The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds
The importance of various factors influencing the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds is critically examined using population genetic models. The factors include gene mutation, initial frequency of resistance alleles, inheritance, weed fitness in the presence and absence of herbicide, mating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.176-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Jasieniuk, Marie Brûlé-Babel, Anita L. Morrison, Ian N. |
description | The importance of various factors influencing the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds is critically examined using population genetic models. The factors include gene mutation, initial frequency of resistance alleles, inheritance, weed fitness in the presence and absence of herbicide, mating system, and gene flow. Where weed infestations are heavy, the probability of selecting for resistance can be high even when the rate of mutation is low. Subsequent to the occurrence of a resistant mutant, repeated treatments with herbicides having the same mode of action can lead to the rapid evolution of a predominantly resistant population. At a given herbicide selection intensity, the initial frequency of resistance alleles determines the number of generations required to reach a specific frequency of resistant plants. The initial frequency of resistance alleles has a greater influence on the evolutionary process when herbicides impose weak selection, as opposed to very strong selection. Under selection, dominant resistance alleles increase in frequency more rapidly than recessive alleles in random mating or highly outcrossing weed populations. In highly self-fertilizing species, dominant and recessive resistance alleles increase in frequency at approximately the same rate. Gene flow through pollen or seed movement from resistant weed populations can provide a source of resistance alleles in previously susceptible populations. Because rates of gene flow are generally higher than rates of mutation, the time required to reach a high level of resistance in such situations is greatly reduced. Contrary to common misconception, gene flow from a susceptible population to a population undergoing resistance evolution is unlikely to slow the evolutionary process significantly. Accurate measurements of many factors that influence resistance evolution are difficult, if not impossible, to obtain experimentally. Thus, the use of models to predict times to resistance in specific situations is markedly limited. However, with appropriate assumptions, they can be invaluable in assessing the relative effectiveness of various management practices to avoid, or delay, the occurrence of herbicide resistance in weed populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0043174500093747 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17082614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0043174500093747</cupid><jstor_id>4045802</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4045802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-28f8a1b057a4e6f7d39f70b8ba5e25318745341c95d56563f463877a7a67fe6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfQHGRlbvomcwtwZWU2goFwba4HCbJmTqlzdSZRPDtTWlxI7g6i--_HH5CrincU6DqYQ7AGVVcAEDBFFcnZECFgDRTojglgz1O9_ycXMS4BqAyo8WAPC4-MBl_-U3XOt8kpqmTCTbYuiom3iZTDKWrXI3JG0YXW9NUmLgmeUes4yU5s2YT8ep4h2T5PF6MpunsdfIyepqlFROyTbPc5oaWIJThKK2qWWEVlHlpBGaC0bz_inFaFaIWUkhmuWS5UkYZqSzKkg3J3SF3F_xnh7HVWxcr3GxMg76LmirIM0l5L6QHYRV8jAGt3gW3NeFbU9D7mfSfmXrP7cGzjq0PvwYOXOSQ9fjmgK3x2qyCi3o5L2QmaAY9ZMc-sy2Dq1eo174LTT_GP40_GgB49Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17082614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Jasieniuk, Marie ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L. ; Morrison, Ian N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jasieniuk, Marie ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L. ; Morrison, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><description>The importance of various factors influencing the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds is critically examined using population genetic models. The factors include gene mutation, initial frequency of resistance alleles, inheritance, weed fitness in the presence and absence of herbicide, mating system, and gene flow. Where weed infestations are heavy, the probability of selecting for resistance can be high even when the rate of mutation is low. Subsequent to the occurrence of a resistant mutant, repeated treatments with herbicides having the same mode of action can lead to the rapid evolution of a predominantly resistant population. At a given herbicide selection intensity, the initial frequency of resistance alleles determines the number of generations required to reach a specific frequency of resistant plants. The initial frequency of resistance alleles has a greater influence on the evolutionary process when herbicides impose weak selection, as opposed to very strong selection. Under selection, dominant resistance alleles increase in frequency more rapidly than recessive alleles in random mating or highly outcrossing weed populations. In highly self-fertilizing species, dominant and recessive resistance alleles increase in frequency at approximately the same rate. Gene flow through pollen or seed movement from resistant weed populations can provide a source of resistance alleles in previously susceptible populations. Because rates of gene flow are generally higher than rates of mutation, the time required to reach a high level of resistance in such situations is greatly reduced. Contrary to common misconception, gene flow from a susceptible population to a population undergoing resistance evolution is unlikely to slow the evolutionary process significantly. Accurate