Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks

The relationship between the intensity of timber harvest and the composition and diversity of ground vegetation was investigated in upland mixed oak forests in the Missouri Ozarks. Pre- and post-harvest data were collected from 420 permanent vegetation plots to determine if changes in the compositio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management 2006-02, Vol.222 (1), p.326-334
Hauptverfasser: Zenner, Eric K., Kabrick, John M., Jensen, Randy G., Peck, JeriLynn E., Grabner, Jennifer K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 334
container_issue 1
container_start_page 326
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 222
creator Zenner, Eric K.
Kabrick, John M.
Jensen, Randy G.
Peck, JeriLynn E.
Grabner, Jennifer K.
description The relationship between the intensity of timber harvest and the composition and diversity of ground vegetation was investigated in upland mixed oak forests in the Missouri Ozarks. Pre- and post-harvest data were collected from 420 permanent vegetation plots to determine if changes in the composition and diversity of ground flora depended upon the intensity of the harvest treatment and, if so, how this varied among life forms of ground flora. The five harvest treatments (no-harvest control, single-tree selection, group selection, thinning, and clearcut) imposed a gradient of overstory canopy cover with reductions ranging from 12.8% in the controls to 83.6% in clearcuts. Both total cover and species richness of the ground flora increased proportionally to harvest intensity. Harvest intensity also caused a proportional impact on the collective relative cover of seven identified life forms of ground flora: annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, legumes, woody vines, shrubs, and tree seedlings. The direction of this change was nearly identical for all harvest treatments, reflecting the consistent and proportional decrease in the relative cover of legumes, and increase in the relative cover of annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, and woody vines, following all harvest treatments. Closer inspection revealed that changes in relative cover, compared to levels in uncut stands, were observed at different levels (thresholds) of harvest intensity for different life forms, although almost all life forms showed significant differences between uncut and clearcut conditions. Managers may be able to use these differential thresholds of response to harvest intensity to develop silvicultural prescriptions specifically intended to increase or decrease the short-term abundance of certain life forms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17084889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112705006316</els_id><sourcerecordid>14764495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-681efee83bd0a5beebe52e174b32cb342adb6b60c67c81ce1e99325217457f303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKHTEUhkOx0KvtGxTMRndze5LJTHI3gohtBYtQ6zpkMiea6zi5zZkr2KdvhhG6s6uEP9_5c_gY-yxgLUC0X7brkDL6tJYATYnWIPU7thJGy0qDkgdsBbU2lRBSf2CHRFsoYKPMit3-RNqlkZB4Cvw-p_3Y8zCk7PiUuCuJ6yOO0_z64PIz0sTjOOFIcXopNz49IP8RidI-R37zx-VH-sjeBzcQfno9j9jd18tfF9-r65tvVxfn15VXUk5VawQGRFN3PbimQ-ywkSi06mrpu1pJ13dt14JvtTfCo8DNppaNLESjQw31ETtdenc5_d6XzexTJI_D4EZMe7JCg1HGbP4PKt0qtWkKqBbQ50SUMdhdjk8uv1gBdlZtt3ZRbWfVc1pUl7GT135H3g0hu9FH-jerlRFGzvXHCxdcsu4-F-buVoKoQUALSqtCnC0EFm_PEbMlX_R77GP5dbJ9im-v8heo_J_D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14764495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zenner, Eric K. ; Kabrick, John M. ; Jensen, Randy G. ; Peck, JeriLynn E. ; Grabner, Jennifer K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zenner, Eric K. ; Kabrick, John M. ; Jensen, Randy G. ; Peck, JeriLynn E. ; Grabner, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between the intensity of timber harvest and the composition and diversity of ground vegetation was investigated in upland mixed oak forests in the Missouri Ozarks. Pre- and post-harvest data were collected from 420 permanent vegetation plots to determine if changes in the composition and diversity of ground flora depended upon the intensity of the harvest treatment and, if so, how this varied among life forms of ground flora. The five harvest treatments (no-harvest control, single-tree selection, group selection, thinning, and clearcut) imposed a gradient of overstory canopy cover with reductions ranging from 12.8% in the controls to 83.6% in clearcuts. Both total cover and species richness of the ground flora increased proportionally to harvest intensity. Harvest intensity also caused a proportional impact on the collective relative cover of seven identified life forms of ground flora: annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, legumes, woody vines, shrubs, and tree seedlings. The direction of this change was nearly identical for all harvest treatments, reflecting the consistent and proportional decrease in the relative cover of legumes, and increase in the relative cover of annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, and woody vines, following all harvest