Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks

Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mammalogy 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565
Hauptverfasser: Falkenberg, Jill C., Clarke, Jennifer A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 565
container_issue 2
container_start_page 558
container_title Journal of mammalogy
container_volume 79
creator Falkenberg, Jill C.
Clarke, Jennifer A.
description Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1382986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17096587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1382986</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1382986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf4LxQRfaoml6ZNfZM5dTARxD2XNLtgZm1nLnvwv7dlQ0Hw5Y67-_F9x8fYqeBXIHlxLaSGUud7bCRUptK-wD4bcQ6QgizgkB0RrTjnqgA-YrMnb0P3ZmofTUwWhEnnkjvEkPQHvEmmzqGNNGxnbcRAa7TeebudjI2-a5MXT-90zA6caQhPdn3MFvfT18ljOn9-mE1u56nt3WMK1mZYaJHnpcpFXmpTlmBAu6U13BRLKXlthOO4dMJIh5jXmcit48q4Gmwhx-xiq7sO3ecGKVYfniw2jWmx21AlCl7mSg_g2R9w1W1C2_9WAYhMKYAButxCfQpEAV21Dv7DhK9K8GrIs9rl2ZPnOzlD1jQumNZ6-sEBpNZS_WIril34V-0bPKF95w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221455227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1382986</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMAAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo, UT: American Society of Mammalogists</publisher><subject>Animal aggression ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Competition ; Deer ; Dipodomys ordii ; Ecological competition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Kangaroos ; Light ; Mammalia ; Mammalogy ; Mice ; Microhabitats ; Moon ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Predation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Rats ; Rodents ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 The American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Mammalogists May 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1382986$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1382986$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2238835$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</description><subject>Animal aggression</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Dipodomys ordii</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Kangaroos</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammalogy</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>0022-2372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf4LxQRfaoml6ZNfZM5dTARxD2XNLtgZm1nLnvwv7dlQ0Hw5Y67-_F9x8fYqeBXIHlxLaSGUud7bCRUptK-wD4bcQ6QgizgkB0RrTjnqgA-YrMnb0P3ZmofTUwWhEnnkjvEkPQHvEmmzqGNNGxnbcRAa7TeebudjI2-a5MXT-90zA6caQhPdn3MFvfT18ljOn9-mE1u56nt3WMK1mZYaJHnpcpFXmpTlmBAu6U13BRLKXlthOO4dMJIh5jXmcit48q4Gmwhx-xiq7sO3ecGKVYfniw2jWmx21AlCl7mSg_g2R9w1W1C2_9WAYhMKYAButxCfQpEAV21Dv7DhK9K8GrIs9rl2ZPnOzlD1jQumNZ6-sEBpNZS_WIril34V-0bPKF95w</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creator><creator>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creator><general>American Society of Mammalogists</general><general>Brigham Young University, Department of Zoology</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><author>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal aggression</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Dipodomys ordii</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Kangaroos</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammalogy</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falkenberg, Jill C.</au><au>Clarke, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>558</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>558-565</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><eissn>0022-2372</eissn><coden>JOMAAL</coden><abstract>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</abstract><cop>Provo, UT</cop><pub>American Society of Mammalogists</pub><doi>10.2307/1382986</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2372
ispartof Journal of mammalogy, 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565
issn 0022-2372
1545-1542
1545-1542
0022-2372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17096587
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal aggression
Animal ethology
Biological and medical sciences
Competition
Deer
Dipodomys ordii
Ecological competition
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitats
Kangaroos
Light
Mammalia
Mammalogy
Mice
Microhabitats
Moon
Peromyscus maniculatus
Predation
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Rats
Rodents
Vertebrata
title Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microhabitat%20Use%20of%20Deer%20Mice:%20Effects%20of%20Interspecific%20Interaction%20Risks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Falkenberg,%20Jill%20C.&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=558&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=558-565&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft.coden=JOMAAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1382986&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1382986%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221455227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1382986&rfr_iscdi=true