measurements of many factors that influence resistance evolution are difficult, if not impossible, to obtain experimentally. Thus, the use of models to predict times to resistance in specific situations is markedly limited. However, with appropriate assumptions, they can be invaluable in assessing the relative effectiveness of various management practices to avoid, or delay, the occurrence of herbicide resistance in weed populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0043174500093747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Aboveground biomass ; Alleles ; Biomass production ; Ecological competition ; EVOLUCION ; EVOLUTION ; GENE ; GENES ; Genetic mutation ; GENETICA ; GENETICA DE POBLACIONES ; GENETIQUE ; GENETIQUE DES POPULATIONS ; HERBICIDAS ; HERBICIDE ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; HEREDITE ; HEREDITE CYTOPLASMIQUE ; HERENCIA CITOPLASMICA ; HERENCIA GENETICA ; MALEZAS ; MAUVAISE HERBE ; METHODE D'ACCOUPLEMENT ; MODELE ; MODELOS ; MUTACION ; MUTANT ; MUTANTES ; MUTATION ; Plants ; RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES ; RESISTANCE INDUITE ; RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS ; RESISTENCIA INDUCIDA ; SELECCION ; SELECTION ; SISTEMAS DE APAREAMIENTO ; Special Topics ; Triazines</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.176-193</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 1996 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-28f8a1b057a4e6f7d39f70b8ba5e25318745341c95d56563f463877a7a67fe6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-28f8a1b057a4e6f7d39f70b8ba5e25318745341c95d56563f463877a7a67fe6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4045802$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4045802$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jasieniuk, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><title>The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>The importance of various factors influencing the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds is critically examined using population genetic models. The factors include gene mutation, initial frequency of resistance alleles, inheritance, weed fitness in the presence and absence of herbicide, mating system, and gene flow. Where weed infestations are heavy, the probability of selecting for resistance can be high even when the rate of mutation is low. Subsequent to the occurrence of a resistant mutant, repeated treatments with herbicides having the same mode of action can lead to the rapid evolution of a predominantly resistant population. At a given herbicide selection intensity, the initial frequency of resistance alleles determines the number of generations required to reach a specific frequency of resistant plants. The initial frequency of resistance alleles has a greater influence on the evolutionary process when herbicides impose weak selection, as opposed to very strong selection. Under selection, dominant resistance alleles increase in frequency more rapidly than recessive alleles in random mating or highly outcrossing weed populations. In highly self-fertilizing species, dominant and recessive resistance alleles increase in frequency at approximately the same rate. Gene flow through pollen or seed movement from resistant weed populations can provide a source of resistance alleles in previously susceptible populations. Because rates of gene flow are generally higher than rates of mutation, the time required to reach a high level of resistance in such situations is greatly reduced. Contrary to common misconception, gene flow from a susceptible population to a population undergoing resistance evolution is unlikely to slow the evolutionary process significantly. Accurate measurements of many factors that influence resistance evolution are difficult, if not impossible, to obtain experimentally. Thus, the use of models to predict times to resistance in specific situations is markedly limited. However, with appropriate assumptions, they can be invaluable in assessing the relative effectiveness of various management practices to avoid, or delay, the occurrence of herbicide resistance in weed populations.</description><subject>Aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Biomass production</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>EVOLUCION</subject><subject>EVOLUTION</subject><subject>GENE</subject><subject>GENES</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>GENETICA</subject><subject>GENETICA DE POBLACIONES</subject><subject>GENETIQUE</subject><subject>GENETIQUE DES POPULATIONS</subject><subject>HERBICIDAS</subject><subject>HERBICIDE</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>HEREDITE</subject><subject>HEREDITE CYTOPLASMIQUE</subject><subject>HERENCIA CITOPLASMICA</subject><subject>HERENCIA GENETICA</subject><subject>MALEZAS</subject><subject>MAUVAISE HERBE</subject><subject>METHODE D'ACCOUPLEMENT</subject><subject>MODELE</subject><subject>MODELOS</subject><subject>MUTACION</subject><subject>MUTANT</subject><subject>MUTANTES</subject><subject>MUTATION</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES</subject><subject>RESISTANCE INDUITE</subject><subject>RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</subject><subject>RESISTENCIA INDUCIDA</subject><subject>SELECCION</subject><subject>SELECTION</subject><subject>SISTEMAS DE APAREAMIENTO</subject><subject>Special Topics</subject><subject>Triazines</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhgdRsFYfQHGRlbvomcwtwZWU2goFwba4HCbJmTqlzdSZRPDtTWlxI7g6i--_HH5CrincU6DqYQ7AGVVcAEDBFFcnZECFgDRTojglgz1O9_ycXMS4BqAyo8WAPC4-MBl_-U3XOt8kpqmTCTbYuiom3iZTDKWrXI3JG0YXW9NUmLgmeUes4yU5s2YT8ep4h2T5PF6MpunsdfIyepqlFROyTbPc5oaWIJThKK2qWWEVlHlpBGaC0bz_inFaFaIWUkhmuWS5UkYZqSzKkg3J3SF3F_xnh7HVWxcr3GxMg76LmirIM0l5L6QHYRV8jAGt3gW3NeFbU9D7mfSfmXrP7cGzjq0PvwYOXOSQ9fjmgK3x2qyCi3o5L2QmaAY9ZMc-sy2Dq1eo174LTT_GP40_GgB49Q</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Jasieniuk, Marie</creator><creator>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L.