treatments. Closer inspection revealed that changes in relative cover, compared to levels in uncut stands, were observed at different levels (thresholds) of harvest intensity for different life forms, although almost all life forms showed significant differences between uncut and clearcut conditions. Managers may be able to use these differential thresholds of response to harvest intensity to develop silvicultural prescriptions specifically intended to increase or decrease the short-term abundance of certain life forms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; canopy ; deciduous forests ; Forest ecology ; Forest harvesting and working in forest ; Forest management ; Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration ; forest trees ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ground flora ; Ground vegetation ; Landscape management ; logging ; Missouri flora ; Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP) ; MOFEP ; montane forests ; overstory ; Ozark flora ; plant growth ; silvicultural practices ; Silviculture ; species diversity ; Species richness ; Synecology ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; understory</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2006-02, Vol.222 (1), p.326-334</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-681efee83bd0a5beebe52e174b32cb342adb6b60c67c81ce1e99325217457f303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-681efee83bd0a5beebe52e174b32cb342adb6b60c67c81ce1e99325217457f303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112705006316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17481825$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zenner, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabrick, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Randy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peck, JeriLynn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabner, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><title>Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>The relationship between the intensity of timber harvest and the composition and diversity of ground vegetation was investigated in upland mixed oak forests in the Missouri Ozarks. Pre- and post-harvest data were collected from 420 permanent vegetation plots to determine if changes in the composition and diversity of ground flora depended upon the intensity of the harvest treatment and, if so, how this varied among life forms of ground flora. The five harvest treatments (no-harvest control, single-tree selection, group selection, thinning, and clearcut) imposed a gradient of overstory canopy cover with reductions ranging from 12.8% in the controls to 83.6% in clearcuts. Both total cover and species richness of the ground flora increased proportionally to harvest intensity. Harvest intensity also caused a proportional impact on the collective relative cover of seven identified life forms of ground flora: annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, legumes, woody vines, shrubs, and tree seedlings. The direction of this change was nearly identical for all harvest treatments, reflecting the consistent and proportional decrease in the relative cover of legumes, and increase in the relative cover of annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, and woody vines, following all harvest treatments. Closer inspection revealed that changes in relative cover, compared to levels in uncut stands, were observed at different levels (thresholds) of harvest intensity for different life forms, although almost all life forms showed significant differences between uncut and clearcut conditions. Managers may be able to use these differential thresholds of response to harvest intensity to develop silvicultural prescriptions specifically intended to increase or decrease the short-term abundance of certain life forms.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canopy</subject><subject>deciduous forests</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest harvesting and working in forest</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ground flora</subject><subject>Ground vegetation</subject><subject>Landscape management</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>Missouri flora</subject><subject>Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP)</subject><subject>MOFEP</subject><subject>montane forests</subject><subject>overstory</subject><subject>Ozark flora</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>silvicultural practices</subject><subject>Silviculture</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>understory</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFKHTEUhkOx0KvtGxTMRndze5LJTHI3gohtBYtQ6zpkMiea6zi5zZkr2KdvhhG6s6uEP9_5c_gY-yxgLUC0X7brkDL6tJYATYnWIPU7thJGy0qDkgdsBbU2lRBSf2CHRFsoYKPMit3-RNqlkZB4Cvw-p_3Y8zCk7PiUuCuJ6yOO0_z64PIz0sTjOOFIcXopNz49IP8RidI-R37zx-VH-sjeBzcQfno9j9jd18tfF9-r65tvVxfn15VXUk5VawQGRFN3PbimQ-ywkSi06mrpu1pJ13dt14JvtTfCo8DNppaNLESjQw31ETtdenc5_d6XzexTJI_D4EZMe7JCg1HGbP4PKt0qtWkKqBbQ50SUMdhdjk8uv1gBdlZtt3ZRbWfVc1pUl7GT135H3g0hu9FH-jerlRFGzvXHCxdcsu4-F-buVoKoQUALSqtCnC0EFm_PEbMlX_R77GP5dbJ9im-v8heo_J_D</recordid><startdate>20060215</startdate><enddate>20060215</enddate><creator>Zenner, Eric K.