Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones

There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The bone & joint journal 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219
Hauptverfasser: Loh, B W, Stokes, C M, Miller, B G, Page, R S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1219
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1214
container_title The bone & joint journal
container_volume 97-B
creator Loh, B W
Stokes, C M
Miller, B G
Page, R S
description There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p < 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p < 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709709041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709709041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFq3DAQhkVJ6C7JvkEpOubi7ciSZauXsFmaphDoJYHehCSPWxfbciWZZN--2iQbMSDBfPOP-Aj5xGDLOJRfgAMrZAm_tqq-UVtelZJ_IOsShCqEgObs9OZKrMgmxr-QTwOMCfaRrDLNoWrqNQm3OPrgjcNk7DKYQPtx7qffOOKUqI8J_TyYmA5faR-pmQ40YESXsKVm9Etmounwmu7oYKwPJvlwoNbE3MfnGUP_kvPUpz8ZfLJ-wnhJzjszRNy83Rfk8fbbw_6uuP_5_cd-d1-4spKp4KqzQgqrrHCmbqBhvJVowMq2bDvuQLQNM1JB5aCpbcMraXldCadaWVpR8Qty9Zo7B_9vwZj02EeHw2Am9EvUrAaVCwTLqHhFXfAxBuz0nH9uwkEz0Efh-ihcH4Xro3D9IjyPfX7bsNgR2_ehk17-H6xtfTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709709041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</creator><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p &lt; 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p &lt; 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26330587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery ; Femoral Fractures - etiology ; Femoral Fractures - physiopathology ; Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology ; Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology ; Femur Head - physiopathology ; Femur Head - surgery ; Femur Neck - physiopathology ; Femur Neck - surgery ; Humans ; Models, Anatomic ; Osteotomy - adverse effects ; Osteotomy - methods ; Stress, Mechanical ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>The bone &amp; joint journal, 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219</ispartof><rights>2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, R S</creatorcontrib><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><title>The bone &amp; joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p &lt; 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p &lt; 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</description><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - surgery</subject><subject>Femur Neck - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Osteotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFq3DAQhkVJ6C7JvkEpOubi7ciSZauXsFmaphDoJYHehCSPWxfbciWZZN--2iQbMSDBfPOP-Aj5xGDLOJRfgAMrZAm_tqq-UVtelZJ_IOsShCqEgObs9OZKrMgmxr-QTwOMCfaRrDLNoWrqNQm3OPrgjcNk7DKYQPtx7qffOOKUqI8J_TyYmA5faR-pmQ40YESXsKVm9Etmounwmu7oYKwPJvlwoNbE3MfnGUP_kvPUpz8ZfLJ-wnhJzjszRNy83Rfk8fbbw_6uuP_5_cd-d1-4spKp4KqzQgqrrHCmbqBhvJVowMq2bDvuQLQNM1JB5aCpbcMraXldCadaWVpR8Qty9Zo7B_9vwZj02EeHw2Am9EvUrAaVCwTLqHhFXfAxBuz0nH9uwkEz0Efh-ihcH4Xro3D9IjyPfX7bsNgR2_ehk17-H6xtfTM</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Loh, B W</creator><creator>Stokes, C M</creator><creator>Miller, B G</creator><creator>Page, R S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</title><author>Loh, B W ; Stokes, C M ; Miller, B G ; Page, R S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-39fb464b9b4ca780813d6ea0b6d2df3c04d81a6905c087b8356b3754c9d62b453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - surgery</topic><topic>Femur Neck - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Osteotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loh, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stokes, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, R S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loh, B W</au><au>Stokes, C M</au><au>Miller, B G</au><au>Page, R S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones</atitle><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97-B</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1214</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1214-1219</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>There is an increased risk of fracture following osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head-neck junction has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control, 10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture between the control group and the 10% resection group (p &lt; 0.001). The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before failure (p &lt; 0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection (p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone, there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral femoral head-neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to minimise the subsequent fracture risk.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26330587</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-4394
ispartof The bone & joint journal, 2015-09, Vol.97-B (9), p.1214-1219
issn 2049-4394
2049-4408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709709041
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Femoracetabular Impingement - surgery
Femoral Fractures - etiology
Femoral Fractures - physiopathology
Femoral Neck Fractures - etiology
Femoral Neck Fractures - physiopathology
Femur Head - physiopathology
Femur Head - surgery
Femur Neck - physiopathology
Femur Neck - surgery
Humans
Models, Anatomic
Osteotomy - adverse effects
Osteotomy - methods
Stress, Mechanical
Weight-Bearing
title Femoroacetabular impingement osteoplasty: is any resected amount safe? A laboratory based experiment with sawbones
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T18%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoroacetabular%20impingement%20osteoplasty:%20is%20any%20resected%20amount%20safe?%20A%20laboratory%20based%20experiment%20with%20sawbones&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Loh,%20B%20W&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=97-B&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1214&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1214-1219&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709709041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709709041&rft_id=info:pmid/26330587&rfr_iscdi=true