Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds

Hummingbirds' responses to the spatial distribution of their food were examined using arrays of visually identical feeders in the laboratory. Rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, learned to visit profitable feeders in square arrays of 64 feeders on a wall in which only half contained food an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 1995, Vol.50 (5), p.1273-1286
Hauptverfasser: Sutherland, Glenn D., Gass, Clifton Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1286
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1273
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 50
creator Sutherland, Glenn D.
Gass, Clifton Lee
description Hummingbirds' responses to the spatial distribution of their food were examined using arrays of visually identical feeders in the laboratory. Rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, learned to visit profitable feeders in square arrays of 64 feeders on a wall in which only half contained food and the only source of information about feeder quality was location. Birds learned quickly and well if profitability was simply patterned. They learned more slowly but eventually reached high performance on complex patterns, especially if feeders were regularly distributed. Memory of pattern accounted for much more of performance on all patterns than either simple movement rules or memory of individual locations. When food distributions were switched to their mirror images after birds had reached asymptotic performance, all birds that had performed well before the switch continued for several trials to visit the feeders they had visited before the switch, lagging in redistributing effort to match the new pattern. It is suggested that in the absence of visible correlates of feeder quality, hummingbirds use coarse-grained memories of the spatial patterning of energetic profitability to guide their foraging. These memories develop with repeated experience of environments, develop more quickly in simply patterned environments and persist despite changes in food distribution. Poorer performance in complex arrays is inconsistent with a fine-grained model in which birds remember point sources of food independently. Persistence of foraging patterns at the cost of significantly reduced gross food intake and severely reduced net intake after pattern switches demonstrates that hummingbirds rely greatly on memory of profitability in guiding foraging; however, their quick recovery to previous performance shows that they quickly modify their memory of places on the basis of new information. These results are compared with some recent field studies of hummingbird foraging in which use of memory could not be reliably demonstrated, or was only one of several mechanisms underlying foraging patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80043-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17087436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0003347295800433</els_id><sourcerecordid>17087436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-872b281f20ea30d739b6e2d772d656ce24d70cff32d6fa13d71508af1445b3373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKtv4GIQEV2M5jKZZEAEKd6g4EbXIZOcaMpcajIj9O1NbenChavDz_nOhQ-hU4KvCSblDcaY5awQ9LLiVxLjIqU9NCG44rmkku6jyQ45REcxLlIsOeYTdDsHHTrffWS6s1mAFtoawjr3LotLPXjdZKkMELqY1avsc2zb1K59sPEYHTjdRDjZ1il6f3x4mz3n89enl9n9PDesIkMuBa2pJI5i0Axbwaq6BGqFoLbkpQFaWIGNcyxlpwmzgnAstSNFwWvGBJuii83eZei_RoiDan000DS6g36MiggsRcHKBJ79ARf9GLr0m6K04KUkQiao2EAm9DEGcGoZfKvDShGs1j7VWpZay1IVV78-FUtj59vdOhrduKA74-Nulsqq4rhK2N0GgyTk20NQ0XjoDFgfwAzK9v7_Oz8jZ4dD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224568178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sutherland, Glenn D. ; Gass, Clifton Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Glenn D. ; Gass, Clifton Lee</creatorcontrib><description>Hummingbirds' responses to the spatial distribution of their food were examined using arrays of visually identical feeders in the laboratory. Rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, learned to visit profitable feeders in square arrays of 64 feeders on a wall in which only half contained food and the only source of information about feeder quality was location. Birds learned quickly and well if profitability was simply patterned. They learned more slowly but eventually reached high performance on complex patterns, especially if feeders were regularly distributed. Memory of pattern accounted for much more of performance on all patterns than either simple movement rules or memory of individual locations. When food distributions were switched to their mirror images after birds had reached asymptotic performance, all birds that had performed well before the switch continued for several trials to visit the feeders they had visited before the switch, lagging in redistributing effort to match the new pattern. It is suggested that in the absence of visible correlates of feeder quality, hummingbirds use coarse-grained memories of the spatial patterning of energetic profitability to guide their foraging. These memories develop with repeated experience of environments, develop more quickly in simply patterned environments and persist despite changes in food distribution. Poorer performance in complex arrays is inconsistent with a fine-grained model in which birds remember point sources of food independently. Persistence of foraging patterns at the cost of significantly reduced gross food intake and severely reduced net intake after pattern switches demonstrates that hummingbirds rely greatly on memory of profitability in guiding foraging; however, their quick recovery to previous performance shows that they quickly modify their memory of places on the basis of new information. These results are compared with some recent field studies of hummingbird foraging in which use of memory could not be reliably demonstrated, or was only one of several mechanisms underlying foraging patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80043-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Animal memory ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Food ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Selasphorus rufus ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 1995, Vol.50 (5), p.1273-1286</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. Nov 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-872b281f20ea30d739b6e2d772d656ce24d70cff32d6fa13d71508af1445b3373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-872b281f20ea30d739b6e2d772d656ce24d70cff32d6fa13d71508af1445b3373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80043-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2899509$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Glenn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gass, Clifton Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>Hummingbirds' responses