Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus
To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine biology 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1415 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1407 |
container_title | Marine biology |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Guderley, Helga E Himmelman, John H Nadeau, Madeleine Cortes, Hernan Pérez Tremblay, Isabelle Janssoone, Xavier |
description | To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709182312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444561598</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444561598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstrFTEUh4MoeK3-Aa4ccOMmNSeZyWNZSn1AwYJ2HdLkZJwyNxmTuVD_e3MdwQcXySKv7zuc8AshL4GdA2PqbWWMc0UZDJRLpejDI7KDXnAKyojHZNeuBypA8qfkWa33rO0VFztycxUj-rXLsQtTWxZMa7cUDG7NpXY5detX7LB6t2BXsC45VTzSN7PzeWkqpm7vRpxnlyZ_qM_Jk-jmii9-zWfk9t3Vl8sP9PrT-4-XF9fUDxpWapg2PATtAwRxF6LnvRdgIqp2PTCNSivfG-20vhPCm4CoYIAIQgqMQYoz8maru5T87YB1tfup-p9tYD5UC4oZ0FwAb-jrf9D7fCipdWdBGsNZL3vzmxrdjHZKMa_F-WNRe9H3_SBhMLpR9AQ1YsLi5pwwTu34L_78BN9GwP3kTwqwCb7kWgtGu5Rp78p3C8weo7Zb1LZFbY9R24fm8M2pjU0jlj8e-B_p1SZFl60by1Tt7WfOQLa_oXXPpfgBih2y9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1699204649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><description>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>adults ; Asteria vulgaris ; Asterias ; Behavior ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cancer irroratus ; Comparative analysis ; crabs ; Crossaster papposus ; Crustaceans ; Escape behavior ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; glass ; Hyas araneus ; islands ; juveniles ; Leptasterias polaris ; Life Sciences ; Marine & Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Mechanical control ; Microbiology ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Placopecten magellanicus ; Predation (Biology) ; Predators ; Scallops ; Solaster endeca ; Starfishes ; summer ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmelman, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>Asteria vulgaris</subject><subject>Asterias</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer irroratus</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>crabs</subject><subject>Crossaster papposus</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Escape behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>Hyas araneus</subject><subject>islands</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>Leptasterias polaris</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Mechanical control</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Placopecten magellanicus</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Scallops</subject><subject>Solaster endeca</subject><subject>Starfishes</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstrFTEUh4MoeK3-Aa4ccOMmNSeZyWNZSn1AwYJ2HdLkZJwyNxmTuVD_e3MdwQcXySKv7zuc8AshL4GdA2PqbWWMc0UZDJRLpejDI7KDXnAKyojHZNeuBypA8qfkWa33rO0VFztycxUj-rXLsQtTWxZMa7cUDG7NpXY5detX7LB6t2BXsC45VTzSN7PzeWkqpm7vRpxnlyZ_qM_Jk-jmii9-zWfk9t3Vl8sP9PrT-4-XF9fUDxpWapg2PATtAwRxF6LnvRdgIqp2PTCNSivfG-20vhPCm4CoYIAIQgqMQYoz8maru5T87YB1tfup-p9tYD5UC4oZ0FwAb-jrf9D7fCipdWdBGsNZL3vzmxrdjHZKMa_F-WNRe9H3_SBhMLpR9AQ1YsLi5pwwTu34L_78BN9GwP3kTwqwCb7kWgtGu5Rp78p3C8weo7Zb1LZFbY9R24fm8M2pjU0jlj8e-B_p1SZFl60by1Tt7WfOQLa_oXXPpfgBih2y9A</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Guderley, Helga E</creator><creator>Himmelman, John H</creator><creator>Nadeau, Madeleine</creator><creator>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creator><creator>Tremblay, Isabelle</creator><creator>Janssoone, Xavier</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><author>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>Asteria vulgaris</topic><topic>Asterias</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer irroratus</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>crabs</topic><topic>Crossaster papposus</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Escape behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>Hyas araneus</topic><topic>islands</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>Leptasterias polaris</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine & Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Mechanical control</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Placopecten magellanicus</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Scallops</topic><topic>Solaster endeca</topic><topic>Starfishes</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmelman, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guderley, Helga E</au><au>Himmelman, John H</au><au>Nadeau, Madeleine</au><au>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</au><au>Tremblay, Isabelle</au><au>Janssoone, Xavier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1407</spage><epage>1415</epage><pages>1407-1415</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3162 |
ispartof | Marine biology, 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415 |
issn | 0025-3162 1432-1793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709182312 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | adults Asteria vulgaris Asterias Behavior Biomedical and Life Sciences Cancer irroratus Comparative analysis crabs Crossaster papposus Crustaceans Escape behavior Freshwater & Marine Ecology glass Hyas araneus islands juveniles Leptasterias polaris Life Sciences Marine & Freshwater Sciences Marine biology Mechanical control Microbiology Oceanography Original Paper Placopecten magellanicus Predation (Biology) Predators Scallops Solaster endeca Starfishes summer Zoology |
title | Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20different%20predators%20on%20the%20escape%20response%20of%20Placopecten%20magellanicus&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Guderley,%20Helga%20E&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1407&rft.epage=1415&rft.pages=1407-1415&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA444561598%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1699204649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A444561598&rfr_iscdi=true |