Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks

Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280-320-nm wavelengths) doses were estimated for 1024 wetlands in six national parks: Acadia (Acadia), Glacier (Glacier), Great Smoky Mountains (Smoky), Olympic (Olympic), Rocky Mountain (Rocky), and Sequoia/Kings Canyon (Sequoia). Estimates were made using ground-base...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosystems (New York) 2005-08, Vol.8 (5), p.462-477
Hauptverfasser: Diamond, S.A, Trenham, P.C, Adams, M.J, Hossack, B.R, Knapp, R.A, Stark, S.L, Bradford, D, Corn, P.S, Czarnowski, K, Brooks, P.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 477
container_issue 5
container_start_page 462
container_title Ecosystems (New York)
container_volume 8
creator Diamond, S.A
Trenham, P.C
Adams, M.J
Hossack, B.R
Knapp, R.A
Stark, S.L
Bradford, D
Corn, P.S
Czarnowski, K
Brooks, P.D
description Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280-320-nm wavelengths) doses were estimated for 1024 wetlands in six national parks: Acadia (Acadia), Glacier (Glacier), Great Smoky Mountains (Smoky), Olympic (Olympic), Rocky Mountain (Rocky), and Sequoia/Kings Canyon (Sequoia). Estimates were made using ground-based UV-B data (Brewer spectrophotometers), solar radiation models, GIS tools, field characterization of vegetative features, and quantification of DOC concentration and spectral absorbance. UV-B dose estimates were made for the summer solstice, at a depth of 1 cm in each wetland. The mean dose across all wetlands and parks was 19.3 W-h m^sup -2^ (range of 3.4-32.1 W-h m^sup -2^). The mean dose was lowest in Acadia (13.7 W-h m^sup -2^) and highest in Rocky (24.4 W-h m^sup -2^). Doses were significantly different among all parks. These wetland doses correspond to UV-B flux of 125.0 μW cm^sup -2^ (range 21.4-194.7 μW cm^sup -2^) based on a day length, averaged among all parks, of 15.5 h. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), a key determinant of water-column UV-B flux, ranged from 0.6 (analytical detection limit) to 36.7 mg C L^sup -1^ over all wetlands and parks, and reduced potential maximal UV-B doses at 1-cm depth by 1%-87 %. DOC concentration, as well as its effect on dose, was lowest in Sequoia and highest in Acadia (DOC was equivalent in Acadia, Glacier, and Rocky). Landscape reduction of potential maximal UV-B doses ranged from zero to 77% and was lowest in Sequoia. These regional differences in UV-B wetland dose illustrate the importance of considering all aspects of exposure in evaluating the potential impact of UV-B on aquatic organisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10021-003-0030-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17054274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2094287061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-521f7a353b4d5ca4c5fd86e0e7db650c722402dc44db52e1f16297c74a6914e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdULtOAzEQtBBIhMAHUHGioDtYv3MlikJAikRBqC3H9iGHyznYPh5_j5NQUezuSDuzOxqELjHcYgB5l0onuAagu4JaHKERZpTXIEhzvMekbiYMTtFZSmsAzCeMjdB8lrLf6OxsNXQ56k8fOperqK3X2Ye-siG5VPm--nK5073d4-S_q36_11211fE9naOTVnfJXfzNMVo-zJbTx3rxPH-a3i9qQyXkmhPcSk05XTHLjWaGt3YiHDhpV4KDkYQwINYwZlecONziYl8aybRoMHN0jG4OZ7cxfAwuZbXxybiuOHNhSApL4IxIVojX_4jrMMRiNylJKUhZvhUSPpBMDClF16ptLGHEH4VB7WJVh1hViXRXoETRXB00rQ5Kv0Wf1OsLAUwBg2CNkPQX34tzTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733077650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Diamond, S.A ; Trenham, P.C ; Adams, M.J ; Hossack, B.R ; Knapp, R.A ; Stark, S.L ; Bradford, D ; Corn, P.S ; Czarnowski, K ; Brooks, P.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Diamond, S.A ; Trenham, P.C ; Adams, M.J ; Hossack, B.R ; Knapp, R.A ; Stark, S.L ; Bradford, D ; Corn, P.S ; Czarnowski, K ; Brooks, P.D</creatorcontrib><description>Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280-320-nm wavelengths) doses were estimated for 1024 wetlands in six national parks: Acadia (Acadia), Glacier (Glacier), Great Smoky Mountains (Smoky), Olympic (Olympic), Rocky Mountain (Rocky), and Sequoia/Kings Canyon (Sequoia). Estimates were made using ground-based UV-B data (Brewer spectrophotometers), solar radiation models, GIS tools, field characterization of vegetative features, and quantification of DOC concentration and spectral absorbance. UV-B dose estimates were made for the summer solstice, at a depth of 1 cm in each wetland. The mean dose across all wetlands and parks was 19.3 W-h m^sup -2^ (range of 3.4-32.1 W-h m^sup -2^). The mean dose was lowest in Acadia (13.7 W-h m^sup -2^) and highest in Rocky (24.4 W-h m^sup -2^). Doses were significantly different among all parks. These wetland doses correspond to UV-B flux of 125.0 μW cm^sup -2^ (range 21.4-194.7 μW cm^sup -2^) based on a day length, averaged among all parks, of 15.5 h. