Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention

The social organization of wolves is characterised by strong pairbond associations. Groups may consist of a mating couple and their remaining offspring or of an association of potentially reproductive adults. When a pack consists of several adults, intrasexual mating competition and intersexual part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behaviour 1993, Vol.127 (1-2), p.141-174
Hauptverfasser: Derix, Ruud, VAN HOOFF, Jan, DE VRIES, Han, Wensing, Joep
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 141
container_title Behaviour
container_volume 127
creator Derix, Ruud
VAN HOOFF, Jan
DE VRIES, Han
Wensing, Joep
description The social organization of wolves is characterised by strong pairbond associations. Groups may consist of a mating couple and their remaining offspring or of an association of potentially reproductive adults. When a pack consists of several adults, intrasexual mating competition and intersexual partner preference are expected to play an important role in the establishment of sexual relationships. Data from the wild show that as a rule only one female in a pack gives birth. Female suppression is assumed to prevent the other pack members from breeding. Our main interest was to elucidate the proximate behavioural mechanisms by which the socio-sexual relationships are structured in times of the mating season. Special attention was paid to the influence of differences in dominance status and sex on the competitive interactions between pack members. From 1977 to 1985 we studied the social behaviour of wolves in and around the mating season at Burger's Zoo in Arnhem (the Netherlands) by means of detailed observations on two wolf packs. Together with a general rise in frequency of (sexuo-affiliative) interactions we observed an increase in general aggression and in the frequency of interventions during the mating season. Our results reveal certain differences in male and female mating strategies. 1) Separative interventions were observed predominantly in males and were directed against male-female sexual interactions, while such interventions by females were less apparent. 2) Males showed a high frequency of intrasexual aggression but only during the mating season. By contrast, females showed less intrasexual aggression, and instead, showed a high level of intrasexual dominance display, especially the α-female, and they did so both in and outside the mating season. 3) Males tended to intervene in especially those intersexual contacts in which their own preferred female was involved, whereas the intolerance of the α-female was more general, i.e. it was shown with respect to all manifestations of other females. These patterns clearly explain why in free nature wolf social organization tends towards a multi-male uni-female system in which the non-dominant males have little chance of sexual contact, but are generally tolerated as helpers in brood care. In conclusion, male competition was comparatively more context-related while female competition took the form of unprovoked hostility. /// Die Soziale Organisation bei Wölfen wird charakterisiert durch starke Paarbezieh
doi_str_mv 10.1163/156853993X00461
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17088560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4535147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4535147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b424t-5f646958db0dd879abdd6728f61296ff0150daa17cbb7111216c0880335c524a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlPwzAQhS0EEmU5c-EQCcQtrSfeEm6oYgdxYBUXy0kc5JI6wU4R_HscCgUhcbI975un8RuEtgAPATgZAeMpI1lGHjCmHJbQoK_EofSwjAYYYxaLjGWraM37SXgKRtgA3V2qWkfKltGRnvbXS9UZ-xSNm2mrO9OZxkbGRvdN_ar9_jd0PWtbp73v1Ts_jD5NTm2n3au2fc8GWqlU7fXm17mObo8Ob8Yn8cXV8en44CLOaUK7mFWc8oylZY7LMhWZysuSiyStOCQZryoMDJdKgSjyXABAArzAaYoJYQVLqCLraG_u27rmZaZ9J6fGF7quldXNzEsQAWccB3DnDzhpZs6G2SQQTFIiBKWBGs2pwjXeO13J1pmpcu8SsOxTln9SDh27X77KF6qunLKF8Ys2EhIHEAHbnmMT3zVuIdOwA6C9HM9l4zv9tpCVe5ZcEMHk2fmNxGF918Af5dkPnztT17--8s-UH2Kpn5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303837744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Derix, Ruud ; VAN HOOFF, Jan ; DE VRIES, Han ; Wensing, Joep</creator><creatorcontrib>Derix, Ruud ; VAN HOOFF, Jan ; DE VRIES, Han ; Wensing, Joep</creatorcontrib><description>The social organization of wolves is characterised by strong pairbond associations. Groups may consist of a mating couple and their remaining offspring or of an association of potentially reproductive adults. When a pack consists of several adults, intrasexual mating competition and intersexual partner preference are expected to play an important role in the establishment of sexual relationships. Data from the wild show that as a rule only one female in a pack gives birth. Female suppression is assumed to prevent the other pack members from breeding. Our main interest was to elucidate the proximate behavioural mechanisms by which the socio-sexual relationships are structured in times of the mating season. Special attention was paid to the influence of differences in dominance status and sex on the competitive interactions between pack members. From 1977 to 1985 we studied the social behaviour of wolves in and around the mating season at Burger's Zoo in Arnhem (the Netherlands) by means of detailed observations on two wolf packs. Together with a general rise in frequency of (sexuo-affiliative) interactions we observed an increase in general aggression and in the frequency of interventions during the mating season. Our results reveal certain differences in male and female mating strategies. 