Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study

Abstract Objective To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through 5 years of follow-up of a Phase III trial with Essure inserts. Design Multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm international study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Thirteen clinical study centers i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2015-09, Vol.22 (6), p.951-960
Hauptverfasser: Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS, Nichols, John E., MD, Levie, Mark, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 960
container_issue 6
container_start_page 951
container_title Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
container_volume 22
creator Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS
Nichols, John E., MD
Levie, Mark, MD
description Abstract Objective To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through 5 years of follow-up of a Phase III trial with Essure inserts. Design Multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm international study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Thirteen clinical study centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Patients A total of 518 previously fertile women seeking permanent contraception. Intervention The objective of the hysteroscopic sterilization procedure was bilateral Essure insert placement (ESS205 model) and tubal occlusion. Women with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion (based on modified hysterosalpingography [HSG]) were instructed to discontinue alternative contraception and to rely on Essure inserts for permanent contraception. Measurements and Main Results The primary endpoint for the Phase III study was the rate of pregnancies occurring during the first year of relying (i.e., HSG-confirmed occlusion) on the Essure inserts for permanent contraception (i.e., 12 months after HSG). For the full 5 years of follow-up (5 years total of relying on the Essure inserts for contraception), the endpoints of interest were safety, prevention of pregnancy, and satisfaction. No pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts who completed the full 5 years of follow-up. As of December 5, 2007, 449 women with successful bilateral placement relying on the Essure inserts contributed a total 24 942 woman-months of follow-up for assessing effectiveness. Overall, the Essure inserts were generally well tolerated, with participant comfort rated as “good” to “excellent” by 99% of women (382 of 385) after 5 years of use. Similarly, overall satisfaction was rated as “somewhat” to “very satisfied” by 98% of women (376 of 384) after 5 years of use. The majority of adverse events reported during the 5 years of follow-up were rated as either “mild” or “moderate” in severity. Three severe events (abdominal pain with very heavy periods and irregular menstrual bleeding) were reported in 2 subjects during follow-up as being “possibly” related to the procedure or the inserts. Conclusion The findings from extended follow-up of this Phase III trial with Essure inserts further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of this nonhormonal, nonincisional option for permanent contraception.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709714215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553465015003271</els_id><sourcerecordid>1709714215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e5ed0814f5870329d8b94fafdaa6f5c4c0752e502042540d6880dfc2288b80a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEoj_wAiyQl2wSrp04cRBCQqMpHamIitK15bFvwMGJg51AZ82L42hKFyzY2Jb1fUe652bZCwoFBVq_7ot-sF8LBpQXUBVAm0fZKeW8zKu6bh8_vDmcZGcx9gBlA1A_zU4Yb2nDGnGa_b48xBmDj9pPVpNtjEtAshsjhjmSzgdyjWFQI44z2fhxDkrjNFs_viHbuxlHg4ZceOf8r_x2Ip8xLi71fEcUuf6mYkLtduRj-rQ6ITAkdDpHtSKUIzfzYg7PsiedchGf39_n2e3F9svmMr_69GG3eX-V60rQOUeOBgStOi4aKFlrxL6tOtUZpeqO60pDwxlyYFAxXoGphQDTacaE2AtQUJ5nr47cKfgfC8ZZDjZqdC6N55coaQNtQytGeYqyY1QnNTFgJ6dgBxUOkoJc5ctervLlKl9CJZP8VHp5z1_2A5qHyl_bKfD2GMA05U-LQUZtcdRobEA9S-Pt__nv_qlrZ0erlfuOB4y9X5JYl-aQkUmQN-v61-1TnjbPGlr-AWEWq-M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709714215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS ; Nichols, John E., MD ; Levie, Mark, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS ; Nichols, John E., MD ; Levie, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through 5 years of follow-up of a Phase III trial with Essure inserts. Design Multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm international study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Thirteen clinical study centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Patients A total of 518 previously fertile women seeking permanent contraception. Intervention The objective of the hysteroscopic sterilization procedure was bilateral Essure insert placement (ESS205 model) and tubal occlusion. Women with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion (based on modified hysterosalpingography [HSG]) were instructed to discontinue alternative contraception and to rely on Essure inserts for permanent contraception. Measurements and Main Results The primary endpoint for the Phase III study was the rate of pregnancies occurring during the first year of relying (i.e., HSG-confirmed occlusion) on the Essure inserts for permanent