Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus

To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine biology 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415
Hauptverfasser: Guderley, Helga E, Himmelman, John H, Nadeau, Madeleine, Cortes, Hernan Pérez, Tremblay, Isabelle, Janssoone, Xavier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1415
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1407
container_title Marine biology
container_volume 162
creator Guderley, Helga E
Himmelman, John H
Nadeau, Madeleine
Cortes, Hernan Pérez
Tremblay, Isabelle
Janssoone, Xavier
description To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709182312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444561598</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444561598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstrFTEUh4MoeK3-Aa4ccOMmNSeZyWNZSn1AwYJ2HdLkZJwyNxmTuVD_e3MdwQcXySKv7zuc8AshL4GdA2PqbWWMc0UZDJRLpejDI7KDXnAKyojHZNeuBypA8qfkWa33rO0VFztycxUj-rXLsQtTWxZMa7cUDG7NpXY5detX7LB6t2BXsC45VTzSN7PzeWkqpm7vRpxnlyZ_qM_Jk-jmii9-zWfk9t3Vl8sP9PrT-4-XF9fUDxpWapg2PATtAwRxF6LnvRdgIqp2PTCNSivfG-20vhPCm4CoYIAIQgqMQYoz8maru5T87YB1tfup-p9tYD5UC4oZ0FwAb-jrf9D7fCipdWdBGsNZL3vzmxrdjHZKMa_F-WNRe9H3_SBhMLpR9AQ1YsLi5pwwTu34L_78BN9GwP3kTwqwCb7kWgtGu5Rp78p3C8weo7Zb1LZFbY9R24fm8M2pjU0jlj8e-B_p1SZFl60by1Tt7WfOQLa_oXXPpfgBih2y9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1699204649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><description>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>adults ; Asteria vulgaris ; Asterias ; Behavior ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cancer irroratus ; Comparative analysis ; crabs ; Crossaster papposus ; Crustaceans ; Escape behavior ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; glass ; Hyas araneus ; islands ; juveniles ; Leptasterias polaris ; Life Sciences ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Marine biology ; Mechanical control ; Microbiology ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Placopecten magellanicus ; Predation (Biology) ; Predators ; Scallops ; Solaster endeca ; Starfishes ; summer ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmelman, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><title>Marine biology</title><addtitle>Mar Biol</addtitle><description>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</description><subject>adults</subject><subject>Asteria vulgaris</subject><subject>Asterias</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cancer irroratus</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>crabs</subject><subject>Crossaster papposus</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Escape behavior</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>glass</subject><subject>Hyas araneus</subject><subject>islands</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>Leptasterias polaris</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Mechanical control</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Placopecten magellanicus</subject><subject>Predation (Biology)</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Scallops</subject><subject>Solaster endeca</subject><subject>Starfishes</subject><subject>summer</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstrFTEUh4MoeK3-Aa4ccOMmNSeZyWNZSn1AwYJ2HdLkZJwyNxmTuVD_e3MdwQcXySKv7zuc8AshL4GdA2PqbWWMc0UZDJRLpejDI7KDXnAKyojHZNeuBypA8qfkWa33rO0VFztycxUj-rXLsQtTWxZMa7cUDG7NpXY5detX7LB6t2BXsC45VTzSN7PzeWkqpm7vRpxnlyZ_qM_Jk-jmii9-zWfk9t3Vl8sP9PrT-4-XF9fUDxpWapg2PATtAwRxF6LnvRdgIqp2PTCNSivfG-20vhPCm4CoYIAIQgqMQYoz8maru5T87YB1tfup-p9tYD5UC4oZ0FwAb-jrf9D7fCipdWdBGsNZL3vzmxrdjHZKMa_F-WNRe9H3_SBhMLpR9AQ1YsLi5pwwTu34L_78BN9GwP3kTwqwCb7kWgtGu5Rp78p3C8weo7Zb1LZFbY9R24fm8M2pjU0jlj8e-B_p1SZFl60by1Tt7WfOQLa_oXXPpfgBih2y9A</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Guderley, Helga E</creator><creator>Himmelman, John H</creator><creator>Nadeau, Madeleine</creator><creator>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creator><creator>Tremblay, Isabelle</creator><creator>Janssoone, Xavier</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</title><author>Guderley, Helga E ; Himmelman, John H ; Nadeau, Madeleine ; Cortes, Hernan Pérez ; Tremblay, Isabelle ; Janssoone, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-90892dd8cd1d3bdfc24c319fe7581508e787c498a88b33c9dee7151f1363efd63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>adults</topic><topic>Asteria vulgaris</topic><topic>Asterias</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cancer irroratus</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>crabs</topic><topic>Crossaster papposus</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Escape behavior</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>glass</topic><topic>Hyas araneus</topic><topic>islands</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>Leptasterias polaris</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Mechanical control</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Placopecten magellanicus</topic><topic>Predation (Biology)</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Scallops</topic><topic>Solaster endeca</topic><topic>Starfishes</topic><topic>summer</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guderley, Helga E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmelman, John H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssoone, Xavier</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guderley, Helga E</au><au>Himmelman, John H</au><au>Nadeau, Madeleine</au><au>Cortes, Hernan Pérez</au><au>Tremblay, Isabelle</au><au>Janssoone, Xavier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><stitle>Mar Biol</stitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1407</spage><epage>1415</epage><pages>1407-1415</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>To assess whether giant scallops, Placopecten magellanicus use distinct escape strategies to respond to their seastar and crustacean predators, escape responses to two major seastar predators, Asterias vulgaris and Leptasterias polaris, two seastars with little predatory impact, Crossaster papposus and Solaster endeca, and two crustacean predators, Cancer irroratus and Hyas araneus were compared. A glass rod served as a mechanical control. The responses of juvenile [2+ year (y), ~36-mm shell height (SH)] and adult (6+ y, ~100-mm SH) scallops from the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada, were assessed in early summer 2005. The predatory seastars evoked the strongest response, in terms of both response latency and minimum interval between phasic contractions and numbers of phasic contractions, particularly early in the escape response. Both the minor seastar predators and crabs stimulated stronger responses than the mechanical control. Juvenile scallops were livelier than adult scallops. As P. magellanicus consistently responded to predators with an initial flurry of phasic contractions that tapered off to spaced phasic contractions separated by increasingly long tonic contractions, only the intensity of the escape response seems to have been modified by selection.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3162
ispartof Marine biology, 2015-07, Vol.162 (7), p.1407-1415
issn 0025-3162
1432-1793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1709182312
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects adults
Asteria vulgaris
Asterias
Behavior
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cancer irroratus
Comparative analysis
crabs
Crossaster papposus
Crustaceans
Escape behavior
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
glass
Hyas araneus
islands
juveniles
Leptasterias polaris
Life Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Marine biology
Mechanical control
Microbiology
Oceanography
Original Paper
Placopecten magellanicus
Predation (Biology)
Predators
Scallops
Solaster endeca
Starfishes
summer
Zoology
title Effect of different predators on the escape response of Placopecten magellanicus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A36%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20different%20predators%20on%20the%20escape%20response%20of%20Placopecten%20magellanicus&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Guderley,%20Helga%20E&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1407&rft.epage=1415&rft.pages=1407-1415&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-015-2677-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA444561598%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1699204649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A444561598&rfr_iscdi=true