1) Separative interventions were observed predominantly in males and were directed against male-female sexual interactions, while such interventions by females were less apparent. 2) Males showed a high frequency of intrasexual aggression but only during the mating season. By contrast, females showed less intrasexual aggression, and instead, showed a high level of intrasexual dominance display, especially the α-female, and they did so both in and outside the mating season. 3) Males tended to intervene in especially those intersexual contacts in which their own preferred female was involved, whereas the intolerance of the α-female was more general, i.e. it was shown with respect to all manifestations of other females. These patterns clearly explain why in free nature wolf social organization tends towards a multi-male uni-female system in which the non-dominant males have little chance of sexual contact, but are generally tolerated as helpers in brood care. In conclusion, male competition was comparatively more context-related while female competition took the form of unprovoked hostility. /// Die Soziale Organisation bei Wölfen wird charakterisiert durch starke Paarbeziehungen. Gruppen können bestehen aus Pärchen mit den bei ihnen verbleibenden Jungen oder aus Zusammensetzungen reproduktionsfähigen Erwachsenen. Im Falle eines Rudels mit mehreren Erwachsenen, erwartet man dass intrasexuelle Paarkonkurrenz und intersexuelle Partnerpräferenz grosse Rollen spielen bei dem Zustandekommen der reproduktiven Beziehungen. Daten der Freilandstudien ergeben dass in der Regel nur ein Weibchen im Rudel Jungen bekommt. Unterdrückung der Weibchen wird vorausgesetzt das Paaren anderer Rudelmitglieder zu verhindern. Unser hauptsächliches Interesse lag darin die proximate Verhaltensmechanismen auf zu klären, wodurch die sozialsexuellen Beziehungen strukturiert werden während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Spezielle aufmerksamkeit wurde verwendet auf den Einfluss der Unterschiede in Rang und Geschlecht zwischen konkurrierenden interaktierenden Rudelmitgliedern. Von 1977 bis 1985 haben wir das Sozialverhalten der Wölfe bestudiert, während und außerhalb der Ranzzeit im Burgers Zoo in Arnhem (die Niederlanden), mittels detaillierter Beobachtungen an zwei Wolfsrudeln. Neben einer algemeinen Zunahme der Frequenz von (sexuell-affinitieven) Interaktionen haben wir eine Zunahme der Aggression und der Frequenz von Interventionen während der Ranzzeit beobachtet. Unsere Resultate zeigen bestimmte Unterschiede in männlicher und weiblicher Paarstrategien. 1) Trennende Interventionen wurden vornähmlich bei den Rüden beobachtet und waren vor allem gerichtet auf sexuelle Interaktionen zwischen Rüden und Weibchen, wo diese Interventionen bei den Weibchen weniger hervortraten. 2) Rüden zeigten eine hohe Frequenz von intrasexuelle Aggression, aber nur während der Ranzzeit. Da gegenüber zeigten die Weibchen zwar weniger Intrasexuelle Aggression, dafür aber häufig ein dominantes Verhalten, insbesondere das Alpha-weibchen, während und auch ausserhalb der Ranzzeit. 3) Rüden neigten zur Intervention, insbesondere bei sexuellen Kontakten, wobei ihr eigenes bevorzugte Weibchen beteiligt war, währendessen die Intoleranz des Alpha-weibchen viel algemeiner war, das heist, sie zeigte sie bei allen sozialen Manifestationen der anderen Weibchen. Diese Resultate zeigen deutlich, wieso in der freien Wildebene die soziale Rangordnung der Wölfe zu einem viel-Männer wenig-Weibchen System neigt, in dem die nicht Ranghohen Tiere wenig Gelegenheit haben zu sexuellen Kontakte, aber in dem Sie doch toleriert werden als Helfer in der Brutpflege. Abschliessend, Männer-Konkurrenz war im Vergleich mehr Kontext-orientiert weil die Konkurrenz bei den Weibchen mehr nach ungeprovozierter Feindschaft neigte.