Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation
There is a general lack of information on the effects of irrigation on soil carbon (C) sequestration in (semi)arid regions. For that purpose we present results of the sediment and C budget of a 30 ha furrow-irrigated corn field in the Central Valley in California. This field was monitored to assess...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2006-04, Vol.113 (1), p.391-398 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 398 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 391 |
| container_title | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment |
| container_volume | 113 |
| creator | Poch, Rosa M. Hopmans, Jan W. Six, Johan W. Rolston, Dennis E. McIntyre, Jim L. |
| description | There is a general lack of information on the effects of irrigation on soil carbon (C) sequestration in (semi)arid regions. For that purpose we present results of the sediment and C budget of a 30
ha furrow-irrigated corn field in the Central Valley in California. This field was monitored to assess the effects of minimum tillage versus standard tillage on soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. Water samples of two irrigation events in July and August 2004, were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, dissolved organic C (DOC) and N (DON), total C and N. Field and soil water budgets were estimated from meteorological data, flow measurements of applied irrigation and runoff water, and neutron-probe soil water measurements. Tail waters contained less sediment but more organic C than irrigation waters, due to particle settlement and enrichment in organic matter. Tillage treatment had no significant effect on composition of water or sediment. Furrow irrigation resulted in a net field input of 700
kg
sediment
ha
−1, 21.4
kg
C
ha
−1, and 7.7
kg
N
ha
−1. The added C by the sedimentation accounted for about two-thirds of the total C increase. The corresponding soil C increase associated with these two irrigation events was about 20% of reported yearly C sequestration rates in long-term soil C sequestration experiments. Our experiments showed the importance of time scale in C budgeting for intensively irrigated agroecosystems, where fast dynamics and large variability of inputs are common. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17080117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880905005074</els_id><sourcerecordid>17080117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-12b04f8b37f16a814178d00b682f4473002590a9d99ee5339b5658356bfb1d333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gBuz0V3Hm6ZpUnAjgy8QXOisQ5reDBk6jSYdxX9v6gjuzCbh8J1zbw4hZwzmDFh9tZ6bFeK8BBBZmGdpj8yYkrwoOYh9MsuKLJSC5pAcpbSGfEquZuRhEYbkO4xm9PlFg6OGOo99VyRreqQp-J5aE9sw0HbbrXCkLkTqtjGGT-pj9Ksf6wk5cKZPePp7H5Pl3e3r4qF4er5_XNw8FZYrMRasbKFyquXSsdooVjGpOoC2VqWrKsnzWqIB03RNgyg4b1pRC8VF3bqWdZzzY3K5y32L4X2LadQbnyz2vRkwbJNmEhQwJjNY7kAbQ0oRnX6LfmPil2agp9L0Wk-l6am0SctSNl38ppvp-y6awfr055SiYqoSmTvfcc6EnBIzs3wpgfE8GiRvIBPXOwJzGR8eo07W42Cx8xHtqLvg_1vkG3qJiew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17080117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Poch, Rosa M. ; Hopmans, Jan W. ; Six, Johan W. ; Rolston, Dennis E. ; McIntyre, Jim L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Poch, Rosa M. ; Hopmans, Jan W. ; Six, Johan W. ; Rolston, Dennis E. ; McIntyre, Jim L.</creatorcontrib><description>There is a general lack of information on the effects of irrigation on soil carbon (C) sequestration in (semi)arid regions. For that purpose we present results of the sediment and C budget of a 30
ha furrow-irrigated corn field in the Central Valley in California. This field was monitored to assess the effects of minimum tillage versus standard tillage on soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. Water samples of two irrigation events in July and August 2004, were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, dissolved organic C (DOC) and N (DON), total C and N. Field and soil water budgets were estimated from meteorological data, flow measurements of applied irrigation and runoff water, and neutron-probe soil water measurements. Tail waters contained less sediment but more organic C than irrigation waters, due to particle settlement and enrichment in organic matter. Tillage treatment had no significant effect on composition of water or sediment. Furrow irrigation resulted in a net field input of 700
kg
sediment
ha
−1, 21.4
kg
C
ha
−1, and 7.7
kg
N
ha
−1. The added C by the sedimentation accounted for about two-thirds of the total C increase. The corresponding soil C increase associated with these two irrigation events was about 20% of reported yearly C sequestration rates in long-term soil C sequestration experiments. Our experiments showed the importance of time scale in C budgeting for intensively irrigated agroecosystems, where fast dynamics and large variability of inputs are common.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agricultural runoff ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; C sequestration ; carbon ; Carbon budget ; carbon sequestration ; conventional tillage ; corn ; dissolved organic carbon ; dissolved organic nitrogen ; DOC ; DON ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Furrow irrigation ; gas emissions ; grain crops ; greenhouse gases ; irrigation water ; minimum tillage ; nitrogen ; Physical properties ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; sediment yield ; semiarid zones ; soil nutrient balance ; soil organic carbon ; Soil science ; Soil water ; soil water balance ; Synecology ; temporal variation ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Water and solute dynamics ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2006-04, Vol.113 (1), p.391-398</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-12b04f8b37f16a814178d00b682f4473002590a9d99ee5339b5658356bfb1d333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-12b04f8b37f16a814178d00b682f4473002590a9d99ee5339b5658356bfb1d333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17541845$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poch, Rosa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopmans, Jan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Six, Johan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolston, Dennis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Jim L.</creatorcontrib><title>Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</title><description>There is a general lack of information on the effects of irrigation on soil carbon (C) sequestration in (semi)arid regions. For that purpose we present results of the sediment and C budget of a 30
ha furrow-irrigated corn field in the Central Valley in California. This field was monitored to assess the effects of minimum tillage versus standard tillage on soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. Water samples of two irrigation events in July and August 2004, were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, dissolved organic C (DOC) and N (DON), total C and N. Field and soil water budgets were estimated from meteorological data, flow measurements of applied irrigation and runoff water, and neutron-probe soil water measurements. Tail waters contained less sediment but more organic C than irrigation waters, due to particle settlement and enrichment in organic matter. Tillage treatment had no significant effect on composition of water or sediment. Furrow irrigation resulted in a net field input of 700
