Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects

Summary Goal Dysphonia is more prevalent in teachers than among the general population. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical, vocal, and videolaryngoscopical aspects in dysphonic teachers. Methods Ninety dysphonic teachers were inquired about their voice, comorbidities, and work condi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2015-09, Vol.29 (5), p.564-571
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves, Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes, Martins, Regina Helena Garcia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 571
container_issue 5
container_start_page 564
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 29
creator Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves
Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes
Martins, Regina Helena Garcia
description Summary Goal Dysphonia is more prevalent in teachers than among the general population. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical, vocal, and videolaryngoscopical aspects in dysphonic teachers. Methods Ninety dysphonic teachers were inquired about their voice, comorbidities, and work conditions. They underwent vocal auditory-perceptual evaluation (maximum phonation time and GRBASI scale), acoustic voice analysis, and videolaryngoscopy. The results were compared with a control group consisting of 90 dysphonic nonteachers, of similar gender and ages, and with professional activities excluding teaching and singing. Results In both groups, there were 85 women and five men (age range 31–50 years). In the controls, the majority of subjects worked in domestic activities, whereas the majority of teachers worked in primary (42.8%) and secondary school (37.7%). Teachers and controls reported, respectively: vocal abuse (76.7%; 37.8%), weekly hours of work between 21 and 40 years (72.2%; 80%), under 10 years of practice (36%; 23%), absenteeism (23%; 0%), sinonasal (66%; 20%) and gastroesophageal symptoms (44%; 22%), hoarseness (82%; 78%), throat clearing (70%; 62%), and phonatory effort (72%; 52%). In both groups, there were decreased values of maximum phonation time, impairment of the G parameter in the GRBASI scale (82%), decrease of F0 and increase of the rest of acoustic parameters. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant in teachers; laryngopharyngeal reflux, polyps, and sulcus vocalis predominated in the controls. Conclusions Vocal symptoms, comorbidities, and absenteeism were predominant among teachers. The vocal analyses were similar in both groups. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant among teachers, whereas polyps, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and sulcus were predominant among controls.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708901156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199714002057</els_id><sourcerecordid>1708901156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-8ccefca2de24f748d7338f4f66ec7f7cb4c940223cd337850619987a00a328a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCGyAUiU0XJFw7TuywQKqm_FSqYEGZreVe34BDJh7smUp9exxlAKkbVr6yj499vsPYCw4VB96-GarhLnikSgCXFXQV8O4RW3Gt6lI2Wj9mK9CdKHnXqVP2NKUBAEQ-fcJORaNAStWs2OfN7FFc-hSio5gKPxU3ZPFHnt8W69FPHu34uth4R2G08X76HhKG3bJrJ1dsQh6Li7Qj3Kdn7KS3Y6Lnx_WMffvw_mb9qbz-8vFqfXFdopTNvtSI1KMVjoTsldRO1bXuZd-2hKpXeCuxkyBEja6ulW6gzSm0sgC2Ftrq-oydL767GH4dKO3N1iekcbQThUMyXOXswHnTZumrB9IhHOKUf2e4ltCIVgBklVxUGENKkXqzi36b8xoOZuZtBrPwNjNvA53JvPO1l0fzw-2W3N9LfwBnwbtFQJnGnadoEnqakJyPGZhxwf_vhYcGeCzlJ91T-pfFJGHAfJ07nyvnMrcNjap_A74Vpjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840526200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves ; Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes ; Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves ; Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes ; Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Goal Dysphonia is more prevalent in teachers than among the general population. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical, vocal, and videolaryngoscopical aspects in dysphonic teachers. Methods Ninety dysphonic teachers were inquired about their voice, comorbidities, and work conditions. They underwent vocal auditory-perceptual evaluation (maximum phonation time and GRBASI scale), acoustic voice analysis, and videolaryngoscopy. The results were compared with a control group consisting of 90 dysphonic nonteachers, of similar gender and ages, and with professional activities excluding teaching and singing. Results In both groups, there were 85 women and five men (age range 31–50 years). In the controls, the majority of subjects worked in domestic activities, whereas the majority of teachers worked in primary (42.8%) and secondary school (37.7%). Teachers and controls reported, respectively: vocal abuse (76.7%; 37.8%), weekly hours of work between 21 and 40 years (72.2%; 80%), under 10 years of practice (36%; 23%), absenteeism (23%; 0%), sinonasal (66%; 20%) and gastroesophageal symptoms (44%; 22%), hoarseness (82%; 78%), throat clearing (70%; 62%), and phonatory effort (72%; 52%). In both groups, there were decreased values of maximum phonation time, impairment of the G parameter in the GRBASI scale (82%), decrease of F0 and increase of the rest of acoustic parameters. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant in teachers; laryngopharyngeal reflux, polyps, and sulcus vocalis predominated in the controls. Conclusions Vocal symptoms, comorbidities, and absenteeism were predominant among teachers. The vocal analyses were similar in both groups. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant among teachers, whereas polyps, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and sulcus were predominant among controls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25704475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Acoustics ; Adult ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Case-Control Studies ; Comorbidity ; Dysphonia ; Faculty ; Female ; Fundamental frequency ; Humans ; Laryngology ; Laryngoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Diseases - diagnosis ; Occupational Diseases - epidemiology ; Occupational Diseases - physiopathology ; Occupational Health ; Otolaryngology ; Phonation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Severity of Illness Index ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Singing ; Sound Spectrography ; Speech Production Measurement ; Teachers ; Time Factors ; Verbal aggression ; Videolaryngoscopy ; Vocal analyses ; Voice ; Voice disorders ; Voice Disorders - diagnosis ; Voice Disorders - epidemiology ; Voice Disorders - physiopathology ; Voice Quality</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2015-09, Vol.29 (5), p.564-571</ispartof><rights>The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>2015 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-8ccefca2de24f748d7338f4f66ec7f7cb4c940223cd337850619987a00a328a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-8ccefca2de24f748d7338f4f66ec7f7cb4c940223cd337850619987a00a328a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25704475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</creatorcontrib><title>Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>Summary Goal Dysphonia is more prevalent in teachers than among the general population. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical, vocal, and videolaryngoscopical aspects in dysphonic teachers. Methods Ninety dysphonic teachers were inquired about their voice, comorbidities, and work conditions. They underwent vocal auditory-perceptual evaluation (maximum phonation time and GRBASI scale), acoustic voice analysis, and videolaryngoscopy. The results were compared with a control group consisting of 90 dysphonic nonteachers, of similar gender and ages, and with professional activities excluding teaching and singing. Results In both groups, there were 85 women and five men (age range 31–50 years). In the controls, the majority of subjects worked in domestic activities, whereas the majority of teachers worked in primary (42.8%) and secondary school (37.7%). Teachers and controls reported, respectively: vocal abuse (76.7%; 37.8%), weekly hours of work between 21 and 40 years (72.2%; 80%), under 10 years of practice (36%; 23%), absenteeism (23%; 0%), sinonasal (66%; 20%) and gastroesophageal symptoms (44%; 22%), hoarseness (82%; 78%), throat clearing (70%; 62%), and phonatory effort (72%; 52%). In both groups, there were decreased values of maximum phonation time, impairment of the G parameter in the GRBASI scale (82%), decrease of F0 and increase of the rest of acoustic parameters. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant in teachers; laryngopharyngeal reflux, polyps, and sulcus vocalis predominated in the controls. Conclusions Vocal symptoms, comorbidities, and absenteeism were predominant among teachers. The vocal analyses were similar in both groups. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant among teachers, whereas polyps, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and sulcus were predominant among controls.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dysphonia</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental frequency</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngology</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Phonation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Singing</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Verbal aggression</subject><subject>Videolaryngoscopy</subject><subject>Vocal analyses</subject><subject>Voice</subject><subject>Voice disorders</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Voice