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-7959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-539X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853993X00461</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BEHAA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: Brill</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding seasons ; Canis lupus ; Ecological competition ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human sexual behavior ; Male animals ; Mammalia ; Mating behavior ; Primates ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Social behavior ; Social interaction ; Vertebrata ; Wolves</subject><ispartof>Behaviour, 1993, Vol.127 (1-2), p.141-174</ispartof><rights>1993 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 1993 E. J. Brill</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b424t-5f646958db0dd879abdd6728f61296ff0150daa17cbb7111216c0880335c524a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4535147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4535147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27846,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3959117$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Derix, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HOOFF, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE VRIES, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Joep</creatorcontrib><title>Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention</title><title>Behaviour</title><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><description>The social organization of wolves is characterised by strong pairbond associations. Groups may consist of a mating couple and their remaining offspring or of an association of potentially reproductive adults. When a pack consists of several adults, intrasexual mating competition and intersexual partner preference are expected to play an important role in the establishment of sexual relationships. Data from the wild show that as a rule only one female in a pack gives birth. Female suppression is assumed to prevent the other pack members from breeding. Our main interest was to elucidate the proximate behavioural mechanisms by which the socio-sexual relationships are structured in times of the mating season. Special attention was paid to the influence of differences in dominance status and sex on the competitive interactions between pack members. From 1977 to 1985 we studied the social behaviour of wolves in and around the mating season at Burger's Zoo in Arnhem (the Netherlands) by means of detailed observations on two wolf packs. Together with a general rise in frequency of (sexuo-affiliative) interactions we observed an increase in general aggression and in the frequency of interventions during the mating season. Our results reveal certain differences in male and female mating strategies. 1) Separative interventions were observed predominantly in males and were directed against male-female sexual interactions, while such interventions by females were less apparent. 2) Males showed a high frequency of intrasexual aggression but only during the mating season. By contrast, females showed less intrasexual aggression, and instead, showed a high level of intrasexual dominance display, especially the α-female, and they did so both in and outside the mating season. 3) Males tended to intervene in especially those intersexual contacts in which their own preferred female was involved, whereas the intolerance of the α-female was more general, i.e. it was shown with respect to all manifestations of other females. These patterns clearly explain why in free nature wolf social organization tends towards a multi-male uni-female system in which the non-dominant males have little chance of sexual contact, but are generally tolerated as helpers in brood care. In conclusion, male competition was comparatively more context-related while female competition took the form of unprovoked hostility. /// Die Soziale Organisation bei Wölfen wird charakterisiert durch starke Paarbeziehungen. Gruppen können bestehen aus Pärchen mit den bei ihnen verbleibenden Jungen oder aus Zusammensetzungen reproduktionsfähigen Erwachsenen. Im Falle eines Rudels mit mehreren Erwachsenen, erwartet man dass intrasexuelle Paarkonkurrenz und intersexuelle Partnerpräferenz grosse Rollen spielen bei dem Zustandekommen der reproduktiven Beziehungen. Daten der Freilandstudien ergeben dass in der Regel nur ein Weibchen im Rudel Jungen bekommt. Unterdrückung der Weibchen wird vorausgesetzt das Paaren anderer Rudelmitglieder zu verhindern. Unser hauptsächliches Interesse lag darin die proximate Verhaltensmechanismen auf zu klären, wodurch die sozialsexuellen Beziehungen strukturiert werden während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Spezielle aufmerksamkeit wurde verwendet auf den Einfluss der Unterschiede in Rang und Geschlecht zwischen konkurrierenden interaktierenden Rudelmitgliedern. Von 1977 bis 1985 haben wir das Sozialverhalten der Wölfe bestudiert, während und außerhalb der Ranzzeit im Burgers Zoo in Arnhem (die Niederlanden), mittels detaillierter Beobachtungen an zwei Wolfsrudeln. Neben einer algemeinen Zunahme der Frequenz von (sexuell-affinitieven) Interaktionen haben wir eine Zunahme der Aggression und der Frequenz von Interventionen während der Ranzzeit beobachtet. Unsere Resultate zeigen bestimmte Unterschiede in männlicher und weiblicher Paarstrategien. 