kg
sediment
ha
−1, 21.4
kg
C
ha
−1, and 7.7
kg
N
ha
−1. The added C by the sedimentation accounted for about two-thirds of the total C increase. The corresponding soil C increase associated with these two irrigation events was about 20% of reported yearly C sequestration rates in long-term soil C sequestration experiments. Our experiments showed the importance of time scale in C budgeting for intensively irrigated agroecosystems, where fast dynamics and large variability of inputs are common.</description><subject>agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>C sequestration</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon budget</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>conventional tillage</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>dissolved organic nitrogen</subject><subject>DOC</subject><subject>DON</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Furrow irrigation</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>grain crops</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>irrigation water</subject><subject>minimum tillage</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>sediment yield</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>soil nutrient balance</subject><subject>soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>soil water balance</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Water and solute dynamics</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gBuz0V3Hm6ZpUnAjgy8QXOisQ5reDBk6jSYdxX9v6gjuzCbh8J1zbw4hZwzmDFh9tZ6bFeK8BBBZmGdpj8yYkrwoOYh9MsuKLJSC5pAcpbSGfEquZuRhEYbkO4xm9PlFg6OGOo99VyRreqQp-J5aE9sw0HbbrXCkLkTqtjGGT-pj9Ksf6wk5cKZPePp7H5Pl3e3r4qF4er5_XNw8FZYrMRasbKFyquXSsdooVjGpOoC2VqWrKsnzWqIB03RNgyg4b1pRC8VF3bqWdZzzY3K5y32L4X2LadQbnyz2vRkwbJNmEhQwJjNY7kAbQ0oRnX6LfmPil2agp9L0Wk-l6am0SctSNl38ppvp-y6awfr055SiYqoSmTvfcc6EnBIzs3wpgfE8GiRvIBPXOwJzGR8eo07W42Cx8xHtqLvg_1vkG3qJiew</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Poch, Rosa M.</creator><creator>Hopmans, Jan W.</creator><creator>Six, Johan W.</creator><creator>Rolston, Dennis E.</creator><creator>McIntyre, Jim L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation</title><author>Poch, Rosa M. ; Hopmans, Jan W. ; Six, Johan W. ; Rolston, Dennis E. ; McIntyre, Jim L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-12b04f8b37f16a814178d00b682f4473002590a9d99ee5339b5658356bfb1d333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>C sequestration</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon budget</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>conventional tillage</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>dissolved organic nitrogen</topic><topic>DOC</topic><topic>DON</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Furrow irrigation</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>grain crops</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>irrigation water</topic><topic>minimum tillage</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>sediment yield</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>soil nutrient balance</topic><topic>soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>soil water balance</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Water and solute dynamics</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poch, Rosa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopmans, Jan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Six, Johan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolston, Dennis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Jim L.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poch, Rosa M.</au><au>Hopmans, Jan W.</au><au>Six, Johan W.</au><au>Rolston, Dennis E.</au><au>McIntyre, Jim L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>391-398</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>There is a general lack of information on the effects of irrigation on soil carbon (C) sequestration in (semi)arid regions. For that purpose we present results of the sediment and C budget of a 30
ha furrow-irrigated corn field in the Central Valley in California. This field was monitored to assess the effects of minimum tillage versus standard tillage on soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. Water samples of two irrigation events in July and August 2004, were collected and analyzed for suspended sediment, dissolved organic C (DOC) and N (DON), total C and N. Field and soil water budgets were estimated from meteorological data, flow measurements of applied irrigation and runoff water, and neutron-probe soil water measurements. Tail waters contained less sediment but more organic C than irrigation waters, due to particle settlement and enrichment in organic matter. Tillage treatment had no significant effect on composition of water or sediment. Furrow irrigation resulted in a net field input of 700
kg
sediment
ha
−1, 21.4
kg
C
ha
−1, and 7.7
kg
N
ha
−1. The added C by the sedimentation accounted for about two-thirds of the total C increase. The corresponding soil C increase associated with these two irrigation events was about 20% of reported yearly C sequestration rates in long-term soil C sequestration experiments. Our experiments showed the importance of time scale in C budgeting for intensively irrigated agroecosystems, where fast dynamics and large variability of inputs are common.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-8809 |
| ispartof | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2006-04, Vol.113 (1), p.391-398 |
| issn | 0167-8809 1873-2305 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17080117 |
| source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | agricultural runoff Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences C sequestration carbon Carbon budget carbon sequestration conventional tillage corn dissolved organic carbon dissolved organic nitrogen DOC DON Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Furrow irrigation gas emissions grain crops greenhouse gases irrigation water minimum tillage nitrogen Physical properties Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils sediment yield semiarid zones soil nutrient balance soil organic carbon Soil science Soil water soil water balance Synecology temporal variation Terrestrial ecosystems Water and solute dynamics Zea mays |
| title | Considerations of a field-scale soil carbon budget for furrow irrigation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considerations%20of%20a%20field-scale%20soil%20carbon%20budget%20for%20furrow%20irrigation&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Poch,%20Rosa%20M.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=391-398&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17080117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17080117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880905005074&rfr_iscdi=true |