Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk

We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143
Hauptverfasser: Moody, Anthony L., Houston, Alasdair I., McNamara, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 143
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 38
creator Moody, Anthony L.
Houston, Alasdair I.
McNamara, John M.
description We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002650050225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17075694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4601181</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4601181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFaP3jzkIN6ibz-ze5RqtVBQRM9hux-wNU3qvuTgf29KS0EYeDDze3MYQq4p3FOA6gEBmJIAEhiTJ2RCBWclVIqdkglwAaUUgp-TC8Q1ACiq9YSUCx9sU8xzCMVTwj6n1dCnrsViaH3IxXsO3u6M4iPh9yU5i7bBcHW4U_I1f_6cvZbLt5fF7HFZOk5VX1bB2OCjqFwVowSqVBjFPaNaCWmNpJFHcAIi9dz7FVPWOAVRCC2liZpPyd2-d5u7nyFgX28SutA0tg3dgDWtoJLKiBEs96DLHWIOsd7mtLH5t6ZQ70ap_40y8reHYovONjHb1iU8PjGjhdRmxG722Br7Lh9joYBSTfkfzlpotw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17075694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002650050225</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BESOD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animal feeding behavior ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ecological competition ; Food ; Food availability ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Group size ; Mortality ; Predation ; Predators ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4601181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4601181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,4022,27922,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2984589$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Alasdair I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><description>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal feeding behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1Lw0AUxBdRsFaP3jzkIN6ibz-ze5RqtVBQRM9hux-wNU3qvuTgf29KS0EYeDDze3MYQq4p3FOA6gEBmJIAEhiTJ2RCBWclVIqdkglwAaUUgp-TC8Q1ACiq9YSUCx9sU8xzCMVTwj6n1dCnrsViaH3IxXsO3u6M4iPh9yU5i7bBcHW4U_I1f_6cvZbLt5fF7HFZOk5VX1bB2OCjqFwVowSqVBjFPaNaCWmNpJFHcAIi9dz7FVPWOAVRCC2liZpPyd2-d5u7nyFgX28SutA0tg3dgDWtoJLKiBEs96DLHWIOsd7mtLH5t6ZQ70ap_40y8reHYovONjHb1iU8PjGjhdRmxG722Br7Lh9joYBSTfkfzlpotw</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Moody, Anthony L.</creator><creator>Houston, Alasdair I.</creator><creator>McNamara, John M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</title><author>Moody, Anthony L. ; Houston, Alasdair I. ; McNamara, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7e9aedf47c7ff50166e66e3d218645a951f3f0c40f1d3ddb26a9c60f448559f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal feeding behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moody, Anthony L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Alasdair I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moody, Anthony L.</au><au>Houston, Alasdair I.</au><au>McNamara, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>131-143</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><coden>BESOD6</coden><abstract>We examine the trade-off between gathering food and avoiding predation in the context of patch use by a group of animals. Often a forager will have to choose between feeding sites that differ in both energetic gain rate and predation risk. The ideal site will have a high gain rate and low risk of predation. However, intake rate will often decrease when the patch is shared with other foragers and it may be optimal for some individuals to feed elsewhere. Within the framework of ideal free theory, we investigate the distribution of foragers that will equalise individual fitness gains. We focus on a two-patch environment with continuous inputs of food. With reference to existing experimental studies, we examine the effects of risk dilution, food input rates and an animal's expectations of the future. We identify the effect of total animal numbers when one patch is subject to predation risk and the other is safe. Conditions under which the difference in intake rate in the two patches is constant are identified, as are conditions in which the ratio of animals in the two patches is constant. If current conditions do not alter future expectations an increase in input rates to the patches promotes increased use of the risky patch. Yet, if conditions are assumed to persist indefinitely the opposite effect is seen. When both patches are subject to predation risk, dilution of risk favours more extreme distributions, and may lead to more than one stable distribution. The results of these models are used to critically analyse previous work on the energetic equivalence of risk. This paper is intended to help guide the development of new experimental studies into the energy-risk trade-off.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s002650050225</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1996, Vol.38 (2), p.131-143
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17075694
source JSTOR; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal ethology
Animal feeding behavior
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Ecological competition
Food
Food availability
Foraging
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Group size
Mortality
Predation
Predators
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
title Ideal Free Distributions under Predation Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ideal%20Free%20Distributions%20under%20Predation%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Moody,%20Anthony%20L.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=131-143&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft.coden=BESOD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002650050225&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4601181%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17075694&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4601181&rfr_iscdi=true