1) Trennende Interventionen wurden vornähmlich bei den Rüden beobachtet und waren vor allem gerichtet auf sexuelle Interaktionen zwischen Rüden und Weibchen, wo diese Interventionen bei den Weibchen weniger hervortraten. 2) Rüden zeigten eine hohe Frequenz von intrasexuelle Aggression, aber nur während der Ranzzeit. Da gegenüber zeigten die Weibchen zwar weniger Intrasexuelle Aggression, dafür aber häufig ein dominantes Verhalten, insbesondere das Alpha-weibchen, während und auch ausserhalb der Ranzzeit. 3) Rüden neigten zur Intervention, insbesondere bei sexuellen Kontakten, wobei ihr eigenes bevorzugte Weibchen beteiligt war, währendessen die Intoleranz des Alpha-weibchen viel algemeiner war, das heist, sie zeigte sie bei allen sozialen Manifestationen der anderen Weibchen. Diese Resultate zeigen deutlich, wieso in der freien Wildebene die soziale Rangordnung der Wölfe zu einem viel-Männer wenig-Weibchen System neigt, in dem die nicht Ranghohen Tiere wenig Gelegenheit haben zu sexuellen Kontakte, aber in dem Sie doch toleriert werden als Helfer in der Brutpflege. Abschliessend, Männer-Konkurrenz war im Vergleich mehr Kontext-orientiert weil die Konkurrenz bei den Weibchen mehr nach ungeprovozierter Feindschaft neigte.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human sexual behavior</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><issn>0005-7959</issn><issn>1568-539X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUlPwzAQhS0EEmU5c-EQCcQtrSfeEm6oYgdxYBUXy0kc5JI6wU4R_HscCgUhcbI975un8RuEtgAPATgZAeMpI1lGHjCmHJbQoK_EofSwjAYYYxaLjGWraM37SXgKRtgA3V2qWkfKltGRnvbXS9UZ-xSNm2mrO9OZxkbGRvdN_ar9_jd0PWtbp73v1Ts_jD5NTm2n3au2fc8GWqlU7fXm17mObo8Ob8Yn8cXV8en44CLOaUK7mFWc8oylZY7LMhWZysuSiyStOCQZryoMDJdKgSjyXABAArzAaYoJYQVLqCLraG_u27rmZaZ9J6fGF7quldXNzEsQAWccB3DnDzhpZs6G2SQQTFIiBKWBGs2pwjXeO13J1pmpcu8SsOxTln9SDh27X77KF6qunLKF8Ys2EhIHEAHbnmMT3zVuIdOwA6C9HM9l4zv9tpCVe5ZcEMHk2fmNxGF918Af5dkPnztT17--8s-UH2Kpn5U</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Derix, Ruud</creator><creator>VAN HOOFF, Jan</creator><creator>DE VRIES, Han</creator><creator>Wensing, Joep</creator><general>Brill</general><general>BRILL</general><general>E. J. Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HQAFP</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention</title><author>Derix, Ruud ; VAN HOOFF, Jan ; DE VRIES, Han ; Wensing, Joep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b424t-5f646958db0dd879abdd6728f61296ff0150daa17cbb7111216c0880335c524a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human sexual behavior</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Derix, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HOOFF, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE VRIES, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wensing, Joep</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 23</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Derix, Ruud</au><au>VAN HOOFF, Jan</au><au>DE VRIES, Han</au><au>Wensing, Joep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention</atitle><jtitle>Behaviour</jtitle><addtitle>BEH</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>141-174</pages><issn>0005-7959</issn><eissn>1568-539X</eissn><coden>BEHAA8</coden><abstract>The social organization of wolves is characterised by strong pairbond associations. Groups may consist of a mating couple and their remaining offspring or of an association of potentially reproductive adults. When a pack consists of several adults, intrasexual mating competition and intersexual partner preference are expected to play an important role in the establishment of sexual relationships. Data from the wild show that as a rule only one female in a pack gives birth. Female suppression is assumed to prevent the other pack members from breeding. Our main interest was to elucidate the proximate behavioural mechanisms by which the socio-sexual relationships are structured in times of the mating season. Special attention was paid to the influence of differences in dominance status and sex on the competitive interactions between pack members. From 1977 to 1985 we studied the social behaviour of wolves in and around the mating season at Burger's Zoo in Arnhem (the Netherlands) by means of detailed observations on two wolf packs. Together with a general rise in frequency of (sexuo-affiliative) interactions we observed an increase in general aggression and in the frequency of interventions during the mating season. Our results reveal certain differences in male and female mating strategies. 1) Separative interventions were observed predominantly in males and were directed against male-female sexual interactions, while such interventions by females were less apparent. 