Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks
Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of mammalogy 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 565 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 558 |
container_title | Journal of mammalogy |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Falkenberg, Jill C. Clarke, Jennifer A. |
description | Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1382986 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17096587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1382986</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1382986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf4LxQRfaoml6ZNfZM5dTARxD2XNLtgZm1nLnvwv7dlQ0Hw5Y67-_F9x8fYqeBXIHlxLaSGUud7bCRUptK-wD4bcQ6QgizgkB0RrTjnqgA-YrMnb0P3ZmofTUwWhEnnkjvEkPQHvEmmzqGNNGxnbcRAa7TeebudjI2-a5MXT-90zA6caQhPdn3MFvfT18ljOn9-mE1u56nt3WMK1mZYaJHnpcpFXmpTlmBAu6U13BRLKXlthOO4dMJIh5jXmcit48q4Gmwhx-xiq7sO3ecGKVYfniw2jWmx21AlCl7mSg_g2R9w1W1C2_9WAYhMKYAButxCfQpEAV21Dv7DhK9K8GrIs9rl2ZPnOzlD1jQumNZ6-sEBpNZS_WIril34V-0bPKF95w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221455227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-2372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1382986</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMAAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Provo, UT: American Society of Mammalogists</publisher><subject>Animal aggression ; Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Competition ; Deer ; Dipodomys ordii ; Ecological competition ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitats ; Kangaroos ; Light ; Mammalia ; Mammalogy ; Mice ; Microhabitats ; Moon ; Peromyscus maniculatus ; Predation ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Rats ; Rodents ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Journal of mammalogy, 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 The American Society of Mammalogists</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Mammalogists May 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1382986$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1382986$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2238835$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><title>Journal of mammalogy</title><description>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</description><subject>Animal aggression</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Dipodomys ordii</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Kangaroos</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammalogy</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Moon</subject><subject>Peromyscus maniculatus</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><issn>0022-2372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKf4LxQRfaoml6ZNfZM5dTARxD2XNLtgZm1nLnvwv7dlQ0Hw5Y67-_F9x8fYqeBXIHlxLaSGUud7bCRUptK-wD4bcQ6QgizgkB0RrTjnqgA-YrMnb0P3ZmofTUwWhEnnkjvEkPQHvEmmzqGNNGxnbcRAa7TeebudjI2-a5MXT-90zA6caQhPdn3MFvfT18ljOn9-mE1u56nt3WMK1mZYaJHnpcpFXmpTlmBAu6U13BRLKXlthOO4dMJIh5jXmcit48q4Gmwhx-xiq7sO3ecGKVYfniw2jWmx21AlCl7mSg_g2R9w1W1C2_9WAYhMKYAButxCfQpEAV21Dv7DhK9K8GrIs9rl2ZPnOzlD1jQumNZ6-sEBpNZS_WIril34V-0bPKF95w</recordid><startdate>19980501</startdate><enddate>19980501</enddate><creator>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creator><creator>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creator><general>American Society of Mammalogists</general><general>Brigham Young University, Department of Zoology</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980501</creationdate><title>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</title><author>Falkenberg, Jill C. ; Clarke, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-2cc4e781669561698a992a28fdca0a7d330ba1f0edf1a3fee6b416cf05afb2c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal aggression</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Dipodomys ordii</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Kangaroos</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammalogy</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Moon</topic><topic>Peromyscus maniculatus</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falkenberg, Jill C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falkenberg, Jill C.</au><au>Clarke, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mammalogy</jtitle><date>1998-05-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>558</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>558-565</pages><issn>0022-2372</issn><issn>1545-1542</issn><eissn>1545-1542</eissn><eissn>0022-2372</eissn><coden>JOMAAL</coden><abstract>Microhabitat use by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) was tested under five different simulated moonlight intensities, using an indoor habitat chamber with shrub covered areas and open areas, and food sources. Tests were run in the presence and absence of a potential competitor, Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). From tracks in the sand, we determined that, when alone, deer mice decreased total activity as moonlight increased and were more active in areas with cover than in open areas. However, deer mice did not vary proportions of activity allocated to open areas (ca. 20%) and cover/edge areas (ca. 80%) with variations in moonlight. Deer mice consumed more seeds in areas with cover but also did not vary the proportions of seeds eaten in the open (ca. 43%) or cover (ca. 57%) with variations in moonlight. Using infrared video filming, we determined that deer mice increased use of cover to nearly 100% in the presence of Ord's kangaroo rats. Aggression (active chasing and locking fights) by kangaroo rats towards deer mice caused this shift. Our experiments substantiate field observations of variable microhabitat use by deer mice in areas with and without kangaroo rats and identify behavioral interactions involved.</abstract><cop>Provo, UT</cop><pub>American Society of Mammalogists</pub><doi>10.2307/1382986</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2372 |
ispartof | Journal of mammalogy, 1998-05, Vol.79 (2), p.558-565 |
issn | 0022-2372 1545-1542 1545-1542 0022-2372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17096587 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Animal aggression Animal ethology Biological and medical sciences Competition Deer Dipodomys ordii Ecological competition Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitats Kangaroos Light Mammalia Mammalogy Mice Microhabitats Moon Peromyscus maniculatus Predation Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Rats Rodents Vertebrata |
title | Microhabitat Use of Deer Mice: Effects of Interspecific Interaction Risks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microhabitat%20Use%20of%20Deer%20Mice:%20Effects%20of%20Interspecific%20Interaction%20Risks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mammalogy&rft.au=Falkenberg,%20Jill%20C.&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=558&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=558-565&rft.issn=0022-2372&rft.eissn=1545-1542&rft.coden=JOMAAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1382986&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1382986%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221455227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1382986&rfr_iscdi=true |