</creator><creator>Kabrick, John M.</creator><creator>Jensen, Randy G.</creator><creator>Peck, JeriLynn E.</creator><creator>Grabner, Jennifer K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060215</creationdate><title>Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks</title><author>Zenner, Eric K. ; Kabrick, John M. ; Jensen, Randy G. ; Peck, JeriLynn E. ; Grabner, Jennifer K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-681efee83bd0a5beebe52e174b32cb342adb6b60c67c81ce1e99325217457f303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canopy</topic><topic>deciduous forests</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest harvesting and working in forest</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ground flora</topic><topic>Ground vegetation</topic><topic>Landscape management</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>Missouri flora</topic><topic>Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP)</topic><topic>MOFEP</topic><topic>montane forests</topic><topic>overstory</topic><topic>Ozark flora</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>silvicultural practices</topic><topic>Silviculture</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zenner, Eric K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabrick, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Randy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peck, JeriLynn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabner, Jennifer K.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zenner, Eric K.</au><au>Kabrick, John M.</au><au>Jensen, Randy G.</au><au>Peck, JeriLynn E.</au><au>Grabner, Jennifer K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2006-02-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>326-334</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>The relationship between the intensity of timber harvest and the composition and diversity of ground vegetation was investigated in upland mixed oak forests in the Missouri Ozarks. Pre- and post-harvest data were collected from 420 permanent vegetation plots to determine if changes in the composition and diversity of ground flora depended upon the intensity of the harvest treatment and, if so, how this varied among life forms of ground flora. The five harvest treatments (no-harvest control, single-tree selection, group selection, thinning, and clearcut) imposed a gradient of overstory canopy cover with reductions ranging from 12.8% in the controls to 83.6% in clearcuts. Both total cover and species richness of the ground flora increased proportionally to harvest intensity. Harvest intensity also caused a proportional impact on the collective relative cover of seven identified life forms of ground flora: annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, legumes, woody vines, shrubs, and tree seedlings. The direction of this change was nearly identical for all harvest treatments, reflecting the consistent and proportional decrease in the relative cover of legumes, and increase in the relative cover of annuals/biennials, forbs, graminoids, and woody vines, following all harvest treatments. Closer inspection revealed that changes in relative cover, compared to levels in uncut stands, were observed at different levels (thresholds) of harvest intensity for different life forms, although almost all life forms showed significant differences between uncut and clearcut conditions. Managers may be able to use these differential thresholds of response to harvest intensity to develop silvicultural prescriptions specifically intended to increase or decrease the short-term abundance of certain life forms.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.027</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 2006-02, Vol.222 (1), p.326-334
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17084889
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
canopy
deciduous forests
Forest ecology
Forest harvesting and working in forest
Forest management
Forest management. Stand types and stand dynamics. Silvicultural treatments. Tending of stands. Natural regeneration
forest trees
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Ground flora
Ground vegetation
Landscape management
logging
Missouri flora
Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP)
MOFEP
montane forests
overstory
Ozark flora
plant growth
silvicultural practices
Silviculture
species diversity
Species richness
Synecology
Terrestrial ecosystems
understory
title Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A35%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20of%20ground%20flora%20to%20a%20gradient%20of%20harvest%20intensity%20in%20the%20Missouri%20Ozarks&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Zenner,%20Eric%20K.&rft.date=2006-02-15&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=326-334&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14764495%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14764495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112705006316&rfr_iscdi=true