2) Males showed a high frequency of intrasexual aggression but only during the mating season. By contrast, females showed less intrasexual aggression, and instead, showed a high level of intrasexual dominance display, especially the α-female, and they did so both in and outside the mating season. 3) Males tended to intervene in especially those intersexual contacts in which their own preferred female was involved, whereas the intolerance of the α-female was more general, i.e. it was shown with respect to all manifestations of other females. These patterns clearly explain why in free nature wolf social organization tends towards a multi-male uni-female system in which the non-dominant males have little chance of sexual contact, but are generally tolerated as helpers in brood care. In conclusion, male competition was comparatively more context-related while female competition took the form of unprovoked hostility. /// Die Soziale Organisation bei Wölfen wird charakterisiert durch starke Paarbeziehungen. Gruppen können bestehen aus Pärchen mit den bei ihnen verbleibenden Jungen oder aus Zusammensetzungen reproduktionsfähigen Erwachsenen. Im Falle eines Rudels mit mehreren Erwachsenen, erwartet man dass intrasexuelle Paarkonkurrenz und intersexuelle Partnerpräferenz grosse Rollen spielen bei dem Zustandekommen der reproduktiven Beziehungen. Daten der Freilandstudien ergeben dass in der Regel nur ein Weibchen im Rudel Jungen bekommt. Unterdrückung der Weibchen wird vorausgesetzt das Paaren anderer Rudelmitglieder zu verhindern. Unser hauptsächliches Interesse lag darin die proximate Verhaltensmechanismen auf zu klären, wodurch die sozialsexuellen Beziehungen strukturiert werden während der Fortpflanzungsperiode. Spezielle aufmerksamkeit wurde verwendet auf den Einfluss der Unterschiede in Rang und Geschlecht zwischen konkurrierenden interaktierenden Rudelmitgliedern. Von 1977 bis 1985 haben wir das Sozialverhalten der Wölfe bestudiert, während und außerhalb der Ranzzeit im Burgers Zoo in Arnhem (die Niederlanden), mittels detaillierter Beobachtungen an zwei Wolfsrudeln. Neben einer algemeinen Zunahme der Frequenz von (sexuell-affinitieven) Interaktionen haben wir eine Zunahme der Aggression und der Frequenz von Interventionen während der Ranzzeit beobachtet. Unsere Resultate zeigen bestimmte Unterschiede in männlicher und weiblicher Paarstrategien. 1) Trennende Interventionen wurden vornähmlich bei den Rüden beobachtet und waren vor allem gerichtet auf sexuelle Interaktionen zwischen Rüden und Weibchen, wo diese Interventionen bei den Weibchen weniger hervortraten. 2) Rüden zeigten eine hohe Frequenz von intrasexuelle Aggression, aber nur während der Ranzzeit. Da gegenüber zeigten die Weibchen zwar weniger Intrasexuelle Aggression, dafür aber häufig ein dominantes Verhalten, insbesondere das Alpha-weibchen, während und auch ausserhalb der Ranzzeit. 3) Rüden neigten zur Intervention, insbesondere bei sexuellen Kontakten, wobei ihr eigenes bevorzugte Weibchen beteiligt war, währendessen die Intoleranz des Alpha-weibchen viel algemeiner war, das heist, sie zeigte sie bei allen sozialen Manifestationen der anderen Weibchen. Diese Resultate zeigen deutlich, wieso in der freien Wildebene die soziale Rangordnung der Wölfe zu einem viel-Männer wenig-Weibchen System neigt, in dem die nicht Ranghohen Tiere wenig Gelegenheit haben zu sexuellen Kontakte, aber in dem Sie doch toleriert werden als Helfer in der Brutpflege. Abschliessend, Männer-Konkurrenz war im Vergleich mehr Kontext-orientiert weil die Konkurrenz bei den Weibchen mehr nach ungeprovozierter Feindschaft neigte.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/156853993X00461</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-7959
ispartof Behaviour, 1993, Vol.127 (1-2), p.141-174
issn 0005-7959
1568-539X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17088560
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Animal ethology
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding seasons
Canis lupus
Ecological competition
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human sexual behavior
Male animals
Mammalia
Mating behavior
Primates
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Social behavior
Social interaction
Vertebrata
Wolves
title Male and Female Mating Competition in Wolves: Female Suppression Vs. Male Intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Male%20and%20Female%20Mating%20Competition%20in%20Wolves:%20Female%20Suppression%20Vs.%20Male%20Intervention&rft.jtitle=Behaviour&rft.au=Derix,%20Ruud&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=141-174&rft.issn=0005-7959&rft.eissn=1568-539X&rft.coden=BEHAA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853993X00461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4535147%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303837744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4535147&rfr_iscdi=true