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), a key determinant of water-column UV-B flux, ranged from 0.6 (analytical detection limit) to 36.7 mg C L^sup -1^ over all wetlands and parks, and reduced potential maximal UV-B doses at 1-cm depth by 1%-87 %. DOC concentration, as well as its effect on dose, was lowest in Sequoia and highest in Acadia (DOC was equivalent in Acadia, Glacier, and Rocky). Landscape reduction of potential maximal UV-B doses ranged from zero to 77% and was lowest in Sequoia. These regional differences in UV-B wetland dose illustrate the importance of considering all aspects of exposure in evaluating the potential impact of UV-B on aquatic organisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-003-0030-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>amphibians ; Aquatic organisms ; Aquatic plants ; Canyons ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Glaciers ; Mountains ; National parks ; ozone depletion ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; quantitative analysis ; Sequoia ; Solar radiation ; Spectrophotometers ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Wavelengths ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2005-08, Vol.8 (5), p.462-477</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-521f7a353b4d5ca4c5fd86e0e7db650c722402dc44db52e1f16297c74a6914e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-521f7a353b4d5ca4c5fd86e0e7db650c722402dc44db52e1f16297c74a6914e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diamond, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trenham, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossack, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, S.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corn, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnowski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, P.D</creatorcontrib><title>Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><description>Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280-320-nm wavelengths) doses were estimated for 1024 wetlands in six national parks: Acadia (Acadia), Glacier (Glacier), Great Smoky Mountains (Smoky), Olympic (Olympic), Rocky Mountain (Rocky), and Sequoia/Kings Canyon (Sequoia). Estimates were made using ground-based UV-B data (Brewer spectrophotometers), solar radiation models, GIS tools, field characterization of vegetative features, and quantification of DOC concentration and spectral absorbance. UV-B dose estimates were made for the summer solstice, at a depth of 1 cm in each wetland. The mean dose across all wetlands and parks was 19.3 W-h m^sup -2^ (range of 3.4-32.1 W-h m^sup -2^). The mean dose was lowest in Acadia (13.7 W-h m^sup -2^) and highest in Rocky (24.4 W-h m^sup -2^). Doses were significantly different among all parks. These wetland doses correspond to UV-B flux of 125.0 μW cm^sup -2^ (range 21.4-194.7 μW cm^sup -2^) based on a day length, averaged among all parks, of 15.5 h. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), a key determinant of water-column UV-B flux, ranged from 0.6 (analytical detection limit) to 36.7 mg C L^sup -1^ over all wetlands and parks, and reduced potential maximal UV-B doses at 1-cm depth by 1%-87 %. DOC concentration, as well as its effect on dose, was lowest in Sequoia and highest in Acadia (DOC was equivalent in Acadia, Glacier, and Rocky). Landscape reduction of potential maximal UV-B doses ranged from zero to 77% and was lowest in Sequoia. These regional differences in UV-B wetland dose illustrate the importance of considering all aspects of exposure in evaluating the potential impact of UV-B on aquatic organisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>amphibians</subject><subject>Aquatic organisms</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>ozone depletion</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Sequoia</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Spectrophotometers</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdULtOAzEQtBBIhMAHUHGioDtYv3MlikJAikRBqC3H9iGHyznYPh5_j5NQUezuSDuzOxqELjHcYgB5l0onuAagu4JaHKERZpTXIEhzvMekbiYMTtFZSmsAzCeMjdB8lrLf6OxsNXQ56k8fOperqK3X2Ye-siG5VPm--nK5073d4-S_q36_11211fE9naOTVnfJXfzNMVo-zJbTx3rxPH-a3i9qQyXkmhPcSk05XTHLjWaGt3YiHDhpV4KDkYQwINYwZlecONziYl8aybRoMHN0jG4OZ7cxfAwuZbXxybiuOHNhSApL4IxIVojX_4jrMMRiNylJKUhZvhUSPpBMDClF16ptLGHEH4VB7WJVh1hViXRXoETRXB00rQ5Kv0Wf1OsLAUwBg2CNkPQX34tzTA</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Diamond, S.A</creator><creator>Trenham, P.C</creator><creator>Adams, M.J</creator><creator>Hossack, B.R</creator><creator>Knapp, R.A</creator><creator>Stark, S.L</creator><creator>Bradford, D</creator><creator>Corn, P.S</creator><creator>Czarnowski, K</creator><creator>Brooks, P.D</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks</title><author>Diamond, S.A ; Trenham, P.C ; Adams, M.J ; Hossack, B.R ; Knapp, R.A ; Stark, S.L ; Bradford, D ; Corn, P.S ; Czarnowski, K ; Brooks, P.