,27925,33744,33745,41488,42557,43805,51319,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saw, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawat, R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subedi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code</title><title>Journal of fusion energy</title><addtitle>J Fusion Energ</addtitle><description>A range of plasma focus machines from the 200 J FMPF3 through the 2 kJ NX2 to the 20 kJ NX3 are operated at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. The neutron yield Y
n
versus pressure P curves for these machines have been measured and published. We use the Lee code to compute these Y
n
versus P curve for each machine after fitting a computed current waveform to a current waveform measured from each machine. Comparison of computed with measured Y
n
versus P curves show good agreement of peak Y
n
for the NX2 and NX3 whilst the measured peak Y
n
of FMPF3 is larger than the computed by a factor of 3. The computed curve is generally broader whilst the NX3 computed curve also shows a shift to higher pressures than the measured curve. The results are critically discussed.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Energy Systems</subject><subject>Fittings</subject><subject>Fusion</subject><subject>Machinery</subject><subject>Magneto-electric machines</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>Nuclear Fusion</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Plasma focus</subject><subject>Plasma Physics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0164-0313</issn><issn>1572-9591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc-KFDEQxhtRcFx9AG8BLx7sNX-6O8lxGBwVZtZBXFlPIZOuzGbpScZUt-Cz-LKmaUEQTA4JX32_qoKvql4yes0olW-RUaWbmrKm1oqXz6NqxVrJa91q9rhaUdYVUTDxtHqG-EAp1arRq-rXJp0vNgdMkSRP9mBxytCTG5jGXLRvAYaefIWME5JDBpzLZDPlH4DEp0y2-8O2Fm_IzR0nNhbwTpDDYPFsyTa5Au2tuw-xuNcnGyKOZJ44jWXGZ8BpGJHcYognMt4D2QGQfephKKYenldPvB0QXvx5r6rb7bsvmw_17tP7j5v1rnZNq8baKSla73opwLKjaDrHfBGUZz3X_KhVKdq2896CotQJyjvqNG-OQvXSdVJcVa-Xvpecvk-AozkHdDAMNkKa0DBJteSya7piffWP9SFNOZbtDNdMCaqomF3Xi-tkBzAh-jRm68rt4RxciuBD0deSNY2W5RSALYDLCTGDN5cczjb_NIyaOV-z5GtKvmbO19DC8IXB4o0nyH9X-T_0G6C0pwI</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Saw, S. H.</creator><creator>Lee, P.</creator><creator>Rawat, R. S.</creator><creator>Verma, R.</creator><creator>Subedi, D.</creator><creator>Khanal, R.</creator><creator>Gautam, P.</creator><creator>Shrestha, R.</creator><creator>Singh, A.</creator><creator>Lee, S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code</title><author>Saw, S. H. ; Lee, P. ; Rawat, R. S. ; Verma, R. ; Subedi, D. ; Khanal, R. ; Gautam, P. ; Shrestha, R. ; Singh, A. ; Lee, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-c8735fcd73ea1b346c1f35f8f1d292b985fca56ffae800c30260c924b38d7c673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Energy Systems</topic><topic>Fittings</topic><topic>Fusion</topic><topic>Machinery</topic><topic>Magneto-electric machines</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>Nuclear Fusion</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Plasma focus</topic><topic>Plasma Physics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saw, S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawat, R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subedi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanal, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrestha, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of fusion energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saw, S. H.</au><au>Lee, P.</au><au>Rawat, R. S.</au><au>Verma, R.</au><au>Subedi, D.</au><au>Khanal, R.</au><au>Gautam, P.</au><au>Shrestha, R.</au><au>Singh, A.</au><au>Lee, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code</atitle><jtitle>Journal of fusion energy</jtitle><stitle>J Fusion Energ</stitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>474</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>474-479</pages><issn>0164-0313</issn><eissn>1572-9591</eissn><abstract>A range of plasma focus machines from the 200 J FMPF3 through the 2 kJ NX2 to the 20 kJ NX3 are operated at the National Institute of Education in Singapore. The neutron yield Y
n
versus pressure P curves for these machines have been measured and published. We use the Lee code to compute these Y
n
versus P curve for each machine after fitting a computed current waveform to a current waveform measured from each machine. Comparison of computed with measured Y
n
versus P curves show good agreement of peak Y
n
for the NX2 and NX3 whilst the measured peak Y
n
of FMPF3 is larger than the computed by a factor of 3. The computed curve is generally broader whilst the NX3 computed curve also shows a shift to higher pressures than the measured curve. The results are critically discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10894-014-9824-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0164-0313 |
| ispartof | Journal of fusion energy, 2015-06, Vol.34 (3), p.474-479 |
| issn | 0164-0313 1572-9591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709727646 |
| source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Accuracy Comparative analysis Computation Education Energy Systems Fittings Fusion Machinery Magneto-electric machines Mathematical models Neutrons Nuclear Energy Nuclear Fusion Original Research Physics Physics and Astronomy Plasma Plasma focus Plasma Physics Radiation Sustainable Development Waveforms X-rays |
| title | Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Measured%20Neutron%20Yield%20Versus%20Pressure%20Curves%20for%20FMPF-3,%20NX2%20and%20NX3%20Plasma%20Focus%20Machines%20Against%20Computed%20Results%20Using%20the%20Lee%20Model%20Code&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20fusion%20energy&rft.au=Saw,%20S.%20H.&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=474&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=474-479&rft.issn=0164-0313&rft.eissn=1572-9591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10894-014-9824-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714497777%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918308036&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714497777&rfr_iscdi=true |