Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)
Electorates appear to be adrift. Across Western Europe electoral volatility is increasing. But are volatile voters whimsical? Do they behave randomly, like drift sand, or are they emancipated, not committed to a single political party but loyal to their own preferences? To answer these questions thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Party politics 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.100-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Party politics |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | van der Meer, Tom WG van Elsas, Erika Lubbe, Rozemarijn van der Brug, Wouter |
description | Electorates appear to be adrift. Across Western Europe electoral volatility is increasing. But are volatile voters whimsical? Do they behave randomly, like drift sand, or are they emancipated, not committed to a single political party but loyal to their own preferences? To answer these questions this study focuses on the Dutch electorate, which has become the most volatile in Western Europe. We analyse the extensive 1Vandaag Opinion Panel (1VOP) dataset, which covers 55,847 adult respondents who participated in at least 2 of the 58 waves between November 2006 and June 2010. 1VOP allows us to break down electoral volatility by type, direction (intra-bloc versus inter-bloc) and time span. We conclude that volatility reflects voter emancipation rather than disengagement. Although more than half of the respondents (55 percent) change party preference at least once, they mostly stick to one of two ideologically coherent party blocs. Especially middle groups are volatile: people with modal income, with average levels of education and who position themselves in the political centre. However, the lower educated are more likely to switch between dissimilar parties. Our findings question the socialization model: although older voters are relatively loyal when they cast their ballots, they are the most volatile in the years in between. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1354068812472570 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708527887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1354068812472570</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3584134871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-42481de78003b1bbfe18fbcd035c845f18398718b256ab91cc490186fd5e55e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUxgexYK3uXR5wU8HRnJn8uyu5lNoKxW7qeshkztjU3Mk1ybTMzndw5-P5JM3ldiEFKQRywvmd7-Tjq6o3yD4gKvURW8GZ1Bobrhqh2LPqELlkdSt1-7zUpV3v-i-qlyndMIaCoT6s_qwjwW3wJju_KzLFBBRjedv3cHftNslZ4yFESBRdmJNfYOvsj-UTrGFrJvKQ8jwsEEYQGu7MLSVwUw6Qrwkmk-eyoPTIk80hFqmHbS4vcHxVmK9UyOjNNCRoGJN_f_1uGLJ3r6qD0fhErx_uo-rb59Ork_P64vLsy8n6orYcVa55wzUOpDRjbY99PxLqsbcDa4XVXIyo25VWqPtGSNOv0Fq-KtblOAgS5bRH1fFedxvDz5lS7jYuWfLlR1T8dqiYFo3SWj2NSi7lSiLfoW8foTdhjlMxUijRcClKBoVie8rGkFKksdtGtzFx6ZB1u1y7x7mWkXo_ksx3-kf0f_w9EXmhhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652465001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>van der Meer, Tom WG ; van Elsas, Erika ; Lubbe, Rozemarijn ; van der Brug, Wouter</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Tom WG ; van Elsas, Erika ; Lubbe, Rozemarijn ; van der Brug, Wouter</creatorcontrib><description>Electorates appear to be adrift. Across Western Europe electoral volatility is increasing. But are volatile voters whimsical? Do they behave randomly, like drift sand, or are they emancipated, not committed to a single political party but loyal to their own preferences? To answer these questions this study focuses on the Dutch electorate, which has become the most volatile in Western Europe. We analyse the extensive 1Vandaag Opinion Panel (1VOP) dataset, which covers 55,847 adult respondents who participated in at least 2 of the 58 waves between November 2006 and June 2010. 1VOP allows us to break down electoral volatility by type, direction (intra-bloc versus inter-bloc) and time span. We conclude that volatility reflects voter emancipation rather than disengagement. Although more than half of the respondents (55 percent) change party preference at least once, they mostly stick to one of two ideologically coherent party blocs. Especially middle groups are volatile: people with modal income, with average levels of education and who position themselves in the political centre. However, the lower educated are more likely to switch between dissimilar parties. Our findings question the socialization model: although older voters are relatively loyal when they cast their ballots, they are the most volatile in the years in between.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-0688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1354068812472570</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAPOFH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Disengagement ; Elections ; Electoral College ; Electoral volatility ; Freedom ; Ideology ; Netherlands ; Panel surveys ; Political Parties ; Respondents ; Socialization ; Volatility ; Voters ; Western Europe</subject><ispartof>Party politics, 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.100-114</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jan 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-42481de78003b1bbfe18fbcd035c845f18398718b256ab91cc490186fd5e55e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-42481de78003b1bbfe18fbcd035c845f18398718b256ab91cc490186fd5e55e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354068812472570$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1354068812472570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Tom WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elsas, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubbe, Rozemarijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Brug, Wouter</creatorcontrib><title>Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)</title><title>Party politics</title><description>Electorates appear to be adrift. Across Western Europe electoral volatility is increasing. But are volatile voters whimsical? Do they behave randomly, like drift sand, or are they emancipated, not committed to a single political party but loyal to their own preferences? To answer these questions this study focuses on the Dutch electorate, which has become the most volatile in Western Europe. We analyse the extensive 1Vandaag Opinion Panel (1VOP) dataset, which covers 55,847 adult respondents who participated in at least 2 of the 58 waves between November 2006 and June 2010. 