Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk
We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Moody, Anthony L. Houston, Alasdair I. McNamara, John M. |
description | We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s002650050225 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17075694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4601181</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4601181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFaP3jzkIN6ibz-ze5RqtVBQRM9hux-wNU3qvuTgf29KS0EYeDDze3MYQq4p3FOA6gEBmJIAEhiTJ2RCBWclVIqdkglwAaUUgp-TC8Q1ACiq9YSUCx9sU8xzCMVTwj6n1dCnrsViaH3IxXsO3u6M4iPh9yU5i7bBcHW4U_I1f_6cvZbLt5fF7HFZOk5VX1bB2OCjqFwVowSqVBjFPaNaCWmNpJFHcAIi9dz7FVPWOAVRCC2liZpPyd2-d5u7nyFgX28SutA0tg3dgDWtoJLKiBEs96DLHWIOsd7mtLH5t6ZQ70ap_40y8reHYovONjHb1iU8PjGjhdRmxG722Br7Lh9joYBSTfkfzlpotw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17075694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002650050225</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animal feeding behavior ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ecological competition ; Food ; Food availability ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Group size ; Mortality ; Predation ; Predators ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4601181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4601181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4022,27922,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2984589$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Alasdair I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal feeding behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFaP3jzkIN6ibz-ze5RqtVBQRM9hux-wNU3qvuTgf29KS0EYeDDze3MYQq4p3FOA6gEBmJIAEhiTJ2RCBWclVIqdkglwAaUUgp-TC8Q1ACiq9YSUCx9sU8xzCMVTwj6n1dCnrsViaH3IxXsO3u6M4iPh9yU5i7bBcHW4U_I1f_6cvZbLt5fF7HFZOk5VX1bB2OCjqFwVowSqVBjFPaNaCWmNpJFHcAIi9dz7FVPWOAVRCC2liZpPyd2-d5u7nyFgX28SutA0tg3dgDWtoJLKiBEs96DLHWIOsd7mtLH5t6ZQ70ap_40y8reHYovONjHb1iU8PjGjhdRmxG722Br7Lh9joYBSTfkfzlpotw</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Moody, Anthony L.</creator><creator>Houston, Alasdair I.</creator><creator>McNamara, John M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><author>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal feeding behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Alasdair I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moody, Anthony L.</au><au>Houston, Alasdair I.</au><au>McNamara, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>131-143</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s002650050225</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17075694 |
source | JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal ethology Animal feeding behavior Animals Biological and medical sciences Ecological competition Food Food availability Foraging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Group size Mortality Predation Predators Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry |
title | Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ideal%20Free%20Distributions%20under%20Predation%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Moody,%20Anthony%20L.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=131-143&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002650050225&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4601181%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17075694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4601181&rfr_iscdi=true |