Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?

Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?

Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.2005-2008
Hauptverfasser: Polyzos, N.P., Sunkara, S.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Cell Count
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Oocytes
Ovulation Induction
Reference Values
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2008
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2005
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 30
creator Polyzos, N.P.
Sunkara, S.K.
description Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian response based on the number of oocytes retrieved following ovarian stimulation, no systematic effort has been made in order to refine the oocyte yield thresholds for a normal responder. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence behind the oocyte number thresholds for the ovarian response categories and present the rationale and merits in recognizing a new, overlooked, ovarian response group: The sub-optimal ovarian responders.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/dev149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1706205813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/dev149</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1706205813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-625a702817eb1b31839001d4ce9f09a946ef236b5be7c86a22c5fc2bc4da5d653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EoqUwsqKMLKH-iJ2EBaGKL6kSA3SOHOdSAk4c7DiI_x6jFBiZ7p7007t7D6FTgi8IztnyxbcW-mUFI0nyPTQnicAxZRzvozmmIosJEWSGjpx7xTismThEMyoopjyjc7R58mVs-qFppY4suN50FVgX1UZr89F020iZbrBBQRWZUdpGdpELuNdyaEx3GQVtRrDamLeAbK3x_dUxOqildnCymwu0ub15Xt3H68e7h9X1OlZM8CEWlMsU04ykUJKSkYzl4ccqUZDXOJd5IqCmTJS8hFRlQlKqeK1oqZJK8kpwtkDnk29vzbsHNxRt4xRoLTsw3hUkxSEpzwgLaDyhyhrnLNRFb0No-1kQXHw3WUxNFlOTgT_bWfuyheqX_qnu73YI_I_XFyM0gHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1706205813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Polyzos, N.P. ; Sunkara, S.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Polyzos, N.P. ; Sunkara, S.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian response based on the number of oocytes retrieved following ovarian stimulation, no systematic effort has been made in order to refine the oocyte yield thresholds for a normal responder. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence behind the oocyte number thresholds for the ovarian response categories and present the rationale and merits in recognizing a new, overlooked, ovarian response group: The sub-optimal ovarian responders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26202582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cell Count ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Oocytes ; Ovulation Induction ; Reference Values ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.2005-2008</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2015</rights><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-625a702817eb1b31839001d4ce9f09a946ef236b5be7c86a22c5fc2bc4da5d653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-625a702817eb1b31839001d4ce9f09a946ef236b5be7c86a22c5fc2bc4da5d653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Polyzos, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunkara, S.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian response based on the number of oocytes retrieved following ovarian stimulation, no systematic effort has been made in order to refine the oocyte yield thresholds for a normal responder. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence behind the oocyte number thresholds for the ovarian response categories and present the rationale and merits in recognizing a new, overlooked, ovarian response group: The sub-optimal ovarian responders.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EoqUwsqKMLKH-iJ2EBaGKL6kSA3SOHOdSAk4c7DiI_x6jFBiZ7p7007t7D6FTgi8IztnyxbcW-mUFI0nyPTQnicAxZRzvozmmIosJEWSGjpx7xTismThEMyoopjyjc7R58mVs-qFppY4suN50FVgX1UZr89F020iZbrBBQRWZUdpGdpELuNdyaEx3GQVtRrDamLeAbK3x_dUxOqildnCymwu0ub15Xt3H68e7h9X1OlZM8CEWlMsU04ykUJKSkYzl4ccqUZDXOJd5IqCmTJS8hFRlQlKqeK1oqZJK8kpwtkDnk29vzbsHNxRt4xRoLTsw3hUkxSEpzwgLaDyhyhrnLNRFb0No-1kQXHw3WUxNFlOTgT_bWfuyheqX_qnu73YI_I_XFyM0gHg</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Polyzos, N.P.</creator><creator>Sunkara, S.K.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?</title><author>Polyzos, N.P. ; Sunkara, S.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-625a702817eb1b31839001d4ce9f09a946ef236b5be7c86a22c5fc2bc4da5d653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Polyzos, N.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunkara, S.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Polyzos, N.P.</au><au>Sunkara, S.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2005</spage><epage>2008</epage><pages>2005-2008</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>Individualization of IVF treatment and tailored stimulation based on predicted ovarian response may maximize treatment success and minimize the risks following IVF. Whilst there has been a consensus in defining poor ovarian response and an attempt to elucidate the threshold for excessive ovarian response based on the number of oocytes retrieved following ovarian stimulation, no systematic effort has been made in order to refine the oocyte yield thresholds for a normal responder. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence behind the oocyte number thresholds for the ovarian response categories and present the rationale and merits in recognizing a new, overlooked, ovarian response group: The sub-optimal ovarian responders.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>26202582</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/dev149</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 2015-09, Vol.30 (9), p.2005-2008
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1706205813
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Cell Count
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Oocytes
Ovulation Induction
Reference Values
Treatment Outcome
title Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sub-optimal%20responders%20following%20controlled%20ovarian%20stimulation:%20an%20overlooked%20group?&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Polyzos,%20N.P.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2005&rft.epage=2008&rft.pages=2005-2008&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/dev149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1706205813%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1706205813&rft_id=info:pmid/26202582&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/dev149&rfr_iscdi=true