</creator><creator>Morrison, Ian N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds</title><author>Jasieniuk, Marie ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L. ; Morrison, Ian N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-28f8a1b057a4e6f7d39f70b8ba5e25318745341c95d56563f463877a7a67fe6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Biomass production</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>EVOLUCION</topic><topic>EVOLUTION</topic><topic>GENE</topic><topic>GENES</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>GENETICA</topic><topic>GENETICA DE POBLACIONES</topic><topic>GENETIQUE</topic><topic>GENETIQUE DES POPULATIONS</topic><topic>HERBICIDAS</topic><topic>HERBICIDE</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>HEREDITE</topic><topic>HEREDITE CYTOPLASMIQUE</topic><topic>HERENCIA CITOPLASMICA</topic><topic>HERENCIA GENETICA</topic><topic>MALEZAS</topic><topic>MAUVAISE HERBE</topic><topic>METHODE D'ACCOUPLEMENT</topic><topic>MODELE</topic><topic>MODELOS</topic><topic>MUTACION</topic><topic>MUTANT</topic><topic>MUTANTES</topic><topic>MUTATION</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES</topic><topic>RESISTANCE INDUITE</topic><topic>RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</topic><topic>RESISTENCIA INDUCIDA</topic><topic>SELECCION</topic><topic>SELECTION</topic><topic>SISTEMAS DE APAREAMIENTO</topic><topic>Special Topics</topic><topic>Triazines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jasieniuk, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Ian N.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jasieniuk, Marie</au><au>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L.</au><au>Morrison, Ian N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>176-193</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>The importance of various factors influencing the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds is critically examined using population genetic models. The factors include gene mutation, initial frequency of resistance alleles, inheritance, weed fitness in the presence and absence of herbicide, mating system, and gene flow. Where weed infestations are heavy, the probability of selecting for resistance can be high even when the rate of mutation is low. Subsequent to the occurrence of a resistant mutant, repeated treatments with herbicides having the same mode of action can lead to the rapid evolution of a predominantly resistant population. At a given herbicide selection intensity, the initial frequency of resistance alleles determines the number of generations required to reach a specific frequency of resistant plants. The initial frequency of resistance alleles has a greater influence on the evolutionary process when herbicides impose weak selection, as opposed to very strong selection. Under selection, dominant resistance alleles increase in frequency more rapidly than recessive alleles in random mating or highly outcrossing weed populations. In highly self-fertilizing species, dominant and recessive resistance alleles increase in frequency at approximately the same rate. Gene flow through pollen or seed movement from resistant weed populations can provide a source of resistance alleles in previously susceptible populations. Because rates of gene flow are generally higher than rates of mutation, the time required to reach a high level of resistance in such situations is greatly reduced. Contrary to common misconception, gene flow from a susceptible population to a population undergoing resistance evolution is unlikely to slow the evolutionary process significantly. Accurate measurements of many factors that influence resistance evolution are difficult, if not impossible, to obtain experimentally. Thus, the use of models to predict times to resistance in specific situations is markedly limited. However, with appropriate assumptions, they can be invaluable in assessing the relative effectiveness of various management practices to avoid, or delay, the occurrence of herbicide resistance in weed populations.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0043174500093747</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.176-193 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17082614 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Aboveground biomass Alleles Biomass production Ecological competition EVOLUCION EVOLUTION GENE GENES Genetic mutation GENETICA GENETICA DE POBLACIONES GENETIQUE GENETIQUE DES POPULATIONS HERBICIDAS HERBICIDE Herbicide resistance Herbicides HEREDITE HEREDITE CYTOPLASMIQUE HERENCIA CITOPLASMICA HERENCIA GENETICA MALEZAS MAUVAISE HERBE METHODE D'ACCOUPLEMENT MODELE MODELOS MUTACION MUTANT MUTANTES MUTATION Plants RESISTANCE AUX PRODUITS CHIMIQUES RESISTANCE INDUITE RESISTENCIA A PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS RESISTENCIA INDUCIDA SELECCION SELECTION SISTEMAS DE APAREAMIENTO Special Topics Triazines |
title | The Evolution and Genetics of Herbicide Resistance in Weeds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A23%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Evolution%20and%20Genetics%20of%20Herbicide%20Resistance%20in%20Weeds&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Jasieniuk,%20Marie&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=176-193&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0043174500093747&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4045802%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17082614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0043174500093747&rft_jstor_id=4045802&rfr_iscdi=true |