1VOP allows us to break down electoral volatility by type, direction (intra-bloc versus inter-bloc) and time span. We conclude that volatility reflects voter emancipation rather than disengagement. Although more than half of the respondents (55 percent) change party preference at least once, they mostly stick to one of two ideologically coherent party blocs. Especially middle groups are volatile: people with modal income, with average levels of education and who position themselves in the political centre. However, the lower educated are more likely to switch between dissimilar parties. Our findings question the socialization model: although older voters are relatively loyal when they cast their ballots, they are the most volatile in the years in between.</description><subject>Disengagement</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Electoral College</subject><subject>Electoral volatility</subject><subject>Freedom</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Panel surveys</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Socialization</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><subject>Voters</subject><subject>Western Europe</subject><issn>1354-0688</issn><issn>1460-3683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qFTEUxgexYK3uXR5wU8HRnJn8uyu5lNoKxW7qeshkztjU3Mk1ybTMzndw5-P5JM3ldiEFKQRywvmd7-Tjq6o3yD4gKvURW8GZ1Bobrhqh2LPqELlkdSt1-7zUpV3v-i-qlyndMIaCoT6s_qwjwW3wJju_KzLFBBRjedv3cHftNslZ4yFESBRdmJNfYOvsj-UTrGFrJvKQ8jwsEEYQGu7MLSVwUw6Qrwkmk-eyoPTIk80hFqmHbS4vcHxVmK9UyOjNNCRoGJN_f_1uGLJ3r6qD0fhErx_uo-rb59Ork_P64vLsy8n6orYcVa55wzUOpDRjbY99PxLqsbcDa4XVXIyo25VWqPtGSNOv0Fq-KtblOAgS5bRH1fFedxvDz5lS7jYuWfLlR1T8dqiYFo3SWj2NSi7lSiLfoW8foTdhjlMxUijRcClKBoVie8rGkFKksdtGtzFx6ZB1u1y7x7mWkXo_ksx3-kf0f_w9EXmhhg</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>van der Meer, Tom WG</creator><creator>van Elsas, Erika</creator><creator>Lubbe, Rozemarijn</creator><creator>van der Brug, Wouter</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)</title><author>van der Meer, Tom WG ; van Elsas, Erika ; Lubbe, Rozemarijn ; van der Brug, Wouter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-42481de78003b1bbfe18fbcd035c845f18398718b256ab91cc490186fd5e55e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disengagement</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Electoral College</topic><topic>Electoral volatility</topic><topic>Freedom</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Panel surveys</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Socialization</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><topic>Voters</topic><topic>Western Europe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Meer, Tom WG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Elsas, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubbe, Rozemarijn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Brug, Wouter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Party politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Meer, Tom WG</au><au>van Elsas, Erika</au><au>Lubbe, Rozemarijn</au><au>van der Brug, Wouter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)</atitle><jtitle>Party politics</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>100-114</pages><issn>1354-0688</issn><eissn>1460-3683</eissn><coden>PAPOFH</coden><abstract>Electorates appear to be adrift. Across Western Europe electoral volatility is increasing. But are volatile voters whimsical? Do they behave randomly, like drift sand, or are they emancipated, not committed to a single political party but loyal to their own preferences? To answer these questions this study focuses on the Dutch electorate, which has become the most volatile in Western Europe. We analyse the extensive 1Vandaag Opinion Panel (1VOP) dataset, which covers 55,847 adult respondents who participated in at least 2 of the 58 waves between November 2006 and June 2010. 1VOP allows us to break down electoral volatility by type, direction (intra-bloc versus inter-bloc) and time span. We conclude that volatility reflects voter emancipation rather than disengagement. Although more than half of the respondents (55 percent) change party preference at least once, they mostly stick to one of two ideologically coherent party blocs. Especially middle groups are volatile: people with modal income, with average levels of education and who position themselves in the political centre. However, the lower educated are more likely to switch between dissimilar parties. Our findings question the socialization model: although older voters are relatively loyal when they cast their ballots, they are the most volatile in the years in between.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1354068812472570</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-0688 |
ispartof | Party politics, 2015-01, Vol.21 (1), p.100-114 |
issn | 1354-0688 1460-3683 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708527887 |
source | Access via SAGE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Disengagement Elections Electoral College Electoral volatility Freedom Ideology Netherlands Panel surveys Political Parties Respondents Socialization Volatility Voters Western Europe |
title | Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20volatile%20voters%20erratic,%20whimsical%20or%20seriously%20picky?%20A%20panel%20study%20of%2058%20waves%20into%20the%20nature%20of%20electoral%20volatility%20(The%20Netherlands%202006%E2%80%932010)&rft.jtitle=Party%20politics&rft.au=van%20der%20Meer,%20Tom%20WG&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=100-114&rft.issn=1354-0688&rft.eissn=1460-3683&rft.coden=PAPOFH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1354068812472570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3584134871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652465001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1354068812472570&rfr_iscdi=true |