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-521f7a353b4d5ca4c5fd86e0e7db650c722402dc44db52e1f16297c74a6914e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>amphibians</topic><topic>Aquatic organisms</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>ozone depletion</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Sequoia</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Spectrophotometers</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diamond, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trenham, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, M.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossack, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knapp, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, S.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corn, P.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czarnowski, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, P.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diamond, S.A</au><au>Trenham, P.C</au><au>Adams, M.J</au><au>Hossack, B.R</au><au>Knapp, R.A</au><au>Stark, S.L</au><au>Bradford, D</au><au>Corn, P.S</au><au>Czarnowski, K</au><au>Brooks, P.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>462-477</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>Ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B, 280-320-nm wavelengths) doses were estimated for 1024 wetlands in six national parks: Acadia (Acadia), Glacier (Glacier), Great Smoky Mountains (Smoky), Olympic (Olympic), Rocky Mountain (Rocky), and Sequoia/Kings Canyon (Sequoia). Estimates were made using ground-based UV-B data (Brewer spectrophotometers), solar radiation models, GIS tools, field characterization of vegetative features, and quantification of DOC concentration and spectral absorbance. UV-B dose estimates were made for the summer solstice, at a depth of 1 cm in each wetland. The mean dose across all wetlands and parks was 19.3 W-h m^sup -2^ (range of 3.4-32.1 W-h m^sup -2^). The mean dose was lowest in Acadia (13.7 W-h m^sup -2^) and highest in Rocky (24.4 W-h m^sup -2^). Doses were significantly different among all parks. These wetland doses correspond to UV-B flux of 125.0 μW cm^sup -2^ (range 21.4-194.7 μW cm^sup -2^) based on a day length, averaged among all parks, of 15.5 h. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), a key determinant of water-column UV-B flux, ranged from 0.6 (analytical detection limit) to 36.7 mg C L^sup -1^ over all wetlands and parks, and reduced potential maximal UV-B doses at 1-cm depth by 1%-87 %. DOC concentration, as well as its effect on dose, was lowest in Sequoia and highest in Acadia (DOC was equivalent in Acadia, Glacier, and Rocky). Landscape reduction of potential maximal UV-B doses ranged from zero to 77% and was lowest in Sequoia. These regional differences in UV-B wetland dose illustrate the importance of considering all aspects of exposure in evaluating the potential impact of UV-B on aquatic organisms.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-003-0030-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9840
ispartof Ecosystems (New York), 2005-08, Vol.8 (5), p.462-477
issn 1432-9840
1435-0629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17054274
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects amphibians
Aquatic organisms
Aquatic plants
Canyons
Dissolved organic carbon
Glaciers
Mountains
National parks
ozone depletion
Parks & recreation areas
quantitative analysis
Sequoia
Solar radiation
Spectrophotometers
Ultraviolet radiation
Wavelengths
Wetlands
title Estimated ultraviolet radiation doses in wetlands in six national parks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T01%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimated%20ultraviolet%20radiation%20doses%20in%20wetlands%20in%20six%20national%20parks&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Diamond,%20S.A&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=462-477&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-003-0030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2094287061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733077650&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true