contraception (i.e., 12 months after HSG). For the full 5 years of follow-up (5 years total of relying on the Essure inserts for contraception), the endpoints of interest were safety, prevention of pregnancy, and satisfaction. No pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts who completed the full 5 years of follow-up. As of December 5, 2007, 449 women with successful bilateral placement relying on the Essure inserts contributed a total 24 942 woman-months of follow-up for assessing effectiveness. Overall, the Essure inserts were generally well tolerated, with participant comfort rated as “good” to “excellent” by 99% of women (382 of 385) after 5 years of use. Similarly, overall satisfaction was rated as “somewhat” to “very satisfied” by 98% of women (376 of 384) after 5 years of use. The majority of adverse events reported during the 5 years of follow-up were rated as either “mild” or “moderate” in severity. Three severe events (abdominal pain with very heavy periods and irregular menstrual bleeding) were reported in 2 subjects during follow-up as being “possibly” related to the procedure or the inserts. Conclusion The findings from extended follow-up of this Phase III trial with Essure inserts further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of this nonhormonal, nonincisional option for permanent contraception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-4669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25917278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Australia - epidemiology ; Contraception - methods ; Essure insert ; Europe - epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hysterosalpingography - methods ; Hysteroscopic sterilization ; Hysteroscopy - methods ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Permanent contraception ; Pregnancy ; Sterilization, Tubal - methods ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2015-09, Vol.22 (6), p.951-960</ispartof><rights>AAGL</rights><rights>2015 AAGL</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e5ed0814f5870329d8b94fafdaa6f5c4c0752e502042540d6880dfc2288b80a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e5ed0814f5870329d8b94fafdaa6f5c4c0752e502042540d6880dfc2288b80a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, John E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levie, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study</title><title>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</title><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through 5 years of follow-up of a Phase III trial with Essure inserts. Design Multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm international study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Thirteen clinical study centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Patients A total of 518 previously fertile women seeking permanent contraception. Intervention The objective of the hysteroscopic sterilization procedure was bilateral Essure insert placement (ESS205 model) and tubal occlusion. Women with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion (based on modified hysterosalpingography [HSG]) were instructed to discontinue alternative contraception and to rely on Essure inserts for permanent contraception. Measurements and Main Results The primary endpoint for the Phase III study was the rate of pregnancies occurring during the first year of relying (i.e., HSG-confirmed occlusion) on the Essure inserts for permanent contraception (i.e., 12 months after HSG). For the full 5 years of follow-up (5 years total of relying on the Essure inserts for contraception), the endpoints of interest were safety, prevention of pregnancy, and satisfaction. No pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts who completed the full 5 years of follow-up. As of December 5, 2007, 449 women with successful bilateral placement relying on the Essure inserts contributed a total 24 942 woman-months of follow-up for assessing effectiveness. Overall, the Essure inserts were generally well tolerated, with participant comfort rated as “good” to “excellent” by 99% of women (382 of 385) after 5 years of use. Similarly, overall satisfaction was rated as “somewhat” to “very satisfied” by 98% of women (376 of 384) after 5 years of use. The majority of adverse events reported during the 5 years of follow-up were rated as either “mild” or “moderate” in severity. Three severe events (abdominal pain with very heavy periods and irregular menstrual bleeding) were reported in 2 subjects during follow-up as being “possibly” related to the procedure or the inserts. Conclusion The findings from extended follow-up of this Phase III trial with Essure inserts further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of this nonhormonal, nonincisional option for permanent contraception.