Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit

The objectives of this prospective observational study were to determine the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury who received effective anti-seizure prophylaxis. The study was conducted in a tertiary level ICU of a major trauma referral centre between February 2012 and August 2013. A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 2015-09, Vol.43 (5), p.646-651
Hauptverfasser: Sundararajan, K, Milne, D, Edwards, S, Chapman, M J, Shakib, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 651
container_issue 5
container_start_page 646
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 43
creator Sundararajan, K
Milne, D
Edwards, S
Chapman, M J
Shakib, S
description The objectives of this prospective observational study were to determine the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury who received effective anti-seizure prophylaxis. The study was conducted in a tertiary level ICU of a major trauma referral centre between February 2012 and August 2013. A total of 2361 patients were admitted to the ICU in this study period, of whom125 patients (index) with traumatic head injury were included in this study. The patients had a mean age of 45 years (SD=19), a mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 9 (SD=4), a mean injury severity score of 27 (SD=13) and a mean APACHE III score of 55 (SD=27). Only 13.6 % (17 of 125) of patients were given anti-seizure prophylaxis and phenytoin levels were measured in 9.6% (12 of 125). Although all 12 patients achieved an effective concentration for phenytoin therapy (>40 µmol/l) after the loading dose, no patient had their target concentration consistently maintained in the recommended therapeutic range (40 to 80 µmol/l) throughout the seven-day monitoring period. There was wide fluctuation in phenytoin levels in the patients in this study. Twenty-two (18%) of the index patients had post-traumatic seizures, indicating a high prevalence for this study. Poor compliance with guidelines could possibly explain this phenomenon. Future studies are needed to look at the dosing and monitoring of phenytoin and/or alternative anti-seizure prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057X1504300515
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708158572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3806488061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-411e67648090dd6b9327ec9a372680ade9bdf2ccac227305c9baf727f85d89943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwBzigSFy4FOKkaZrjNPElTeICErcqTVMtU9eWJAXGryfVBgc42Y6f91VsI3QO5BpAiBvCgBAuXoGTlMUM-AGaQprmCaECDtF0BJKRmKAT79eEgKSCH6MJzWInBTFFdt4Gm3hjvwZncO-6frVt1Kf12LZYOxusVk2zxbZpcK-CNW3w-MOGFQ5ODZv4onHpVIRtux7cdpSpsQim9fbdYK2i79DacIqOatV4c7aPM_Ryd_u8eEiWT_ePi_ky0UzwkKQAJhNZmhNJqiorJaPCaKmYoFlOVGVkWdVUa6UpFYxwLUtVCyrqnFe5lCmboaudbxzmbTA-FBvrtWka1Zpu8AUIkgPPuaARvfyDrrvBtfF3kQIKjEoyUnRHadd570xd9M5ulNsWQIrxEMX_Q0TRxd56KDem-pX8bJ59A9vsg5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712132902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sundararajan, K ; Milne, D ; Edwards, S ; Chapman, M J ; Shakib, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Sundararajan, K ; Milne, D ; Edwards, S ; Chapman, M J ; Shakib, S</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this prospective observational study were to determine the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury who received effective anti-seizure prophylaxis. The study was conducted in a tertiary level ICU of a major trauma referral centre between February 2012 and August 2013. A total of 2361 patients were admitted to the ICU in this study period, of whom125 patients (index) with traumatic head injury were included in this study. The patients had a mean age of 45 years (SD=19), a mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 9 (SD=4), a mean injury severity score of 27 (SD=13) and a mean APACHE III score of 55 (SD=27). Only 13.6 % (17 of 125) of patients were given anti-seizure prophylaxis and phenytoin levels were measured in 9.6% (12 of 125). Although all 12 patients achieved an effective concentration for phenytoin therapy (&gt;40 µmol/l) after the loading dose, no patient had their target concentration consistently maintained in the recommended therapeutic range (40 to 80 µmol/l) throughout the seven-day monitoring period. There was wide fluctuation in phenytoin levels in the patients in this study. Twenty-two (18%) of the index patients had post-traumatic seizures, indicating a high prevalence for this study. Poor compliance with guidelines could possibly explain this phenomenon. Future studies are needed to look at the dosing and monitoring of phenytoin and/or alternative anti-seizure prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1504300515</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26310417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Brain Injuries - complications ; Critical Illness ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phenytoin - blood ; Phenytoin - therapeutic use ; Seizures - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2015-09, Vol.43 (5), p.646-651</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-411e67648090dd6b9327ec9a372680ade9bdf2ccac227305c9baf727f85d89943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-411e67648090dd6b9327ec9a372680ade9bdf2ccac227305c9baf727f85d89943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26310417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sundararajan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakib, S</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>The objectives of this prospective observational study were to determine