Quality</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCGyAUiU0XJFw7TuywQKqm_FSqYEGZreVe34BDJh7smUp9exxlAKkbVr6yj499vsPYCw4VB96-GarhLnikSgCXFXQV8O4RW3Gt6lI2Wj9mK9CdKHnXqVP2NKUBAEQ-fcJORaNAStWs2OfN7FFc-hSio5gKPxU3ZPFHnt8W69FPHu34uth4R2G08X76HhKG3bJrJ1dsQh6Li7Qj3Kdn7KS3Y6Lnx_WMffvw_mb9qbz-8vFqfXFdopTNvtSI1KMVjoTsldRO1bXuZd-2hKpXeCuxkyBEja6ulW6gzSm0sgC2Ftrq-oydL767GH4dKO3N1iekcbQThUMyXOXswHnTZumrB9IhHOKUf2e4ltCIVgBklVxUGENKkXqzi36b8xoOZuZtBrPwNjNvA53JvPO1l0fzw-2W3N9LfwBnwbtFQJnGnadoEnqakJyPGZhxwf_vhYcGeCzlJ91T-pfFJGHAfJ07nyvnMrcNjap_A74Vpjg</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves</creator><creator>Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes</creator><creator>Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects</title><author>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves ; Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes ; Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-8ccefca2de24f748d7338f4f66ec7f7cb4c940223cd337850619987a00a328a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dysphonia</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental frequency</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngology</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Phonation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Singing</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Verbal aggression</topic><topic>Videolaryngoscopy</topic><topic>Vocal analyses</topic><topic>Voice</topic><topic>Voice disorders</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Voice Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Eny Regina Bóia Neves</au><au>Tavares, Elaine Lara Mendes</au><au>Martins, Regina Helena Garcia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>564</spage><epage>571</epage><pages>564-571</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><abstract>Summary Goal Dysphonia is more prevalent in teachers than among the general population. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical, vocal, and videolaryngoscopical aspects in dysphonic teachers. Methods Ninety dysphonic teachers were inquired about their voice, comorbidities, and work conditions. They underwent vocal auditory-perceptual evaluation (maximum phonation time and GRBASI scale), acoustic voice analysis, and videolaryngoscopy. The results were compared with a control group consisting of 90 dysphonic nonteachers, of similar gender and ages, and with professional activities excluding teaching and singing. Results In both groups, there were 85 women and five men (age range 31–50 years). In the controls, the majority of subjects worked in domestic activities, whereas the majority of teachers worked in primary (42.8%) and secondary school (37.7%). Teachers and controls reported, respectively: vocal abuse (76.7%; 37.8%), weekly hours of work between 21 and 40 years (72.2%; 80%), under 10 years of practice (36%; 23%), absenteeism (23%; 0%), sinonasal (66%; 20%) and gastroesophageal symptoms (44%; 22%), hoarseness (82%; 78%), throat clearing (70%; 62%), and phonatory effort (72%; 52%). In both groups, there were decreased values of maximum phonation time, impairment of the G parameter in the GRBASI scale (82%), decrease of F0 and increase of the rest of acoustic parameters. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant in teachers; laryngopharyngeal reflux, polyps, and sulcus vocalis predominated in the controls. Conclusions Vocal symptoms, comorbidities, and absenteeism were predominant among teachers. The vocal analyses were similar in both groups. Nodules and laryngopharyngeal reflux were predominant among teachers, whereas polyps, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and sulcus were predominant among controls.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25704475</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2015-09, Vol.29 (5), p.564-571
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708901156
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Absenteeism
Acoustics
Adult
Brazil - epidemiology
Case-Control Studies
Comorbidity
Dysphonia
Faculty
Female
Fundamental frequency
Humans
Laryngology
Laryngoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational Diseases - diagnosis
Occupational Diseases - epidemiology
Occupational Diseases - physiopathology
Occupational Health
Otolaryngology
Phonation
Predictive Value of Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Singing
Sound Spectrography
Speech Production Measurement
Teachers
Time Factors
Verbal aggression
Videolaryngoscopy
Vocal analyses
Voice
Voice disorders
Voice Disorders - diagnosis
Voice Disorders - epidemiology
Voice Disorders - physiopathology
Voice Quality
title Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A08%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20Disorders%20in%20Teachers:%20Clinical,%20Videolaryngoscopical,%20and%20Vocal%20Aspects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Pereira,%20Eny%20Regina%20B%C3%B3ia%20Neves&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=564&rft.epage=571&rft.pages=564-571&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1708901156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840526200&rft_id=info:pmid/25704475&rft_els_id=S0892199714002057&rfr_iscdi=true