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Essure insert</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography - methods</subject><subject>Hysteroscopic sterilization</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Permanent contraception</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1553-4650</issn><issn>1553-4669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEoj_wAiyQl2wSrp04cRBCQqMpHamIitK15bFvwMGJg51AZ82L42hKFyzY2Jb1fUe652bZCwoFBVq_7ot-sF8LBpQXUBVAm0fZKeW8zKu6bh8_vDmcZGcx9gBlA1A_zU4Yb2nDGnGa_b48xBmDj9pPVpNtjEtAshsjhjmSzgdyjWFQI44z2fhxDkrjNFs_viHbuxlHg4ZceOf8r_x2Ip8xLi71fEcUuf6mYkLtduRj-rQ6ITAkdDpHtSKUIzfzYg7PsiedchGf39_n2e3F9svmMr_69GG3eX-V60rQOUeOBgStOi4aKFlrxL6tOtUZpeqO60pDwxlyYFAxXoGphQDTacaE2AtQUJ5nr47cKfgfC8ZZDjZqdC6N55coaQNtQytGeYqyY1QnNTFgJ6dgBxUOkoJc5ctervLlKl9CJZP8VHp5z1_2A5qHyl_bKfD2GMA05U-LQUZtcdRobEA9S-Pt__nv_qlrZ0erlfuOB4y9X5JYl-aQkUmQN-v61-1TnjbPGlr-AWEWq-M</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS</creator><creator>Nichols, John E., MD</creator><creator>Levie, Mark, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study</title><author>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS ; Nichols, John E., MD ; Levie, Mark, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-e5ed0814f5870329d8b94fafdaa6f5c4c0752e502042540d6880dfc2288b80a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Essure insert</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography - methods</topic><topic>Hysteroscopic sterilization</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Permanent contraception</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, John E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levie, Mark, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chudnoff, Scott G., MD, MS</au><au>Nichols, John E., MD</au><au>Levie, Mark, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>951</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>951-960</pages><issn>1553-4650</issn><eissn>1553-4669</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through 5 years of follow-up of a Phase III trial with Essure inserts. Design Multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm international study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting Thirteen clinical study centers in the United States, Europe, and Australia. Patients A total of 518 previously fertile women seeking permanent contraception. Intervention The objective of the hysteroscopic sterilization procedure was bilateral Essure insert placement (ESS205 model) and tubal occlusion. Women with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion (based on modified hysterosalpingography [HSG]) were instructed to discontinue alternative contraception and to rely on Essure inserts for permanent contraception. Measurements and Main Results The primary endpoint for the Phase III study was the rate of pregnancies occurring during the first year of relying (i.e., HSG-confirmed occlusion) on the Essure inserts for permanent contraception (i.e., 12 months after HSG). For the full 5 years of follow-up (5 years total of relying on the Essure inserts for contraception), the endpoints of interest were safety, prevention of pregnancy, and satisfaction. No pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts who completed the full 5 years of follow-up. As of December 5, 2007, 449 women with successful bilateral placement relying on the Essure inserts contributed a total 24 942 woman-months of follow-up for assessing effectiveness. Overall, the Essure inserts were generally well tolerated, with participant comfort rated as “good” to “excellent” by 99% of women (382 of 385) after 5 years of use. Similarly, overall satisfaction was rated as “somewhat” to “very satisfied” by 98% of women (376 of 384) after 5 years of use. The majority of adverse events reported during the 5 years of follow-up were rated as either “mild” or “moderate” in severity. Three severe events (abdominal pain with very heavy periods and irregular menstrual bleeding) were reported in 2 subjects during follow-up as being “possibly” related to the procedure or the inserts. Conclusion The findings from extended follow-up of this Phase III trial with Essure inserts further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of this nonhormonal, nonincisional option for permanent contraception.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25917278</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-4650
ispartof Journal of minimally invasive gynecology, 2015-09, Vol.22 (6), p.951-960
issn 1553-4650
1553-4669
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709714215
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Australia - epidemiology
Contraception - methods
Essure insert
Europe - epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hysterosalpingography - methods
Hysteroscopic sterilization
Hysteroscopy - methods
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Permanent contraception
Pregnancy
Sterilization, Tubal - methods
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
United States - epidemiology
title Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T15%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hysteroscopic%20Essure%20Inserts%20for%20Permanent%20Contraception:%20Extended%20Follow-Up%20Results%20of%20a%20Phase%20III%20Multicenter%20International%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20gynecology&rft.au=Chudnoff,%20Scott%20G.,%20MD,%20MS&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=951&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=951-960&rft.issn=1553-4650&rft.eissn=1553-4669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709714215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709714215&rft_id=info:pmid/25917278&rft_els_id=S1553465015003271&rfr_iscdi=true