the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury who received effective anti-seizure prophylaxis. The study was conducted in a tertiary level ICU of a major trauma referral centre between February 2012 and August 2013. A total of 2361 patients were admitted to the ICU in this study period, of whom125 patients (index) with traumatic head injury were included in this study. The patients had a mean age of 45 years (SD=19), a mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 9 (SD=4), a mean injury severity score of 27 (SD=13) and a mean APACHE III score of 55 (SD=27). Only 13.6 % (17 of 125) of patients were given anti-seizure prophylaxis and phenytoin levels were measured in 9.6% (12 of 125). Although all 12 patients achieved an effective concentration for phenytoin therapy (&gt;40 µmol/l) after the loading dose, no patient had their target concentration consistently maintained in the recommended therapeutic range (40 to 80 µmol/l) throughout the seven-day monitoring period. There was wide fluctuation in phenytoin levels in the patients in this study. Twenty-two (18%) of the index patients had post-traumatic seizures, indicating a high prevalence for this study. Poor compliance with guidelines could possibly explain this phenomenon. Future studies are needed to look at the dosing and monitoring of phenytoin and/or alternative anti-seizure prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Phenytoin - blood</subject><subject>Phenytoin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Seizures - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwBzigSFy4FOKkaZrjNPElTeICErcqTVMtU9eWJAXGryfVBgc42Y6f91VsI3QO5BpAiBvCgBAuXoGTlMUM-AGaQprmCaECDtF0BJKRmKAT79eEgKSCH6MJzWInBTFFdt4Gm3hjvwZncO-6frVt1Kf12LZYOxusVk2zxbZpcK-CNW3w-MOGFQ5ODZv4onHpVIRtux7cdpSpsQim9fbdYK2i79DacIqOatV4c7aPM_Ryd_u8eEiWT_ePi_ky0UzwkKQAJhNZmhNJqiorJaPCaKmYoFlOVGVkWdVUa6UpFYxwLUtVCyrqnFe5lCmboaudbxzmbTA-FBvrtWka1Zpu8AUIkgPPuaARvfyDrrvBtfF3kQIKjEoyUnRHadd570xd9M5ulNsWQIrxEMX_Q0TRxd56KDem-pX8bJ59A9vsg5E</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Sundararajan, K</creator><creator>Milne, D</creator><creator>Edwards, S</creator><creator>Chapman, M J</creator><creator>Shakib, S</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit</title><author>Sundararajan, K ; Milne, D ; Edwards, S ; Chapman, M J ; Shakib, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-411e67648090dd6b9327ec9a372680ade9bdf2ccac227305c9baf727f85d89943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Phenytoin - blood</topic><topic>Phenytoin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Seizures - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sundararajan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakib, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sundararajan, K</au><au>Milne, D</au><au>Edwards, S</au><au>Chapman, M J</au><au>Shakib, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>646</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>646-651</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this prospective observational study were to determine the proportion of patients with traumatic brain injury who received effective anti-seizure prophylaxis. The study was conducted in a tertiary level ICU of a major trauma referral centre between February 2012 and August 2013. A total of 2361 patients were admitted to the ICU in this study period, of whom125 patients (index) with traumatic head injury were included in this study. The patients had a mean age of 45 years (SD=19), a mean score on the Glasgow Coma Scale of 9 (SD=4), a mean injury severity score of 27 (SD=13) and a mean APACHE III score of 55 (SD=27). Only 13.6 % (17 of 125) of patients were given anti-seizure prophylaxis and phenytoin levels were measured in 9.6% (12 of 125). Although all 12 patients achieved an effective concentration for phenytoin therapy (&gt;40 µmol/l) after the loading dose, no patient had their target concentration consistently maintained in the recommended therapeutic range (40 to 80 µmol/l) throughout the seven-day monitoring period. There was wide fluctuation in phenytoin levels in the patients in this study. Twenty-two (18%) of the index patients had post-traumatic seizures, indicating a high prevalence for this study. Poor compliance with guidelines could possibly explain this phenomenon. Future studies are needed to look at the dosing and monitoring of phenytoin and/or alternative anti-seizure prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><pmid>26310417</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057X1504300515</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2015-09, Vol.43 (5), p.646-651
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1708158572
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Brain Injuries - complications
Critical Illness
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Male
Middle Aged
Phenytoin - blood
Phenytoin - therapeutic use
Seizures - prevention & control
title Anti-seizure prophylaxis in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury in an intensive care unit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-seizure%20prophylaxis%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients%20with%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20in%20an%20intensive%20care%20unit&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Sundararajan,%20K&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=646&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=646-651&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057X1504300515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3806488061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712132902&rft_id=info:pmid/26310417&rfr_iscdi=true