Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones
There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The bone & joint journal 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1214 |
container_title | The bone & joint journal |
container_volume | 97-B |
creator | Loh, B W Stokes, C M Miller, B G Page, R S |
description | There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p < 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p < 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709709041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709709041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFq3DAQhkVJ6C7JvkEpOubi7ciSZauXsFmaphDoJYHehCSPWxfbciWZZN--2iQbMSDBfPOP-Aj5xGDLOJRfgAMrZAm_tqq-UVtelZJ_IOsShCqEgObs9OZKrMgmxr-QTwOMCfaRrDLNoWrqNQm3OPrgjcNk7DKYQPtx7qffOOKUqI8J_TyYmA5faR-pmQ40YESXsKVm9Etmounwmu7oYKwPJvlwoNbE3MfnGUP_kvPUpz8ZfLJ-wnhJzjszRNy83Rfk8fbbw_6uuP_5_cd-d1-4spKp4KqzQgqrrHCmbqBhvJVowMq2bDvuQLQNM1JB5aCpbcMraXldCadaWVpR8Qty9Zo7B_9vwZj02EeHw2Am9EvUrAaVCwTLqHhFXfAxBuz0nH9uwkEz0Efh-ihcH4Xro3D9IjyPfX7bsNgR2_ehk17-H6xtfTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709709041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</creator><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p < 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p < 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26330587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery ; Femoral Fractures - etiology ; Femoral Fractures - physiopathology ; Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology ; Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology ; Femur Head - physiopathology ; Femur Head - surgery ; Femur Neck - physiopathology ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Humans ; Models, Anatomic ; Osteotomy - adverse effects ; Osteotomy - methods ; Stress, Mechanical ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The bone & joint journal, 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219</ispartof><rights>2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, R S</creatorcontrib><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><title>The bone & joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p < 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p < 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</description><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - surgery</subject><subject>Femur Neck - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Osteotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFq3DAQhkVJ6C7JvkEpOubi7ciSZauXsFmaphDoJYHehCSPWxfbciWZZN--2iQbMSDBfPOP-Aj5xGDLOJRfgAMrZAm_tqq-UVtelZJ_IOsShCqEgObs9OZKrMgmxr-QTwOMCfaRrDLNoWrqNQm3OPrgjcNk7DKYQPtx7qffOOKUqI8J_TyYmA5faR-pmQ40YESXsKVm9Etmounwmu7oYKwPJvlwoNbE3MfnGUP_kvPUpz8ZfLJ-wnhJzjszRNy83Rfk8fbbw_6uuP_5_cd-d1-4spKp4KqzQgqrrHCmbqBhvJVowMq2bDvuQLQNM1JB5aCpbcMraXldCadaWVpR8Qty9Zo7B_9vwZj02EeHw2Am9EvUrAaVCwTLqHhFXfAxBuz0nH9uwkEz0Efh-ihcH4Xro3D9IjyPfX7bsNgR2_ehk17-H6xtfTM</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Loh, B W</creator><creator>Stokes, C M</creator><creator>Miller, B G</creator><creator>Page, R S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><author>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - surgery</topic><topic>Femur Neck - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Osteotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, R S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loh, B W</au><au>Stokes, C M</au><au>Miller, B G</au><au>Page, R S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</atitle><jtitle>The bone & joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97-B</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1214</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1214-1219</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p < 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p < 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26330587</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-4394 |
ispartof | The bone & joint journal, 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219 |
issn | 2049-4394 2049-4408 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709709041 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery Femoral Fractures - etiology Femoral Fractures - physiopathology Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology Femur Head - physiopathology Femur Head - surgery Femur Neck - physiopathology Femur Neck - surgery Humans Models, Anatomic Osteotomy - adverse effects Osteotomy - methods Stress, Mechanical Weight-Bearing |
title | Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoroacetabular%20impingement%20osteoplasty:%20is%20any%20resected%20amount%20safe?%20A%20laboratory%20based%20experiment%20with%20sawbones&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Loh,%20B%20W&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=97-B&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1214&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1214-1219&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709709041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709709041&rft_id=info:pmid/26330587&rfr_iscdi=true |