to the spatial distribution of their food were examined using arrays of visually identical feeders in the laboratory. Rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, learned to visit profitable feeders in square arrays of 64 feeders on a wall in which only half contained food and the only source of information about feeder quality was location. Birds learned quickly and well if profitability was simply patterned. They learned more slowly but eventually reached high performance on complex patterns, especially if feeders were regularly distributed. Memory of pattern accounted for much more of performance on all patterns than either simple movement rules or memory of individual locations. When food distributions were switched to their mirror images after birds had reached asymptotic performance, all birds that had performed well before the switch continued for several trials to visit the feeders they had visited before the switch, lagging in redistributing effort to match the new pattern. It is suggested that in the absence of visible correlates of feeder quality, hummingbirds use coarse-grained memories of the spatial patterning of energetic profitability to guide their foraging. These memories develop with repeated experience of environments, develop more quickly in simply patterned environments and persist despite changes in food distribution. Poorer performance in complex arrays is inconsistent with a fine-grained model in which birds remember point sources of food independently. Persistence of foraging patterns at the cost of significantly reduced gross food intake and severely reduced net intake after pattern switches demonstrates that hummingbirds rely greatly on memory of profitability in guiding foraging; however, their quick recovery to previous performance shows that they quickly modify their memory of places on the basis of new information. These results are compared with some recent field studies of hummingbird foraging in which use of memory could not be reliably demonstrated, or was only one of several mechanisms underlying foraging patterns.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal memory</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Selasphorus rufus</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKtv4GIQEV2M5jKZZEAEKd6g4EbXIZOcaMpcajIj9O1NbenChavDz_nOhQ-hU4KvCSblDcaY5awQ9LLiVxLjIqU9NCG44rmkku6jyQ45REcxLlIsOeYTdDsHHTrffWS6s1mAFtoawjr3LotLPXjdZKkMELqY1avsc2zb1K59sPEYHTjdRDjZ1il6f3x4mz3n89enl9n9PDesIkMuBa2pJI5i0Axbwaq6BGqFoLbkpQFaWIGNcyxlpwmzgnAstSNFwWvGBJuii83eZei_RoiDan000DS6g36MiggsRcHKBJ79ARf9GLr0m6K04KUkQiao2EAm9DEGcGoZfKvDShGs1j7VWpZay1IVV78-FUtj59vdOhrduKA74-Nulsqq4rhK2N0GgyTk20NQ0XjoDFgfwAzK9v7_Oz8jZ4dD</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Sutherland, Glenn D.</creator><creator>Gass, Clifton Lee</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds</title><author>Sutherland, Glenn D. ; Gass, Clifton Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-872b281f20ea30d739b6e2d772d656ce24d70cff32d6fa13d71508af1445b3373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal memory</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Selasphorus rufus</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Glenn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gass, Clifton Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutherland, Glenn D.</au><au>Gass, Clifton Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1273</spage><epage>1286</epage><pages>1273-1286</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>Hummingbirds' responses to the spatial distribution of their food were examined using arrays of visually identical feeders in the laboratory. Rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus, learned to visit profitable feeders in square arrays of 64 feeders on a wall in which only half contained food and the only source of information about feeder quality was location. Birds learned quickly and well if profitability was simply patterned. They learned more slowly but eventually reached high performance on complex patterns, especially if feeders were regularly distributed. Memory of pattern accounted for much more of performance on all patterns than either simple movement rules or memory of individual locations. When food distributions were switched to their mirror images after birds had reached asymptotic performance, all birds that had performed well before the switch continued for several trials to visit the feeders they had visited before the switch, lagging in redistributing effort to match the new pattern. It is suggested that in the absence of visible correlates of feeder quality, hummingbirds use coarse-grained memories of the spatial patterning of energetic profitability to guide their foraging. These memories develop with repeated experience of environments, develop more quickly in simply patterned environments and persist despite changes in food distribution. Poorer performance in complex arrays is inconsistent with a fine-grained model in which birds remember point sources of food independently. Persistence of foraging patterns at the cost of significantly reduced gross food intake and severely reduced net intake after pattern switches demonstrates that hummingbirds rely greatly on memory of profitability in guiding foraging; however, their quick recovery to previous performance shows that they quickly modify their memory of places on the basis of new information. These results are compared with some recent field studies of hummingbird foraging in which use of memory could not be reliably demonstrated, or was only one of several mechanisms underlying foraging patterns.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0003-3472(95)80043-3</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 1995, Vol.50 (5), p.1273-1286
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17087436
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal behavior
Animal ethology
Animal memory
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Food
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Learning
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Selasphorus rufus
Vertebrata
title Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20and%20remembering%20of%20spatial%20patterns%20by%20hummingbirds&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Sutherland,%20Glenn%20D.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1273&rft.epage=1286&rft.pages=1273-1286&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-3472(95)80043-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17087436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224568178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0003347295800433&rfr_iscdi=true